I am leading an initiative to harmonize spinal cord MRI protocols across vendors. When providing the sequence import files (which will be made publicly available via osf.io), we would like to follow the BIDS convention for sequence naming. Could you please let me know if the following protocol sounds BIDS-compatible? For each scan, the symbol ":" separates the BIDS name (on the left) from the vendor-equivalent sequence (on the right).
- T1w: IR-FSPGR/BRAVO (GE), 3D TFE (Philips), MPRAGE (Siemens)
- T2w: FIESTA-C (TrueFISP with dual excitation, GE), VISTA (Philips), SPACE (Siemens)
- GRE-MT1: SPGR (GE), FFE (Philips), GRE (Siemens)
- GRE-MT0: SPGR (GE), FFE (Philips), GRE (Siemens)
- GRE-T1w: SPGR (GE), FFE (Philips), GRE (Siemens)
- DWI: FOCUS (GE), Zoom Diffusion (Philips), ep2d_diff ZOOMit (Siemens)
- GRE-ME: MERGE (GE), mFFE (Philips), GRE (Siemens)
Please note that "MT" refers to magnetization transfer, and "ME" refers to multi-echo.
Thanks,
Julien
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bids-discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bids-discussion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bids-discussion@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/d8a90f3f-a240-42b2-9ad4-d22607f4d3b5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.