
Energy
Technology, Giants, Pyramids, CIA, and Ancient Civilizations
More Advanced Than Ours
Raw Transcript:
Why Does the Science Community Refuse to Admit When They’re Wrong?
AJ,
thank you for doing this. Thanks for having me. Um, you become
huge for a good reason.
You
want to hear my macro explanation for your success? Oh, I
honesty is always the fir, you know, that's always and honesty
good
BS filter, but you expose the deepest truth of all, I think,
which is
there's
a lot of stuff we don't know and we pretend to know. we like
things are not especially the past is not settled
like
at all and there's just a lot that we don't understand and I
don't understand why we won't admit we don't
understand
it whole parts of science archaeology especially but many others
medicine
just won't admit that we don't know what is that I think people
don't like to admit when
they're
wrong would be my guess um I certainly don't I try to because
I'm
wrong a lot I am too um but we admit it And I there's
something
about the scientific community that the so-called mainstream
that just doesn't want to be wrong. Yes.
Maybe
there's a financial aspect to it, grants and so forth. Maybe
there's ego involved, but I I I think it's nothing
more
than that. It's just it's just a human frailty. It turns you
into a liar, though.
It
does. You have to like make the decision, is my pride more
important or the truth more important? And you have to choose
truth.
And I don't think that's common. And if you're if you need a
grant from
the
government, yeah, you need to put in that grant application
what's going to get you paid, what's going to keep your research
going,
even if it's not exactly what you believe or what the even what
the evidence shows. Yes.
What
I don't understand is the extreme hostility against alternate
archaeology.
Uh
yeah, I of course I agree and I'm I'm hostile to the hostility,
but I but I like you, I don't actually
understand
what is that. Why would that be why is it the default position
of the media that anyone who asks questions
about
obvious mysteries is maligned? Like what is that? I don't know.
I think
we
should as a species be interested in in pursuing things we don't
know. Yes.
And
be open to any theory. any theory of course. Um,
I
mean, Isaac Newton was wrong about so many things, but he he was
right for a good a good amount of while.
Exactly.
He was wrong about the philosopher stone, but he got some stuff
right. But, um, when someone like Graham Hancock,
whose
work I admire, I don't agree with all of it, but I admire his
tenacity. Oh, yeah. And persistence.
To
call him a racist, it was like, you're calling him a racist now.
Uh, that was when Ancient Apocalypse
season
1 came out. He became I forget it was in a UK paper. It was the
most
dangerous
show on television because he was promoting um white supremacy
because
these
ancient civilizations had to be white, which he never says. He's
married
to
a woman of color. Um he never says any of that, but that became
the narrative that he's a racist. And then
they
tried to get that show pulled. What? Yes. But Oh gosh. I didn't
I interviewed him
once.
I thought it was the most interesting thing I've ever heard. And
Huh, that's amazing. But why would why
would
you do that? Why would you make up a slur like that to destroy
someone
who's
studying the you know some events that happened presumably
thousands of years ago, the past who's an archaeologist? What
why is he a threat
to
you? I'm not really sure. Um that's sinister though if you think
about
it. It is. Someone like Zahiwas is certainly infamous in
Egyptology.
And
there was there was one there was one time, I don't remember
when it happened,
where
Graham was going to debate Z about their theories. Z refused. He
walked out
and
said, "I don't even want to hear what you have to say." Okay.
So, for people who don't, and I
don't
want to confuse anyone watching. Um, so let's just start at the
beginning. We're talking about Egyptology in the specific case,
the
pyramids,
the tombs. Um, what do we know about the pyramids? What do we
actually know rather than what we've been told,
What Do We Know About the Pyramids and Giants?
but
like what can we be certain of? Be certain of. I don't think we
can be certain of anything. Like we can't be
certain
of when they were built. Some of them we can, but the pyramids
are strange because it it seems like the
ones
that were built earlier are more perfect than the later
pyramids. Huh.
Which
suggests that maybe you certainly I subscribe to the theory that
the Egyptians did not build like
the
the like like kufu. They I think they found that. Um
I
think they I think they they found that and then tried to
replicate it later on and couldn't quite get it right.
Why
don't we know when they were built? Well, you can't really can't
carbon date it. But what about the mummies we found
inside
all the pyramids? I've never found a mummy in a pyramid. Never.
What? No, there's we've never found a
mummy
in a pyramid. I thought the mummies were from the pyramids. No,
they're not. Um, no mummies been
found
in a pyramid. Maybe they were placed in certain structures later
on like Valley of the Kings and so forth,
but
like the Great Pyramid of Giza, that's no mummy's been found
there. There's a there's a giant box in the
king's
chamber that's said to be a sarcophagus, but it's not the right
shape or size for a mummy.
Huh.
So there are no organic objects found in the Great Pyramid, for
example, that would suggest when it was built?
No
organics? No. Huh. But there are strange things about the
pyramid,
like chemical residue at certain at certain openings, shafts
that
suggest
maybe the pyramid had other uses that that are really not
acceptable to mainstream.
Of
the objects that have been found in the pyramids in the tombs,
are there any that we can't explain? any that we can't
explain?
I don't think so. Um, there's a lot of objects that we are not
allowed
to see still. Still, sure. I mean,
you
look at the Smithsonian, I think, has a billion artifacts. We're
not allowed to see hardly any of those. Um,
they
kind of just swoop in and just just take those. So, I don't
think there's any unexplainable objects.
Can
you petition the Smithsonian to see artifacts? Sure, you can.
And
but you're not going to be able to do that. Smithsonian is a
weird organization. Um
throughout
throughout the history of the organization, we have records of
them receiving bones of giants and and
artifacts
that that are kind of hard to explain. We have records of them
receiving it, but then they lose them or
they
deny ever having them. And the Smithsonian, which is a
government
institution,
is exempt from a lot of law. Like not
too
long ago, a law was passed that if any museums are in possession
of
tribal,
like Native American artifacts, specifically funeral artifacts,
they're
to
be returned to the tribes. Bones. Yeah. Bone. Anything. Anything
except the Smithsonian. They don't have to do that.
May
May I ask? Okay. So, couple things, but I just I don't want this
to slip by. So, you're referring to the claim
um
that the Nephilim as described in Genesis 6, this race of giant
people who were a hybrid between the spirit world
and
the human world, and they're the reason that God sent the flood.
This is all described in Genesis. They were
giants.
They were great men of old, I think, is the phrase. The claim
from some people is that was
that's
actually real. And the fossil record proves it's real because
giant bones, human bones, have been found
through
the years and that some or a lot of them wound up in the
Smithsonian where their existence was suppressed.
Yes.
And you're saying there's actually documentary evidence that
that may be
true.
Yes. There's document documentary evidence that the the
Smithsonian has received bones and large coffins from
not
that long ago. We're talking maybe the 50s or 60s and as
recently as the 80s people have been trying to get
access
to this information but it's they're stonewalled or they just
don't have it. And there was one case where
the
Smithsonian said we yes we did receive the bones but we don't
know where they are. And well if you received
human
bones that were larger than any human bones ever described in
literature ever other than Genesis 6 kind of a big
story
right? Yeah. Yeah. And you see that story repeated over and over
again, especially
in
America for hundreds of years. Even native tribes have stories
about giants
have
having wars with giants, driving giants across the country to um
the
famous
one is the Lovelock cave, which is in California. These are the
redheaded giants and red hair has been
found
in that cave and giant sandals and clothing that is enormous
actually.
Yes.
um on display, but it's always an explanation. Oh, it's, you
know, it's
it's
symbolic. It's allegory or whatever it is. But that's not what
the native people say. They say that this was a
cannibalistic
tribe that they cornered in a cave and sealed it and set it set
them
on fire essentially. And if you go to that cave, there is
residue of the fire. Um, there was one tribal leader
who
wore strands of red hair in her clothing for years. That good
look her
up.
She's pretty famous. So what? And this is pre Columbus's
landing.
That um that incident
maybe,
maybe not. It would be hard to hard to say. It's just hard to
see why redheaded people would be on the North American
continent.
You mean talking about like Neanderthal DNA? Yeah. I mean, why
would they be redheaded? Like, none of the people we
believe
lived on this continent before the Europeans arrived were
redheaded. They were all darkhaired. True. But if it's giants,
then this is
DNA
that's a little different than ours. So maybe that's what they
were. Has this ever been tested by anybody?
No.
Christmas feels like just yesterday, but in fact, it's already
time to think
about
Lent. Lent. Lent is a great chance to step back, examine our
lives, and
decide
whether or not we're headed somewhere worth going. This Lent, we
strongly recommend the world's top
number
one prayer app. It's called Hallow. It's Lent prayer challenge
starts February 18th. It's called Pray
40,
The Return. Transformation does not start with improvement. No,
transformation starts
with
repentance. the courage to admit that you are lost and change
direction.
