The Tartarian Banking Systems - Taken Over By The Rothschild Bloodline
Kurt Annaheim
When historians describe the rise of modern banking, they usually
focus on the Medi of
Florence, the merchant houses of Amsterdam, and the emergence of
central banks in the 18th
century. But the real story, the one that barely appears in
financial textbooks, the one
that even today sits buried in monastery archives and sealed
family vaults, began with
something far older. It started with a system that shouldn't have
existed. In 1743, a young
man named Mayor Amel Rothschild was born in Frankfurt, Germany.
By the time of his death in 1812, his family controlled the
largest banking network in
Europe. The official story is that he built this empire from
nothing. A poor Jewish merchant
who became a financial genius. But the documents tell a different
story.
Rothschild didn't build a banking system. He took over one that
already existed. A system
that spanned from Portugal to China. A system with branches in
cities that weren't supposed
to have sophisticated finance.
A system whose records predate the supposed invention of modern
banking by centuries. the
Tartarian banking network. And when the takeover was complete,
every trace of the original
system was erased from history. The first evidence comes from the
architecture itself.
In cities across Europe and Asia, buildings that are now
identified as banks, courouses, and
government offices share distinctive features. ornate facads with
specific symbolic
elements, pillars, domes, and geometric patterns that repeat
across cultures and continents.
Interior layouts that are remarkably similar despite being in
different countries with
different architectural traditions. Basement vaults that extend
far deeper than the
building's official construction dates would suggest. and most
significantly buildings that
local histories claim were constructed in the 1800s, but which
appear in paintings and maps
from centuries earlier. The Rothschild banking houses occupy many
of these buildings in
Frankfurt, in London, in Paris, in Vienna, in Naples.
Buildings that the Rothschilds supposedly commissioned, but the
architectural evidence
suggests these buildings existed before the Rothschilds arrived.
They didn't build their
empire. They moved into one that was already there. The Tatarian
banking system operated on
principles that modern finance has only recently rediscovered.
Documents recovered from a sealed archive in the Eural Mountains
describe a network of value
houses that operated across the old world before the current
historical era. These value
houses functioned as banks, but with significant differences from
modern institutions. They
issued standardized certificates backed by physical commodities,
gold, silver, grain, and
other tangible goods. They maintained a communication network that
allowed value to be
transferred across thousands of miles within days.
A capability that supposedly didn't exist until the telegraph.
They operated on a system of
mutual trust between houses with complex protocols for
verification and dispute resolution
and they charged no interest. The Tartarian system was based on
transaction fees and
commodity storage not usury. This is significant.
When the Rothschilds took over, the first thing they changed was
the introduction of
interestbearing debt. the foundation of modern banking, the
mechanism that has transferred
wealth from populations to banking families for three centuries.
The takeover began in the
1760s. Maya Amshel Rothschild, working as a dealer in rare coins
and antiquities, came into
contact with documents describing the old banking network.
The official history says he learned banking through his work with
the House of Oppenheimer,
but private correspondence that surfaced briefly in a 1923 auction
suggests something
different. A letter allegedly from Rothschild to his son Nathan
contains this passage. The
old system remains intact beneath the surface. Its houses still
stand.
Its vaults still hold their contents. What is needed is not
construction but occupation. The
families who operated it are scattered or eliminated. The
infrastructure awaits new masters.
The old system remains intact. The families who operated it are
scattered or eliminated. The
infrastructure awaits new masters. This letter was purchased at
auction by an anonymous
buyer.
It has not been seen publicly since, but the description matches
what happened. The
Rothschilds didn't slowly build a banking network over decades.
They rapidly expanded across
Europe in a single generation, establishing major houses in five
capitals simultaneously.
Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna, Naples.
Each house was run by one of Mayor's five sons. Each house
occupied buildings that the
architectural evidence suggests already existed. Each house
immediately had access to
sophisticated financial infrastructure that would have taken
decades to develop from
scratch. They didn't build the network.
They inherited it or more accurately they seized it. The original
operators of the Tartarian
banking system were known in the old documents as the keepers. The
Eural Mountain archives
described them as a hereditary class trained from birth in the
management of value and the
protocols of transfer. They maintained neutrality in political
conflicts.
They served all parties equally. They preserved their knowledge
through family lines that
stretched back centuries. And then between 1760 and 1815, they
disappeared. Not gradually,
not through natural decline.
They vanished from the historical record within a single
generation. The same generation
when the Rothschild network emerged. What happened to the keepers?
The documents don't say
explicitly, but they contain references to the displacement and
the transfer of authority.
The displacement, a coordinated removal of one banking class and
its replacement by another,
before we go deeper into these findings. Before we analyze the
financial mechanisms, the
architectural evidence, the documentary trail, and the deeper
questions about who controlled
global finance before the modern era. If you're interested in
these kinds of investigations,
make sure you're subscribed. It helps support the research and
lets me continue these long-
form deep dives.
Thank you. Now, as we move into the next section, we'll examine
what the Tartarian banking
system actually looked like and why it was replaced by something
fundamentally different.
The Tartarian system was decentralized. Each value house operated
independently, connected
to others through protocols rather than hierarchy.
There was no central bank, no single point of control, no
institution that could dictate
terms to governments. The Rothschild system was the opposite.
Centralized, hierarchical,
designed to concentrate control in a single family network. The
five Rothschild houses
didn't compete with each other.
They coordinated. They shared information across borders. They
moved capital in concert.
They presented a unified front to governments and institutions.
This gave them unprecedented power. A king who defied one
Rothschild house faced all five. A
government that couldn't repay one loan found all lines of credit
closed. A nation that
threatened Rothschild interests faced coordinated financial
attack.
This was not how the Tartarian system worked. The old system
served commerce. It facilitated
trade. It provided stability.
The new system served itself. It accumulated power. It made
nations dependent on debt. The
transformation happened in a single generation. and no one
recorded how the interest
mechanism deserves particular attention.
The Tartarian system, according to the recovered documents,
explicitly prohibited interest
on loans. This wasn't religious prohibition, though many religions
share this stance. It was
practical. The documents describe interest as the extraction of
value without creation and
warn that systems based on interest inevitably concentrate wealth
until they collapse.
The Tartarian bankers understood compound interest. They
understood that any system allowing
perpetual interest accumulation would eventually transfer all
wealth to the lenders. They
designed their system to prevent this. Storage fees for deposited
commodities, transaction
fees for value transfers, service fees for document verification.
These fees were capped. They were proportional to actual services
rendered. They could not
compound. The Rothschild system removed these caps.
Interest was charged on loans. Interest compounded over time.
Debts grew faster than
economies. Within a century, European governments owed the
Rothschild network sums they
could never repay.
By 1815, the family financed both sides of the Napoleonic Wars. By
1850, they controlled the
Bank of England's gold reserves. By 1900, their network had
spawned or controlled central
banks across the western world. This was not organic growth.
This was systematic extraction built on a mechanism the previous
system had explicitly
forbidden. The architectural evidence becomes more significant
when you examine the vaults.
Modern banks require security. They build vaults.
But the vaults beneath Rothschild associated buildings are
different. They're deeper than
the building's official construction dates would require. They're
more extensive than the
bank's stated purposes would justify, and they connect. In London,
tunnels link bank vaults
across the financial district.
In Paris, underground passages connect banking buildings that are
supposedly unrelated. In
Frankfurt, the old Rothschild properties sit above a network of
chambers that extend well
beyond their property lines. The official explanation is that
these tunnels were built for
security for moving gold without public exposure. But the
construction style of the tunnels
doesn't match. 19th century engineering.
The stonework is older. The dimensions are larger. The layout
suggests the tunnels predate
the buildings above them. The banks weren't built with vaults
beneath them.
They were built on top of vaults that already existed. Vaults from
the previous system.
vaults that the Rothschilds occupied but didn't construct. The
Napoleonic Wars provided
cover for the final consolidation. Between 1803 and 1815, Europe
was consumed by conflict.
Governments needed money for armies. The Rothschild network
provided it. But the terms were
extraordinary. The family didn't just loan money.
They demanded control. control of central bank policies, control
of government bond markets,
control of gold reserves. By the time Napoleon fell, the
Rothschilds didn't just finance
governments, they dictated to them. And during those same wars,
the last traces of the old
banking families disappeared. The keepers who had maintained the
Tartarian system for
centuries were gone by 1815.
Their records were seized, destroyed, or hidden. Their buildings
were occupied by new
owners. Their protocols were replaced by Rothschild procedures. A
financial system that had
operated for centuries was erased in a single generation.
And the new masters wrote the history books. The gold question
reveals another layer. The
Tartarian banking system, according to the recovered documents,
held vast reserves of gold
and silver. These reserves backed the certificates the system
issued.
When the Rothschilds took over, they took the reserves, too. But
the amounts don't add up.
The gold that appeared in Rothschild vaults after 1815 far
exceeded what could have been
accumulated through their known commercial activities. Nathan
Rothschild's famous
manipulation of the London Stock Exchange after Waterloo.
Buying while others sold, having received early news of Napoleon's
defeat, made him wealthy,
but not wealthy enough to explain the reserves. The gold came from
somewhere else. The
Tartarian vaults taken during the displacement, held in the same
underground chambers the
old system had built, claimed as Rothschild property with no
record of how it was acquired.
This is why the family's early history is so poorly documented.
This is why genealogical records before Mayor Amshell are
suspiciously thin. This is why the
architectural evidence contradicts the official timeline. They
didn't earn their initial
capital. They seized it from a system they then erased from
history.
The implications extend beyond finance. If the Tartarian banking
system really existed, if
it really operated on principles fundamentally different from
modern banking, then
everything we understand about economic history is wrong. We're
taught that modern banking
evolved naturally, that interestbearing debt is inevitable, that
concentrated financial
power is the only way complex economies can function. But the
Tartarian documents suggest an
alternative existed, a system without compound interest, a system
without centralized
control, a system that served commerce rather than extracting from
it.
This system was destroyed not because it failed, because it
succeeded too well, because it
distributed rather than concentrated. Because it couldn't be used
to control governments and
populations. The Rothschilds didn't improve banking. They
corrupted it.
They replaced a system designed for stability with one designed
for extraction. And they've
controlled the narrative ever since. The modern banking system is
the Rothschild system.
Central banks, compound interest, debt-based currency,
concentrated control.
Every element can be traced to the changes implemented after the
displacement. The Federal
Reserve, the Bank of England, the European Central Bank, all built
on Rothschild principles,
all operating on mechanisms the Tartarian system explicitly
prohibited. All concentrating
wealth in ways the old documents warned would lead to collapse.
We're living in the late
stages of that extraction.
Government debts that can never be repaid. Wealth inequality that
exceeds any previous era.
financial systems so complex that no one outside the controlling
families truly understands
them. This isn't an accident. This is the design.
A design implemented when the Tartarian system was destroyed and
replaced. A design that has
operated for three centuries. A design that enriches a few
families at the expense of
nations. The documents that reveal this history are scattered and
suppressed.
The Ural Mountain archives were partially destroyed in the Soviet
era. The 1923 auction
letter has never resurfaced. The architectural studies that reveal
the true age of banking
buildings are dismissed as conspiracy theory. But fragments
survive in family collections
that have kept records for generations.
In monastery libraries that preserved what secular authorities
tried to destroy. In the
buildings themselves whose stones tell a different story than the
plaques on their walls.
The truth is there for those who look. A banking system that
predated the Rothschilds.
A takeover that happened in a single generation. An erasia that
removed centuries of
financial history. And a family that still controls the mechanisms
of global finance. Still
operating the system they seized 250 years ago.
Still extracting wealth through compound interest. Still writing
the histories that hide
their origins. This concludes the documentary, but the
investigation has only just begun.
The Tartarian banking system existed.
The Rothschild takeover happened. The keepers were displaced. The
interest mechanism was
installed. And everything that followed, the central banks, the
national debts, the
financial crisis, the concentration of wealth flows from that
moment.
Something out of place, something out of time. The old system is
gone. The evidence remains
in the architecture, in the vaults, in the fragments of documents
that survived, and in the
financial structures that still extract wealth from populations
today. The same structures,
the same mechanisms, the same family.
For 300 years, some empires conquer with armies, others conquer
with ledgers. The
Rothschilds understood this and they built their empire on the
ruins of the one that came
before the bloodline. Question. The Rothschild family tree
presents its own anomalies.
Official genealogies trace the family to Isaac Elchan Rothschild,
born in Frankfurt in 1577.
Before him, the records become vague. The family supposedly took
their name from the red
shield, rot shield, that hung on their house in the Jewish ghetto.
But this origin story has
problems.
The red shield symbol appears on buildings across Europe and Asia
that predate the Frankfurt
ghetto by centuries. The same heraldic device, the same
proportions, the same placement. In
Tartarian architectural studies, the red shield is identified as a
marker, a symbol used by
the old banking houses to identify their properties. The
Rothschilds didn't create this
symbol.
They adopted it. Or more precisely, they were given it. Some
researchers believe the
Rothschild family didn't emerge from the Frankfurt ghetto at all.
They believe the family
was installed, placed in position by surviving elements of the old
system to serve as the
public face of the takeover.
The real controllers remained hidden. The Rothschilds became the
visible target, the name
everyone knew, while the actual power structure operated in
shadow. This would explain why
the family has been so resilient. Revolutions have toppled
governments.
Wars have destroyed nations. Economic crises have bankrupted
industries, but the Rothschild
network has survived everything. For 300 years, no family
maintains that kind of power
through luck. They maintain it through protection.
Protection from forces that remain unnamed in any public record.
The Five Arrows
The Rothschild family crest features five arrows held in a fist.
The official explanation is
that these represent Mayor Amshaw's five sons united in purpose.
But the five arrow symbol
predates the Rothschild family by centuries. It appears in
Tartarian documents as the symbol
of the Pentarchy, a council of five that allegedly governed the
old banking network.
Five regions, five houses, five bloodlines, each maintaining
autonomy while coordinating
through shared protocols. When the Rothschilds established their
five banking houses,
Frankfurt, London, Paris, Vienna, Naples, they replicated this
structure exactly. Five
cities, five brothers, five autonomous operations with coordinated
strategy. They didn't
invent this structure.
They copied it from the system they replaced. The five arrows
aren't a symbol of family
unity. They're a symbol of the old pentarchy adopted by new
masters who understood the power
of ancient symbols.
The Marriage Patterns
The Rothschild family has maintained unusual marriage practices
for three centuries.
Extensive intermarriage within the family. First cousins marrying
first cousins. Uncle
marrying niece.
Patterns that concentrate wealth and maintain bloodline purity.
The official explanation is
that this preserved the family fortune and maintained trust in a
hostile world, but the same
marriage patterns appear in descriptions of the keepers. The
Tatarian documents describe the
banking families as maintaining closed lineages, bloodlines that
rarely mixed with outside
populations. They believed that the ability to manage value, to
maintain trust across
distances, to operate the protocols of the system was hereditary.
It ran in families. It couldn't be taught to outsiders. It had to
be bred. The Rothschilds
maintained these practices not because they invented them.
They maintained them because they were required. By the system
they had joined, by the
protocols they had inherited, by the hidden masters they served,
the central bank network.
The establishment of central banks followed the Rothschild
expansion with remarkable
precision. Bank of England.
The Rothschilds became dominant shareholders in the early 1800s.
Bank de France established
under Napoleon with Rothschild involvement from the beginning.
Austrian National Bank
created in 1816 with significant Rothschild participation. Federal
Reserve established in
1913 with financial architecture designed by Rothschild connected
bankers.
Each central bank operates on the same principles. Private
ownership hidden behind public
mandates. The power to create currency from nothing. Interest
charged on money lent to
governments.
Nations perpetually indebted to institutions they don't control.
This is the Rothschild
system perfected. The Tartarian documents warned against exactly
this. When the power to
create value is separated from the creation of goods, those who
control value creation will
eventually own all goods.
This is precisely what has happened. Central banks create
currency. Governments borrow that
currency at interest. Taxpayers repay the interest through
perpetual labor.
Wealth flows from populations to banking families. for three
centuries and counting.
The Wars
Every major war since 1800 has been financed by Rothschild
connected banking networks. The
Napoleonic Wars, the Crimean War, the American Civil War, the
Franco-Russian War, World War
I, World War II. The pattern is consistent. Both sides receive
financing.
The winner repays with interest. The loser repays through
reparations and restructuring. The
bankers profit regardless of outcome. The Tartarian system
prohibited this.
The documents describe strict neutrality requirements, but also
prohibitions against
financing conflict. Value houses shall not provide resources for
destruction. Value exists
to build, not to destroy. Any house that finances war shall be
expelled from the network.
The Rothschild system removed this prohibition. War became the
most profitable enterprise.
Nations borrowed to fund armies. The destruction created demand
for reconstruction.
Reconstruction required more borrowing, an endless cycle of debt
and destruction, profitable
at every stage for those who controlled the lending.
The Gold Standard Manipulation
the Tartarian system backed its certificates with physical
commodities, gold, silver, grain,
tangible goods that held real value. The Rothschild system
maintained this appearance while
undermining its reality. The family accumulated gold not to back
currency fairly but to
control supply. By controlling gold reserves, they controlled the
value of currencies.
When they wanted to depress an economy, they removed gold from
circulation. When they wanted
to inflate an economy, they released gold back. Nations that
opposed Rothschild interests
found their gold reserves mysteriously depleted. Nations that
cooperated found credit
abundant and terms favorable.
This was not free market economics. This was financial warfare
waged through control of the
commodity that backed all currency. The Tartarian system
distributed gold storage across
hundreds of independent houses. No single entity could manipulate
supply.
The Rothschild system concentrated gold in family vaults. Total
control over the money
supply. Total control over every economy that used goldbacked
currency.
The Fiat Transition
The final stage of the takeover came in the 20th century. The
Tartarian system required
physical backing for all value certificates. This limited the
amount of currency that could
be created. The Rothschild system eventually abandoned even this
limitation.
The end of the gold standard 1971 in the United States. Earlier in
other nations, currency
no longer backed by anything physical. Value created by
declaration, by fiat. Banks could
now create unlimited currency, lend it at interest, collect real
goods and labor in
repayment for something created from nothing.
The Tartarian documents describe this as the final extraction.
When value is no longer tied
to creation, when currency exists by declaration alone, then all
that exists will eventually
be claimed by those who declare the currency. Nothing will remain
in the hands of those who
create. Everything will pass to those who declare.
This is where we are now. Fiat currency, infinite debt, endless
extraction. The final stage
of a system installed 250 years ago approaching its logical
conclusion.
The Digital Transition
The next phase is already underway. Central bank digital
currencies CBDC's. Digital money
issued directly by central banks. Traceable, programmable,
controllable.
Every transaction visible to the banking authority. The ability to
freeze accounts
instantly. The ability to program money to expire, forcing
spending. The ability to restrict
purchases, certain goods blocked for certain people, total
financial control.
The Tatarian system was designed to prevent exactly this, physical
certificates, bearer
instruments, private transactions. The system preserved anonymity
and individual control.
The Rothschild system has progressively eliminated both from gold
to paper to digital. Each
step removing individual control.
Each step increasing central authority. Each step approaching
total dominance. CBDC's are
the final step. When all money is digital, when all transactions
attract, when all accounts
can be frozen, the extraction will be complete.
Everything will belong to those who control the ledger. Nothing
will remain for those who
labor.
The Resistance
Not everyone accepted the Rothschild takeover. Throughout the 19th
and 20th centuries,
leaders who challenged the banking system met consistent fates.
Andrew Jackson, who
destroyed the second bank of the United States, survived
assassination attempt. Abraham
Lincoln, who issued greenbacks instead of borrowing from banks,
assassinated.
James Garfield, who spoke against banking monopolies,
assassinated. William McKinley, who
maintained gold standard against banking interests, assassinated.
John F. Kennedy, who
issued silver certificates bypassing the Federal Reserve,
assassinated.
The pattern is difficult to ignore. Leaders who cooperated with
the banking system remained
in power. Leaders who challenged it were removed. The Tartarian
documents describe similar
patterns in the old world.
Those who threaten the value network will be removed. The network
protects itself. No king
is above the ledger. No emperor is beyond the account.
The same mechanism, the same enforcement, different names,
different centuries, same system.
The Families Today
the Rothschild family remains active in global finance. They
prefer privacy now. Their
direct holdings are obscured behind layers of corporations,
foundations, and trusts. But
their influence continues, investment banks, asset management,
commodity trading, wine, art.
Their estimated wealth is unknowable, deliberately so. Forbes and
Bloomberg cannot track
assets hidden in family offices and private holdings. Estimates
range from billions to
trillions. No one outside the family knows the true figure, and
the family isn't talking.
What is known? The same financial mechanisms installed in the
1800s continue to operate.
Central banks still create currency and lend at interest.
Governments still carry perpetual
debt.
Wealth still concentrates at the top while populations labor
below. The system functions
exactly as designed, extracting, accumulating, controlling for 300
years without
interruption.
The Buried Evidence
the evidence for the Tartarian banking system remains scattered.
The Eural Mountain archives
were partially accessible until 1937. Then Stalin's purges sealed
what remained. The 1923
auction documents have never resurfaced.
The buyer was never identified. The architectural studies that
demonstrate pre- Rothschild
dating of banking buildings are dismissed without examination. The
family correspondence
that might reveal the true nature of the takeover remains in
private vaults unavailable to
researchers. But fragments continue to surface.
A document here, a photograph there, a family collection that
preserved what officials tried
to destroy. The picture is incomplete, but it's coherent. A
banking system existed before
the one we know. It operated on different principles.
It was displaced by a family that claimed what they didn't build.
And the new system has
extracted wealth from humanity ever since.
The Final Question
the question that haunts all of this research is simple. Was there
an alternative? Could the
Tartarian system have continued? Could we have had banking without
compound interest,
finance without perpetual debt, commerce without extraction?
The documents suggest yes. The system worked for centuries. It
facilitated trade across
continents. It maintained stability through generations.
It failed only because it was destroyed, not through competition,
not through innovation,
not through natural evolution, through deliberate attack. The
keepers were eliminated. The
infrastructure was seized. The principles were inverted.
And we've lived with the consequences ever since. Inflation, debt,
crisis, concentration.
These aren't natural features of economics. They're designed
features of the Rothschild
system.
A system built on the corpse of something better. Something we
were never supposed to know
existed.
Conclusion
The Tartarian banking system was real. The Rothschild takeover was
real. The transformation
of global finance from service to extraction was real. And the
system that emerged continues
to operate today.
In every central bank, in every national debt, in every percentage
of interest, in every
foreclosure and bankruptcy and financial crisis, the same
mechanism, the same beneficiaries,
the same extraction for 300 years, something out of place,
something out of time. A better
system existed once. It was destroyed so that a few families could
accumulate what all of
humanity produced. The buildings still stand.
The vaults still hold their secrets. The ledgers still extract
their tribute. And somewhere
in sealed archives and private collections, the evidence waits.
Evidence of what was taken.
Evidence of who took it. Evidence of the world that might have
been. If the keepers had
survived. If the old system had continued.
If finance served humanity instead of feeding on it. That world is
gone now. But knowing it
existed changes everything because what was built once can be
built again. And what was
taken can perhaps one day be reclaimed.
This concludes the documentary. But the investigation has only
just begun. The Tartarian
banking system existed. The Rothschild takeover happened.
The extraction continues. And the choice of what comes next
belongs to those who finally
understand what was done. Some empires conquer with armies, others
conquer with ledgers. The
question now is whether we remain in the ledger or whether we
finally close the book.
This documentary presents historical analysis and alternative
interpretation for educational
discussion. The claims regarding the Rothschild family are based
on documented historical
activities combined with speculative frameworks regarding
premodern banking systems. Further
research is encouraged. The financial decisions you make should be
based on your own
investigation and professional advice.