You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
Perilous
Times and The Great Falling Away
False Pastors, False Churches On The Increase
By: Apostle Kwamena Ahinfu
False Prophets
In recent times, the disgusting misdeeds carried out by some
pastors or religious crooks or 'azaa' men of God, who have
infested the Christian religion are reported to be on an alarming
increase. This of course has given cause for concern in several
social circles. Some pastors are reported to fornicate or even
rape some women in hotels. And it's an eyesore to see a pastor
whose picture was published last week on the front page of this
newspaper, having been stripped naked when caught attempting to
rape a lady in a Koforidua hotel.
Some years ago, in its attempt to articulate such concerns, a
newspaper editorial raised several interesting controversial
issues which, of late, have been on the lips of certain critics.
First is the commonplace suggestion that it is only in the
mushroom or newly sprung-up churches where the religious crooks
can be found, and therefore these churches deserve to be
condemned.
I beg to differ. A careful observation reveals that the issue of
the crooks' misdeeds such as fornication, adultery, rape, petty
thievery, fraud, money swindling, etc cuts across all
denominations from the the Roman Catholic through the Orthodox
Protestant Churches to Penteco-charismatic churches, down to
Spiritual churches (which use occult rituals, invocation of
familiar spirits and, ostensibly, the Bible)
Indeed, no particular denomination can truly claim to be exempt
from the intrusion of 'azaa' men of God, people who parade
themselves under the guise of respected reverend ministers,
evangelists, prophets, bishops, apostles, priests, pastors or even
deacons whose initial behaviour seem not to hurt a fly!
Haven't you ever heard of some reverend ministers of some
well-established churches caught red-handed in adultery, or some
priests indulging in fornication only to father children outside
marriage? Haven't you ever heard of cases of fraud or financial
mismanagement of certain reverend ministers of some
well-established churches, or of those situations where some
reverend ministers of certain established churches, are secretly
living opulent lifestyles, with some self-indulgence, drinking
bottles of beer every day, or putting up private mansions and
riding in two or three posh cars?
OLD CHURCHES' HYPOCRISY The general tendency in such churches has
been to create what is described as the eleventh, twelfth and
thirteenth commandments, namely: 'Thou shalt not be caught and if
thou hast been caught, thou shalt arrange to be transferred
immediately from thy station' and finally, 'Thy misdeeds should
not be disclosed to any one, nor to the press so that thy church
is not disgraced by negative exposures'.
Without doubt, such misdeeds of well-established churches are so
deftly managed that cases of fraud, adultery, misbehavior etc
scarcely leak out to the public except an unfortunate or
inadvertent incident breaches those churches' security systems.
The underlying fact is that 'nowhere is cool', and as the Ghanaian
parlance puts it: 'People just don't know what is happening in
Dodowa forest'.
As a matter of course, this is not meant to exculpate the mushroom
or fledgelling churches from any blames: Several of them are
equally guilty of religious crookery, and they deserve to be
condemned outright. Hypocrisy is one thing I hate in my life.
Therefore, the pretentious sanctimoniousness, the infallibility
paranoia and superiority complex assumed by some of us pastors of
some established churches (whilst pinpointing the mushroom
churches as the only errant ones) need to be condemned. Some of us
pastors are like, as Christ says, 'whitewashed tombs which look
beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of dead men's
bones and everything unclean,' (Matthew 23:27). Blind hypocrites!
Let's first remove the beam in our eyes before we can see clearly
to cast out the mote of other churches' eyes. (Matthew 7:5)
One thing is that, the so-called mushroom churches, like children,
imitate what they see of the established churches. Let us
therefore clean ourselves of our filth first, before we begin to
talk about the filth of others. Some reverend ministers of some
well-established churches are themselves religious crooks; or do
condone and connive at the activities of religious crooks in their
own midst, by failing to expose them to the public. Instead, they
rather hypocritically turn round to trumpet loud, or condemn, the
activities of religious crooks of mushroom churches, as if nothing
is happening in their own churches.
On this account, their church members are psychologically
brainwashed to arrogantly consider themselves as morally upright,
belonging to churches which are supreme paradigms of piety. Thus,
priding themselves on infallibility concepts, they do not hesitate
to point accusing fingers at mushroom churches, whilst sweeping
their own misdeeds under the carpet! If this is not hypocrisy,
then what else could it be? And this is what I vehemently condemn
without fear or favour! Fact is, all of us, like sheep, have gone
astray (Isaiah 53:6)!
