1: Do you feel that the gaseous pyrolysis products would be neutral beneficial, or detrimental to the soil?
2: I have difficulty understanding how, on a level field, you could ignite the biomass at one end of a trench, and have the smoke appear at the other. Certainly, this could happen if the trench was "up the slope" on a hillside, but on level ground, OR, if the trenches followed the contours on a hillside, there would be no "stack effect" to cause the smoke to migrate to "the far end" away from the fire. Perhaps I missed something in your explanation.
3: If gaseous pyrolysis products (CO, H2, Tars, Acetic Acid, etc) were not positively beneficial to the soil, there is a way you could solve a lot of problems simply: set two 45 gallon drums (with tops and bottoms removed) up over the middle of a trench, and light a fire in it. This should make a great "ELSD" installation... "End Lit, Side Draft". The 2 drums would create a stack effect, that would draw air into the trench from the far ends. The pyrolysis front should progress from the center ignition point out to the ends. You could have a large number of trenches coming to the single center "Ignition and Draft Source."
4: In the photos you have shown, the soil looks to be virtually devoid of organic matter. This absence of organic matter would have a very detrimental effect on moisture retention capacity for the soil. Charcoal has a very poor moisture retention capacity... perhaps only a maximum of 30% of the initial dry charcoal weight. Composted biomass can retain perhaps about 10 times as much moisture. Would the Farmers be better off if they simply buried their agricultural wastes and allowed them to compost in place? This should also be very beneficial for the "Soil Food Web."
5: Alternatively, would the Farmers be better off if they simply chopped the agricultural waste, and applied it as a mulch?
# OK.... I could see teh smoke coming out the end that was lit, but could not see how the smoke would travel through the uncharred biomass without some sort of draft assistance. . If this is how the system operated, then it would perhaps be close to a TLUD. The process would likely be slow, charcoal yield would likely be low, and most of the volatiles would likely be burned.
# OK!! There might be major differences in your results, depending on whether you light the "Stack End", or light the "far end". Lighting of the "far end" would tend to produce more tars and acetic acid for absorption by the soil, BUT, the moisture in teh biomass and teh water produced in partial combustion might wet the fuel that it passes through, to the point where the fire went out. If tars and acetic acid production were considered to be a major benefit, then they could perhaps still be attained if the trench length was limited.
# OK.... if these materials were difficult to compost, then they would remain a long time in teh soil, and their mositure retention capability would last a relatively long time. Would it be a worthwhile test to chop some of these "difficult to compost" residues, and determine if they contributed significantly to moisture retention capability?
5: Alternatively, would the Farmers be better off if they simply chopped the agricultural waste, and applied it as a mulch?Yes, farmers are not ready, burning the biomass is easy for them than chopping the agriculture waste to use it as a mulch.
# If tehy could see an adequate benefit, then they would probably become ready very quickly!! :-)
It’ll need a few minutes of your time to read the project, register, and vote on the link: http://www.sparktherise.com/projectdetail.php?pid=4238 <http://www.sparktherise.com/projectdetail.php?pid=4238>
It’ll make such a huge differenece to our work if you take a few moments to read and vote for our project and ask your network of friennds to do the same.
With warm regards,
Rajnish
Dear Dr. Reddy,
I am very well and hope you are doing greatly. Thank you for your vote. So far, we have not made an progress on stove manufacture, but we are going to take it up once our pine needle project starts. We are specially interested in charcoal stoves.
With regards,
Rajnish
Dear Rajnishji,
How are you. It is great to know about the project. I have voted. Hope you should get this project. Is there any progress regarding the good stoves production and facilitation?
Regards,
Sai Bhaskar
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jain Rajnish <yogar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks & Regards
Perses Bilimoria
Dear Perses,
Thank you so much for your support, as this project is going to be a very important initiative for people and ecology of sub Himalayan region.
With regards,
Rajnish
Dear Rajnish,
Congratulations !! I have forwarded your initiative to the International Biochar Institute, in the U.S. for recognition on an international level as well !!
Good Luck !!
Thanks & Regards
Perses Bilimoria
The Society of Biochar Initiatives - India
"Sealand", 4th Flr,
41, Cuffe Parade,
Mumbai 400 005
Tel : +91 (22) 22150374
Fax : +91 (22) 2215 2065
Mobile : +91 98210 50328
Email : bili...@vsnl.com <mailto:bili...@vsnl.com>
Website : www.earthsoulindia.com <http://www.earthsoulindia.com/>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:54:51 +0530
Subject: Re: Electricity and biochar from pine needles
From: yogar...@gmail.com
To: biocha...@googlegroups.com
Re: Electricity and biochar from pine needles
Dear Dr. Reddy,
I am very well and hope you are doing greatly. Thank you for your vote. So far, we have not made an progress on stove manufacture, but we are going to take it up once our pine needle project starts. We are specially interested in charcoal stoves.
With regards,
Rajnish
Dear Rajnishji,
How are you. It is great to know about the project. I have voted. Hope you should get this project. Is there any progress regarding the good stoves production and facilitation?
Regards,
Sai Bhaskar
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Jain Rajnish <yogar...@gmail.com <http://yogarajnish%40gmail.com> > wrote: