rdf:value instead bibo:content

[ljgarcia]

Hi all,

I have seen at http://bibotools.googlecode.com/svn/bibo-ontology/trunk/doc/index.html
that bibo:content is deprecated and rdf:value is recommended instead.
We are working with portions of the document, e.g. sections and
paragraphs rather than the whole document. We need to model the
content so bibo:content seems to be the right property but (i) it is
deprecated, and (ii) it takes bibo:Document as domain.
Any suggestions? I find using rdf:value some inaccurate and confusing,
I rather to use a more specific property.

Best regards,

Leyla García

[Christopher Gutteridge]

Property: sioc:content

content - The content of the Item in plain text format.

OWL Type:	DatatypeProperty
Domain:	sioc:Item
Range:	rdfs:Literal

This property is for a plain-text rendering of the content of an Item. Rich content (e.g., HTML, wiki markup, BBCode, etc.) can be described using the Content class from AtomOwl or the content:encoded property from the RSS 1.0 Content Module.

[back to top]

-- 
Christopher Gutteridge -- http://id.ecs.soton.ac.uk/person/1248 

/ Lead Developer, EPrints Project, http://eprints.org/
/ Web Projects Manager, ECS, University of Southampton, http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/
/ Webmaster, Web Science Trust, http://www.webscience.org/

[Leyla Jael García Castro]

Thanks so much, that is exactly what I was looking for!

Cheers,

Leyla

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Christopher Gutteridge <c...@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

alternatively you could use

<mydocument> rdf:value "Plain text version"^^xtypes:Fragment-PlainText

http://graphite.ecs.soton.ac.uk/xtypes/

On 31/05/12 15:56, ljgarcia wrote:

[Christopher Gutteridge]

I've got a rule not to invent a predicate if I can possibly reuse one. Myself and Alex Dutton at Oxford try to collect together reasonable "patterns" for common tasks at: http://openorg.ecs.soton.ac.uk/wiki/Main_Page -- contributors welcome.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bibliographic Ontology Specification Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to bibliographic-ontolog...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bibliographic-ontology-spec...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bibliographic-ontology-specification-group?hl=en.