The assignment I worked on was a very quick (2 weeks) schematic design
with no budget! haha.
Makes a quite lot of difference then in real life, right? Anyways, I'm
a 5th year architecture
major and i'm guessing you're in the same profession as well?
What i think is as i mentioned on sajha post (new) that the site is
the most important
element in a design process. Without a site context, how can you
design? Maybe i'm thinking
too micro at this time and ignoring the basics of an ideal city. Well,
i think the basics of an ideal
city that you mentioned on your first post is correct. Integrating all
those things are important
since the idea is to expand from there on. One can look at poor urban
planning of kathmandu and
instantly figure out the key issues. for instance, zoning, why is that
every house in the block have
a store? do we really need that? the noise from people playing carrom
board, is that appropriate
in a residential neighborhood? or parking? how can you park on a small
street alley when it's
clearly destined for pedestrians and bikes. I just think that
kathmandu lacks organization due to
poor planning and of course thats due to the role government plays.
Also, one needs to look at
how closely houses are built in kathmandu, due to high crime rates, is
it important to either to
close of that gap or expand the gap for security reasons? I think
addressing the issues of
kathmandu will like likely be the basis of this new masterplan.
Another thing that needs to be
addressed is, who are the clients? what kind of people will be living
here? rich? poor? middle
class? people from abroad?
By the way, heres the link to the project even though it's bad.
http://issuu.com/shakeen/docs/updatesystemfinal
On May 21, 3:09 pm, Nepal City Development Corporation