Pray
40 forces you to confront that responsibility, forgiveness, and
what it means to truly repent and live a life of
meaning
by following Jesus. Every day, enjoy simple, deliberate prayer.
No
spectacle,
no performance, just silence, honesty, and one small step toward
renewal.
This is not about fixing your life overnight. It's about
beginning the
journey
home. Pray 40, the return starts Wednesday, February 18th, and
runs right
So,
I guess this is the macro question, just to circle back to the
first exchange. Why would the US government
Why Would the U.S. Government Suppress the Truth About Giants?
have
an interest, clearly they do, in suppressing this and waving
people off?
Boy,
I hate to say I don't know, so many times, but I I I really
don't. Um, you
know,
there's a famous story about uh connected to giants about GE
Concincaid who explored the Grand Canyon. This is
the
early 1900s, I think like 1908, 1909. and his story ended up in
the
Arizona
Gazette where he was uh kind of rowing down the Colorado River
and he
finds
these steps that go into a hole in the side of the canyon and he
goes and he explores it and he's kind of mapping
it
and inside he finds basically the remains of an ancient city,
artifacts, a
giant
statue that kind of looks like Buddha but but not quite,
hieroglyphics that kind of look Egyptian but not
quite.
and he comes out and he's um putting together an expedition and
when it's
time
to go back and explore he never shows up. And that story was in
the papers. What bothers me about that one,
it's
it's one of the mysteries I that I really wish I knew is that
you can find
you
can find that opening in the Grand Canyon and it's covered with
an iron gate and above that area of the canyon
is
a no-go zone. You cannot go there. You can't walk there, but
some people
have.
Some people have. And you can see embedded into the top of the
cliff
there,
iron hooks and equipment that would be used maybe to repel down
the
side
of the cliff. But when you do go there, suddenly white planes
will
appear.
And you can't fly over the Grand Canyon. But these white
unmarked planes can't fly over the Grand Canyon. No. And black
helicopters will appear.
And
you can't do that over the Grand Canyon. You can you can see
this episode on my
channel
um where I linked to the full video of these people going up
there and there are the helicopters and there's
the
plane and eventually they're park rangers or whatever throw them
off
the
property. That bothers me. You think? And nobody will tell us
why.
So,
not I've never heard any of that before, but um as a general
matter, there's very clearly a coordinated
long-standing
effort by the US government, specifically US government, to bat
away speculation about the past.
Yes.
And to shut down any thinking about whether or not the things
we're looking
at
could be supernatural in any way. They're all natural
phenomenon. That's that's what we know. But anything that
suggests
like supernatural is just ruthlessly put down. I wouldn't see
giants as supernatural.
I
that's that's a that's a that's an animal. That's a creature.
That's a mammal. That's right.
So
I don't know why that is so dangerous. I don't I don't either. I
mean, but that's kind of the question. Like you
see
the truth in the reaction, I guess, is what I'm saying. Like why
why would you why do you care? Right. For how long, you know,
how long
were
the Clovis people were the first people in America and that was
if you said that anyone was here before them,
you
were ridiculed. But we keep finding artifacts that are older and
older and thousands of years older.
And
of course, nobody from the Pacific could have made it to the
Americas that
long
ago. But that's been proven that tribes in East Ecuador on the
Atlantic
side
have DNA from Polynesian people that goes back thousands of
years. So
there
has been contact of civilizations going back as far as we can
remember
clearly
and we know that from sacred art ancient art on you know five
different
continents
we see the same images the birdman the purse yes so I mean I
think you've done work
on
this and it's like what is the explanation for that how could
people living on separate continents before
transatlantic
communication come up with precisely the same images clearly
they're
responding to something They're all seeing what they must be
communicating. So what what is that?
The
birdman, for example, this image which is throughout Latin and
North America, also Europe, also Africa, also
the
Near East, also the Far East. It's a sacred image carved on
walls on pottery
of
a birdfaced man with wings. What is that? How they all think of
that?
Easter Island. Easter Island is Yeah. is also very, very
strange. Um, the Birdman, I think.
Boy,
I can get really woo woo with this. It could be a metaphor for a
sky god. It
could
be or an angel or or an angel. Looks a lot like the angels
described in the Old Testament. Just saying.
It
it does. And um there are plenty of passages in both old and new
testament
and
even in in apocryphal works like book of Enoch where describing
angels
but
describing them a way that sound kind of like the birdman or
sound almost like an alien entity. Um I think it was
maybe
the book of Daniel describes a man who's who's glowing with
topaz
and
um I think Elijah was taken up to heaven. um no one's allowed to
mortally
go
to heaven, but he was taken and shown. And Ezekiel talks all
about visions of this futuristic city that he
thought
was going to be a new temple of Solomon, but it sounds like a
city. And
in
uh that's after he describes UFOs as wheels in the sky and all
that. Those are the wheel, but that shows up
over
and over again. And Enoch is also taken up by Uriel and shown
how the
winds
are made. and he describes the heavens in in ways that we're not
supposed to know at that time. So
there's
some there's something to it. Um all religions have these. If
the Vetic
texts
have very similar stories to these where um Arjuna goes up and
sees the
heavens
and sees these flying vehicles that were called vammana that vom
are described in such detail that they
describe
the technology of how they worked with rotating mercury and and
and engineering specifications in texts that
are
the thousand BC. Same with Buddhist, Hindu. It's all all very
similar
stories.
Coming back to the pyramids. Yes. Um so we don't know when they
were
How Were the Pyramids Built?
built.
We cuz how could we know? But the Egyptian government and the
archaeological
community is totally vested in telling us they know exactly when
these were built. But in point of fact, we don't know and can't
know. No
mummies
have been found in the pyramids. I didn't know that till you
told me. But critically from my perspective was like
how
were they built? Do we know? We don't really know. uh the the
conventional story is ramps and pulleys,
right?
But I you know I think it's been mathematically shown that the
the amount
of
ramps and pulleys and equipment that you would need to build the
pyramids would exceed the weight of the pyramids
themselves.
I mean, how long will the ramp have to be to go up? I mean, it
it just doesn't make any sense. Um no one
can
really explain it. and the precision of of how these stones were
cut. We can
only
barely match it now. And this is this is supposed to be bronze
bronze
age.
Yes. Done with bronze soft metal. Soft metal cutting the hardest
granite
in
the world. Um it defies explanation, but that's the
explanation.
And why why is the pyramid made of all these different
materials? Why not just make it out of out of the
whatever
sandstone you have lying around? Why why bring in tour
limestone? Why use rose granite in certain places?
I
didn't know that. Well, rose granite is is very special because
it's highly poolectric, meaning
if
you apply pressure to it, it creates voltage. So, that's one of
the theories about the pyramid is the the grand
gallery
leading up to the king's chamber is lined with rose granite. You
don't see it anywhere else in the pyramid. So
that's
highly conductive. Um the exterior of the pyramid was covered in
tour limestone which is um an insulator.
So
you you have this structure that's almost designed like an
electricity generator and then you have the queen's
chamber
and some other shafts where there's chemical residue that when
combined create an enormous amount of
hydrogen
gas that then flows up through the Grand Gallery um expands,
creates
electricity
with this rose granite which ionizes the air. And then at the
time
there
were these slats, 24 slats of wood that would create sound and
which would
amplify.
And what's strange is leading from the Grand Gallery into the
King's Chamber is a is a small hole. I forget
what
it was. Maybe it's 6 3x six. It just happens to be the right
size to be a wave guide for hydrogen atoms. So
those
flow then into the king's chamber and this resonates at a at a
frequency. I think it's 440 hertz, but it's it's
like
a an F sharp. And then and then above the king's chamber is a
stone
called
a relieving stone. And this is said to help relieve the pressure
coming
from
the top of the pyramid. The thing is, it doesn't connect to
anything. It's perfectly flat on the bottom, but it's
chipped
on the top almost as if someone was tuning chipping away almost
like a
tuning
fork to get the right frequency. Now, I'm not saying that's what
it is. saying there's a lot of science there
that
makes you wonder why did why go through all this trouble for a
tomb and there's no writing in there.
There's
no writing in the great No, there's no there's no there's no
writing in there. Um there was some
writing
found in expedition I think it was in the 80s
where
a robot was sent in. They found a door with copper handles which
are not
supposed
to be there. the other side of the door were it looked like
hieroglyphics but they were not. Um and
that
eventually was suppressed and the explanation was well that was
like the signature of the masons who built it or
something
like that. Well, let's have a look at that footage. Well, you
can't really get a hold of that.
What?
