On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Bharanee Rathna <
deep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> out of curiosity, do you think we can get this with mmap ?
Nope. At least, not as easily as you seem to imply. Keeping
everything in memory is an enormously simplifying design choice.
Spilling data to disk would require beanstalkd to effectively
become a database (and probably to become slower, too).
There are plenty of databases out there that do roughly this,
even some that pretend to be queueing systems. (And some that
pretend to be queueing systems pretending to be memcacheds.)