That kind of depends what you think confidence intervals mean:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confidence_interval#Meaning_and_interpretation
HPDs are a form of credible interval (the Bayesian analog) but as with
most things Bayesian, they have a much more straight forward
interpretations:
"For example, a statement such as "following the experiment, a 90%
credible interval for the parameter t is 35-45" means that the
posterior probability that t lies in the interval from 35 to 45 is
0.9. In general, Bayesian credible intervals do not coincide with
frequentist confidence intervals as the credible interval incorporates
problem-specific contextual information from the prior distribution
whereas confidence intervals are based only on the data."
Quoted from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credible_interval
Andrew
On 6 Aug 2008, at 08:36, pete cowman wrote:
> just wondering if some one could tell me if the 95% HPD around a node
> height for a beast analysis is comparable to a 95% confidence
> interval?
--
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.