BBC turns its back on year of Our Lord: 2,000 years of Christianity jettisoned for politically correct 'Common Era'
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Pastor Dale Morgan
unread,
Sep 25, 2011, 10:45:29 PM9/25/11
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Bible-Pro...@googlegroups.com
Faith
Under Fire....
BBC turns its back on year of Our Lord: 2,000 years of
Christianity jettisoned for politically correct 'Common Era'
By Chris Hastings
The Daily Mail UK
Last updated at 12:43 AM on 25th September 2011
The BBC has been accused of 'absurd political correctness' after
dropping the terms BC and AD in case they offend non-Christians.
The Corporation has replaced the familiar Anno Domini (the year of
Our Lord) and Before Christ with the obscure terms Common Era and
Before Common Era.
Some of the BBC's most popular programmes including University
Challenge, presented by Jeremy Paxman, and Radio 4's In Our Time,
hosted by Melvyn Bragg, are among the growing number of shows
using the new descriptions.
BBC goes PC with BCE: The birth of Jesus will no longer be used as
a reference point at the Corporation. The Before Christ time
marker will be replaced with Before Common Era
God fearing: University Challenge, presented by Jeremy Paxman, is
among the growing number of shows using the new descriptions
The BBC's religious and ethics department says the changes are
necessary to avoid offending non-Christians.
It states: 'As the BBC is committed to impartiality it is
appropriate that we use terms that do not offend or alienate
non-Christians.
In line with modern practice, BCE/CE (Before Common Era/Common
Era) are used as a religiously neutral alternative to BC/AD.'
But the move has angered Christians, mystified other faith leaders
and been branded unnecessary by the Plain English Campaign.
Critics say the new terms are meaningless because, just like AD
and BC, they still denote years in relation to the life of Christ.
End of an era: The website for BBC Religion and Ethics, headed by
commissioning editor Aaqil Ahmed, who is a Muslim, is littered
with references to Common Era and Before Common Era
The website for BBC Religion and Ethics, headed by commissioning
editor Aaqil Ahmed, who is a Muslim, is littered with references
to Common Era and Before Common Era
Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester, said: 'I
think this amounts to the dumbing down of the Christian basis of
our culture, language and history. These changes are unnecessary
and they don't achieve what the BBC wants them to achieve.
'Whether you use Common Era or Anno Domini, the date is actually
still the same and the reference point is still the birth of
Christ.'
Marie Clair of the Plain English Campaign said: 'As with most
politically correct innovations, I am sure this was done with the
best of intentions. But it is difficult to see what the point of
the changes are if people do not understand the new terms. It
sounds like change just for the sake of change.'
The website for BBC Religion and Ethics, headed by commissioning
editor Aaqil Ahmed, who is a Muslim, is littered with references
to Common Era and Before Common Era.
However, the BBC bizarrely insists the bbc.co.uk/religion website
has nothing to do with Mr Ahmed and is actually the responsibility
of BBC Learning.
The terms are not confined to religious output and have also been
used in news bulletins. Some reports add to the confusion by
switching between both terms in the same item.
A report on historic monuments in Jerusalem, for instance,
informed viewers that Temple Mount, a shrine which is sacred to
both Jews and Muslims, was built in '70 AD (the Common Era)';
while a recent report on frankincense quoted one reference to 7000
BC before describing another event as taking place in the 1st
Century BCE.
The BBC's Learning and GCSE Bitesize websites, which are aimed at
schoolchildren, also use the terms.
The Learning website advises that 'BCE/CE is now more acceptable
to a greater number of faiths and religions'.
This is absurd political correctness and these new terms do not
mean anything to anyone. I think it's an example of the BBC trying
to undermine Christianity by pushing an aggressive secularism. Rev
Peter Mullen
One of the BBC's study guides highlights Greek philosopher
Demokritos, whose dates are given as 460-370 BCE, while a section
on GCSE Bitesize on American playwright Arthur Miller says that
the first tragedies were written by the Greeks in the 5th Century
BCE.
BBC presenters and producers have used the phrase in their online
blogs. Last year, Northern Ireland correspondent William Crawley
referred to the construction of the Temple of Solomon in about 950
BCE.
Earlier this year, Stephen Marsh, producer of the upcoming 23
Degrees science programme, used a reference to 250 BCE in an item
on the summer solstice.
Often viewers have no idea why presenters, contributors and guests
are using the new terms.
In an edition of In Our Time broadcast in March, one contributor
made several references to the Common Era in a discussion on
sacred Hindu texts. Melvyn Bragg did not feel the need to clarify
it.
This is not the first time the BBC has caused controversy over its
use of alien language to promote a politically correct, Europhile
agenda.
Its increasing reliance on metric measurements rather than the
imperial system and its occasional reference to expenditure in
terms of euros rather than pounds has infuriated many viewers.
Several prominent Christians last night blasted the Corporation
for sidelining Christianity.
The Rev Peter Mullen, Anglican chaplain to the London Stock
Exchange, said: 'This is absurd political correctness and these
new terms do not mean anything to anyone.
'I think it's an example of the BBC trying to undermine
Christianity by pushing an aggressive secularism.
'I would be very surprised if any other faith had complained about
the use of Anno Domini and Before Christ.'
Ann Widdecombe, the Catholic former Tory Minister, said: 'I think
what the BBC is doing is offensive to Christians. They are
discarding terms that have been around for centuries and are well
understood by everyone.
'What are they going to do next? Get rid of the entire calendar on
the basis that it has its roots in Christianity?' A spokesman for
the Church of England said that although both terms were common,
BC and AD 'more clearly reflect Britain's Christian heritage'.
Traditional: Presenter John Humphrys will continue to use BC and
AD
Traditional: Presenter John Humphrys will continue to use BC and
AD
Several of the BBC's most well-known presenters said they saw no
problem with the established system of AD and BC.
John Humphrys, who presents Radio 4's Today programme and TV's
Mastermind, said: 'I will continue to use AD and BC because I
don't see a problem.
'They are terms which most people use and are clearly understood.'
Historian Simon Schama, who has presented several programmes for
the BBC, said: 'As a Jew I don't have any problems with AD or BC.
But CE and BCE are used frequently in Jewish circles.
'I have been familiar with them since the Fifties, so it's not
like the BBC have just made them up.'
Other faith leaders were divided on the move.
Dr Ghayasuddin Siddiqui, of the Muslim Institute, said: 'I don't
know anyone who has been offended by AD and BC, so why change
them?'
But Rabbi Jonathan Romain, from Maidenhead Synagogue, said he
could see the logic behind the change.
He said: ' “In the year of Our Lord” is a religious view that is
not shared by many across the world, or even the UK. The change to
BCE and CE is simply more inclusive.'
The BBC said last night: 'The BBC has not issued editorial
guidance on the date systems.
'Both AD and BC, and CE and BCE are widely accepted date systems
and the decision on which term to use lies with individual
production and editorial teams.'