I've got a fancy battery charger on my First 310 and a total of three
batteries with a standard 3-way 12-volt start/house/off switch. I
assume the charger works when my AC shore power is plugged in and the
AC breaker for the charger is on. Here's my question:
What position should the 3-way 12-volt switch be in to charge all my
batteries while connected to AC shore power?
Thanks!
-Matt
Larry
It all depends on how your charger was hooked up. If done correctly, with
the charger connected directly to the batteries, the position of the switch
doesn't matter.
Bill
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.6/617 - Release Date: 1/5/2007
> 11:11 AM
>
>
My 361 used to have a pair of batteries -- a 4D and Group 27. The 4D was
always charged regardless of switch position. The Group 27 was charged via
two paths. If it's battery switch were on it got charged via the current
being directed to the 4D, but it was also directly connected to the Echo
Charge outlet of the charger so it was charging even with the switch
off. Bottom line is that you are best tracing wires and making a diagram
to figure out exactly how it is all connected. This is particularly
important if anyone has ever done work on the boat *upgrading* the charging
system or adding batteries.
Mike Ordun
ABYC Marine Electrical Certified
s/v insanity B361
Uwe Mewes
F305
Heaven Can Wait
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt" <matt...@gmail.com>
To: "Beneteau Owners" <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 3:24 PM
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Basic Battery Charging Question
>
I'd second what others have said about tracing the wires.
Normally I'd say the batteries would be charged no matter what the position
of the switch, however, I believe the factory F310 configuration is 2
batteries under the companionway steps and the three red and black switches
inside the quarter berth.
At least that's how mine is so I'd guess your's has been modified.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 2:25 PM
To: Beneteau Owners
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Basic Battery Charging Question
What are the switches in your aft bunk and their functions?
Brian
F305 Due South
When I check the water in my batteries, I have to disconnect the wires, and
I'm not sure if I'm putting them back right. I have 4 batteries, three
house and one starter. The starter is in front of the motor, the house
under the rear birth, and two additional house batteries in the cockpit
locker. The house battery under the rear birth is the only one that has the
smaller wires.
Are the smaller wires - which on mine are red - connected to the positive or
negative terminal? I have them connected to the positive terminal, but my
charge monitor usually shows me a 99.7 % charge.
Rick D'Amico
"Airtime"
B-323
San Diego/Phoenix
The red wire from the charger should be connected to the positive terminal
of the battery. There should be a heavy red wire from your battery under the
rear berth connected to the positive terminal of the house bank in the
locker, and a heavy black wire going to the negative of the other two as
well.
Bill
Instead of the three way switch that Matt was describing I believe most
Beneteau of the First 310 era came with three separate switches, one red and
two black in color or it could be one black and two red, I not sure which.
The way you turn the handles determines if the switches are on or off.
One turns the complete system on/off, the other two, in my case since I only
have two batteries, turn the individual batteries on and off.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Mikiten
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 7:28 PM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: Basic Battery Charging Question
TIA
Brian
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I too have a 331 and am asking myself the same questions. The halyard should
run from the masthead block into the mast slot and down inside the mast
exiting near the goose neck.
I plan to buy an asymetrical as it will be more usefull in a wider range of
wind angles. I will buy the dousing sock which I will also use between
tacks. I should be able to use a single sheet and bring it and the sail
around the front for the forestay.
The sheet can run all the way to the back of the toe rail where there is
about a 6" slot. The end of the slot has a small roller from where the sheet
can be run back forward to the winch. Or, spend the $80 and get a proper
snap block attached to the tor rail.
I have flown true spinnakers on previous boats and just as soon not mess
with the pole = it makes the crew of one nervious. The idea of flying a big
blooper is more appealing.
I have not priced used 'A' sails, but the price of a new one with the dodads
is a couple of grand$.
Neal Lindeman
>From: "Mark Stillwell" <still...@att.net>
>Reply-To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
>To: <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
_________________________________________________________________
Dave vs. Carl: The Insignificant Championship Series. Who will win?
http://clk.atdmt.com/MSN/go/msnnkwsp0070000001msn/direct/01/?href=http://davevscarl.spaces.live.com/?icid=T001MSN38C07001
-Matt
Nice job.
Uwe Mewes
F305
Heaven Can Wait
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt" <matt...@gmail.com>
To: "Beneteau Owners" <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 4:00 PM
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: Basic Battery Charging Question
>
Bill
Brian
----- Original Message -----From: Brian MikitenSent: 1/8/2007 10:22:27 PMSubject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: Spinnaker on a B331
I have always used a Tacker on our asymmetric spinnakers. I also recommend the ATN sleeve because of its fiberglass mouth, particularly for larger sails. A smaller boat may get away with out the ATN but a big sail with any pressure in it at all will cause the other designs without a “bell” to collapse and make it difficult to haul the sock down over the sail when you really need it.
I would recommend the use on any asymmetrical chute particularly when tight reaching because it keeps the luff of the sail from falling off to leeward and will help make the sail easier to fly in light wind or in choppy sea conditions. We have ours shackled to the tack of the sail with a quick pin so it is very easy to connect when setting up the sail. Someone else reported using the Tacker with a symmetrical chute but I am not sure that is a good option to eliminate the spin pole. I don’t think the sail would fly very well and you lose the advantage of pulling the tack of the sail out to windward allowing you to sail further off the wind as you could using the spin pole.
Rick Donovan
Biddeford, Maine
Beneteau 473 #29
Turn the Page
> . . . .[for] flying a spinnaker on a B331 . . . .
> I'm wondering about making a bridle between the
> two bow cleats as an anchor point for the tack
> of the sail.
While I recognize that some do this, you might want to verify whether you
have an older or newer B331, i.e., one made before or after B's limited
recall of earlier versions to fix the design flaw that, for some,
necessitated reinforcement of the glass and bolts/nuts for the anchor
roller assembly and/or replacement by a newer/stronger anchor roller than
on earlier made boats of that model.
As for the separate issue of the kind of sail itself, if cost is a not a
major factor or is a consideration less important than performance
including ease of use, you might want to consider Doyle's "UPS" or a like
maker's comparable self-furling alternatives.
My 323 will be one year old next week. I have about 40 hours on the motor.
The boat has operated flawlessly the first 12 months. My service people are
recommending an oil change and haul out for inspection as part of annual
maintenance. Is that pretty typical?
Rick D'Amico
"Airtime"
B-323
San Diego/Phoenix
Apart from providing more control over the spinnaker by allowing you to alter the height of the tack , they also keep the side loads of the pulpit caused by the spinnaker tack line.
I have three versions, The parallel beads from Neil Pryde, I find put excessive stress on the Genoa furling track and I stopped using them.
The ATN Tacker, which I think is a much better solution, spreads the load on the forestay a lot more and I don’t see the drastic bending that the beads caused.
I also received a version from North Sails for Christmas along with one of there awesome Gennaker bags. The north version is a simply canvas strap but I can keep it attached to the tack of the sail in the sail bag which is cool, hopefully now my crew wontt mix up the tack and the clew again J
Regards
Stewart
Seattle WA
From:
Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Ivars
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007
6:01 AM
To:
Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re:
Spinnaker on a B331
As stated in a previous email the rule-of-thumb for oil changes is 1 year or
50 hours. I'd say there is no big hurry, but you may want to change the oil
soon.
Michael
Cheap Talk? Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
----- Original Message -----From: Dan....@carrier.utc.comSent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:01 PMSubject: {Beneteau Owners} Spinnaker on a B331
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
Dan
If your sailing is for fun, cruising and you are looking for a sail to extend your sailing time before turning the engine on when going downwind and you have little or no experience with a spinnaker, the asymmetrical form of that sail will probably be your best bet. If you have spent time on your past boats or others boats while sailing with a symmetrical spinnaker and understand all that is involved to hoist one, you probably wouldn’t be asking this question in the first place, (that is my guess of course).
