Dear
BEC Supporter,
SAVE THE MURRAY DARLING
BASIN
The Guide to the Proposed Basin
Plan has been released by the Murray Darling Authority and is now open for
community and stakeholder feedback. This plan was initiated by the Howard
Government and there was broad consensus on the implementation. This cooperation
has now fallen by the way-side due to the opportunistic tactics by the leader of
the opposition, Mr. Abbott. Thus, it is important that we counter some of the negative
information issued by the Federal Opposition. Feedback received before 30
November 2010 can be considered in the drafting of the proposed Basin
Plan.
ABOUT THE
BASIN
-
Diverse and rich natural environments -
contains one world heritage site
+ 30,000 wetlands
-
Provides critical habitat for 95 Basin
state and Commonwealth-listed threatened inundation-dependent fauna
species
-
Provides 39% of national agricultural
production + critical water supplies
of more than three million people
-
Critical cultural
asset to the many Aboriginal nations who live in
the Basin
-
Under enormous stress -
overdeveloped + water overallocation
-
20 out of 23 catchments in the
Basin are in ‘poor’ to ‘very poor’ ecosystem health
-
Increasing water quality
problems + more
frequent outbreaks of blue-green algae blooms
- Water consumption per annum has increased from
about 2,000 GL/y in 1920 to 11,000 GL/y in the 1990s
- Severe and prolonged drought +
compounded by
natural climate variability and climate change
- No significant flows
through the Murray Mouth since 2002
Click here to SAVE THE BASIN
This will
only take 2 minutes!
If you don't have time to read
the full guide, please use our submission proforma below.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Dear Members of the Murray
Darling Authority,
I believe that the focus of the
Murray Darling Basin Plan needs to be on the water required for the restoration and protection of the
environment.
You, as the Authority, have determined
that "the amount of additional surface water
needed for the environment is between 3,000 GL/y and 7,600 GL/y", and yet, you "ha[ve] made a judgement to only examine
scenarios for increasing the amount of water available for the environment to
between 3,000 GL/y and 4,000 GL/y", despite
stating that, "providing water at the higher end of the
range would on the whole deliver better environmental outcomes".
Please alter your recommendation for
additional surface water needed for the environment to be between 3,000 GL/y and
7,600 GL/y.
The current level of surface
water being diverted from the Basin and resultant high level production and
economic activity is unsustainable. I understand that the impacts of providing
additional surface water of the above quantities for the environment will be
felt by more severely by agro-industries with "high water usage but lower or more
volatile value products such as broadacre cereals, rice and
cotton". While regrettable, I believe that this impact
is unavoidable if we are to make the necessary societal transition towards
more sustainable diets and clothing choices. We need to modify our lifestyles to
suit our environment, not alter and impair our environment, as has been done
with the Murray Darling thus far, to suit our lifestyles.
Yours Sincerely,
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Click here to SAVE THE BASIN
This will
only take 2 minutes!
For Gaia,
Leif Nielsen Lemke & Amy
Boyd
Environmental
Campaigners, Bellingen
Environment Centre