So, I there's all these strange things about the pyramid that
that we just can't go. We can't dig. I don't
know
if you saw my episode on the on the labyrinth at Hara, but it's
that one really bothers me because that that's an
ancient
legend that goes back to Heroditus and even before talked about
this this labyrinth in Haru. It's about
50
mi from Cairo. That this labyrinth was was enormous, a
thousand
3,000 rooms. And um and the priest said this was built by the
ancients, the ancient kings. Oh, you
mean
the pharaohs? And they said, "No, no, the ones the ones before
from Zeppi, which was the first time." Well, the the
labyrinth
was talked about by Heroditus, by by Plenny, by by Strao, by all
these
famous
historians. It's there. It's there. It's there. It's it's
bustling and eventually just sort of disappears
from
history and becomes a legend. Well, it gets rediscovered at the
early like
late
19th century and during the colonial period. Yes. But we're not
allowed to dig or go
down
there. But recent technology like ground penetrating radar, LAR
from space shows
that
there's stuff down there. Um, the explorer who found it thought
he found
the
foundation of the labyrinth and was very excited about it. It
turned out what he found was the roof. So the liar
is
showing these giant spaces underneath the ground that are feet
thick of heavy
granite
with all these spaces in between. And in the center of this
giant
atrium
is a 150 ft metallic ring that
nobody
can explain. And boy, I'd like to I'd like permission to dig or
see what's
down
there. And the tragedy is the water table is eroding all of that
away. And
geologists
are saying, "Look, we have to do we have to preserve this
because this is going to be gone in a 100 years, 200
years.
We can't stop that." The answer is no. Can't dig. We're not
going to
prevent
the water from eroding it. Leave it be. The incuriosity about
the monuments,
ancient
monuments in Egypt, is pretty shocking. I mean, it was only when
the French showed up briefly that we got the
Rosetta
Stone and figured out what hieroglyphics were. And it was only
under the British that any of this was excavated. Howard Carter
was British who
found
King Tut's tomb. It's like and then the Brits leave after the
Second
World
War and it's like not really a huge effort to find out anything
else. Like what is that? I is it Egyptian
national
pride? I I I don't I don't know. These things are are more
important than any nation.
Of
course. So I I I don't know. But do you think the Egyptian
government, which is the
Has the Egyptian Government Covered up Information About Its Monuments?
second
largest recipient of US aid, maybe that's related in some way,
has actively covered up information about
its
monuments? Yes. I mean, we have evidence of it. Um, tell me. Uh,
there's I think I think it was
called
the tomb of the birds was discovered not too long ago. I I
forgot the scientist. I wish I remembered his name, but I
recently did an episode on
him.
I just discovered this this ancient tomb, this these caverns in
in Egypt.
And
there I mean it's it's sprawling and it's clearly man-made and
there's there's artifacts and there's there's
writing
there's all these kinds of things and he does the right thing
and reports it to the authorities. Well, he's banned from the
country and uh
what
yeah thrown out he's banned from the country can no longer do
any research and Zahwas says oh he always knew that
was
there and um who who did you refer to? Zahwas. Zahwas. Once
again, um he was in he was
the
his title was something like this the supreme leader of the the
Council of
Egyptian
Antiquities. Some crazy title. And he's he's still running
interference. He's supposedly retired
but
still runs interference. And there's video of him repelling down
into the caves kind of exploring them saying,
"Look
at what I have discovered." So what do you think the motive is
there?
Some
of that is ego. Um, I don't know the the deeper political
motives. I really don't know whether
it's
Egypt or our government. I I don't know. But I but it bothers
me.
So,
what do you think? Um, since we don't know anything like the
basic questions, if this were we were writing
a
police report, we'd have to leave every line blank cuz we just
don't know. When was it built? Who built it? How did
they
build it? Unknown. Unknown. Unknown. So, since you know a great
deal about
this
topic, hypothesize for a minute. What do you think this is?
I
think the clearest evidence comes from um maybe Robert Shock's
work and John Anthony West and certainly Randall
Carlson
at the erosion patterns at the base of the Sphinx. You've heard
about this. Yes. Yes. Which clearly shows
water
and and a lot of it a lot of water moving at high speed for a
long time
which
would indicate a great flood. And I think all of these stories
kind of go
back
to the one the story which is the story of the great flood that
probably
connects
to the end of the younger dry whether that's the Greenland
impact theory or a solar event or whatever it
is.
Something happened that caused worldwide floods
and
eroded that sphinx which means it was there 13,500 years ago or
older.
These
would be the floods that the the Old Testament says were sent to
eliminate the Nephilim.
Correct.
Um or there's another story of Napishim. I don't know if you
know him from he's from Gilgamesh. And his story
goes
like this. Um one of the gods Anki who is u you may know as an
Anunnaki
god.
Anki tells Pishnam, "A flood is coming to reset mankind. I want
you to
build
a boat and here are the specifications. Take your family on the
boat. take the animals on the boat. The
floods
come. He's saved. He releases a dove and a raven. He finds land.
He
lands
on a mountain. He offers a sacrifice. And he's granted
immortality
with
God. And that story sounds awfully familiar. It does indeed.
And
tell me again, where is this story? That's in Gilgamesh. Oh,
that's in Gilgamesh. How did I miss
that?
It's because it's a small part of it. You know, Gilgam, it's
Gilgish is a heroic epic. This is, you know, a side
story,
but it's interesting that it's it's telling the story of Noah.
It right down to the dove and the raven.
That's
wild. The only thing different is I think they're reversed. And
I think um the dove comes back with the olive branch or
Is There Physical Evidence of a Great Flood?
something
in Noah's. Is there physical evidence around the world of of a
great flood? Yes, all over the place. Um,
uh,
Carlson's work is fascinating about the erosion patterns all
across Africa
that
show the if you look at it from high in the sky, it looks like
these kind of just
waves
across the landscape, but these waves are 30 ft high. So these
are this
is
threetory buildings indicating an immense amount of water,
millions and
millions
of gallons of water per second just rushing across the
landscape. And we see that across across Africa, a
desert.
What about in the continental United States?
Not
as much. I, you know, I could be wrong about that because
because the ice sheets would have come from the North
American
continent. So, how they get to Africa, I'm not exactly sure. Um,
but
we certainly have evidence of of the glaciers moving and and
retreating very quickly in the United States. I mean,
that's
how Long Island was made. other parts of course I mean the whole
country was was sculpted by them not that long ago
Maine
was covered them 11,000 years ago right it's like yesterday
right the pyramids were there they were there
I
mean gocly is another thing that we can't explicit go is pre
flood this is a
pre-duvian
structure not supposed to happen where is it in Turkey that's
that's where all the
good
stuff is in in Turkey um tell tell us what that is
an
ancient site. It's about 13,000 years old. Could be wrong on the
date, but I'm pretty close. And um it it's it's
pillars
arranged in that align with astrological formations that align
with the seasons. They're carved with
intricate
designs, animals, writing, all kinds of stuff. And we're not
supposed
to
have we're supposed to be hunter gatherers with, you know, with
spears and buffalo at this point, not building
these
immense structures. And what's really strange about Quebec is
Not hunter gatherer behavior. No, it is not. That's very
sophisticated
behavior.
It appears that it was buried intentionally. I can't explain
why, but
maybe
it was someone knew something was coming and we need to protect
this site, but that's very strange. That's not even
the
oldest structure we found. Karan is even older than Quebec. So,
how well
2026
is likely to be the year that some companies will find
patriotism. They'll discover it. During the Biden years,
corporate
America thought hating our country was the thing to do, so they
did it. Now that we're in a new era, they
are
coming back to reality. It's not real, though. It's a trick.
They don't mean it at all. Black Rifle means it.
And
they've been doing it since day one. Not just discovering
patriotism. They were founded on the premise. As this
country
celebrates 250 years of existence, Black Rifle is brewing bold
American roasted beans built for people
who
believe in the values that made America great. So, kick off 2026
with roast made for patriots, not spectators.
And
for the new year, Black Rifle is launching cold brew coffee cans
in just black and vanilla. Powerful, smooth, and
made
in America. Want something even more explosive? Try Grape X or
Tiger Strike. Woo! Their new zero sugar energy
drinks
with 200 mg of caffeine. That's about half the output of a
nuclear power
plant,
but it's clean energy for Americans doing business. Visit
wherever
great products are sold. Black Rifle Coffee, Veteran Founded,
America Roasted. It's America's coffee. Well,
Ancient Civilizations and Their Advanced Technology
the
first thing I think you just have to admit to yourself is the
descriptions of the societies that created these are
just
completely false. Like this is not hunter gatherer, primitive
agrarian,
whatever
they're telling you people had for civilizations 13,000 years
ago is just not true. Cuz if you're if you're
cutting
stone with that level of precision, barely achievable now.
We
don't understand your technology very well. Right. Certainly
not. Cuz you look at Stonehenge, which came thousands of
years
later. It's an amazing place, but it's stones in a circle. Yeah.
