राजाजी - सी राजगोपालाचारी जी के कुछ विचार

[Vijay Mohan]

ॐ,

साथियों नीचे कुछ राजा जी के विचार लिखे है , इन्होने एक स्वतंत्र पार्टी का गठन किया था , यह पहली पार्टी थी जो कांग्रेस और नेहरु के खिलाफ थी और कुछ सफलता भी हाथ लगी परन्तु इनके निधन के बाद ये संगठन आगे नही चल सका ! मै इनके विचारों से बहुत प्रभावित हूँ , इनके विचारों से हम एक ऐसा भारत तेयार कर सकते है , जिसकी हम भारत स्वाभिमान से कल्पना कर रहे हैं 

ज़रूर पड़ें और अपने विचार व्यक्त करें !

‎'I want the spirit of compassion and benevolence to have free play and not stifled by State schemes of monopolizing all welfare by over-taxation and over-centralization'. - Rajaji

‎'Socialism ... is pure Statism'. Its believers imagine that 'wisdom resides only in the State' - Rajaji.

‎'In India ... honest men [are] engaged in the difficult tasks of production or trade' but face 'ruin at the hands of officials, ministers, and party bosses'. - Rajaji

‎'The laws of production are laws of nature and hence not alterable. ...The "State" cannot produce, it can tax or hinder or encourage, BUT NOT PRODUCE'. - Rajaji

‎'I want an India where talent and energy can find scope for play without having to cringe and obtain special individual permission from officials and ministers, and where their efforts will be judged by the open market in India and abroad'. - Rajaji

To Save Freedom

(From, “Why Swatantra,” 1960, by C. Rajagopalachari)

The Swatantra Party stands for the protection of the individual citizen against the increasing trespasses of the State. It is an answer to the challenge of the so-called Socialism of the Indian Congress party. It is founded on the conviction that social justice and welfare can be attained through the fostering of individual interest and individual enterprise in all fields better than through State ownership and Government control. It is based on the truth that bureaucratic management leads to loss of incentive and waste of resources. When the State trespasses beyond what is legitimately within its province, it just hands over the management from those who are interested in frugal and efficient management to bureaucracy which is untrained and uninterested except in its own survival.

The Swatantra Party is founded on the claim that individual citizens should be free to hold their property and carry on their professions freely and through binding mutual agreements among themselves and that the State should assist and encourage in every possible way the individual in this freedom, but not seek to replace him.

The new party seeks to oppose the trend of the ruling Congress Party to adopt the ways and ideals of the Communists in its eagerness to prevent the Communists from going forward. The Swatantra party believes that going over to the enemy is not defence, but surrender.

The Swatantra Party, apart from the ideology here explained, hopes to furnish a real opposition to the Congress Party so that parliamentary democracy may be properly balanced. The absence of a true opposition has led to the rapid deterioration of democracy into a kind of totalitarianism. Voices have been heard from all quarters calling for a strong opposition and the new party is supplying a felt want.

Inner party democracy

This party of freedom is further making a novel experiment in restricting disciplinary control over party members to essential issues, giving freedom in all other matters to vote according to individual opinion. This is not mere strategy to “net in” discordant miscellaneous elements as at first might appear. It is really an answer to the constantly expressed sense of dissatisfaction with party rigidity, and to the complaint that it often amounts to suppression of opinion and rule by a minority in the name of a majority. A majority in the ruling caucus can always, under present conditions, impose their views on all and every issue in the Parliament of the nation.

The Swatantra Party intends to initiate a departure from the usual practice of political parties and, true to its name, give Swatantra or freedom to its members to vote according to their own convictions and conscience on all but the party’s fundamentals so that the decisions of Parliament may on those issues truly reflect the prevailing opinion, and not be just, a replica of the majority opinion of the ruling party or the fads of the ruling clique.

Without the inconveniences resulting from proportional representation and, in particular, the instability of governments formed under such a system, the reduction of voting in accordance with whips to the barest minimum, as proposed by the Swatantra Party would be a healthy example for all parties. If followed generally or even by the more important ones among the various parties, the freedom given to members on all but essential issues would result in government more in accordance with the ideals of those who conceived the system of proportional representation and laid high hopes thereon. In this matter, the new party may claim to have initiated a great democratic advance worthy of trial in all countries really believing in democracy, and not willing to be subjected to a form of dictatorship in the name of party discipline which often serves only the ambition of individuals or groups.

