Dear Joan,
Looking at how small your sequence data likelihood is, I suspect
you're running an analysis either with a very large dataset or under a
substitution model with a larger number of states. In both cases, any
form rescaling to avoid underflows can be problematic (in any ML or
Bayesian analysis). BEAGLE implements several rescaling
procedures. The default is something we are calling "dynamic". The
"always" procedure is often more stable, but slightly slower. Using
the following BEAST command-line option to switch:
-beagle_scaling always
best, Marc
PS Also, if you are brave, you could ignored these very small (and
hopefully insignificant) differences by setting the <mcmc> XML block
attribute fullEvaluation="0".
PPS If using BEAGLE or any other modeling extension or inference add-
on (e.g., *BEAST), please cite them in addition to the BEAST release
publications.