Faith
Under Fire...
Ministry helping persecuted Christians now defends itself -
Attack comes from church leader who accused group of being
divisive
Posted: October 22, 2011
10:45 pm Eastern
By Michael Carl
A prominent international ministry that focuses on helping
persecuted Christians around the world now has had to defend
itself from accusations leveled by a "church" leader in the United
Kingdom that its pro-Christian activism is "divisive."
The stunning attack on the Barnabas Fund, also known as Barnabas
Aid, was orchestrated by a person only identified as a "lay
reader" in the Church of England.
The situation actually has a happy resolution for the Christian
ministry that explains in its mission statement that its goal is
"to support Christians where they are in a minority and suffer
discrimination, oppression and persecution as a consequence of
their faith. Our goal is to strengthen Christian individuals,
churches and their communities by providing material and spiritual
support in response to needs identified by local Christian
leaders."
We do this by making their needs known to Christians around
the world, by encouraging prayer and financial giving in support
of these brothers and sisters in Christ, working with existing
local Christian organizations, and by speaking on their behalf.
The Fund channels this aid from donors to the needy recipients
with minimum overheads. All gifts are monitored to ensure they are
used in line with the stated need.
In accordance with Biblical teaching, we believe that
Christians should treat all people of all faiths with love and
compassion, even those who persecute them.
The end of this chapter of the organization's ministry is that the
UK Charity Commission has cleared the human rights group of
allegations that it was violating the rules of its charitable
status by "committing a divisive act" by "campaigning against
another religion."
The Fund said the commission ruled it did not commit a hate crime
for distributing the booklet "Slippery Slope," which promotes
Christianity.
In a statement from the Fund, it said, "On 7 August 'The Sunday
Times' carried an article about our campaign against the growing
Islamization of Britain, making reference to our booklet 'Slippery
Slope.' Having read the article, a lay reader in the Church of
England then filed a complaint against us with the Charity
Commission."
The Fund continued, "The complainant asked whether Barnabas should
be allowed to retain its charitable status when we were engaged in
allegedly 'divisive' activity. She suggested that 'campaigning'
against another religion was akin to inciting racial hatred and
questioned its public benefit."
But in its letter to the Barnabas Fund, the Charity Commission
wrote that the booklet that was the focus of the complaint fits
the Barnabas Fund's mission.
"The charity, in its campaigning around 'Operation Nehemiah'
appears to be acting within its objects, as the campaign can be
seen as promoting 'the advancement of the Christian faith.' A
charity can become involved in a campaign which furthers or
supports its charitable purposes," the commission's letter said.
The commission also ruled that the Barnabas Fund was not "inciting
racial hatred."
"The campaign does not appear to be inciting racial hatred and the
charity believes that it has public benefit in that it 'is
committed to maintaining Christian values of freedom of
conscience, speech and religion for the next generation in church
and society,'" the letter also said.
"We are therefore content that the charity, in carrying out this
campaign, is operating within its objects and within the terms of
our guidance," the Charity Commission letter concluded.
In reacting to the case, Christian Solidarity International-USA
President John Eibner says he's pleased with the Charity
Commission ruling. He also turns the tables and suggests that the
intolerance was from the one who complained.
"CSI is concerned about efforts of intolerant individuals and
groups who often advocate a utopian vision of a 'Eurabian'
civilization," Eibner said.
"In an effort to advocate for their vision, they often prevent
non-violent free speech and open debate about religious ideologies
and their implications for religious liberty and other aspects of
human rights," Eibner said.
Eibner adds that he hopes this decision will give more religions
freedoms to groups like Barnabas Fund.
"Hopefully, the decision of the Charity Commission in the UK
signifies a broader resolve in the UK and other Western countries
not to yield to forces of intolerance," Eibner also said.