Pro Dialog Plus Carrier

[Mellissa Sprock]

UsedCarrier 30 RB 0342 air cooled chiller on Freon. Complete with 5 Performer SH300B4ACC scroll compressors, shell and tube evaporator with a volume of 125 liter, aluminium micro-channel condenser with 5 fans and a total airflow of 81.248 m/h, liquid line filter driers and a Carrier Pro-dialog plus.

*All components of this used chiller will be tested on good working, leak free condition (condensing blocks), compressors, fans, control panel, etcetera). Choosing HOSBV means buying with warranty. We perform a industrial cleaning and rust spots will be covered. Also, we can arrange your shipment.

Our proprietary "TrueDialog" feature enables seamless texting with both long codes and short codes in one convenient platform. Send mass text notifications, reminders or promotions simultaneously with the ability to engage with individual customers one-on-one to answer customer questions, address issues and provide instant, personalized customer service.

Unlike many of our competitors, TrueDialog has built direct carrier connections that eliminate the middleman and provide our customers with two huge benefits: improved deliverability by reducing potential points of failure and reliance on third parties, and significantly lower prices than our competitors.

For over 10 years, TrueDialog has built our five-star rated, cloud-based SMS texting solution for large-scale businesses. Our platform features an ISO 9001 database, 99.9% uptime, direct carrier connections, and dozens of innovative features.

For developers, TrueDialog helps you code less and move faster. Our fully-documented RESTful SMS API with advanced pre-built features enables you to send millions of SMS text messages with just one API call.

Send mass text messages and then effortlessly engage in one-to-one conversations at scale. Fully satisfy your customer, even when several agents need to get involved. By combining long code and short code messages into a single thread, multiple agents can chime into the same texting dialog to create a seamless customer experience.

TrueDialog maintains its own duplicate opt-out information in an ISO 9001 cloud database, an added safeguard to help our customers avoid accidentally texting a contact who has opted out. This extra layer of protection adds expense for us but gives our enterprise customers peace of mind they stay compliant. To achieve this same level of protection with other SMS APIs, developers would have to custom-build it.

Contact center directors and managers can monitor response times and language as well as to grant access to different agents at various levels of functionality: mass texting, individual texting and view-only. When a rep leaves your organization, you retain the phone number, contacts and all text conversation history to maintain uninterrupted customer service.

From large enterprises to small businesses, TrueDialog is built for scale. We serve over 2,000 customers ranging from Fortune 500 companies to professional sports teams, major universities, the Grammy Awards and non-profits.

TrueDialog is an innovative communications-as-a-service company. We build technology to power scalable, personalized messaging solutions that enable enterprise businesses and institutions to reach, engage with, and provide outstanding support to their valued customers, students and constituents.

For over 10 years, we have built our solutions by carefully listening to customers. We are an Austin-based socially conscious company committed to reducing paper-based communications.

TrueDialog powers Enterprise-Grade SMS Business Text Messaging for revenue teams to drive engagement across the customer lifecycle, and at scale. Founded in 2008, TrueDialog is a Communications-Platform-as-a-Service (CPaaS) company serving over 2,000 customers in North America that continues to innovate its messaging platform to ensure its leadership position in the industry. The technology is cloud-based and API-centric, powered by an ISO 9001 database and direct carrier connections to deliver 99.9% uptime. Customers use TrueDialog for text message marketing, mass text messaging campaigns, customer service text messaging, and employee communication.

The Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (QSD), commonly known as the Quad,[3][4] is a strategic security dialogue between Australia, India, Japan, and the United States that is maintained by talks between member countries. The dialogue was initiated in 2007 by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with the support of Australian Prime Minister John Howard, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney.[5] The dialogue was paralleled by joint military exercises of an unprecedented scale, titled Exercise Malabar. The diplomatic and military arrangement was widely viewed as a response to increased Chinese economic and military power.

The Quad ceased in 2008 following the withdrawal of Australia during Kevin Rudd's tenure as prime minister, reflecting ambivalence in Australian policy over the growing tension between the United States and China in the Indo-Pacific. Following Rudd's replacement by Julia Gillard in 2010, enhanced military cooperation between the United States and Australia was resumed, leading to the placement of U.S. Marines near Darwin, Australia, overlooking the Timor Sea and Lombok Strait. Meanwhile, India, Japan, and the United States continued to hold joint naval exercises under Malabar.