I have 20 years or more of racing boats with both types of spinnakers and I chose an asymmetrical chute for our 473. The bottom line for me was that we tend to sail short handed, as a couple, and cruise most of the time. I don’t want the all the hassles of a symmetrical chute under those circumstances. If we regularly sailed with more crew or I raced this boat more, I would have set it up for a symmetrical chute. I believe the symmetrical has advantages over the asymmetrical chute at deeper wind angles. Sailing more than 120-130 degree’s true wind direction will be difficult at best with the asymmetrical chute regardless of what the sales brochures tell you. The reason is that it is very difficult to get the sail out from behind the shadow of the main sail when at those wind angles. There are building methods/designs of putting extra sail area into the top of the sail and allowing that to rotate out in front of the boat that help, but that sail will not reach very well. This then forces you to choose a second reaching cut sail to cover the full wind range.
I basically agree with Bill Jarvis when he said:
>>>The asym. is simpler to rig sail and gybe.
The Symetric sails deeper but has more control lines.
There is no simple choice. I have sailed both either crrewed or single handed. Both are possible but sailing a poled spinnaker single handed requires much more thought inhow to set, gybe and perhaps most importantly douse.
You need to think through what you want from the sail and then make your choice.<<<
This is something that you need to think about carefully before spending the money a spinnaker and its related gear will cost you only to find out that you don’t use it because of some unforeseen hassle. It is my belief that for most folks an asymmetrical spinnaker/gennaker is the way to go, particularly if you don’t have a lot of experience with spinnakers in general. They are pretty easy to set up so that fact alone will get you using it more often and build on your sailing experience. Most folks and cruisers in particular don’t use the spinnaker except for “play time”. I don’t mean to criticize cruisers here; I only mention this because their priorities are different than a racer will be.
For performance, on many boats the symmetrical will ultimately be a better choice but is definitely not a sail for short handed crew without experience with one. They can be very intimidating until you use one for a while, then the decision on which one to choose will be closer because of your experience. As others have stated, lots of strings to keep adjusted on a symmetrical sail mostly because of the control lines for the spinnaker pole. For all but the most experienced sailors, I believe that a minimum of 3 sets of capable hands are needed to sail with the symmetrical spinnaker, 4 would be even better. Once the sail is up and trimmed, things become easier until it is time to take the sail down then you might be wishing you had 4,5 or even more sets of hands, lol, but it can be done with practice. Yes, it can be flown by single handers but it certainly should not be a beginner trying to do that without expecting to get him/herself into big trouble with no easy way out.
Rick Donovan
Biddeford, Maine
Beneteau 473 #29
Turn the Page
-----Original Message-----
From:
Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Dan....@carrier.utc.com
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007
9:02 PM
To:
Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners}
Spinnaker on a B331
Let me throw in something else here. What is your opinion:
Larry
I only haul out when the bottom needs new paint. Your diver should
alert you to any significant problems (but they can miss things
underwater). Who are your service people? Contact me off-line if you
want to discuss further (e-mail or phone).
Paul Nierman
B-323 Pandemonium
San Diego
pauln...@pacbell.net
With the introduction of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-low_sulfur_diesel ), we go from 500
PPM to 15 PPM of sulfur, so there's less chance for sulfuric acid to
build up in the oil. Regardless, twice a year is cheap insurance that
your oil will be clean and the engine will be in tip top shape. If you
pick up an Oil Boy from West Marine, you can do the whole thing
yourself in 20 min or less.
Also, adding a little Bio Diesel to your fuel blend ( < 20%) will keep
the injectors and fuel system slightly better lubed - good for long
term cleanliness and wear.
Good Luck -
Rob
I change my oil about 2 times a year (boat is always in water) and I figure that equates to about once every 20-25 hours or so. I am more concerned about the soot, water, and acids that can build up rather than the viscosity of the oil.
R
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
I also have Jettas - (2) 2006 TDI's, both running 10,000 mi Oil Change
Intervals with full synthetic. One has 505.01 oil. the other is on
506.01. Both cars on B20 and occasional power service. All of our
weekly transport is diesel at this point, and all of it is done on some
bio diesel.
I am running convential oil (Valvoline that meets Volvo's latest
standard) in the Penta 2002. I've been thinking about switching to
synthetic, but I'm afraid it's overkill down here with our warm
weather, especially since I change it out frequently. What do you
think?
Best Regards,
Rob
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.