Now they
they're
aligned perfectly and all of that. It's it's it's certainly a
wonder of the world, but if you look at
Stonehenge
compared to go back, it's Stonehenge looks it's almost like kids
made
this with with clay. Go back is a work of art. It's
unbelievable.
Petra
in Jordan. Yes. You know, it's miles down a wadi down a box
canyon and totally
inhospitable.
You get to the end of the box canyon and there's this like most
evolved intricate series of buildings
carved
into the cliffsides. It's like there's no there's not a
stonemason on planet Earth right now who could do that. That's
right.
Period.
It's like what's that? Who did that? And they're like, "Oh,
well, you know, our ancestors did it. How' they do
that?"
Oh, I with sandpaper or something. Slaves. I No, that's not
true. No, that's not that's not how it
happened.
So as you push forward a little bit on this stuff, you get to
the question of
technology.
Like what was the technology that built all this stuff? It
wasn't bronze hands tool hand tools.
No.
Um they will say that it was they poured water or sand over the
stone and
used
some type of mechanism to grind it away. They did it with
abrasives. With abrasives, but there's there's no
evidence
of that. These these stones are polished. They're immaculate.
Some
of the stones inside the structures are polished so well that
they're like mirrors.
So
abrasives can't do that. I mean, I've seen them and I I I it
just I but I was lulled to sleep by the lies
that
like, you know, it's just incredible. It's like how many
man-hour would that take, right? About a billion, right? Like it
just
didn't
happen that way. So do we have is there any hint as to what the
technology was that these civilizations
only
only legends there are legends of acoustic levitation
um
that are found in a lot of different cultures. What's acoustic
levitation? specifically Buddhist. Um there's there was even a a
British
scientist who's allegedly filmed this where Buddhists would
sing
and play instruments at a certain frequency that would cause
objects to levitate. And that's part of the legend
of
how these megaliths were built was some type of sound waves
allowed them to
lift
these objects and place them perfectly into place. What's a
megalith? A giant stone.
Giant
stone. So there are giant stones around the world that are so
large. Again, there's no modern stone cutting
that
produces stones that big. There is not. There's nothing. Go to
New York Public Library or whatever granite building you
think
is impressive and it's nothing compared to these stones, right?
And you can you can pick at the mortar between those bricks and
they're
kind
of it's kind of slipshot compared to the things that were, you
know, made thousands of years ago.
So,
I'm just saying the same thing over and over, but like how could
you not look at that and ask questions? I you know, why is
Atlantis such a taboo
subject
with science? It's a because I think it goes back to the same
thing. We're talking about a
So,
what what is Atlantis? What do we know about I mean Atlantis is
like a by word for conspiracy theory, but like what actually is
it?
Um,
we first learned about Atlantis from Plato who uh talked about
in his dialogues. Was he a conspiracy theorist? Do you
think?
Yes, I think so. I think so. People call him a whack job. Um,
and Plato described in in the
dialogues
for Plato dialogues just he he plays characters called that.
So
in I think it's Cretaceous he talks about hearing the story from
Solon who
was
like his great great uncle who heard a story from an Egyptian
priest about this ancient land beyond the arms of
Hercules
which people think is probably the rock of Jialter and it's a
large continent larger than India and it's
it's
populated by advanced people and there's a cataclysm and it goes
underwater
and he describes concentric ring things and waterways and all
this
technology
if you want to call it that. And what's interesting about
Atlantis and a lot of people don't talk about
this
is in um in Cretaceous 2 which is which is which is Plato's
telling of it.
He's
writing about Atlantis and he stops mid-sentence and that's the
end of it. There's no
more
there's no more writing about Atlantis. So that's that's the
earliest story we have of it. And there are
strange
structures around the world that could indicate maybe Atlantis.
Um the eye of the Sahara is a very interesting
structure.
I don't think that's it. Um it's also called the Rishot
structure. I don't know if you've seen this. It's in
it's
in Western Africa. If you look at it, it's concentric rings. Is
it underwater? No. And it's a concentric rings and it
looks
like it fits the description. Now, someone like Randle Carlson,
who's a
paleo
hydraologist, which I learned was a thing, uh, says it's not,
and I tend
to
believe him because it's it's bu built more like a dome and, uh,
it's been above water for millions of years,
so
it's probably not it, but it's worth looking at. But there are
places like Biminy Road,
which
are very hard to explain. That's in the Bahamas. That's it's
long. it.
These
are right angles that are submerged underwater. There's
something that looks like a a city buried under
Cuba
that's definitely been there for 20,000 years. Underwater.
And
the Yanuguni Monument off of Japan. We've got these giant
amazing thing. These are all right angles
in
shallow water. Yes. In shallow water. It's like an underwater
temple off Japan and like 12 ft of water.
You
can dive it. Yeah. But no, but it's if you start talking about
these things, you're you're you're
a
cook. And that Well, it's on video and you can watch it. And and
the official position, correct me please if I'm wrong, but the
official
position of the Japanese government is rock formations. Yes.
Rock. That's it. It rock formations. Natural.
No.
No. No. Like it's this elaborate non-natural for non-random
building.
I'll give you one right angle. I I'll let you have one right
angle. I won't let you have two. I can't.
Two.
Well, there are a lot, but there's a lot. And this was
discovered pretty recently by like fishermen or something.
Yes,
it was. Wow. It's just absolutely amazing. Um,
okay.
So, here's what we've established. We've established that the
our view of the of prehistory is completely just
wrong
because the physical remains of these civilizations prove our
theories
wrong.
This couldn't happen. We know that world governments, not simply
ours, but others, Japanese in this case, seem
to
be very committed to stopping questions about this, halting
curiosity,
shaming
people, maybe worse. Um, so is it fair to say that there were
civilizations
as in some ways as advanced as ours tens of thousands of years
ago?
I
can't make that leap. I'd like to, but I can't make that leap
because I I feel like there would be evidence of that.
And
um I think this is where Graham Hancock gets criticized unfairly
because he's never
said
that there's been you know Atlanteanss with flying ships or
anything like that. All he said is we we
may
have been more advanced than we've been led to believe and it
deserves some more explanation. That's obviously true. I mean
like it's not a linear progression. So like the
history
that I learned always interested in history is that you had this
kind of flowering civilization in the west. China's difference
in the west centered
at
Athens and then Rome and then Rome fell in the fifth century
and
you had this thing called the dark ages where we stopped
building aqueducts and steam baths and then it reemerged
during
the renaissance. But basically it was like a linear progression
from the caves to the moonshot. You know, just
like
technology building on itself, human civilization becoming ever
more complex
and
but it was in a straight line. That's just clearly not true. No.
And certainly not in Egypt where we have
basically
nothing and then suddenly we have hieroglyphics and astronomy
and all and mathematics. Everybody knows the
Pythagorean
theorem. Everybody knows that. Pythagoras learned that in Egypt.
That's he's he's credited with that. But
that's
Egyptian library. That's correct. Yes. So um
which
leads us back to Aristotle which back to Plato just to be clear
the current occupants
of
Egypt the Egyptians are not I don't think related to the ancient
Egyptians. Is that fair to say?
I
I I think it I think they are. They are. I I I think genetically
certainly they are. I don't know why I thought that
maybe
speaking of Greece. Um, okay. But
civilization
can certainly go backward, like much farther backward than
medieval Europe went from Rome.
Certainly.
We've got a new partner. It's a company called Cowboy Colostrum.
It's a brand that is serious about actual health. And
the
product is designed to work with your body, not against your
body. It is a pure and simple product, all natural.
Unlike
other brands, Cowboy Colostrum is never diluted. It always comes
directly from American grass-fed cows. There's no
filler.
There's no junk. It's all good. It tastes good, believe it or
not. So,
before
you reach for more pills for every problem that pills can't
solve, we recommend you give this product, Cowboy
Claustrm,
a try. It's got everything your body needs to heal and thrive.
It's like the original superfood, loaded with
nutrients,
antibodies, proteins, help build a strong immune system,
stronger hair, skin, and nails. I threw my wig
away
and right back to my natural hair after using this product. You
just take a scoop of it every morning in your
beverage,
coffee or a smoothie and you will feel the difference every
time. For a limited time, people listen to our
show
get 25% off the entire order. So go to
cowboyclustrom.com. Use
the code Tucker at checkout. 25% off when you use
here
first. The pyramids have been not that explored as noted, but
crown
The Chambers Under the Great Pyramid of Giza and Ancient Egyptian Discoveries
ground
penetrating radar has been applied recently to the Great
Pyramid. Yes. I think from an airplane, but maybe
that's
wrong. Uh, and satellite. Satellite. Okay. And the headline for
like
one day was, "Holy smokes, massive chambers discovered under
Great Pyramid of Giza."
Is
what is that? Is that real? I I'm I'm skeptical of it. I'm
hopeful,
but
I'm skeptical. That Italian group has not been peer-reviewed as
of yet. Um, I think they're seeking it.
