--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cincinnati Bicycle Commuters" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/bikecincy/-/C5Eng8hYVGcJ.
To post to this group, send email to bike...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bikecincy+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bikecincy?hl=en.
| Hi Ron, Thanks for the reply and effort on your part. I'll read your response in greater detail later but I get the point of what he was saying. Which sucks... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00bcszgv4RI sorry about the audio-- had to play it in the background while I focused on their code for the city-- may have to turn it up at points and there is a difference in volume because the phone is next to my mouth and he's across the squad car. The police chief was going to get back to me after he has a discussion with the officer. He said that the officer is correct in that the "law" says a bike must use a a bike path when available instead of the road but there is a gray area as to what defines a bike path. When he calls me back I'll be sure to ask for a copy of this "law" they keep citing. The speak it as truth but I can't find it anywhere. --- On Thu, 5/3/12, Ron <bike...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
| just to put a name to the voice, the officer's name is Lt. Joseph Asbrock |
--- On Thu, 5/3/12, Ron <bike...@gmail.com> wrote: |
|
|
|
|
Sounds like Steve Magas ought to send a friendly letter to Lt. Joseph Asbrock explaining the new (2006) laws…