--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "biocaml" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to biocaml+u...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bio...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/biocaml.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/biocaml/3f0e84df-a73c-48fa-af84-af298a2530cc%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/biocaml/CAMu2m2Lyfdk%2BY7_ZRt5GPY%3DZ-JOo5Dop5Ox9Qe3P6wJKV%3DSd0g%40mail.gmail.com.
Le 18 mars 2014 10:38, "Francois Berenger" <francois.ber...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Philippe Veber
> <philipp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi François (and Ashish!)
> >
> > Ashish's right, you need to have the score of the positive examples
> > separated from the scores of the negative examples (here your dichotomy is
> > more like true predictions vs false predictions). I have a better version of
> > this Roc module that I lasted too long integrating to biocaml. I can do it
> > by wednesday if you need it.
>
> If the list I shown is filtered based on the boolean, we can
> separate the positive examples from the negative ones, no?
Yes, if you know which score threshold was used to get your prediction. BTW I committed a better version of the ROC stuff. See the new Bin_pred module:
https://github.com/biocaml/biocaml/blob/master/src/lib/biocaml_bin_pred.mli
Cheers,
PH.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/biocaml/CAMQaOgNufBKZYgXTTVTrfiyVd8F979UrcCOFGmbT-uF8vfHFYA%40mail.gmail.com.