Just thought it would be interesting to note/summarise some of the different ways of understanding the mitzvah of appointing a king and the introductory words “when you come to the land…you will say, ‘let us appoint a king like all the other nations around us’”.
1)
King is good/mitzvah – the request for a king to be “like all the
other nations” is a prophecy of the incorrect way in the king would be
requested in the future in the times of Shmuel – to be “like all the other
nations” has idolatrous connotations (see Ramban quoting the opinion of R
Yehudah). However, the monarchy in essence is a positive thing.
2) King is good/mitzvah – there is nothing negative in the statement “like all the nations”. It reflects a normative national desire for someone to lead the nation, a strong leader who will organise, protect and strengthen them. “Like all other nations” reflects the common denominator between any state, the difference lies in the purpose not in the set up. According to Rambam the problem in the times of Shmuel was the rejection of Shmuel, nothing else.
3)
King is neutral – similar to the above, but it is
not a king per se, but rather the concept of a centralised form of government
which is critical –after entering the land, the people will naturally request a
form of political system as they seek to develop as a nation - in line with the
standard norms this took the form of a king, but the king is not essential to
the system. By addressing the request of the people in the affirmative, the
Torah is confirming the need to build up the people into a nation, though the
specific system remains the people’s choice. The Torah is confirming that the political
system of the “other nations” will be an important milestone. The Torah then
sets out, that if it is to be in the form of a king then his power needs to be
restricted in line with the following pesukim.
4) King is neutral – political systems are not really important – they can be either positive or negative. The main point is that when people ask for a king as they naturally would, there is a danger of arrogance which the Torah attempts to address by imposing certain restrictions.
5) King is bad – this is the position of the Abarbanel – he compares it to the mitzvah of yefat toar (i.e. better if never performed) – the statement “like all the other nations” represents the fundamental problem of a king, that it is merely to create national power and prestige. As a result, the king obtains absolute power, and as we know “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. The ideal is therefore a democracy.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "beisparsha" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beisparsha+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Indeed, the very long version is in Shmuel
Rafi Ganz
Deloitte LLP
Tel/Direct: +44 20 7303 4832
www.deloitte.co.uk
We
support and accelerate sustainable economic
growth and a prosperous society.
www.deloitte.co.uk/impact