I have got 2 applications that are both using a lot of system resources. When I decrease the priority of one in Task Manager, while increasing the other, I don't notice any significant improvement in speed in the application with the higher priority.
The startup of the emulator is very slow. The good thing is that you only need to start the emulator once. If the emulator is already running and you run your app again, the emulator reinstalls the app relatively quickly. Of course, if you want to know how fast it will run on a phone, it is best to test it on a real phone.
The emulator seems to slow itself down when idle. This is made apparent by rapidly mousing over the keys on the side and observing the light-up responses. As a workaround, I pass -icount auto to QEMU when starting the emulator. You can make a batch file called my_avd.bat to do it for you:
The current (May 2011) version of the emulator is slow particularly with Android 3.0 (Honeycomb) primarily because the emulator does not support hardware GL -- this means that the GL code gets translated into software (ARM software, in fact) which then gets emulated in software in QEMU. This is crazy-slow. They're working on this problem and have it partially solved, but not with any sort of release quality.
Here's what you can try. It does speed up the emulator for me, especially during loading time. I noticed the emulator is only using a single core of the available CPU. I set it to use all available processors.
After developing for a while, my emulator became brutally slow. I chose wipe user data, and it was much much better. I am guessing that it takes time to load up each APK file you've deployed.
I had intermittent slow emulator (SDK v8.0) load times, up to three minutes on Intel Core i7 920 2.67 GHz CPU running on Xubuntu 10.04 VirtualBox 3.2.12 guest with Eclipse (3.6.1) loaded. I changed the VirtualBox guest memory from 1024 MB to 2048 MB and from that point on, I never experienced the slowness again (load times consistent at 33 seconds, CPU load consistent at 20%). Both Eclipse and the emulator are memory hogs.
Android emulator is dead slow. It takes 800MB memory while running.If you are on Windows, You can use Microsoft Android Emulator. It is superb, provides you functionalities more than Android Studio Emulator. And most important it is fast ( consumes 13MB only).It comes with Visual Studio 2015 Technical Preview. I am using it and happy with it. I downloaded and installed entire VS pack, I need to look how we can install VS Emulator only.
I noticed that the my emulator (Eclipse plugin) was significantly slowed by my Nvidia graphics card anti-aliasing settings. Removing 2x anti aliasing from the graphics menu and changing it to application controlled made it more responsive. It is still slow, but better than it used to be.
So I downloaded the new EA desktop app when EA Play came to gamepass yesterday and I tried downloading NFS Heat. I was surprised to see the download speed was going from 400kb/s to 900kb/s. I checked on every other launcher like Epic Games, Steam and even on the xbox app/microsoft store and I was getting 6-10mb/s download speeds on those. Any solutions to fix EA's terrible download speeds. I can't find any anywhere because this app is only new.
I've been reading up on why SCP on faster networks seems so slow, and it appears that most folks have tracked it down to the underlying SSH protocol and "statically defined internal flow control buffers" and that for the most part, no tweaking that you do will make a significant impact unless that underlying SSH protocol is rewritten to accommodate larger or dynamic buffers.
Luckily, it looks as if someone has done this and are getting great results. Like up to 1000% speed improvements in ideal conditions. 1 Gigabit speeds on 1 Gigabit networks. It kind of hints that unpatched systems benefit from working with a patched system, but its unclear if that's strictly for uploading to the patched system, or if it will speed things up for downloads from a patched system too, like to a Cisco router or switch for instance. The good news is, that Cisco is helping to fund this project, which I would think would increase the chances that they incorporate these changes into their products.
I have got a wireless connection to the internet. I have got two operating systems, one of them is Ubuntu 14.04 and the other one is Windows 7. My problem is, the downloading speed of the Ubuntu is much slower than the downloading speed of the my Windows OS. I can download 5 times faster with Internet Download Manager on windows than downloading the same file with FatRat, FlashGot, SteadyFlow, Axel, Uget, and even Wget on Ubuntu. It seems that the Ubuntu downloading speed is too slow. The same thing does NOT hold for loading web pages.