Dharma

The new party does not believe that legislative compulsion, any more than the violence that preceded and enthroned Communism in certain countries, can contribute to true or lasting human happiness. We must depend on the moral sense of the people in order to equalise without destroying freedom.

It may be that there are a large number of people in our ancient land who have now lost the capacity to respond to moral appeals, who are impervious to the call of dharma. There have been causes that have brought about this state of things. But this large number of bad and successful men of the world should not blind us to the fact that in the large mass, dharma still rules and supports our society. The millions that make up our nation are still moved and guided by their sense of dharma and the voice of their conscience. If the cynics who deny this were right, our society would have broken down long ago and perished. We should have been hearing of starvation deaths in thousands every day. If we take a survey of the numerous charitable foundations and trusts that work as a matter of routine in the country and which were born of a sense of dharma, without any kind of State compulsion, we can cure our cynicism with irrefutable and abundant facts. The charitable motives and compulsions of the heart which prevailed in the days when these trusts and charitable institutions were founded can prevail today, for we are the same people after all.

“There is no need for charity when there is an obligation; let the State compel”. This is the slogan of the Socialists. But it is forgotten that this will lead irresistibly to total serfdom.

The cynics are not right. Our society is still maintained by the inner law. The outer laws can touch but the fringe of life. They deal with criminals and keep order going. Normal life ‘does hot depend on the laws. It depends on the moral consciousness of people. This moral sense has not been effaced whatever changes may have taken place in the rituals and observances of forms. It is by dharma that society is sustained, Lokah dhriyate. It is on dharma we must build, and not on the sands of material motives and our capacity to satisfy them quickly and get votes to be in power. The good seed is not lost. It is still there. We must not ignore its availability. The soil also is good and God will send us the rains. Let us not fail to look after it.

[ajay mehta]

जय भारत

ओम

बहुत अच्छा लेख आपने दिया हें. एसी हीं व्यवस्था कि में परिकल्पना करता हू अपने भारत के लिये. यह व्यवस्था समाजवाद ऑर पुंजीवाद से उपर उठकर भारतवाद, योग्यतावाद  ऑर मानवतावाद हें.

में स्वर्गीय धीरूभाईजी (संस्थापक रिलाइंस ग्रुप )  से प्रेरित हू ऑर जहां बता दू कि वह भी पश्चिमी पुंजीवाद से खुश नही  थे. एक जगह यह प्रसंग आता हें कि जब श्री मुकेश अंबानी केमिकॅल इंजीन्रिंग करने के बाद हार्वर्ड में पदने के कहने लगे तो य्न्होने कहा फेक्ट्री में काम करोगे तो ज्यादा सिखोगे ऑर नये- नये प्रयोग करो.

The cynics are not right. Our society is still maintained by the inner law. The outer laws can touch but the fringe of life. They deal with criminals and keep order going. Normal life ‘does hot depend on the laws. It depends on the moral consciousness of people. This moral sense has not been effaced whatever changes may have taken place in the rituals and observances of forms. It is by dharma that society is sustained, Lokah dhriyate. It is on dharma we must build, and not on the sands of material motives and our capacity to satisfy them quickly and get votes to be in power. The good seed is not lost. It is still there. We must not ignore its availability. The soil also is good and God will send us the rains. Let us not fail to look after it. 

 

जय भारत

 

 

 

 

2010/10/26 Vijay Mohan <evija...@gmail.com>

--
Manage emails receipt at http://groups.google.com/group/bharatswabhimantrust/subscribe
To post ,send email to bharatswab...@googlegroups.com
Visit http://www.rajivdixit.com for Rajiv Dixit audio and videos lectures.

[Vijay Mohan]

ॐ,

अजय जी , प्रतीत होता है अभी आप  "Breaking free of nehru " का अध्ययन  नही कर पाए है  !

तो यहाँ राजा जी सरकारी नियंत्रण को बिलकुल ख़त्म करने की बात केह रहे है , ये बिलकुल भी समाजवाद नही है , दुनिया इसी को पूंजीवाद कहती है ! दरअसल मेरी नज़र में पूंजीवाद मनुश्यवाद है , इसमें मनुष्य अपने विचारों के अनुसार जीने के लिए स्वतंत्र है , सरकार का उसपर कोई नियंत्रण नही ! 

परन्तु हां स्वतंत्रता का ये अर्थ नही के आप दूसरों को परेशान करेंगे , यह बिलकुल भी बर्दाशत नहीं किया जा सकता , येदी कोई उद्योगपति गलत सामग्री बनाता है , या फिर गलत तरीके से और झूठ का उपयोग करता है , तो ये बर्दाश्त नही किया जा सकता ! 