So,
I don't, you know, it be it's kind of one of those clickbait
stories where they when
you
actually see the images, it's really just color colored stripes,
but then when it lands in the news, it's these
pillars
with with spirals and all this magical stuff. That's that's not
what I see in in in
the
in the data, but, you know, maybe it is there. Um, we know that
the the Great Pyramid has strange properties. We know
that
there's there is space down there. Un space all underneath the
plateau.
We
know that. We know that for sure. Um, are these natural caverns?
I No, I don't think so. Um, you know,
there's
been there's been legends about the the the chambers under the
Sphinx
that
go back a long time. And you know, if you want to get very woo
woo about it, there's been psychics who've
explored
that. Someone like Ed Edgar Casey, who's a famous psychic, who
said that's where the Hall of Records is
stored,
which is interesting because that connects back to the labyrinth
as
well, which is which some people think could be the actual Hall
of Records. Um,
but
I mean, I I'll tell you a very strange story about Dorothy Edy,
if you have a moment. I do have a moment and I love strange
stories.
Dorothy Edi was um she's born early early 1900s in in England.
She
she's
a troubled child. She's unhappy all the time. She's taken to the
British
Museum
when she's 3 or four years old and she they go to the Egyptian
section. She suddenly lights up and she um she
runs
over to the the mummy of I think it's Ramsay's and she says, "I
know
him."
And they think she's a wacky kid.
She's
still she's still kind of despondent. She gets a a book from her
dad about ancient Egypt and she's going
through
it and she says she recognizes all these places, Temple of Si
and and Abbidos, all these things and she starts
studying
at the British Museum and for some reason she takes the
hieroglyphics very very quickly and ancient languages
very
very quickly. She claims that she's a reincarnated Egyptian
priestess that
worked
in that worked and lived in in Abidos, you know, thousands of
during the fourth dynasty, something like that.
She
eventually goes over to Egypt and she shows up and she's she
says,
"I'm
reincarnated Egyptian person." Of course you are. Um
I
she can prove it. They take her to these tombs or underground
chambers and
they
say, "All right, show us around." and she says, "Let's go." And
she says, "This is where the gardens were. This is where the
fountain was. This is where
this
was." And she she's so good at this that that the Egyptians
authorities take
her
on staff with antiquities. And she's able to describe and detail
all of these
ancient
places that nobody knows anything about. This is a reincarnation
story. Yet, she is embedded in the
scientific
community. She is invaluable to Egyptian research. So much so
that at
at
that time you had you were forced to retire at age 65. And this
is a woman by the way working in the 50s and 60s in
Egypt.
She's allowed to stay on until she wants to retire because she's
invaluable to the research. She says
that
underneath the the Sphinx is where we're going to find all sorts
of of
tombs
and and artifacts of Nefertiti and all these all these famous
people. She says they're down there.
I
don't know, but her story is very compelling to me. All right.
Well, so I mean this is like one of these speculations you could
probably
prove if you tried. Yes. But we we lack the technology to
dig
now or can't dig. But we certainly have ground penetrating
radar.
Yes.
Presumably if that was employed by the Egyptian authorities, you
know, over time you could get a pretty detailed
picture
of what's underneath. No. Well, like with Hara, their labyrinth,
they
didn't
seek permission to scan it. They just did. The permission has to
come. Would you, but you still have to get
your
hands in the dirt. So, we can scan all we want, but unless
permission is granted to dig, we're just not going to
know.
And what would be the the rationale for not allowing people to
pursue their curiosity and science and all that?
Like,
again, I don't know. With the Hir Labyrinth, the the excuse is
if we
disrupt
the site, then there's um there's a canal there, it will disrupt
the local agriculture, which is very
important
to that region. So, we can't disrupt the farm the farmers. Okay,
that's
that's that's the reason pyramids. Why we can't dig, I don't
know. But we
shouldn't
we should also acknowledge that there is exploration happening.
I
mean,
um, I think Pharaoh Tutmas II was just discovered with a few
weeks ago in the Valley of the Kings. So, people are
looking.
I just I don't think they're looking exactly in the right
places. There was a disc found in a tomb in
Egypt
maybe a hundred years ago. Um, that looks to be it's made out of
basalt. It's made out of stone. Uh, but
it
looks it's the most modern thing you've ever seen. And I would
encourage people to look it up. If you're on your phone right
now, we'll just look up
Egyptian
tomb disc. And it looks like an impeller maybe in a motor, an
electric
motor.
But clearly that was not created by a primitive civilization.
No,
it's the most precisely. First of all, how do you machine
basalt? Okay, it's not handcarved obviously. Look at
it.
What's the explanation for that? I I don't think there is one. I
don't think there is one. I would like to know
how
they carve that. Basalt would be lava rock, ignous rock. The
hardest rock on Earth. I I don't
Oh,
is it the hardest? I'm the Well, it's not like diamond, but you
copper is not going to get through
that.
Yeah. And it's so precise. It's perfect. It's It's perfect. It's
perfect.
And
it You look at it for about 15 seconds, you're like, "No, no,
no. Ancient culture did not make that." At least the ancient
cultures that have
been
described to me, not just the machining, but the the
mathematics. I mean, it's perfect. Well, that's a good point.
The design.
Mhm.
Huh. Okay. Um, so do we have any hint of
the
energy? So clearly the missing piece here is energy. The these
the megaliths including the
ones
in the United States, the massive structures in the American
Midwest and in Florida, earth and earthworks,
these
are not buil just the math doesn't work on the number of manh
hours required to build any of this stuff. a
lot
of the temples in Latin America, Anchor Watt, like clearly it's
not just
somebody
with a bronze knife making this stuff. It's not. Namadal is
another one with these that's uh that's Polynesia also,
but
these the tons these these they look almost look like Lincoln
logs, but
they're
10 20 tons. They're they're huge. No one knows how they could
have been put into place. And um
they
still stand. They still stand. We don't know when they were
built or how long ago, but if you look at it from the air, you
can see
they
had a sewer system. They devised a way to get fresh water
through this whole society, but nobody knows who
built
this. Why? Or or why. The why could just be we live here. We
What's
interesting is sewer system, fresh water. And so this is a long
time
before
Roman aqueducts. Yes. But there they are. So what what the
explanation
lacks is a is an energy source. It's not just biceps. And does
has anyone put forward a like a
reasonable
hypothesis on that? I mean it depends how you define reasonable.
Of
course it does. Plausible I guess is what I would say.
Plausible. Not nothing that satisfies
me.
I the copper doesn't work. The abrasives don't work for me.
Acoustic levitation I like, but it's that's
really
hard to prove it. I'm Acoustic levitation is a thing. You can
levitate things with sound. That's that is
proven.
Giant stones, we we can't do that. But just because we can't
doesn't
mean
someone else could. Are you sure we can't? I guess another way
of another way of
putting
it would be, are you convinced that the US government is totally
transparent about energy?
The U.S. Government’s Knowledge and Use of Advanced Technology
No.
No. I think they're totally opaque about energy. Really totally.
Oh yes. Um I think the US government
probably
has unlocked 0 point or close to zero point
energy
which would be pulling energy out of the vacuum. Um we have
inventors that
have
done that over and over and over. Uh and making energy
apparently nothing.
Well,
we can start with there was someone there's a man named Charles
Pogue who in the 30s tinkered with his
carburetor
and was able to get 200 miles a gallon. It was proven this it
was
engineers
investigated scientists totally proven. Um it worked he was
going to be a zillionaire. Whatever he's
going
to transform society and um the problem was once the news of his
engine
got
out uh the oil stocks crashed. They just crashed. So the oil
industry
lobbyed
the US government. We have to do something about this. And in
1951, the invention secrecy act was passed. So now
if
you patent any device that is more than 20% efficient, that's
instantly
classified.
That's that is now a state secret. It's it's vital to national
security. You
can't
talk about it. You can't um build it. And you can't sell it
unless you
sell
it to the US military. you cannot do it. Um, that went on for a
while. Then there was
a
man named Tom Ogle and Tom is the se this is the 70s now.
He
accidentally rewires his lawnmower engine to take the
exhaust
and pump it back into the carburetor. And this thing runs on a
gallon of gas for 78 hours or something
like
that. So he can reconfigures his car. It's like a 1976 Ford
Galaxy, you know, like a boat. And he's getting 200
miles
to the gallon on the thing. He's offered a billion dollars from
an oil producing country. Shell Oil offers him
$25
million for the patent that he considers, but they're going to
shove it. So, he says no. Um,
it's
considered, you know, maybe one of the biggest inventions of the
century.
