Did I miss something? Is it settled or have both parties lost steam?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/a487c905-981c-495e-8eab-c9b7fa224337n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CALLw9YzoGCRS-u7KonG-sKa3gkxbhUNgogD6iMgJthN5%3DbgZBg%40mail.gmail.com.
On 10 Mar 2024, at 17:21, Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CALLw9YytCKmcirWtOfKZLbSPjyVaU5U00-ZJHwodxtwxxsG1TA%40mail.gmail.com.
On 10 Mar 2024, at 14:31, antonvrba <anto...@gmail.com> wrote:
Did I miss something? Is it settled or have both parties lost steam?
On 10 Mar 2024, at 18:34, Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com> wrote:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CALLw9Yx0OS73AkM9qLfjvwUYdK48NYK%3DAM_ZPEod3vR6bDA71g%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CALLw9Yx0OS73AkM9qLfjvwUYdK48NYK%3DAM_ZPEod3vR6bDA71g%40mail.gmail.com.
On 10 Mar 2024, at 18:07, Mark Hadley <sunshine...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 11 Mar 2024, at 13:14, Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com> wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/ADD75DFA-712F-4F66-95A4-ABD2306D5397%40gmail.com.
![]() | |
![]() | |
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/8f7921f6-c563-4290-9ad8-a140c4518ac0n%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/E3F1DA58-091A-4E3D-8D15-95342D9D9DAB%40gmail.com.
![]() |
Department of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping Phone: +46 (0)13-28 14 68 Mobile: +46 (0)13-28 14 68 Visiting address: Campus Valla, House B, Entr 27, 3A:512 Please visit us at www.liu.se |
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Gill <gill...@gmail.com>Subject: Re: [Bell_quantum_foundations] Gill–Sanctuary Bet?
Date: 12 March 2024 at 15:53:39 CETTo: Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com>Thanks BryanI agree we should call off the bet.RichardOn 12 Mar 2024, at 15:32, Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com> wrote:Dear Richard,
I have been mulling things over. I think we should call off the bet, which you seem to want, for several reasons. One reason is I am not interested in taking your money, and the bet for me was about EPR awareness and not money. Also, I really was dismayed that you agreed to review my paper for the Foundations of Physics. That was unfair because you were in a conflict of interest with me. That is enough to cancel the bet too. You wasted 9 months of the two years you suggested.
I also know that changing paradigms often takes a generational change, and I should live so long. Like us all I need constructive criticism. People on this forum have been very helpful, which I appreciate very much, and thank them. The discussions helped focus my issues. However, I have decided not to participate in this forum anymore. It has run its course and we have expressed our ideas and differences; all very useful for me. I am happy, of course, to have private discussions with anyone willing.
Good luck with Lucy,
Bryan
On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 7:05 AM Richard Gill <gill...@gmail.com> wrote:Why don’t you just ask Penrose, ’t Hooft, and Susskind?You could cc me if you like, I would certainly be interested in their reactionsWatch your spelling carefully: the guy in the middle writes his name as follows: Gerard ’t Hooft
On 11 Mar 2024, at 12:40, Bryan Sanctuary <bryancs...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 13 Mar 2024, at 08:25, 'Jan-Åke Larsson' via Bell inequalities and quantum foundations <Bell_quantum...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
I think the model (not yet a theory imho) is interesting, but fail to see the connection to eventum mechanics.
Belavkin's model had a switch from quantum to classical at the time "now".
In this new model, the spacetime metric is classical, full stop, and matter fields are quantum, full stop.
Richard, why do you think this is eventum mechanics, I'm intrigued?
Best
Jan-Åke
On 2024-03-13 08:15, Richard Gill wrote:
I think that this *new* theory is a reincarnation of Belavkin’s “eventum mechanics”
<maxresdefault.jpg>
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/fd714495-76a4-4c36-b1a0-9e1d9c1d9a94%40liu.se.
On 13 Mar 2024, at 08:52, Jan-Åke Larsson <jan-ake...@liu.se> wrote:
Those are similarities in intent, not connections through actual similar mechanisms.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/74E5C2C9-3FF7-4E04-994E-DB271BFAE9F9%40gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CAN%3D2%2Bo0vnECuJqjG9bPH%2BH7BLj1B083GQ4v1mJbQEesG7Bs2Gg%40mail.gmail.com.
<Physical_Thinking_and_the_GHZ_Theorem-1.pdf>
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/em79cd1f29-0919-4ad3-bd3b-cb5e34c0c35d%404cd7e46e.com.
Dear Jan-Åke, dear Richard, dear all,
I completely agree with you, Jan-Åke, that quantum mechanics needs to be reformulated so that it can be understood.
What I can offer you all in that connection, is the content of the attached article, just finished, and intended as a conclusion after many years of rather intensive research with the goal to find a version that could be explained also to my colleagues, the statisticians.
In this article, the whole quantum formulation is derived from 6 postulates, postulates that in my opinion are much easier to understand than the ordinary formal apparatus. The basic notion is that of theoretical variables, which have connections to the outer world, but also are connected to an observer or to a group of communicating observers in some context. The theoretical variables may be accessible or inaccessible to the observer(s), again primitive notions, but regulated by the postulates.
The variables may be made more precise in several directions. If they are physical variables, a foundation of quantum mechanics is given. If they are decision variables, a foundation of quantum decision theory is the result.
The mathematical proofs are not given in this article, but in a long article just published in Foundations of Physics, together with another article submitted to the same journal.
In the present article, also explanations are given, using my theory, of the results of David Bohm's version of the EPR experiment, and of the results of the Bell experiments. Also, socalled paradoxes like that of Schrödinger's cat can be addressed.
It is interesting that links can be found from my theory to relativity theory and to quantum field theory. This is the content of a forthcoming book written together with the Indian physicist Harish Parthasarethy.
I have dicussed aspects of the theory with you, Richard, but I now miss a more broad discussion. I will post the article on arXiv and on the discussion forum Queios today, and it is also posted here.
Any feedback or comment wiil be welcome.
Best regards
Inge