कृपया आप पूरी किताब पड़ें और अपने विचार व्यक्त करें 

जय भारत 

विजय मोहन 

२६ अक्तूबर २०१० ५:३३ अपराह्न को, ajay mehta <sga...@gmail.com> ने लिखा:

[ajay mehta]

जय भारत

ओम

मैने राजा गोपालचारीजी के विचार आज से २५ वर्ष फळे भी पढे थे ऑर आज भी यह बात कह सकता हो कि राजाजी कभी भी समाजवाद के विरोधी नही थे. वह तो सिर्फ ऑर सिर्फ नेहरूजी के समाजवाद के विरोधी थे ऑर इसीलिये नेहरूजी कि सरकार के जरीये जो पुंजीवाद समाजवाद के बेनर के नीचे चळाया जा रहा था उसका वे विरोध कर रहे थे.

आप नये यादी चान्क्याजी का आर्थिक शास्त्र के कुच अंश पढे होंगे तो मेरे मित्र पुंजीवाद का सही स्वरूप आप को जरूर मिलेगा.

में यहा यह स्पष्ट करना चाहुंगा कि में भी पुंजीवाद का विरोधी नही हू वाश्र्ते वह मनुष्यवाद ऑर देशवाद  के लिये हो.

 

जय भारत

 

2010/11/1 Vijay Mohan <evija...@gmail.com>

[Vijay Mohan]

ॐ ,

नेहरु जी का शासन सिर्फ समाजवाद था और कुछ नही , उसे आप पूंजीवाद नहीं कह सकते , समाजवाद के अंतर्गत .."production and source of production"  सरकार के नियंत्रण में रहता है ! आम नागरिक नही कर सकता ! 

राजा जी समाजवाद के कट्टर विरोधी थे और इसीलिए वे नेहरु के विरोधी थे , मुझे दिखाइए कहाँ उन्होंने समाजवाद के विरोधी नही थे , मैंने आपको दिखाया के वे समाजवाद के विरोधी थे !

किया आप हर नागरिक की स्वतंत्र के विरुद्ध है , किया आप अत्याधिक सरकारी नियंत्रण को सही ठहराते है , येदी नही तो आप भी पूंजीवादी है , और येदी आप के अनुसार सरकार का नागरिकों के personal कामों (business) में सरकारी नियंत्रण होना चाहिए और सरकार को लोगों को रोटी पहचानी चाहिए न की रोटी कमाने के लिए वातावरण तेयार करना चाहिए तो आप समाजवादी है 

मुझे नही पअत आप किस वाद तो किया कहें , मुझे जो पसंद है वेह प्रत्येक नागरिक को स्वतंत्रता और सरकार का कम से कम नियंत्रण ! जो की राजा जी की निम्नलिखित बातों में झलकता है , येदी आप इने सहमत है तो आइये अच्छे भारत के निर्माण में जुटें , और ऐसी policies पे काम करें जिनसे स्वतंत्रता बड़े 

‎'I want the spirit of compassion and benevolence to have free play and not stifled by State schemes of monopolizing all welfare by over-taxation and over-centralization'. - Rajaji

‎'Socialism ... is pure Statism'. Its believers imagine that 'wisdom resides only in the State' - Rajaji. 

‎'In India ... honest men [are] engaged in the difficult tasks of production or trade' but face 'ruin at the hands of officials, ministers, and party bosses'. - Rajaji

‎'The laws of production are laws of nature and hence not alterable. ...The "State" cannot produce, it can tax or hinder or encourage, BUT NOT PRODUCE'. - Rajaji

‎'I want an India where talent and energy can find scope for play without having to cringe and obtain special individual permission from officials and ministers, and where their efforts will be judged by the open market in India and abroad'. - Rajaji

मुझे ऐसा भारत चाहिए , किया भारत स्वाभिमान के अंतर्गत ऐसा हो रहा है , येदी नही तो मुझे संदेह है के अति ताकत की वजह से आने वाले नेता भी वही करेंगे जो हो रहा है , मनुष्य को बदलना उसके दिमाग को बदलना बहुत कठिन है और न के बराबर है  , पर हम ऐसी policies  बना सकते है और बनी भी हुई है जिनसे , मनुष्य की लालसा उससे अच्छे काम करवा सकती है , मनुष्य अपने लिए धन कमा रहा होगा परन्तु उससे देश का भला भी हो रहा होगा ! 

