Collection bindings

[Thomas Matthijs]

Hey,

Would it be possible to add an option to automatically consider generic types for generating bindings aswel

So for example

@Bindable
public class Foobar {
   public List<Serenity> ships;
}

would also create a SerenityBinding.

I understand you can't simply navigate into them. But it would reduce the amount of @Bindable you need to add, and keep updated.

I'm also using a little trick to have Bindings on 3rd party classes by making a little

@Bindable

public class Bindables {

  public Some3rdPartyClass foo;

}

But I have to add a field like that for every class Some3rdPartyClass uses in a List<> for example aswel. Would be nice if those where found & generated automaticly.

mvg,

[Stephen Haberman]

Hi Thomas,

> Would it be possible to add an option to automatically consider
> generic types for generating bindings

Hm...yeah, I think that is reasonable. I pushed out a 2.20 release
which has this feature, if I implemented it correctly.

Thanks for the feedback!

- Stephen

[Thomas Matthijs]

On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Stephen Haberman <ste...@exigencecorp.com> wrote:

Hi Thomas,

> Would it be possible to add an option to automatically consider
> generic types for generating bindings

Hm...yeah, I think that is reasonable. I pushed out a 2.20 release
which has this feature, if I implemented it correctly.

Works great, Thank you.