The place I'd start looking would be the config for the new kernel.
One example: none of the kernels I use are relocatable - this saves
about 5-10% on the kernel size, but may present a problem for kexec -
e. I'm only guessing, and I suspect you want to take this up with the
kexec people as they'll have a better idea of what you need to do.
cheers,
Biff.
On Aug 30, 11:51 am, Razvan Dragomirescu
<
razvan.dragomire...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Has anyone else tried to use the kexec call on the Bifferboard to start a
> new kernel to replace the existing one? I've compiled the "kexec" utility
> from kexec-tools 2.0.1 (a statically linked version is athttp://
www.cayennegraphics.com/kexecif anyone else needs it) and also