It is often imagined that a very strong anti-motoring ideology coupled
with massive funding of rapid urban mass transit will reduce motoring.
My rejection of anti-motoring ideology and my rejection of mass rapid
transit funding are seen as failures in my pro-cycling theories. A paper
written by authors whom I admire, concerning transit rather than
cycling, illustrates my views. These are not the dominant views in urban
planning, which I find appalling, but represent the views of those who
have paid attention to modern developments in urban patterns. As an
amateur, I developed my views over many years, only to discover that
others with better qualifications than mine had developed their views
along the same lines.
This paper may be found at:
https://www.chapman.edu/wilkinson/_files/cdp-transit-web-sm.pdf
This paper definitely shows that massive funding of rapid urban mass
transit, whether combined with anti-motoring ideology or not, has had no
effect in reducing motoring.
--
John Forester, MS, PE
Bicycle Transportation Engineer
7585 Church St, Lemon Grove, CA 91945
619-644-5481,
fore...@johnforester.com