Hi Vanessa
I think Omar means this article:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0062992But approaches or subsampling strategies were called as local, pooled, scattered. And they are very demanding about sample size for each population.
In our study of tick-borne encephalitis virus, the analysis of different highly isolated population together demonstrated some kind of a "chimeric" effect (top plot), when skylines of each population fused into one skyline (
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/3/2921):

I also got this effect in my simulation analysis, but the data is not published yet.
The good news is that Nicola Muller et al presented the skyline approach for structured coalescent, based on their MASCOT package for BEAST2:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.06.583734v2.fullI didn't try this yet, but as far as I know about MASCOT and other structure coalescent models, they are very sensitive to priors. So you should run analysis with different priors to check if there is a difference in results (maybe Nicola correct me here if he notice your discussion).
Best,
Artem
среда, 18 сентября 2024 г. в 02:37:25 UTC+8, Vanessa Bieker: