On Jan 4, 2013 12:19 AM, "Elliot Temple" <
cu...@curi.us> wrote:
>
> Eagerness lowers status.
?!?!
> It is associated with children.
Oh! Now I know why people say I act like a child sometimes. I knew
they meant that something I did was like children do, implying that
typically adults don't do it, but I didn't pinpoint what exactly. I
didn't see a problem with it, so I didn't question it much. I like
children. I like how they behave/think. I like them better than
adults.
> And when it comes to interacting with people, eagerness communicates that you need them too much and lack other options. Or something along those lines.
WOW!
> But wanting to interact for mutual benefit, and being eager for such benefits, does not actually, rationally imply you lack other options or are needy or low status. Eagerness for your life, and to get anything good underway, is good, isn't it?
YES!
> People worry about giving too much away. About hiding their values. About letting others come to them. About hiding what they want so the price of it isn't raised. But why treat everyone as our enemies? And if someone actually acts like an enemy, not a cooperative friend, why interact with them at all?
hmm. I guess people are afraid of rejection (aka social disapproval).
> Is there anything actually bad about eagerness? Or is *all* the dislike of eagerness mistaken?
I've run into trouble with it before. I make a plan. I'm eager to do
it. Of course I know that the plan is fallible, meaning that it might
fail. But because I don't explicitly say that it might fail, and
because I look so eager, people think that I think that my plan is
fail-safe. WTF!? Why don't they understand fallibilism?
-- Rami