Suddenly,
Tom, without a history of drug use, stumbles out of a bar. He's
drunk
and
he's he's killed and that's the end of Tom Ogle's story and that
all
disappears. All that research goes away and this repeats over
and over and over again till we get to Stanley Meyer
and
you might remember Stanley Meyer and the water car cuz this goes
this is 1990s now. So
now
we have a vehicle that doesn't even we're not even talking about
fossil fuels and protecting a multi- trillion dollar industry.
We've got a car that
runs
on water using um electrolysis, which has been around since the
1700s.
But
electrolysis requires a lot of energy and perfect water without
impurities. But Stanley's figured out how to take tap water, put
it into his
car,
and run his car on water. And what it does is splits the water
into hydrogen. Oxygen runs on hydrogen.
Hydrogen
is a fuel. It works. And it works. And he drives it all over the
place. It's all over the news. Engineers
look
at it. They say, "This is the invention of the century. This
changes everything." He's offered a billion
dollars
and millions of dollars and everyone wants his engine and um
he's
sitting at I think he sitting at a Cracker Barrel with his
brother and some investors and they raise a glass of
toast
new investment and go into the future and um
they
take their toast and Stanley suddenly doesn't feel well. He runs
outside. He starts vomiting. His brother
chases
after him and says, "What's going on?" and his and and Stanley
says they poisoned me and he dies. And in the
medical
examiner's report, it says he died of an aneurysm. But if you
read the report, you can tell the medical examiner didn't really
like that cuz he
wrote
some other stuff like, "Oh, he said he was poison, but
toxicology doesn't really show it." But but it says he died of
an aneurysm and that
technology
is now gone. the the patent's useless because Stanley faked the
numbers because he didn't trust the
government
because he had another invention that most people don't know
about before his water car, which was
this
tooid ring. A toroid is a donut. This donut-shaped ring that he
invented that
created
energy out of nothing and levitated, but he patented it. It got
and
and he got hit with a secrecy act and they made his life
miserable. But people started to learn about that
and
that brings us there there are other inventors in between T. Tom
and T. Toms
and
Brown Towns and Brown in invents this anti-gravity technology.
He runs into all kinds of bad luck. All these
men
have their research stolen. They're broken into. They're they're
carrying guns. They're threatened. They're
they're
disappearing. It happens over and over and over again. I have an
episode on this. It's very sad. And um
we
get to Floyd suite, Floyd Sparky Suite, who's he's my favorite
because
his
inventions, he videotaped all of his stuff. And you see him in
his workshop.
And
Sparky, he's an engineer. This is this is a he's a garage
tinkerer, but he's he's an engineer. And this was
supervised
by the military physicist. Maybe it was a mistake. And you see
him running a fan at high RPMs. And then
he's
got light bulbs. all this energy and it's all running off this
little box
the
size of a deck of cards and he puts in 03 mwatts and he gets out
all the
watts
you want. It's a device that no matter what you attach to it, it
just
whatever
the need is, it will give you the energy. This is Sparky Suite.
This
actually connects to UFO technology. I don't know if we'll go
there, but but it does connect. So Sparky's got this invention.
He gets
some
help from military physicist. Gets a visit late one night. Two
men in
suits.
Come talk to him, say good night. He has a heart attack.
Ambulance comes.
They
they grab Sparky. The wife is not allowed in the ambulance. He
dies. Uh
soon
after a couple of black vans pull up. They take all his stuff,
all his notes, every piece of equipment, and it
just
disappears. And that's the last we hear of it. About when was
this? I would say this is
late
90s. I mean Stanley Meyer was 1998. So this is recently.
Recently.
Yeah. So he may even be more recent than that. Is there evidence
the US government is
using
any of this technology hyperefficient, you know, anti-gravity,
levitation, any
of
the stuff in like military technology? I mean you can argue that
the go fast video, the tic tac, some of these could
be
that. I tend to think they are. So, there was a kind of
tanalyzing um almost kind of
shocking
admission the other day from the US government that during the
Maduro snatch operation in
Caracus
on January 3rd that the US military used apparently used
directed energy weapons. I don't know that
anyone's
ever said out loud I don't know if they said it out loud but it
was I
mean
it was obvious that's what it was that they were have been very
interested in those since Tesla's research. So te
tell
us what they are. Directed energy weapons and with with Tesla he
had a few different versions about ionizing air
and
and projecting electricity through the air. He had a few
different ways of doing it. And I don't have the science
background
to explain specifically what it is. But directed energy is just
that you take like a laser is would be a
directed
energy but using it as a weapon. And Tesla was working on that
technology.
But what what he wanted to do was create free energy for the
world. which turned out to be a problem for him
and
that's another story. But when he died, um so he died, I think
it was January 7th, 1943, the FBI was there.
They
would they were like on top of it. Um they came way too fast and
all his
research
60 boxes were confiscated by the Office of Alien Property, which
has
nothing to do with extraterrestrials. It's about all his valiant
property because he's he's not a
US
born. So they come and take his research although he was a
citizen since I don't know the the 1800s. He'd have
been
a citizen 50 years. So they seize his property and they send it
to a Wright Patterson Air Force Base for uh a
scientist
named John Trump to investigate Tesla's research specifically
looking
later
an MIT professor. Yes. And later an uncle of a president and
they're specifically looking for de
for
DEWs. That's the technology they want. They finally return
Tesla's boxes to Wait, are you sure it was John Trump who
received
Tesla's effects? Yes. That's That's documented.
Um
what's actually Yes. But what's you know, for a country of
hundreds of
millions
of people, we have these weird coincidences a lot. Isn't it
strange? And the same families show up over and over.
It's
probably not the episode to get into the Bush family, but boy,
I'd love to one day. Um we'll do an episode on them. Uh, I don't
talk about the Bushes
or
the Clintons on my show or MSAD. Um, I I think you're a wise
man. It's
so
the boxes wild. I've talked to Trump about his uncle like 20
times. He's very proud of his uncle.
The
last point on that? Yeah. 20 boxes are missing and we don't know
where they are. That
that
that's the last point on that. We don't know where the boxes
are. But you're sure it was the same John Trump that the
president talks about as
a
long tenure MIT professor. I mean, he talks about him all the
time. brags about him all the time.
Yes.
And he was in connected to military intelligence.
Huh.
Yeah. Right. Patterson Air Force Base, the home of Project Blue
Book UFO research.
So
those 20 boxes of Nikolai Tesla's research have never surfaced.
They
have not. So can you give us I I know many books have been
written on this and you know famous company was
named
after Tesla of course and all that but can you just give us the
cliff's notes version of his life? You said it
didn't
end well for him. What did you mean? Um he was very focused on
free energy for the world. He wanted to usher in
sort
of a new age for humanity which free energy certainly would do.
Um
he
was supported by JP Morgan was his finance year. Tesla was not a
good businessman. his rival Edison was. He
wasn't
as talented. Um, but he was good at playing the
business
game. Tesla was not. So Tesla wanted to create free energy. He
was supported by JP Morgan and said, "I'm
close.
I Tesla demonstrated free free energy by he plugged light bulbs
into
the
ground and had them had them working." So he demonstrated it and
he said to JP Morgan, "I just need a little
bit
more money and we can we can put energy for everyone. Could you
just tap into it?" And JP Morgan said, "Well, if
energy
comes out of the air, where do we put the meter?" What do you
mean free energy? New age of
mankind.
JP Morgan pulls the funding and funds Edison and Maronei
instead. And
Tesla's
This is Warden Cliff Tower on Long Island where he's doing this
research. He goes in default on the
mortgage.
They tear it down. He dies in poverty in the New Yorker hotel in
1943.
One
of the most brilliant across from Penn Station. Yes, it is. One
of the grim now a migrant hotel.
Yes,
it is. That's where he died. That's where That's right. Room
3327. That's a crummy place to die.
It
is. But there's a good white castle downstairs. Yes. I don't
think anymore. Probably not.
Wow.
Um, do we have any sense of
what
concepts he was working on when he died or what might have been
in those 20 missing boxes?
It
was the directed energy weapons that I that they really wanted.
Uh, there's there's a good deal of documentation
that
the military was interested in that, but specifics, no, we don't
have that.
We
just we just don't know specifically what were in those boxes.
His nephew says it was everything to do with
energy.
Um, and just for interest sake, John Trump, the uncle of the
current
president,
longtime MIT professor, is there any evidence that he worked on
the
OAP question? None that I could find, but if you're at Wright
Patterson in the 40s and 50s,
that's
Project Blue Book. So that's that's that's the home base of UFO
research.
So,
you know, whether he's working on it, I I can't prove that, but
he's certainly passing those guys in the
hall.
I mean, Blue Book started when 52. So, he's involved. He's, you
know, he's
there.
So, I keep hearing this phrase remote viewing, which I I sort of
picture in my head what it is. I don't
What Is Remote Viewing? How Did the CIA Use It to Spy on the Soviets?
really
know what it is. I don't know if it's real or not. The
government's involved. What What do you know about remote
viewing?