अभी भी हम पतंजलि और भारत स्वाभिमान के अंतर्गत किसी न किसी के द्वारा कुछ अनिमियतताओं का ज़िक्र करते रहते है , यह मनुष्य प्रकृति है , अब जब हम मनुष्य प्रकृति को जानते है फिर भी किया हम ऐसी व्यवस्था बनाएं जो की पूरी तरह से नेताओं या कुछ सरकारी अफसरों के हाथ का खिलौना बन जाए !

जय हिंद जय भारत 

१ नवम्बर २०१० ४:१८ अपराह्न को, ajay mehta <sga...@gmail.com> ने लिखा:

[ajay mehta]

Jai Bharat

Om

‎'I want the spirit of compassion and benevolence to have free play and not stifled by State schemes of monopolizing all welfare by over-taxation and over-centralization'. - Rajaji

If one can able to analyse this quote with reference to highlighted one then only the real meaning of Cpitalist Economy will come.

 

My dear these quotes have usually made by others from the speeches given. So don't get confuse over the presentation of providers of such material through books and mainly through Internet. Here in majority cases you find alternation to the level of one wishes to present. (I hope you can get this sentence)

 

Now please read this carefully.....this I have taken from the material given by you......

 

It is an answer to the challenge of the so-called Socialism of the Indian Congress party.

It is founded on the conviction that social justice and welfare can be attained through the fostering of individual interest and individual enterprise in all fields better than through State ownership and Government control.

It is based on the truth that bureaucratic management leads to loss of incentive and waste of resources. When the State trespasses beyond what is legitimately within its province,

 

Here I conclude that Rajaji was in favour of socialism in a better state than the Nehryji was trying to give.

What Nehruji was doing, a pure Capitalism with a restricted opportunity to some very Selective class of Industrialists like Tatas, Birlas, Sundrams, Bangurs, Dalmias, Shrirams, ...upto 20/25 in nos.

 

That was under the banner of Mixed Economy Setup that Capitalist Plus Socialist Economic Setup.

 

Here people like Rajaji and other liked minded wishes to have a Fair and Level Playing Field for all and for selective ones. But these people nowhere said that set all EXPLOITERS and LUSTERS free, unsocial and unaccountable to fullfill their Lust by exploiting huge resources of Bharat Mahan like Land, Water, Mines, and aboveall Manpower.

 

If anyone really wishes to study what system Bharat really needs which last atleast in next hundred years then please have a look at period of 1977-1980 --a period of PRIMEMINSTERSHIP of Late Morarji Desai. He was among like minded of Rajaji and an IRS (Indian Revenu Services).

 

That period really laid down the foundation of Human and Socian Capitalism in Bharat.

What dear Today's Capitalism was just an Eye Wash and nothing but a buch of lies like all Western and European did, do and will be doing. The way Economic Reforms started in 1990 uptill 1997 was a pure Bull Run without any ROPE and Control. It seems that the period of eight years was just a period of Blind Administrators those were just playing in the hand of Western AKAS and things were rooling for One Scam to Another.

 

However from 1998 to 2004, a small try was initiatived to get back to Bharat from India. But as Kalyug in running in full swing and Bharat was forced to back on India's trac.

 

Today we don't have any Jhunjhunwalaji, Jamshedji, DhiruBhaiji type industrialists. We need such and I am for all Capitalists setup with such people.

 

We in Bharat having people like Swami Ramdevji, Rajiv Dixitji, Anil Mitalji, Rajiesh Tripatiji, E Vijay Mohanji and lakhs of other brains of course including Ajay Mehta those can think and discuss lot about the matter which ultimately benefit Bharat and its people then  why should we depend on these exploiters and liers.

 

Jai Bharat

2010/11/1 Vijay Mohan <evija...@gmail.com>

[Vijay Mohan]

Aum ,

Ajay ji ... Its good that you got the concept ... I want power to be with individual not the state .. 

whatever you are thinking the negative effects of Capitalism .... are caused by State power (which is a socialist concept )..

anyway you got the concept so "naam mein kia rakha hai "

Now the question .. What is Bharat Swabhiman's policies for this .. whether it wants to keep the powers with itself or centralization of power ??? or decentralization

Whether it wants to indulge in Govt Companies ( Trains , phones ... food .. milk .. houses etc etc )

whether it will be working to provide more freedom to its people .. ..

I am afraid .. without serious policies .. India will not change ... no matter who gets the Power

Jai BHarat 

२ नवम्बर २०१० ११:५४ पूर्वाह्न को, ajay mehta <sga...@gmail.com> ने लिखा: