pregraph_sparse_127mer.v1.0.3 -s 200_800_reads.config -K 71 -z 378590000 -p 30 -o 71kmer 1>71kmer_pregraph.log 2>71kmer_pregraph.err
SOAPdenovo-127mer contig -g 71kmer -p 30 1>71kmer_contig.log 2>71kmer_contig.err
SOAPdenovo-127mer map -s 200_800_reads.config -g 71kmer -p 30 -k 71 1>71kmer_map.log 2>71kmer_map.err
SOAPdenovo-127mer scaff -g 71kmer -p 30 1>71kmer_scaff.log 2>71kmer_scaff.err
My config file:
max_rd_len=100
[LIB]
avg_ins=200
reverse_seq=0
asm_flags=3
rd_len_cutoff=3
rank=1
pair_num_cutoff=3
map_len=32
q1=/home/kdu224/sequences/N_lecontei_genome/filtered_fastq/200_R1_qfiltered.fastq
q2=/home/kdu224/sequences/N_lecontei_genome/filtered_fastq/200_R2_qfiltered.fastq
[LIB]
avg_ins=800
reverse_seq=0
asm_flags=3
rd_len_cutoff=3
rank=2
pair_num_cutoff=3
map_len=32
q1=/home/kdu224/sequences/N_lecontei_genome/filtered_fastq/800_R1_qfiltered.fastq
q2=/home/kdu224/sequences/N_lecontei_genome/filtered_fastq/800_R2_qfiltered.fastq
The first 10 lines of one of my fastq files (the quality scores are in phred+33):
@HWI-ST354R:352:D11GRACXX:5:1101:1335:1949 1:N:0:ACTTGAA
CAAAAACTTCTATAAAACATAGATTTGAAATTTTTTACTAAAGCTAACTTAGTTGCAACCAAATAAAAACTGTGGTCTACATAGCACAGAAAAAAGTT
+
=DDDBBHFFFDIGIIIIIIIIEHIIEGIIGGEDGCGCHHHIIGHIHCDDBDGGFEFBGGIIIGGIGHHIEEHHHDFFFFFECEECECC?AC@<??=>A
@HWI-ST354R:352:D11GRACXX:5:1101:1445:1960 1:N:0:ACTTGAA
TACTCGGAGAGATTCGATTTTGGACGGCGAGTCGAGAACTCGGAGAATTGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATAAACGGAAATTTGAAACGGGATTGATAA
+
=DFFFFGFHDHDHIIJJJJJJIJHGIJEGEIHGHIJCEE?EDFFDBDDDDCCDCDDDDBDDDD&5>B1@CC4<<?@<:AAC>@CA?B55-93::>C
@HWI-ST354R:352:D11GRACXX:5:1101:1325:1982 1:N:0:ACTTGAA
TTTTATTGCATACCTTTTTTTGTATAATACATTGTGCTCAACATGTTCTGCTGTGTCAACTTAACTGGACCACCTCATATAATGGGTTGTAAACTATAAA
The log files for each module are attached. The same pattern of no mapped reads and no scaffolds made is also seen for 51, 61 and 81 kmer sizes (51 and 61 kmer were run with the 63mer executables).
Weihua Huang
BGI shenzhen