http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_faith#Ethics.2C_phenomenology.2C_existentialism
John Merriman, Yale
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEk1JAkyvj4
Those of the middle class are not peasants or people from traditional societies. They have choices in how they live. But they don't want to face this. So instead they find things to hide behind. Usually this is marriage and the family. When they hide behind this they are trying to make it look like they are just doing what they have to do, what everyone is expected to do. So they are hiding behind children, using children, exploiting children, and abusing children.
The middle class invented childhood, the special types of clothes and the roles children are placed into. And then of course comes the taking of pictures of children. All of this is being done in order to legitimate the adults.
When I speak of Baby Books, I mean the kinds of books sold in any of America's large chain book stores which sentimentalize childhood and try to market parenthood. So adults are being encouraged to use children to justify themselves. Of course this is child exploitation. And of course this should be considered an entry level form of kiddie porn. And I am certain that some pedophiles are drawn to these pedagogy manuals for exactly this reason.
The root source of child exploitation is the middle class family. The other forms operate in its shadow. More sexual molestation happens in the family, than in any other venue.
My indictment of the middle class family does not apply to people who come from traditional societies as found in the developing world, as for these people having children is not a conscious choice. They really don't have any options. But the middle class in the industrialized nations does have a choice. It is just that they don't want to face this. They don't want to take responsibility for the fact that they are making choices. So instead they look to the degree of social cover they will get by having children. And yes, the Liberal Pedagogy Manuals sold in stores promote this.
So where Alice Miller starts is with the mother trying to get the child to mirror her own facial expressions, and the child hence coming to doubt the validity of it's own existence. You would not find this in a traditional society. There, children just are, they aren't there to be used for anything. They have as much of a right to exist as anyone else does. But for the Middle Class it is different, children are to serve a purpose, just like a new automobile or a washing machine or a drier is. So when the mother starts to find the situation problematic, not being able to face the fact that she had a choice, she starts to consider whether or not this child is covered by a manufacturers warranty and if it can be returned.
So this Narcissistic Wound occurs, closely related to post partum depression. And it is a gifted child who will be most sensitive to this. So this is why when you look at the faces of the children on the cover of Autism Asperger's Digest, you can see that they have suffered some sort of deep internal wound.
So of course knowing that people are going to exploit this wound and use it to gain power over them, they will often avoid direct eye contact.
Here is a picture of the writer Nelson Algren with Simone de Beauvoir. The author of a biography of de Beauvoir commented that Algren is showing unusual vulnerability. To me he looks like the children who are being exploited on the cover of Autism Asperger's Digest.
http://www.emma.de/sites/default/files/upload/field_images_all/2000/07/sdb_algren_01_0.jpg
And to me they all look like the monkeys Harry Harlow used in his maternal deprivation studies at U Wisconsin Madison. He had done earlier maternal deprivation studies on rats at Stanford, under the direction of Lewis Terman.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCWiDmta7fI
Rock-a-bye Baby - Harry Harlow (1970)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O81rk19Z__w
About Harry Harlow
I continue to read this Nick Dubin, talking about himself. I become still ever more convinced that he and these other autism advocates are just completely wrong. But I doubt anyone would ever be able to convince any of them of this.
Specifically about his sexuality and his eventually ending up looking at free online kiddie porn; his therapist recommended that he start looking at adult porn, in order to determine to his own satisfaction his sexual orientation. He started with print magazines, and yes he did find that he liked the gay stuff better. So he started looking online. He found that upon going to the gay sites, pop up windows started opening, and some of it was kiddie porn. About this I know absolutely nothing. But what Dubin says is that he was only attracted to the pictures which showed one child alone. The idea of an adult having sex with a child was repulsive to him, and he would never even consider sex with a child. Rather, seeing these children reminded him of himself and his own sexuality which was lost.
I'm not going to comment further on this itself. But I am going to talk more about what Dubin says and what can be discerned about the larger cultural context of his life and how I feel this contributes to the blindness he is showing.
He writes, and others write, that those on this Autism Spectrum are often seen as being asexual. And he was, by virtue of the directions his life had gone, being forced to live this way.
John E. Robison is completely heterosexual, and he is now on his second wife. But for me reading him, it does seem like sexuality is secondary to him. He writes of being with the rock band KISS, and of their really wild parties. He says, "Madams came to sample their wares." He never seemed to take any interest in anything like this.
What I say is that of course these persons are going to be quite asexual, as they have been beaten down. They are seriously wounded. And then if they accept the diagnosis, this breaks them down even further. So they are not able to be life affirming. Accepting the diagnosis means that they accept the idea that it is they who are defective, or just different. This means they renounce all redress.
Dubin even talks optimistically about the call for "Neuro Diversity", meaning giving up on the idea of a cure or a fix.
Well if this is not pity seeking then I don't know what is. It is rather like in the middle of a campaign of genocide, if the victims said, "Please don't kill us, allow for racial diversity."
There is something seriously wrong with a person if they are not able to stand up and use deadly force and any other means available to defend themselves. Those on this Autism Asperger's spectrum are already broken by the middle class family, by our age segregated schools, and by the white coats. If they accept the diagnosis, then they have completely capitulated and they live moment to moment by virtue of pity. So of course they are going to be asexual.
TO BE CONTINUED
BO