Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
Perilous
Times and The Great Falling Away
Chrislam and Religious Syncretism
CultureWatch: Bill Muehlenberg's commentary on issues of the day…
I have written before about the new development known as Chrislam
in which some misguided Christians believe they can somehow
combine the two religions (Christianity and Islam) and still have
something recognisable as the Christian faith. Sorry, but it can’t
happen.
As I have demonstrated, such attempts are all one-way traffic.
Muslims are happy to use such versions of religious syncretism to
gain entry into Christian circles, but it just results in the
creation of more dhimmitude – Christians becoming second-class
citizens.
Islam always wins in such attempts, while Christianity always
loses. The truth is, the two religions are fully incompatible.
They may seem to be similar (both are world religions, both have
Abrahamic origins, both are monotheistic, etc) but the differences
are far greater.
By way of analogy, the uninformed motorists might think gas and
oil are all rather similar, and can therefore be used
interchangeably. After all, both are liquids, both are products
from the ground, and both are used in cars. But just try using
half gas and half oil in the fuel tank or oil tank, and disastrous
results will follow.
Yet some quite foolish Christians think they can blend their faith
with that of Islam and still remain intact, effective, and
biblical. Sorry, but it just does not – indeed, cannot – happen.
But increasingly Christians are going down this path. Some years
ago now I saw a TV documentary about some churches in London
sharing their premises with Muslims.
They seemed to think that a church and mosque could coexist in the
same premises, and that Christianity and Islam could coexist as a
faith system. But all that happens is the Christian faith gets
watered down while Islam continues to thrive.
More recently in the US some churches have been sharing services
with Muslims. Here is how a recent news outlet carried this story:
“They see it as their Christian duty. But others disagree, saying
it extends the hand of fellowship where it was never intended to
go. Two Protestant churches are taking some heat from critics for
opening their church buildings to Muslims needing places to
worship because their own facilities were either too small, or
under construction.
“Heartsong Church in Cordova, Tenn., let members of the Memphis
Islamic Center hold Ramadan prayers there last September. And
Aldersgate United Methodist Church in Alexandria, Va., allows the
Islamic Circle of North America to hold regular Friday prayers in
their building while their new mosque is being built. Diane
Bechtol of Aldersgate says this is something Christians are called
to do: Be neighborly and develop relationships – even those who
don’t share your beliefs.
Plenty of questions arise here. First and foremost is this: If
Christians needed a place to worship in say, Saudi Arabia, would
the local Muslim mosque be happy to open its doors to them? Of
course not. Christians must either submit to Allah and renounce
their false beliefs, or live as dhimmis there.
It is always one-way traffic in any Muslim-Christian interfaith
venture. They gain while Christians lose. And if these churches
are into “relationships” and open-door policies, will they allow a
coven of witches to do their thing in the churches?
Will they allow cults free reign in their sanctuaries as they
denounce the very core teachings of Christian faith? And if
building bridges is the aim, why not allow atheists in to conduct
their meetings, or secular humanists, or any other group for that
matter? After all, we want to show just how tolerant and friendly
we Christians are.
Melbourne-based expert on Islam Mark Durie offers some words of
warning about all this: “A prominent element in Islamic daily
prayers is the recitation of Al-Fatihah (the Opening), the first
chapter of the Koran. Often described as a blessing, Al-Fatihah
has a sting in its tail. After introductory praises, the final
sentence of Al-Fatihah is a request for guidance ‘in the straight
path’ of Allah’s blessed ones, not the path ‘of those against whom
You are wrathful, nor of those who are astray.’
“Who are the ones who are said to be under Allah’s wrath or to
have gone astray from his straight path? According to the revered
commentator Ibn Kathir, Muhammad himself gave the answer: ‘Those
who have earned the anger are the Jews, and those who are led
astray are the Christians.’
“Al-Fatihah is as central to Islamic devotion as the Lord’s Prayer
is to Christians: It is recited at least 17 times a day as part of
daily Muslim prayers. Yet according to Muhammad himself, this
prayer, which is on the lips of every pious Muslim day and night,
castigates Christians as misguided and Jews as objects of Allah’s
wrath.”
And while Muslims may look up to Jesus as a prophet, they regard
it as blasphemous to view him as God’s son and the saviour of the
world. As Durie remarks, “Certainly there are some similarities
between Isa of the Koran and Jesus of the Gospels. The Koran calls
Jesus ‘al-Masih’ – the Messiah – and both figures are said to have
been born of a virgin, to have performed miracles of healing and
to have raised the dead. Yet here the similarities end. Isa of the
Koran was not crucified and did not die but was raised up by Allah
(Sura 4:157-158).
“It is in Muhammad’s vision of the end times that the role of the
Muslim Jesus comes into sharp focus. Muhammad taught that when Isa
returns, he ‘will fight for the cause of Islam. He will break the
cross, kill pigs, and abolish the poll tax. Allah will destroy all
religions except Islam’ (Sunan Abu Dawud 27:4310).
“What does this saying mean? The cross is a symbol of
Christianity. Breaking the cross means abolishing Christianity.
According to Islamic law, the poll tax, or jizya, buys protection
of the lives and property of Christians (and Jews). Abolishing
this tax will mean that jihad will be restarted against Christians
and no more protection shall be afforded to those who do not
submit to Islam.”
Bringing a false religion like Islam into the Christian churches
is really the beginning of the end of those Christian houses of
worship. Sure, Christians can invite a Muslim – or any other
non-Christian – into a Christian service to point them to Jesus
the saviour, and to expose them to the truth claims of the
biblical gospel.
Effectively signing your own death warrant by foolishly seeking
for some sort of theological equivalence here is not the way to
go. We help no one with that approach. It simply undermines the
Christian faith and does an injustice to our Muslim neighbour who
desperately needs to be set free from the bondage of Islam and
released into the freedom of the gospel of Christ.
As Durie concludes: “Churches should not welcome into their
buildings the veneration of Isa the Islamic Jesus, who, as a true
Muslim, is intended to bring about the final, violent destruction
of Christianity. By all means, let Christians show kindness to
their Muslim neighbors, but the sentiments embedded in Islamic
daily prayers, which curse Jews as the target of Allah’s wrath and
Christians for going astray, can have no place in a Christian
church – even if recited in the cadences of classical Arabic.”
This unenlightened religious syncretism by some Christians may be
just another sign of last days madness in which the church of
Jesus Christ which is supposed to be heralding the great news of
the gospel is instead becoming bound in false beliefs, false
practices, and above all, a false understanding of what Christian
compassion and tolerance is all about.