Secondly is the question of national crusade, which the newspaper
espoused in its editorial some years ago, as the antidote to the
on-going religious roguery in Christendom. This is an excellent
proposition to put forth. But it unfortunately hits against a wall
of problems. The question is who are to embark upon the national
crusade? If it is the media, through muckraking criticisms, then
it will be fine: One can be sure of a certain amount of success.
But if it is the reverend ministers of some of the
well-established churches, then one has cause to question the
validity of the holiness stance they have assumed, with which they
intend to judge others, or reorient other 'sinful' churches. How,
as the proverb goes, can the kettle call the pot black?
If on the other hand, it is conceded- and quite rightly too- that
not all established churches are sinful and disqualified from
preaching to others on the need for a moral reorientation, what
might be asked is: How can we know which pastors or churches are
righteous to lead the national crusade? It is to be borne in mind
that the 'hood does not make a monk' and this being so, those
selected pastors or churches which appear righteous might not,
after all, be righteous or the best choice to lead the national
crusade. I submit that if there should be the need for a national
crusade, it should not be led by any selected pastors but it
should be the preoccupation of the media.
Another controversy which hangs on the national crusade issue as a
means of curbing religious crookery is the view that the crusade
agenda cannot be an effectual antidote. Only prayers, so it is
argued, can curb the phenomenon of the religious roguery.
From macro-religious point of view, the opponents of the national
crusade issue argue that it is not only Ghana that is bedevilled
with the religious crookery problem, but several other countries
such as the United States, Britain, France, Japan, South Korea,
Uganda, Nigeria, South Africa, etc. It is contended that even
though most of these countries abound in more wicked and
conscienceless religious crooks, no such country has embarked upon
any national crusade, because such a step is considered to be
ineffectual and time wasting. So the national crusade issue should
be abandoned. I disagree to this plea also.
CHRIST'S PROPHECY The next argument is from the Biblical point of
view. It is argued that the phenomenon of the proliferation of
'azaa' pastors or religious crooks is a fulfillment of Christ's
own prophecy which says: 'for MANY will come in my name, claiming
I am the Christ, and will deceive many……… and MANY false prophets
will appear and deceive MANY people,' (Matthew 24:5, 11).
On the strength of this prophecy, so it is argued, nothing can be
done to stem the tide of the proliferation of the activities of
religious crooks: That is to say, no remedies nor plans prescribed
by society can curb the doings of such false prophets, because the
practicalization of Christ's prophecy has already triggered off,
and nothing can stop it. To the opponents, any attempt to curb it
is like swimming against a sweeping tide- an entirely useless
venture! Well, if the macro-religious and 'prophecy' arguments
above are weighed against the national crusade logic, what
conclusion can be stricken by readers? No national crusade; or
national crusade?
Thirdly is the dual arguments that there should be 'some form of
state intervention' or that 'the state should have the right to
have adequate information on the men behind the numerous churches
in the country'. Of course, the 'state intervention' argument
naturally dissolves itself into nothing when the constitutional
principle of 'freedom of worship' is invoked. There is no case for
it! With the pastors registration issue, it is argued that since
many men of God in the olden times were called from rather
nebulous circumstances, the examination of the background of
modern day pastors cannot be the best criterion to judge their
character, in as much as most of them were called from their
sinful estate.
For example, according to the argument of the opponents, Moses
committed the crime of murder before he was called by God to lead
the Israelites. Matthew was a publican (a fraudulent tax
collector) and St. Paul was an accomplice to the crime of
murdering Christians, before both were called by Christ. In spite
of their criminal backgrounds, God felt that they deserved to be
sent by Him. And so are some of the previously sinful modern-day
pastors. I agree to the contention that examining the background
of pastors is not necessary.
Fourthly is the criminalization argument, meaning that pastors who
have been found to engage in rape, or in adultery (thus breaking
the marriage ordinance) or to have stolen or misappropriated some
church funds, should be prosecuted in the court, and when found
guilty, jailed as a deterrent sanction . This can be another good
means of stopping the disgraceful deeds of evangelists or pastors
who are dishonouring Christ by their awful misdeeds
At any rate, I strongly contend that the society can somehow curb
the activities of the religious crooks. And the prayer
prescription aside, the best way of stopping or reducing the
misdeeds of the 'azaa' men of God is the embarking on national
crusade by the media. Don't you side with me?