Xiangrui Li, Ph.D.
Center for Cognitive and Behavioral Brain Imaging
The Ohio State University
Hi Xiangrui,
The proposed tag for ReceiveCoilActiveElements (which ‘dcm2niix’ is already including in its json’s) is intended to be distinct from (0018,1250), ReceiveCoilName (which Siemens chooses not to populate for some reason, although certainly worth including as well).
Rather ReceiveCoilActiveElements is intended to capture the actual coil elements that were used, in whatever format a particular vendor describes that particular info.
Cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
Siemens uses the “CoilString” in their shadow header (CSASeriesHeaderInfo, usually in 0029, 1020), and also includes the same info in private tag (0051, 100f). I have some older (VA25) data that doesn’t use either, and it’s possible that they added the information to the shadow header before they added the private tag, but if tag 0051, 100f is present that’s probably easier to read than the shadow header. This lists the groups of coil elements that are selected: for example, when using the 32 channel head coil, you can use either the posterior elements, the anterior elements, or both, so you’ll see “HEA;HEP” here rather than a list of all 32 elements.
Technically, this value will be at (0051, XX0f), and there will be a matching (0051, 00XX) (“PrivateCreator”) with a value “SIEMENS MR HEADER”. Usually XX = 10, but If there’s other private data in the (0051, 10..) block Siemens will move on to another block and XX will equal something else. This is something to keep in mind whenever you read private DICOM tags.
The Enhanced MR format things DOES require this information, but the only major vendor to currently use the enhanced MR dicom format that I am aware of is Philips (Siemens can export spectroscopy files in enhanced mr dicom format but generally does not use it). There is a DICOM MR Receive Coil Functional Group Macro (0018, 9042) that is required in the “enhanced mr” dicom format (it’s inside 5200,9229, the Shared Functional Groups Sequence). Within that macro, (0018, 9046) is “Multi-coil Configuration”, defined as “A textual description of the configuration of multi-coil elements that was used in the current acquisition.” Unfortunately that element is conditional, not required, and Philips does not use it (at least in these older files I’m looking at, they may have changed). Siemens does use that element, which has the same value as 0051,100f. Philips uses the required “ReceiveCoilName”, (0018, 1250), but this doesn’t tell you what elements are used (for comparison, Siemens would have “Head_32” as the “ReceiveCoilName” and “HEA;HEP” as the “MultiCoilConfiguration”). The Philips file I have open has “SENSE-Head-8” as the ReceiveCoilName, and “MULTICOIL” as the ReceiveCoilType. MULTICOILs are required to have a “Multi-Coil Definition Sequence”, which should clarify things, as it should list the name of every element in the coil (“MultiCoilElementName”) and whether or not the element is used (“MultiCoilElementUsed”). Siemens does list every single element in the 32 channel coil and whether it was used, but in this Philips file they only list a single “MultiCoilElementName” with a value of “SENSE”, whose “MultiCoilElementUsed” field is “YES”. I believe this is a mistake in interpreting the standard on the part of Philips, to be honest; in my reading the standard requires information on each of the 8 elements. It would be interesting to look at some more recent files to see if they’ve changed this (this is from 2006). I would guess that they are listing selectable groups of elements, and there’s only one group of selectable elements in this particular coil.
Jolinda
From: Chris Gorgolewski <krzysztof....@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2018 10:11 AM
To: bids-discussion <bids-di...@googlegroups.com>; Jolinda <jol...@uoregon.edu>; RORDEN, CHRIS <ROR...@mailbox.sc.edu>; <xiang...@gmail.com> <xiang...@gmail.com>; Michael Harms <mha...@wustl.edu>
Subject: Is there a DICOM equivalent of ReceiveCoilActiveElements?
Hi,
I’ve proposed appropriate changes to the ReceiveCoilName and ReceiveCoilActiveElement entries in the current BIDS draft spec.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110 Email: mha...@wustl.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bids-discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
bids-discussi...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
bids-di...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/CAAQzouObKcEssbc-x9pmFig7sjgDj3we_ecG4OGkmUv11Zm7Ew%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bids-discussion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bids-discussion@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/CAAQzouObKcEssbc-x9pmFig7sjgDj3we_ecG4OGkmUv11Zm7Ew%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bids-discussion" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bids-discussion+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bids-discussion@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bids-discussion/22487E4B-3428-4EED-A61F-BDB6EA0B1EB4%40wustl.edu.