First,
tell me what you think it is. I think remote viewing is I'm like
actually being a little bit false. I
have
some sense of what it is. It's this it's the ability to see
things
that are very far from your physical proximity. So like close
your eyes and you can all of a sudden look
into
a room a thousand miles away. I know that I think it's true that
CIA worked to evoke this ability in people.
Um
but I I kind of want to know this state of play. Is that
actually real? Do we know that it's real?
We
know that it's real. Um remote viewing started
it
probably started but you know at the beginning of the human race
but remote viewing that we're talking about started
1972
Stanford Research Institute um Russell Tar and uh Halutoff
physicists
scientists were just studying psychic phenomenon just you know
where
here's
a shape on a card you know that scene at the beginning of
Ghostbusters is it a star is a circle. They're doing
that
sort of thing. And um a man walks in, his name is Ingo Swan.
He's
become a very famous psychic. And uh at this point, Target put
off for
essentially
advertising on campus psychics wanted. So he walks in and says,
"I'm the best psychic in the
world."
So they give him a card to read and he says, "Give
me
something hard to do." Like what? send somebody out in the San
Francisco Bay area and I'll tell you what where
they
are and what they see. It's like, okay, we'll do that. So, they
send somebody out
and
he just starts to kind of focus and concentrate and he starts to
draw, you know, I see I see I see a water
fountain,
but it's but there's no water in it. I see these circles on the
ground. I see a building. And turns out
they
got it all right. They described the pattern of the walkway.
There was a fountain there that was not on that
particular
day. The building was exactly where they said it was. Then they
realized, "Okay, we have something
something
different here than a shape on a card." They said, "Well, Ingo,
where can you
go?"
And he said, "I can go anywhere." Like anywhere. Like anywhere
in space
and
time. I have a whole episode of Ingo remote viewing the moon,
but let's stick
with
this for now. So they test Ingo Swan um a few times at
Yuri
Geller was was another one they tested who was able to see
things inside safes and there are a few other
psychics.
Pat Price is my personal favorite. Joe McMonicle is a very
famous one. But um what got CIA's attention was
in
SR in in at Stanford buried deep underground was a magnetometer
and this was used to
measure
perturberations in the earth's crust to detect nuclear
explosions. So this is an
important
device. It's buried underground shielded by cement
superconducting shielding like you can't
it's
you can't get to it. Ingo is able to draw what it looks like.
And
he says, "I could even move that needle." I said, "Go for it."
So he
moves
the needle. Now they're excited. The experiment works, but that
needle
moving
means a nuclear explosion just went off somewhere. So the CIA
government gets involved. They want to
What's
going on? It's not a nuclear explosion. Oh, we we're doing this
program. And they say, "You're doing what?" And
they're
not really they don't really care that he can move a needle.
They're worried about he can see inside behind
cement
and that means there's no more secrets. So the CIA starts
funding this
project
through various front companies and
all
intelligence agencies want to get involved with this.
It
comes kind of comes to a a peak. This is before Pat gets
involved, but it's an
interesting
story. It's called the It's called the Sugar Grove breakin.
There's a CIA analyst. There's a bunch of CIA
people
there. CI analyst says, um, here are coordinates.
They
give to Ingo Swam. Nobody knows what the coordinates are. The
analyst won't tell, nobody, the handlers won't
tell,
nobody knows. Here are the coordinates. And Ingo does his thing
and he says, I see a guard house. There's a
there's
a radar giant radar dish and there's building it looks like a
military. There's accordion rollup
doors.
There's jeeps. It's a military some type of military
installation. He draws it. The mountains are here. The
roads
here. There's the river. Detailed map. Says, "That's what I
saw." And uh
they
give to the analyst say, "Here, is this it?" And the guy's like,
"It's not even close. I gave you the coordinates
of
my vacation house in West Virginia." Then they were like, "Ah
shit." Okay.
So,
that didn't work. But Pat Price comes along and Pat Price maybe
the most talented psychic ever
remote
views the same location, sees the same things without knowing
anything what Ingo saw. You look at the maps,
they're
almost identical. Radar dish, guard tower, roll up doors. But
Pat is
very
talented. He says, "I see a building. I'm going into the
building."
Let
me back up for a second. Pat Price, retired police officer from
Burbank, always had an intuition to solve crimes.
Where's
the body? Price knows. Where's the suspect hiding? Price knows.
He just thought he had a hunch. But he retired
and
started to develop this skill and heard about this program and
got involved. So that's Pat Price. So he
sees
the same things. So now that's clearly not a coincidence. So
this is not a log cabin vacation on
what's
going on there. So SRRI sends someone to the coordinates. They
they find the vacation. They found the log
cabin
and they're like, "But there's a dirt road here about 200 ft.
We'll
follow
the road." And they follow the road down just over the ridge in
West Virginia in Sugar Grove and there's the
guard
house. It's a military installation and they can't they can't
enter, but they can see there's a radar
dish.
The problem was Pat Price went into the building. He said, "I
see green filing
cabinets."
All right, Pat. What else? It says operation pool. Okay, go.
He's he
said,
"I'm going through the folders. Q ball, QST stick, rackup,
eightball, all
very
specific." It turns out that caused every law enforcement agency
in
the country to show up at SRRI and they wanted to know why this
weird
CIA
pet project was spying on the the most secret NSA facility in
the world.
Not
just secret but so top secret that even the names of the
projects which were cubal
rack
up all this were top top secret. This is a facility to spy on
Russian
satellites.
Nobody knew it was there. The CIA analysts didn't know it was
there. So Ingo and Pat just their
consciousness
they just assumed well they they don't care about the log cabin.
We're this is the CIA. They
obviously
want us to look at this. So from then on, every intelligence
agency
had
psychics working. All of them. None of them admitted to it, but
they all had psychics working for them. And um
I
know that the Iran rescue operation in 1980 had one. Correct.
That was Joe McMonicle who
found
them. Um this operation I think was leaked by Jimmy Carter in 96
who was giving a talk
at
a college and some kid asked him like, "What's the weirdest
thing that ever happened when you were president?" and he said,
you know, in his in his far
peanut
farmer voice, you know, we had this Russian bomber go down in
Africa and we needed to get there before the
Soviets.
We didn't know how to do that, but we knew we had this group of
like psychics that could see stuff and they
were
helping solve involved with the Patty Patty Earth kidnapping.
They helped they helped find that. Um, but
that
that's not why they reported, but it is but it happened. Um, so
they had a remote viewer who was really just like a
receptionist
that they trained to do this because this is so this is an
ability that we can all do. She found
where
that bomber went down and the American military was able to
get
there before the Russians and retrieve this bomber. This is this
all documented and and Carter just kind of
let
that slip and that was sort of the end of the public knowing
about that was the whole reveal.
It
kind of was. It was called Project Stargate at this time, but it
was originally Project Scan 8 and Grill
Flame
and Centerlane and some other names like that. Project Stargate
is the one that everybody knows. Um, so they
test
Pat Price again and they say we, you know, rather than spy on
ourselves,
let's
see what he can see on the Soviet side. And Pat draws this. He
says, "I see a science fiction crane." And he
draws
it out. It's a big gantry crane which is like a a I don't know
100 foot
tall
crane that sits on railroad tracks. It's huge thing and he draws
it
and
shows it to CIA and they can't believe it but it matches aerial
photography.
So
he sees it. So now they want to know what is this thing? He says
I don't know what it is but underground are these are
these
60ft metal spheres but they don't work.
Nobody
knows what they are. It later comes out that they weren't 60
foot spheres. They were 58 feet and they were
containment
for nuclear nuclear material, but they didn't work. So he
saw
that that was Pat Price. CA is so impressed with his work that
they
say you just come and work for us. So they pulled him out of
SRRI and he's exclusively working for uh for CI at
that
point. He's doing some of his own remote viewing on kind of on
the side some not
espionage.
He's looking around and his most famous one is he remote viewed
Mount Hayes. Mount Hayes in Alaska and
he
sends his consciousness into the mountain and he sees inside the
mountain tall thin alien beings working alongside
American
military. He sees it inside the mountain. Now people have gone
up there. There's no way in. There's no way out. I
can't
prove any of it. But this is what he saw. So he takes that
information. He gives it to Haluto off. Hal's no longer
with
Stargate at this point. I think it's run by Skip Atwater. Could
be wrong, but I think it was Skip. Gives it
to
Skip. And Skip passes it along. Just a couple of days later, Pat
is in Las Vegas and he's
in
the hotel lobby front of the elevators heading up to his room.
Someone bumps into him and he feels like
a
pinch a pinch on his leg. goes upstairs, calls his wife to say
good
night. She says, "You don't sound good." He says, "Um, I don't
feel well." He says, "Say good night." And he's
found
dead the next morning. 58 years old. That's They called it a
heart attack. But no autopsy is done.
