Scientists Foresee Extinction Domino Effect
Pastor Dale Morgan
*Scientists Foresee Extinction Domino Effect*
Stephen Leahy
BROOKLIN, Canada, May 18 (IPS) - Climate change is accelerating species
extinctions and unraveling the intricate web of life, experts fear.
Birds, animals, insects and even plants are on the move around the
Earth, trying to flee new and increasingly inhospitable local weather
conditions. For some, including alpine species and polar bears, there is
nowhere to go. And many others, like plants, lack the mobility to stay
ahead of changing climatic conditions.
"We're already seeing species moving, but they're not moving fast enough
to avoid potential extinction," says Jeremy Kerr, an ecologist at the
University of Ottawa in Canada.
"The really awful predications about rapid, massive extinction appear to
be true, according to the early evidence," Kerr told IPS.
One of those predictions came last year from the Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment (MA), an unprecedented international four-year research
effort. The MA warned that up to 30 percent of all species on Earth
could vanish by 2050 due to unsustainable human activities.
By 2100, it will be a completely different planet if greenhouse gas
emissions continue rising at the current rate. Nearly 40 percent of
Earth's continental surface may experience totally new climates,
primarily in the tropics and adjacent latitudes, as warmer temperatures
spread toward the poles, said a new study published this month by the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
"We are going to be seeing climates that certainly are completely
outside the range of modern human experience," said Stephen Jackson of
the University of Wyoming in a statement.
Scientists estimate there are between three and 30 million species of
plants, animals, fungi, bacteria and so on, but only 1.4 million have
been identified so far.
The importance of species -- and the word "biodiversity" -- is not well
understood by the public, business or politicians. And yet biodiversity
-- the sum total of all living species -- is what gives us air to
breathe, water to drink and food to eat.
Schoolchildren learn that trees and plants produce oxygen, absorb carbon
dioxide, clean water, and so on. However, what is not well understood,
even by scientists, is exactly how insects, bacteria, birds, and animals
interact with trees and plants to produce the ecological services we
rely on, like clean air and water.
The loss of a few species in a forest or the oceans might not result in
any obvious immediate changes, but scientists are beginning to connect
the dots. One example of a cascade of impacts was recently documented by
Canadian and U.S. marine scientists, who found that a dramatic reduction
in shark populations along the U.S. east coast has resulted in
population booms for rays and skates, which in turn decimated their food
supply of shellfish.
The loss of the shellfish has reduced water quality and seagrass beds.
The cascade doesn't stop there, but that is as far as science has been
able to track it.
Michael Totten, senior director of Conservation International, a global
environmental group, offers another example.
Coastal mangrove forests provide local communities with nearly 90
percent protection from storm surges, studies show. Equally important,
mangroves are the nurseries for many species of fish and play a key role
in sustaining ocean fish populations, Totten said in an interview.
The more species there are in an ecosystem, the more resilient it is to
change. So the combination of reduced species numbers and climate change
is opening the world up for ecosystem collapse, he warned.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon offered a similar message for
International Biodiversity Day on May 22, noting that "biodiversity is
being lost at an unprecedented rate [and] this, in turn, is seriously
eroding the capacity of our planet to sustain life on earth."
"Unless we do something there will be no tigers, lions or bears left in
the wild for my grandchildren," said Stuart Pimm, a conservation
ecologist at Duke University in the U.S. state of North Carolina.
"The impacts will be obvious to even the smallest child and this is a
very real possibility," Pimm told IPS.
Avoiding this grim future is challenging but far from impossible.
Halting deforestation is one critical step, since it accounts for more
than 20 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions. While tropical
deforestation gets nearly all the attention, Canada's
567-million-hectare boreal forest could go in a generation, he said.
Pimm, along with 1,500 other scientists, urged Canada last week to
protect at least half the forest, and manage the other half much more
carefully.
Not only is the boreal "the largest intact forest and wetland ecosystems
remaining on earth", it is the single largest terrestrial carbon
storehouse in the world, they said in an open letter.
However, despite its enormous size, 10 percent of the forest has already
been touched by mining or oil and gas operations, and another 20 percent
has been clear-cut along its southern tip where biodiversity is richest,
they said.
The second "easy step" to combat climate change and boost biodiversity
is reforestation of tropical areas already deforested, Pimm said.
Seven million square kilometres of tropical forest have vanished in the
last 50 years. About two million of that is used for crops while the
remaining five million sq km are poor quality lands with a few cattle
and goats on them, he said.
Turning these unproductive lands back into native forest could capture
an estimated five billion metric tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere
every year for 10 to 20 or more years. Reforestation is also relatively
easy thing to do and has enormous benefits for biodiversity.
Global annual carbon emissions are currently eight billion tonnes.
"This could take us a long way to carbon neutrality," Pimm said, adding
that, "Things are beginning to change. The world has finally got the
message on climate change -- except for the White House."
Despite accounting for a quarter of all greenhouse gas emissions, the
United States has refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, arguing that the
treaty -- which mandates emissions reductions by the world's most
industrialised countries -- would be too costly to enforce. (END/2007)
Copyright © 2007 IPS-Inter Press Service. All rights reserved.