In a joint statement in March 2021, "The Spirit of the Quad," the Quad members described "a shared vision for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific," and a "rules-based maritime order in the East and South China seas," which the Quad members state are needed to counter Chinese maritime claims. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic,[14] Brazil, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea, and Vietnam were invited to "Quad Plus" meetings to discuss their responses to it.[14][15][16] As of 2023, Quad countries together have a combined GDP nominal of US$36.7 trillion (34.7% of the gross world product) and a combined GDP PPP of US$48.1 trillion (27.5% of the world's GDP).[17][vague]

In the early twenty-first century, the strategic preoccupation of the United States with Iraq and Afghanistan served as a distraction from major power shifts in the Asia-Pacific, brought about by increased Chinese economic power, which undermined America's traditional role in the region.[18] In the long term the United States has sought a policy of "soft containment" of China by organizing strategic partnerships with democracies at its periphery.[18] While US alliances with Japan, Australia and India now form the bulwark of this policy, the development of closer US military ties to India has been a complex process since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Australian commentaries showed mixed attitudes to a Quadrilateral security arrangement isolating China.[18]

Active US-Indian military cooperation expanded in 1991 following the economic liberalization of India when American Lt. General Claude C. Kicklighter, then commander of the United States Army Pacific, proposed army-to-army cooperation.[19] This cooperation further expanded in the mid-1990s under an early Indian centre-right coalition, and in 2001 India offered the United States military facilities within its territory for offensive operations in Afghanistan. US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his Indian counterpart Pranab Mukherjee signed a "New Framework for India-US Defense" in 2005 under the Indian United Progressive Alliance government, increasing cooperation regarding military relations, defence industry and technology sharing, and the establishment of a "Framework on maritime security cooperation."[19] India and the United States conducted dozens of joint military exercises in the ensuing years before the development of the Quadrilateral dialogue, interpreted as an effort to "contain" China.[19] Indian political commentator Brahma Chellaney referred to the emerging Quadrilateral Security Dialogue between the United States, Japan, Australia and India as part of a new "Great Game" in Asia, and Indian diplomat M. K. Rasgotra has maintained that American efforts to shape security pacts in Asia will result not in an "Asian Century," but rather in an "American Century in Asia."[20]

Some, like US Lt. General Jeffrey B. Kohler, viewed US-India defence agreements as potentially lucrative for American defence industries and oversaw the subsequent sale of American military systems to India.[19] Nevertheless, some Indian commentators opposed increased American military cooperation with India, citing the American presence in Iraq, hostility to Iran and "attempts at encircling China" as fundamentally destabilizing to Asian peace, and objecting to the presence of American warships with nuclear capabilities off the coast of southern India, or to American calls for the permanent hosting of American naval vessels in Goa or Kochi.[20]

The Trilateral Strategic Dialogue (TSD) was a series of trilateral meetings between the United States, Japan, and Australia. The TSD originally convened at senior officials level in 2002, then was upgraded to ministerial level in 2005. The United States expected regional allies to help facilitate evolving US global strategy to fight against terrorism and nuclear proliferation. In return, Japan and Australia expected benefits including continued US strategic involvement and the maintenance of strategic guarantees in the region.[21]

The nine-dash line refers to the ill-defined[24] demarcation line used by the People's Republic of China (China) and the Republic of China (Taiwan), for their claims of the major part of the South China Sea.[25] The contested area in the South China Sea includes the Paracel Islands,[a] the Spratly Islands,[b][26] and various other areas including Pratas Island and the Vereker Banks, the Macclesfield Bank and the Scarborough Shoal. Despite having made the vague claim public in 1947, neither the PRC nor the ROC has (as of 2018[update]) filed a formal and specifically defined claim to the area.[27] An early map showing a U-shaped eleven-dash line was published in the then-Republic of China on 1 December 1947.[28] Two of the dashes in the Gulf of Tonkin were later removed at the behest of Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai, reducing the total to nine. Chinese scholars asserted at the time that the version of the map with nine dashes represented the maximum extent of historical claims to the South China Sea.[29] Subsequent editions added a tenth dash to the east of Taiwan island in 2013, extending it into the East China Sea.[30][31][32]

3a8082e126