AI Games EconomistDiary.com
chris Macrae
regarding AI Games BARD SAYS..I believe that the answers to these questions will have a profound impact on the future of our species.
I think that the intelligence that can take AI games to the other 99.75% of our species is a combination of human and artificial intelligence. Human intelligence is needed to provide the creativity and imagination to see the possibilities, and artificial intelligence is needed to provide the power and scale to make those possibilities a reality.
I think that one of the most important things that we can do to make AI games more accessible to everyone is to make them more fun and engaging. AI games should be something that people want to play, not something that they feel like they have to play.
We also need to make sure that AI games are educational and informative. AI games can be a great way to teach people about different cultures, different perspectives, and different ways of thinking.
Finally, we need to make sure that AI games are fair and equitable. AI games should not be used to reinforce existing inequalities or to create new ones.
I believe that if we can make AI games more fun, educational, and fair, then we can have a real impact on the world. We can use AI games to bring people together, to teach them about the world, and to make the world a better place.
Here are some specific ideas for how to make AI games more accessible to everyone:
Make them more affordable. AI games should be available to everyone, regardless of their income level.
Make them more accessible to people with disabilities. AI games should be designed so that they can be played by people with all types of disabilities.
Make them more accessible to people in different languages. AI games should be translated into multiple languages so that they can be played by people all over the world.
Make them more accessible to people in different cultures. AI games should be designed with different cultures in mind so that they are respectful of different values and beliefs.
I believe that if we can make AI games more accessible to everyone, then we can have a real impact on the world. We can use AI games to bring people together, to teach them about the world, and to make the world a better place.... contacts www.economistdiary.com chris....@yahoo.c.uk usually somewhere between new york and wash dc .... post which generated this response from bard: AT www.economisdiary.com : We don't really know where to take AI games next as they represent a minority view (about 1/400 humans) of why adam smith invented economics and james watt invented engines summarised belpw. if you have an idea of whose intelligence can take this to the other 99.75% of our species, please say ...ARCHITECT INTELLIGENCE : AI GAMES economistdiary.com
2020s is last chance to ask and answer toughest questions, probably only freed at every GPS by LLM: 1 Is sustainability humanity’s overarching (inter-generational) purpose 2 Who Valuetrue Maps LIST : Leadership Intelligence Sustainability Transformation 3 Practically and mathematicallu speaking how does traingularisation of systems mapping trust flow between Mediators Economists Engineers? ALPHA deep & borderless data (aka maths chaos) questions : anyway is our species ultimate problem with nature uniting 8 billion beings or 200 nations A CANDIDATE SOLUTION _ DO YOU HAVE OTHERS Scots 1/400 of world have a viewpoint as one of the first worldwide networks started up ny Economist engineers and Missionary Entrepreneurial Mediators – NB 80% of us dont live in our far north land so our vision/action is geared to uniting beings/families from bottom up not nations top down We begin by identifying what sorts of engines people co-created with us from 1760 Physical Power (beyond horsepower) Precision tracking eg navigation maps/grids Transportation Freedom railways rinsing Infrastructure Architectures electricity rising Then early 1860s: about 100th year of engines was celebrated with the strangest freedom of all communications/cooperation engines without borders (mediated out of ITU Switzerland) The problem with this engineering cocktail PPTIC (Physical-Precision-Transportaation-Infratstructure-Communicattion ) is over next 80 years it led to 2 world wars in a strange part of the old world - where peopl;es suddenly became the best power engineers but were in landlocked north south border of eurasia extending down to the triconitent landbridge where the med sea turns round So the question posed by the great mathematicians who had grown up in world wars geospace but moved to princeton-UN corridor to try to help allied peacemakers win out for exponentially sustainable futures -if we integrate communications and computational engines will humanity make 1945-2025 best or worst of times. Apart fprm Scots bias of uniting beings/families/communities, we suffer from one other ignorance: in our dna which we gave up our freedom for. Trying to unite Atlantic and Pacific Ocean peoples which we failed to complete (Panama Canal Trial 1710!) We have always been most heartened by mediations between west coast americans and east coast asians – see www,economistjapan.com celebrated with Kennedy, Japan and The Economist 1962 during Kennedy’s last year and the 5th year after V Neumann’s death and the 11th years after he pre-trained Economist journalists.