With the introduction of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra-low_sulfur_diesel ), we go from 500
PPM to 15 PPM of sulfur, so there's less chance for sulfuric acid to
build up in the oil.
Rick and others,
You are quite correct in everything you say. When I initially asked the question of the group, I really wanted the advice on the sail performance differences, not necessarily the handling issues.
I notice however that everyone who answered couldn't resist from going into the handling issues. This pretty much confirms what I suspected before: symmetrical spinnakers are superior to asymmetrical, however more complicated to handle. An exception to this could be reaching in light airs, although a large genoa would cover this situation quite well, I think. I have also noticed that people seem to be concerned with the pole handling, perhaps more so than the handling of the sail itself. That's easy to understand, I've seen a guy carrying a pole on the foredeck who lost balance and the inboard end went right through an expensive mainsail. I'm sure the skipper didn't see the funny side. In the end, it seems to me people choose an asymmetrical sail for the ease of handling and live with the deficiencies. That's fair enough, we have furling mains for the same reason.
As you say, symmetrical spinnakers can be used by single handers, although that can easily lead to big trouble. I have some (very limited) experience with this type of sail on a 36' offshore racing boat and still believe that it can be handled well by a cruising couple, providing that the autopilot is working and the sail has a dousing sock. Similarly, gybing can be done the 'granny' way, what's the hurry in a cruising situation? I'd say the key would be not to leave taking the sail down until the wind pipes up too much and not to fly it at night.
Dan
_____
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Donovan
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2007 20:17
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: Spinnaker on a B331
Dan
If your sailing is for fun, cruising and you are looking for a sail to extend your sailing time before turning the engine on when going downwind and you have little or no experience with a spinnaker, the asymmetrical form of that sail will probably be your best bet. If you have spent time on your past boats or others boats while sailing with a symmetrical spinnaker and understand all that is involved to hoist one, you probably wouldn t be asking this question in the first place, (that is my guess of course).
I have 20 years or more of racing boats with both types of spinnakers and I chose an asymmetrical chute for our 473. The bottom line for me was that we tend to sail short handed, as a couple, and cruise most of the time. I don t want the all the hassles of a symmetrical chute under those circumstances. If we regularly sailed with more crew or I raced this boat more, I would have set it up for a symmetrical chute. I believe the symmetrical has advantages over the asymmetrical chute at deeper wind angles. Sailing more than 120-130 degree s true wind direction will be difficult at best with the asymmetrical chute regardless of what the sales brochures tell you. The reason is that it is very difficult to get the sail out from behind the shadow of the main sail when at those wind angles. There are building methods/designs of putting extra sail area into the top of the sail and allowing that to rotate out in front of the boat that help, but that sail will not reach very well. This then forces you to choose a second reaching cut sail to cover the full wind range.
Yup - was just there today as a matter of fact. What year is your TDI?
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.
Yup - was just there today as a matter of fact. What year is your TDI?
Yup - was just there today as a matter of fact. What year is your TDI?
Rick and others,
And I thought I was the only diesel freak, as my wife calls me, I just picked up a 06 jetta TDI making this my fourth VW diesel and this is the nicest one yet
Terry and Amanda
Marie Claire OC381
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007
4:32 AM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.</a
>From: Scott <ipac...@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
>To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
>Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: haul out?
>Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 09:16:41 -0800 (PST)
>
>I'm going to run mine to 300K (I hope)
>
>Labones <lab...@comcast.net> wrote: And I thought I was the
>only diesel freak, as my wife calls me, I just picked up a 06 jetta TDI
>making this my fourth VW diesel and this is the nicest one yet
> Terry and Amanda
> Marie Claire OC381
> lab...@comcast.net
>
> ---------------------------------
> From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
>[mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott
>Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:32 AM
>To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
>Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: haul out?
>
> 03 wagon 112K
>
> tdi club name - puyalluptdi
>
> no major problems with the car,
>
>
>
> alternator pulley froze up and spun off (only time car has been to the
>dealer for service)
>
>
>
> timing belt done at 95K
>
>
>
> intermittent glow plug issue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Rob R <robr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Yup - was just there today as a matter of fact. What year is your TDI?
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Be a PS3 game guru.
>Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo!
>Games.</a
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>The fish are biting.
>Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
>>
_________________________________________________________________
Your opinion matters. Please tell us what you think and be entered into a
draw for a grand prize of $500 or one of 20 $50 cash prizes.
http://www.youthographyinsiders.com/R.aspx?a=116
It may be sooner then we think no ice on the big lake so far this year that I’ve seen
Terry and Amanda
<br
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott
Sent: Jan 16, 2007 12:16 PM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: haul out?
I'm going to run mine to 300K (I hope)
Labones <lab...@comcast.net> wrote:
And I thought I was the only diesel freak, as my wife calls me, I just picked up a 06 jetta TDI making this my fourth VW diesel and this is the nicest one yetTerry and AmandaMarie Claire OC381
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Scott
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:32 AM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Re: haul out?
03 wagon 112Ktdi club name - puyalluptdino major problems with the car,alternator pulley froze up and spun off (only time car has been to the dealer for service)timing belt done at 95Kintermittent glow plug issue
Rob R <robr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Yup - was just there today as a matter of fact. What year is your TDI?
Be a PS3 game guru.
Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo! Games.</a
Lake Huron southern tip we sail out of Sarnia Ont Canada
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com [mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Howell Cooper
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007
4:39 PM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
By the way, I decided to do what most of you do, haul out every other year
when I have the bottom re-done.
Does 200 bucks for the oil change sound reasonable?
Rick D'Amico
"Airtime"
B-323
San Diego/Phoenix
----- Original Message -----
From: "RICK-DAMICO" <rick-...@cox.net>
To: <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 8:21 PM
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} haul out?
>
> My 323 will be one year old next week. I have about 40 hours on the
> motor. The boat has operated flawlessly the first 12 months. My service
> people are recommending an oil change and haul out for inspection as part
> of annual maintenance. Is that pretty typical?
>
> Rick D'Amico
> "Airtime"
> B-323
> San Diego/Phoenix
>
>
> >
>
I've never paid to have mine changed, so I'm not sure what the going rate
is. However, if that's all they're doing, it seems like quite a lot.
Why not buy an oil changer, get the filter, and do it yourself. It's not
complicated or time consuming and you can drink your favorite beverage while
you're doing it.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:Benetea...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of RICK-DAMICO
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 11:04 AM
To: Benetea...@googlegroups.com
Just checked my records it was Primary and Secondary fuel filters and it was
$30 on 5/13/2000 with me supplying the filters.
Bob
S/V Our Dream
'97 Beneteau Oceanis 351 #195
Slip C-17, Castle Harbor Marina
Chester River Kent Island
Chester, MD
_/)__/)__/)_
However, another great idea is the part about the beverage, I like that,
especially if its an "adult" beverage!
By the way, I'll be sailing tomorrow and Friday in Sunny San Diego..(highs
will be in the 60's)
Rick D'Amico
"Airtime"
B-323
San Diego/Phoenix
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Rohrbeck" <rsroh...@swbell.net>
To: <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives. Check it out.
I think $200 for an oil change and new filter is excessive. Definetely less than an hours work....actuallly for someone familar with boats probably 30 minutes is more than enough.
Joe
Hi Rick,
I hired a really good mechanic, watched what he did, took notes and pictures
and now feel comfortable doing it all myself.
Chris
Rick - as for the oil change, I would highly recommend the Oil Boy from
West Marine. I have owned two of them now over 10 years - great little
units. I even use them to change the oil in my TDI.
Yes, I said TDI. Off topic - not really - it's a diesel engine, and you
never know when you might Learn Something about a peripherially related
piece of equipment. I don't think Diesel engines are off topic,
regardless of where they reside. They basically operate the same way
and require specific maintenance, even if the intervals are different.
Physics are generally similar.
Circling back to your oil change Rick - I highly recommend getting
familiar with that engine. An oil change is a great way to do it, and
it is not very complicated. You can get a basic service manual which
will tell you how to do it, and if you get stuck, you've got the list
here to help you. A great way to start, if you are worried about it,
would be to have a mechanic show you how to do it. Most will oblige
willingly as long as they are being paid, and some actually enjoy the
teaching aspect of it. If you pay a mechanic to supervise, it might
cost you 75 dollars, but you'll recoupe that money very quickly in
piece of mind and of course, engine longevity.