Um,
someone comes in with credentials. They say, "We'll take it from
here." Pat's body's cremated. And then they
call
his wife and say what happened. And Pat's now buried in an
unmarked grave in
North
Hollywood, which you can find if you want to pay your respects
if that's where Pat is. Patrice is probably the
most
talented that there was. Joe McMonagle is famous. He's still
around,
by
the way, still remote viewing. He's the one who found
he
found a large building like a 100 yards from water in the Soviet
Union
and
didn't know what they were building in there. He starts
sketching a submarine like, "All right, they're building a sub."
He says, "No, this is
different.
It's got like it's like two subs together. It's like a twin
sub."
They
like, "What are you talking about?" Cuz a twin hole sub. He
said, "It's it's giant." He said, "I've never seen
anything
this big." And they're going to launch it in 120 days. That's
kind of
specific.
And 118 days later, the Russian Typhoon
class
sub is launched. And it's the largest submarine ever made. And
it's a twin hull sub. And Joe saw that. Now he
claims
his success rate is like 90 95%. CIA says it's lower than that,
but he
saw
that. And Joe McMonagle, he's he's received the Order of Merit,
which
I think is the second highest award you can get as a from I
think it's
the
second highest as a civilian from the military. And in his in
his citations, it's for
200
successful missions, 150 of which provided vital intelligence
to
American operations, but it doesn't say anything more than that,
but that's
in
his official citation. Now, all this kind of comes out and I
think
Gates
was I think Gates was DCI at this point. He goes on TV and says,
"There's nothing to
this
Stargate thing. no real intelligence has come from it and we're
shutting it down
and
that was kind of the last that happened with Stargate publicly
publicly. I I think it continues because
the
Soviets were trying to do the same thing at the time and uh and
they allegedly got it to
work.
Now, interestingly enough, Soviet and American remote viewers,
they get together and they teach each other and
actually
practice. Um, what I find fascinating is they could see not just
through space but through time. So there
was
one time where Joe McMonicle was given he was given coordinates
and he remote viewed it and he said, "I think
I'm
on Mars." I said, "Okay, what do you see?" He says, "I see these
tall slender beings walking around. Something's going
on.
There's a problem. There's there's species dying." And he said,
"I feel
feel
like it's a long time ago." and he comes out of his transport
whatever. So the coordinates were Mars and it said
Mars
1 million BC. So he saw beings on Mars. Um at the time
the
the Mars was supposed to be this barren planet but Mars had was
full of was very
earthlike.
Yes. Oceans all but at the time no one said that but Joe saw it
just like Ingo on
the
moon saw alien bases on the moon. saw psychic beings on the
moon. He said they're aware of us. And um
I
think I think those are the things that that make the
government. Crew of uh any of the Apollo missions
What Was Seen on the Apollo Mission and Did We Land on the Moon?
when
they landed on the moon, do they see anything? Officially no.
Officially no. Um the
story
goes that there's a there's a radio blackout when Neil and Buzz
are up
there
when they first get there. And there is a radio blackout. And
the story is, well, you know how the
orbit
works. Sometimes the radio signal drops, whatever. The story is
they switch over to the medical channel and
said
they're here. They're on the crater and they can see us. That's
that's what the
story
is. And Ingos Swan said he saw things on the moon. He saw
structures.
He
saw beings that are there. If you go through secondary sources,
every
astronaut has seen strange things in space. Edgar Mitchell is on
record as
saying
UFOs are real. They're extraterrestrial. Roswell is real. That
happened. We have craft. Um the
government
is lying. This is a sixth man to walk on the moon. This is not a
kook. This is an American hero. So something's
clearly
going on up there. But anyway, that's that's the know about the
moon. Exactly. Not not very much. Not very much at all.
We
um Let me ask you, do do you think we went to the moon? Do you
think we landed on
the
moon? I have a lot of thoughts on it uh that I never get into. I
mean, I
You
squirm the way I do and asked. I mean,
I
I went down this once um cuz it's my job, right? And I I found
it really
distressing,
so I just kind of gave up. But I did, you know, I talked, you
know, you never know who's telling you the
truth
about anything, right? But, uh, I talked to people, you know, I
sort of do trust like, no, it's not. But then I
thought,
you know, whatever. I don't I don't There are a lot I spent my
life looking into into things and trying to figure out what's
real and what's not.
And
and I do think in midlife you realize, having done this for so
many years that like some things you're just you're not going to
know,
right?
And and I think you can go crazy because I've pushed to the edge
of it
myself
trying to figure out what's right, what's true, what actually
happened, what reality is. But I think
it's
unattainable on certain stories. This may be one of them. I I
will say we accidentally taped over the original
footage
cuz we ran out of Betamax. Yeah. And the, you know, the
schematic
drawings
of the of the spacecraft are like missing and all. It's like
telemetry data is gone.
your
data is going it's like stop they can't replicate the technology
right yeah so that would um
I'll
say this if it if it was faked of course can't prove that
um
then it's just one more instance of the US government having to
backfill you know a 57y old lie and it's done that a
lot
did certainly did it with the murder of John F Kennedy and it
just it you know you tell a lie and it just kind of
doesn't
go away because you have to continually make up new lies in
order to cover, you know, the lie, the original
lie.
So, um, you'd hate to think that's that's real. That's the
struggle with the moonlanding
question,
I think, because I it wasn't a gotcha question cuz when I'm
asked that all the time, and I do the same thing. I kind of go,
"Uh,
A,
I wish you didn't ask me that. B, I'm not sure. I think we did.
I think
something
was found up there, which is why we didn't go back." And for
me,
it all hinges on Edgar Mitchell cuz I trust I trust and believe
him. And if
he
says he walked on the moon, then I believe him. But I think
something was found up there that that maybe the
government
didn't want us to find. There's clearly lying around it. I mean,
that's what we know. That's I just know that from having a lot
of children. If
there's
like evasion and certain parts of the story don't make sense,
then there's lying there. Now, what does that
add
up to? Sometimes it's it's just very minor, you know, um and
sometimes it's not. But lying is the tell. It's a sign
of
you know what it is which is deception. Trying to hide the truth
from other people. Like
clearly
clearly uh they are lying. And that's what makes this so
difficult
is
because we know they lie about all these things. We run around
in circles. Yeah. And the muddy the waters are muddied.
And
I think that's kind of the whole point of it. It may be because
simply because I know you're lying does not mean I know what
the
truth is. Correct. And that is true for so many different
things. Some of which I have like very close proximity
to
where like I know for a fact you're lying. Like you basically
told me you're lying, but I can only guess as to why.
Right.
Right. That's 100% true. Last question. Do you ever feel driven
Does AJ Gentile Ever Feel Driven to Craziness By His Job?
to
like craziness by your job? I mean, talk about in the middle of
it. Yes. um maybe not insanity, but I I have
become
maybe certainly more jaded, disappointed in my government. Yeah.
Cuz I didn't grow up that way. I grew up
either
in a very patriotic home. Yep. So, everybody's a cop or in the
military or both. We're draped in draped in old
glory.
And then and I was like that really my whole life. Iraq wars.
I'm behind you. You know, me
too.
America, everything. All of it. And in my research, I learned
that I think just
about
every war we've fought since the Second World War is based on a
lie. I can't find any that are based on
truth.
And there's an argument that even World War II was were kind of
the American was deceived into getting
involved
in that. Um, but every other war was based on a lie, which and
that's that's that's certainly proven. Uh, the
Gulf
War was started by a PR company. You remember when Naria gave
her her
testimony
in front of Congress that they were throwing the babies on the
ground in the hospital? Oh, it was very heartbreaking when she
was the daughter
of
the ambassador of Kuwait. Um, and lying. She had never been to
that hospital. But I remember that
we
had boots on the ground. Yeah. Killed a lot of people. You know,
not many Americans died. Thank heaven.
But,
um, yeah, I I drove on the highway of death. Boy, I'm not not
defending the Iraqis. I guess we're, you know, it
doesn't
matter how many we kill. That's the official view. But there's
only 30,000. It was pretty brutal. I mean, I saw the
aftermath
of it is pretty pretty brutal. But but 500 Americans, that's
enough for me to get. There are 500 killed in the first Gulf
War.
I'm so embarrassed I didn't remember that. So jaded,
disappointed, angry. Um but
not
bitter. Not bitter. You know, I I end my episodes really never
with
despair,
never really with hope. It's more about um
try
to when when you're told things just think closely. I try to
help people to
not
what to think but but how to think. Don't trust everything that
you that you that comes out of the media. Whether
you're
on the right or the left that really that's all kind of a puppet
show. It's really about people versus power.
And
anything that the powerful tell you don't trust it. Exactly.
Exactly. Ex. Boy, I couldn't
have
put that better. AJ, thank you very much. Thank you for having
me