The other problem is, whenever I try to download something with ubuntu I get two options, one would be to download the file via one of the external programs that I have installed like Axel which would be gone through it via FlashGot on Firefox. Is not there any way to make the program like Axel or SteadyFlow to popup automatically whenever I click a download link? Just like internet download manager.
it's not really a "problem" on their end as much as a low priority server for Microsoft to run traffic through. Windows updates are painfully slow at the best of times and it's usually on their end compared to the quoted internet speeds of the users. -but at the end of the day, for Microsoft anyway, users getting updates is nearly a zero priority compared to other money making things they can use the same servers to host. It sucks but it's not unusual.
Not sure if the issue is at my end, but my download speeds for purchases have slowed to a trickle. I double-checked my broadband connection and I am getting fast internet, completely normal. But Install Manager download speed for products purchased today are fluctuating from 1.5 Mb/s to .180 Kb/s. Taking forever to download the latest Bluejaunte product, for example. Anyone with similar issue? I suspect that my carrier might be throttling downloads due to extraordinary pressure on telecom services. Hard to tell. Does anyone have feedback or similar experience to share?
One of the key factors in improving website speed with Google Tag Manager is to minimize the number of tags. Each tag added to your site comes with its own code and resources, which can contribute to increased page load times.
Collaborating with your development team is valuable for implementing long-term strategies to improve website speed. They can help identify areas where heavy DOM manipulation occurs and suggest alternative techniques or optimizations.
Unused tags, variables, or triggers that linger in your GTM container contribute to unnecessary processing and can slow down your website. By taking the time to review your container regularly, you can identify and eliminate these unnecessary components. This maintenance ensures that only essential elements are present, streamlining the overall operation of your GTM setup.
To avoid bloating and slow loading times, carefully consider your tag usage. Prioritize essential tags that most closely align with your goals and objectives and remove tags that are no longer relevant.
However, improper tag configuration, excessive use of tags, or inefficient firing rules can cause performance issues, leading to slower page load times and potential disruptions to the user experience.
First please note that IDM shows download speed in Bytes per second and some providers write their bandwidth in Bits per second. One Byte is 8 Bitsso download speed in IDM may be 8 times less than reported connection bandwidth.
I have the same problem on two different NVR's. Any TP-LINK Cameras I try and view playback from my Windows PC, the playback is very slow. You only see one second of video every five seconds or so. Live view and everything else is working fine. My Phone app also views playback fine. I have old onviv camera that play fine, it just seems to be with the c300 or c400 cameras. I have tried to downgrade the Vigi Security manager software on my Windows PC to ver 1.1.8 but makes little to no difference. I let it auto update again to the latest version 1.2.2, still the same. My friend has the same system and he is also having the same problem.
We currently have a problem where our authors are using big images on our AEM websites, making the pages very slow. I understand that each image from the dam has renditions, but we use them in a way where it can help us speed up our websites.
Injecting code via Google Tag Manager, or any 3rd party application, can cause slow mobile loading speeds to the detriment of SEO ranking. A potential workaround could be attaching a timer trigger to the Google Tag, containing the code, so that page content loads before the chat application.
This article will guide you on how to attach a 5-second trigger timer on a custom HTML Google Tag containing chat code. We will be using an example website so that you can see the impact that this fix has on page loading speeds and SEO ranking. We assume you know how to inject chat code through Google Tag Manager.
Tagging speed
View ad speed by elapsed time for different periods, including "Page navigation to tag loaded time," "Page navigation to first ad request time," and "Tag loaded to first ad request time." Measured in seconds.
While the script itself does not actually slow down the loading of any page on your website visibly or in real world browsing it does however return bad page experience and Core Web Vitals scores when testing the site speed in Google Page Insights. We have actually found a way to speed up Google Tag Manager script on your WordPress site.
Below are the scripts that were included in the Google tag manager for a WordPress website that we optimized. This is how the scripts were executing with the standard Google Tag Manager script that Google provides for you to embed into your website.
df19127ead