Anyway - again, glad to be here, and hope I have not angered the powers
that be.
Rob
>>>> You are quite correct in everything you say. When I initially asked the question of the group, I really wanted the advice on the sail performance differences, not necessarily the handling issues.<<<<
Dan
In the past we have had some discussions about this kind of question that always seemed to end up as handling of
these 2 sails so that is where I went with my reply.
From a strictly performance point of view, I would have to say that the symmetrical spinnaker is the better of the 2 sails in general, my opinion of course, and there are certainly exceptions. I am not claiming to be a sail maker or boat designer with my comments here, but I do have experience racing against the asymmetric chutes using a symmetrical chute and that seems to be what you are asking about.
From a strictly racing point of view there may be lots of opposite opinions on this, but I am basing mine on having raced a Nelson/Marek 45 against a J-120 for several years here in Maine. There are other examples but I have the most experience with this one and will use it to try to make my point. The J-120 was using asymmetrical chutes exclusively. The J boat regularly had new sails aboard, often had some “ringers” from the North Sail loft helping out, it was always well sailed tactically, the crew made very few mistakes in handling the boat around the course and we still normally beat them down wind.
What it seems to come down to, at least as I see it, is that the asymmetrical chute can’t go deep down wind, they must sail angles to keep the air flowing over the sail for their best boat speeds. Those sailing angles don’t match up well with a symmetrical chute in many situations on boats that I have experience with. The gybing angles this J boat needed to sail for its best VMG provided for some rapid speeds thru the water for sure, but not in the best direction of the down wind mark we were sailing to. If they sailed a deeper angle the boat speed was drastically affected.
We had a number of races where the J boat would come out of the fog, cross our bow going 12 knots or something, while we were doing 8 knots and sail off into the fog using their VMG plot to sail the correct angles for best VMG, only to show up just behind us on their next gybe back towards the down wind mark. Both of us had computer generated VMG predictions and had crew that understood how to sail their boats well. It was a real eye opener for me. When the J showed up to race that first season, we expected them to do well because the asymmetrical spinnakers seemed like the next new design advantage. This boat simply didn’t prove that to me and I know for a fact the owner was really frustrated at times because he also expected things to be different than how they worked out on the race course, but we had some really fun races over the years with them.
The exception for that boat seemed to be in light air, under 6-8 knots true wind speed, when we also needed to sail hot angles to keep the boat moving well. In those conditions the asymmetrical chute seemed to have an advantage if we couldn’t get them to make a mistake out on the course. As soon as the wind reached 10-12 knots, things started to go back our way again because we could get the tack of the symmetrical chute out from behind the main using the spinnaker pole while sailing deeper angles than the J boat was capable of. With the wind at 16-18 knots or more, we could pretty much point at the downwind mark making maximum VMG with the symmetrical chute while they were sailing their gybing angles for their best VMG using the asymetrical. It basically came down to this, the J boat had to sail a longer distance thru the water than we did and that extra distance around the whole race course was what kept them from beating us regularly.
Rick Donovan
Biddeford, Maine
Beneteau 473 #29
Turn the Page
By the way went sailing last Thursday and Friday in Sunny San Diego, only it
wasn't sunny at all, low clouds, rain and cold, about 58 degrees! But you
know how it is, when your on your boat, all is right with the world.
regards
Uwe Mewes
F305
Heaven Can Wait
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Mikiten" <bmik...@idworld.net>
To: <Benetea...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 11:46 PM
Subject: {Beneteau Owners} Replacement compass
>
> I wanted to replace the compass behind the wheel (on the pedestal) on my
> F305. Does anyone know the specs? I think the one installed is a
> Plastimo.
>
> Brian
>
>
> >
Brian
The message below caught my eye.
A friend of mine has a Ritchie compass that he sent back to the company to have rebuilt. He had it on the boat today. Looks like new. He said it was less that half the cost of a new one. His boat is a 1979 Tartan 37.
Mark & Suzanne
"Dragonfly" B331
http://home.att.net/~dragonflyb331/
Brian