Bell inequalities and quantum foundations

Richard What would happen if your colored regions on the disk reduce to lines determining points on

Dear Alexei You misinterpret me. I think that good philosophers do not think obscurely. If their work

Maybe somebody can help me make out what this paper is actually saying. The author sent it to me

Adding to my last email: Pay attention to the bottle and glass. Geraldo A. Barbosa, PhD KeyBITS

Dear Bryan, Here is one explanation given to you back in October.. On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 10:49 PM

Hi Richard I like to visualise the physics within equations. Equations without the physics aren't

I disagree, Bryan has done some complicated manipulations in his papers. I can't believe he can

Very good, Mark! I missed this one. Sent from my iPad On 13 Jan 2026, at 23:37, Mark Hadley <

𝙷𝚎𝚢 𝚗𝚎𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚋𝚘𝚛𝚜! Richard 𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚢 Duct's 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚎'𝚜 𝚘𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚙 𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚒𝚏 𝚊 𝚏𝚎𝚠

Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: > From: Richard Gill > Date: 11 January 2026 at 13:

Fred Diether, Your responses to me and others in the group indicate that you are unable to engage

Joy, The point is 20 years of your work has been discredited by others and by me. You have confirmed

I deleted nothing. I'm not a moderator of this group. I stepped down from that job long ago. Sent

Alexandre, I guess you are busy... Here are some rules for the group for you to ponder. 1. Impolite

First we should define what a fanatics is. From an online dictionary, "filled with or expressing

Hmm... Strange as I thought there were more people in this group that think Bell was wrong. Never

Quadruple LOL! Now clueless BS is proving to us how clueless he really is by resorting to chatbots.

Well group, you just heard it from the horse's mouth. The Bell fanatic Mark doesn't want to

We're scheduling a dryer vent cleaning and if anyone else is interested, we can get a group

Einstein's Bodkin: Bell's Inequality Revisited https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

Dear Austin, In fact I agree with you that my expression in that simulation paper is not convincing

I meant to say, Richard is getting out while the gettin' is good. The inequalities are broken

I will not rest until justice prevails. You used this forum to promote, yourself, your ideas and your

I second the "please maintain some minimal standards of civilised discourse and of scientific

Anyone Interested? On Friday, October 17, 2025 at 6:01:23 PM UTC+5 Mary Diaz wrote: I'm having

Quantum mechanical phenomena are represented by the quantum state in Hilbert space, but observed in

CHSH is broken physics. It's that simple. Bell was wrong. On Friday, November 7, 2025 at 4:03:44

We're scheduling a dryer vent cleaning and if anyone else is interested, we can get a group

Apologies. On Friday, October 17, 2025 at 12:00:05 PM UTC+1 Jan-Åke Larsson wrote: No, I said there

With a statistical mixture of linearly polarized photon pairs, the highest visibility you can reach

Dear Bryan, I think that your model is consistent with my approach, and I encourage you to read about

Dear Jan-Åke, I have responded, read section 3 of the paper. To you I also state: put your objections

Viele Grüße