Kush's Section Edited in Final Paper

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Patel, Kush Dipak

unread,
Jul 26, 2011, 6:17:11 PM7/26/11
to bianc...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

So this is my section. I editted, researched and added more information with better writing and references.
I also added pictures where he ask so don't forget to transfer that over to the final paper.
If either of you can see the rest of the sections, I couldn't see the Software portion in his comments, please send it to me so I can make edits and what not.
Let me know if any questions or concerns asap as I am leaving thursday morning and will be gone for 10 days.

Kush Patel

________________________________
From: bianc...@googlegroups.com [bianc...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Naumaan Ansari [naumaan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:19 PM
To: bianc...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re:

Ya for some reason Binachis corrections paper has a lot of connected words. It seems like he backspaced a lot of the words together for some reason. i dont knwo if it was on purpose or what.

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Patel, Kush Dipak <kpa...@wpi.edu<mailto:kpa...@wpi.edu>> wrote:
Hey,

Gotcha. i'm working on my changes right now.
I'm leaving on thursday morning for 10 days.
I might have computer access so i might be able to work. maybe not.
I'm working on my sections right now. Trying to perfect them and stuff.
Also, i opened Bianchi's comments paper.
I can only see edits till the Software section. I can't see results or anything past it.
And Naumaan, the paper you sent us, seems to be a little different then Bianchi's correction paper.
Nonetheless I will highlight all my changes in blue and send it to you soon.

Kush Patel
________________________________
From: bianc...@googlegroups.com<mailto:bianc...@googlegroups.com> [bianc...@googlegroups.com<mailto:bianc...@googlegroups.com>] on behalf of Naumaan Ansari [naumaan...@gmail.com<mailto:naumaan...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 4:06 PM
To: bianc...@googlegroups.com<mailto:bianc...@googlegroups.com>
Subject:

Okay

So i read through the comments. He was a LOTTTT harsher this time around. Its starting to get a little annoying how on each paper he writes comments in old sections.... It would be much easier if he just covered our frist paper in comments so we could do proper editing, instaed of having to constantly go back. ALL of our sections have problems. Its kind of annoying, almost all of his comments are purely content related and not grammatical. (I wish he did that b4 in our frst 2 drafts.....). My sections need a little bit of rewroding, refrences, and pictures. Kush, yours needs a lot of refrences and some rewordings. Tom, you need some rewording and some images. I think we should EACH work onour parts. And any SECTION that is changed, we should turn it into a different color. For example. Say i have an error in the conclusion, a simple grammatical mistake. Lets say i fix it, i should highlight ALL of the conclusion into one color. Each of us should use a different color. Tom use Red, Kush use Blue, Ill use Yellow. FIx our sectiosn as best as we can and lets finish this retarded paper. At the end, one of us compiles evreything. For example, Kush's paper should be 1/3 blue. He replaces his black text with our Red and Yellow texts but keeps anythign taht is black on both papers. Itll make copying and pasting over everythign easier. Then, Kush sends it out to all of us. We each go through the paper and do heavy duty grammatical editing/ anythign we think looks bad. FOR THAT, we just highlight the mistake, not the whole section. For example, if there is a missing comma, we add the comma and highlihg tit red. Well use all Red for that. Then, we do one final recompliation. Send that in, and hopefully that should be our PRE final draft. Today is Tuesday, so our goal to send the final compilation should be by SUNDAY. That is very generous for all of us. Make sure you read the his comments as if they were scripture. Use the file that IIIIIIII sent you to do modifications, DO NOT USE THE FILE HE SENT US. FOr some reason, there are a ton of spacing errors in his file, maybe he did that by mistake or something. Please respond to me by tonite to confirm what we are doing. If you dont, im gonna spam call u for the next 3 days. I think our goal shoul dbe to hand in a finalized draft by next Friday. Any later, and I think were getting a B. (As of right now, it seems hes not too happy with us. Lets try to knock editing out of the park.) It also seems like he wants a lot more research. If you CAN add some more, (with references). Ill try to add one or two more sources for the specific sections he talked about. Priority is polishing the paper. The research stuff can be added later if necessary, but TRY to do it if u can.

thanks
fucker

IQPpt7_Ansari_Patel_Womersley_kush.docx

Patel, Kush Dipak

unread,
Jul 27, 2011, 7:31:10 PM7/27/11
to bianc...@googlegroups.com, Bianchi, Frederick W.
Hello Professor and Team,

Professor Bianchi, the paper you sent us only had comments up to the Sounds section of the paper.
Also, certain parts of the paper had been removed or something had been mixed around.

We were wondering if that was your specific editing or if Microsoft Word had glitched.
I'm leaving for vacation for 10 days tomorrow and I probably won't have internet access thus I have made revision to my sections and sent them to my partners. If my parts and the paper in general need more work, I'll have to work on them when I get back, but I did follow all your commentary and did research to add more relating information as well as referenced more frequently.

We all are trying to get an A on this project and are trying to output a great paper to match the success of the actual trashcan design and implementation.

Kush Patel
__________
________________________________________
From: bianc...@googlegroups.com [bianc...@googlegroups.com] on behalf of Patel, Kush Dipak [kpa...@WPI.EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 6:17 PM
To: bianc...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Kush's Section Edited in Final Paper

IQPpt7_Ansari_Patel_Womersley_kush.docx
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages