Federal Court finally tanks Natura
15 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael
Jun 5, 2008, 11:24:40 PM6/5/08
to Billyville
Today June 5, 2008, what became the last hearing in the two year
Bankruptcy litigation drama of Bill Martin and his so called Religious
Company’s was convened and concluded.
Present were nine [9] people from the Park, Billy Martin and two
opposition lawyers. A third opposition lawyer was connected
electronically for Karl Thomas and T&T Management.
The hearing was actually a re-hearing at Martins twice before request
to argue “new evidence” austensibly proving that the original
Bankruptcy plan Order was defective and therefore should be reversed.
The hearing was scheduled for ½ hour but Martins rant went on for 50
minutes. The theatrics that ensued are difficult to place into words
because the sight of Martin carrying on cannot be seen by the reader,
and it was something to behold. But, I try.
Martin opened his motion with a lecture of the history of the Quaker
church starting in the 1600’s. After a time, the Court interrupted and
asked Martin what the history lecture had to do with the argument
before the Court. Martin continued saying that the Court was
disrespecting his Church. Martin then rambled on saying something
about slavery and the Parks in South Africa that were named after
fellow Quakers. Then on to how much Martin had done for Americans,
particularly the elderly, and included a claim that he was an Honorary
Board of Director of the Quaker Church.
The Court felt compelled to interrupt again and politely asked Martin
to move along to his legal argument. Martin then claimed that all of
the actions of the Court over the two years of hearings had interfered
with his right to operate a free church. Thus it emerged out that his
claim for relief was allegedly grounded in a denial of equal
protection under the law. Martin then attacked the number of attorneys
in America as some kind of proof of the overall corruption of the
country and control over the legal system. Then he went on to claim
that his rights pursuant to the Ninth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution were violated. Then Martin suddenly suggested that the
Court should be quiet and listen to him because they had already
abridged his rights under the Bankruptcy Act, The Freedom of Religion
Act, the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Codes of Conduct and Statutes.
Martin concluded that line by adding that the U.S. Statutes were
illegal.
The Court interrupted to say that Martin had not offered any evidence
in the two years of hearings that his Company’s were in fact a church.
Martin responded saying that the Court was acting in an unconscionable
manner towards him by ignoring all his rights. The Court seemed to try
and balance the situation by asking Martin if he had any contracts to
support his Reigious claims. Martin responded that was not necessary
as a Quaker does business with a hand shake. He then continued by
telling the Court they were stealing all his assets and giving them to
the lawyers that were all going to be turned in for malpractice.
Martin’s former attorney was one of those in attendance and asked the
Court to Notice the record that Billy was defaming their law firm. The
Court allowed the request. Undeterred, Martin went on to tell the
Court that Karl Thomas, another of the creditors, had deceived Billy
with false representations right from the start five years ago. The
Thomas Attorney, who was present electronically asked the Court to
Note the record that Martin was defaming her client too and the Court
allowed the request.
Martin cranked up again to go on once more and tell the Judge that he
was bias and should have excused himself from the case long ago …. And
then ole’Billy boi blurted out to the Court that he, Ole’ Billy boi,
was an expert on detecting bias in a Judge by observing their facial
expressions and watching his body language.
Martin’s former attorney then suggested to the Court that there was no
new evidence to be considered as a legal basis to grant Martin the
relief that was being requested. Martin then rebutted off topic by
saying any property that he was involved in was a religious experience
and as much a part of his Church as praying. Martin seemed to have
finally stopped and the Court made their finding. No new evidence had
been submitted. The Motion was denied.
The proceedings thereby are finalized.
Martin issued Notice of his intention to Appeal.
Michael T.
www.Fairwindlakes.com
Bankruptcy litigation drama of Bill Martin and his so called Religious
Company’s was convened and concluded.
Present were nine [9] people from the Park, Billy Martin and two
opposition lawyers. A third opposition lawyer was connected
electronically for Karl Thomas and T&T Management.
The hearing was actually a re-hearing at Martins twice before request
to argue “new evidence” austensibly proving that the original
Bankruptcy plan Order was defective and therefore should be reversed.
The hearing was scheduled for ½ hour but Martins rant went on for 50
minutes. The theatrics that ensued are difficult to place into words
because the sight of Martin carrying on cannot be seen by the reader,
and it was something to behold. But, I try.
Martin opened his motion with a lecture of the history of the Quaker
church starting in the 1600’s. After a time, the Court interrupted and
asked Martin what the history lecture had to do with the argument
before the Court. Martin continued saying that the Court was
disrespecting his Church. Martin then rambled on saying something
about slavery and the Parks in South Africa that were named after
fellow Quakers. Then on to how much Martin had done for Americans,
particularly the elderly, and included a claim that he was an Honorary
Board of Director of the Quaker Church.
The Court felt compelled to interrupt again and politely asked Martin
to move along to his legal argument. Martin then claimed that all of
the actions of the Court over the two years of hearings had interfered
with his right to operate a free church. Thus it emerged out that his
claim for relief was allegedly grounded in a denial of equal
protection under the law. Martin then attacked the number of attorneys
in America as some kind of proof of the overall corruption of the
country and control over the legal system. Then he went on to claim
that his rights pursuant to the Ninth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution were violated. Then Martin suddenly suggested that the
Court should be quiet and listen to him because they had already
abridged his rights under the Bankruptcy Act, The Freedom of Religion
Act, the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Codes of Conduct and Statutes.
Martin concluded that line by adding that the U.S. Statutes were
illegal.
The Court interrupted to say that Martin had not offered any evidence
in the two years of hearings that his Company’s were in fact a church.
Martin responded saying that the Court was acting in an unconscionable
manner towards him by ignoring all his rights. The Court seemed to try
and balance the situation by asking Martin if he had any contracts to
support his Reigious claims. Martin responded that was not necessary
as a Quaker does business with a hand shake. He then continued by
telling the Court they were stealing all his assets and giving them to
the lawyers that were all going to be turned in for malpractice.
Martin’s former attorney was one of those in attendance and asked the
Court to Notice the record that Billy was defaming their law firm. The
Court allowed the request. Undeterred, Martin went on to tell the
Court that Karl Thomas, another of the creditors, had deceived Billy
with false representations right from the start five years ago. The
Thomas Attorney, who was present electronically asked the Court to
Note the record that Martin was defaming her client too and the Court
allowed the request.
Martin cranked up again to go on once more and tell the Judge that he
was bias and should have excused himself from the case long ago …. And
then ole’Billy boi blurted out to the Court that he, Ole’ Billy boi,
was an expert on detecting bias in a Judge by observing their facial
expressions and watching his body language.
Martin’s former attorney then suggested to the Court that there was no
new evidence to be considered as a legal basis to grant Martin the
relief that was being requested. Martin then rebutted off topic by
saying any property that he was involved in was a religious experience
and as much a part of his Church as praying. Martin seemed to have
finally stopped and the Court made their finding. No new evidence had
been submitted. The Motion was denied.
The proceedings thereby are finalized.
Martin issued Notice of his intention to Appeal.
Michael T.
www.Fairwindlakes.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages