Why are computer simulations easily able to detect the difference between classic and quantum models? Correlations between quantum particle pairs are alway strongly correlated with each other (example: if one is up, the other is down). But classic particle pairs only appear strongly correlated with each other when the classic particles are "strongly" aligned or anti-aligned with their BPS or GS deflector (example: BPS and classic photon initialized to nearly the same polarity or nearly 90° different polarity).
Simplified example in 2D: if the polarization of the BSP (Beam Splitting Polarizer) is 45°, then EPR (classical) photons emitted from the source with polarizations close to 0°, 90°, etc.) have a near equal probability of being detected as either 45° or 135°.
These classic particles (weakly aligned with their polarizer or deflector) will appear weakly correlated (unlike all quantum particle pairs or classical particles pairs wth initial polarizations closely matching or anti-bathing their BPS or GS deflector (strongly aligned with their polarizer or deflector) will appear strongly correlated).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/840a574e-6d9f-4bc6-9ee0-10c96c77f0e3n%40googlegroups.com.
![]() |
Department of Electrical Engineering SE-581 83 Linköping Phone: +46 (0)13-28 14 68 Mobile: +46 (0)13-28 14 68 Visiting address: Campus Valla, House B, Entr 27, 3A:512 Please visit us at www.liu.se |
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CAD%3DV2RtE6SVXHK58G%3DEpJc8pMh7QNp7m-ByXHa%3DfO9BJ4ZdYwQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi Jan-Åke,I do not appear to have access to your paper, but I am interested in studying it.
It is possible that the simulation math is lacking in some way, though Richard Gill did review and have me make several changes to the software in 2020, but he is not fluent in Java Script to verify claims I was making about the software, I shifted focus, and the review process did not come to a conclusion.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/66f64498-115a-0f8f-85a3-16df0f6e8f34%40liu.se.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/53d2c798-c088-45f3-ab41-a8d0758f745dn%40googlegroups.com.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bell inequalities and quantum foundations" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to Bell_quantum_found...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/Bell_quantum_foundations/CAD%3DV2RvN72SXTiin8HJnLqdHPTLsCLgNPD4FXbvXL4dEoLv2cw%40mail.gmail.com.