Skip to first unread message
Antoine Rennuit
Jun 3, 2016, 8:07:15 AM6/3/16
to BeagleBoard
Hi all,
Does anyone know the difference between the Robert C. Nelson kernels tagged "ti" and the ones tagged "bone"? At some point there was a difference in the PRU handling ("bone" was using the old uio_pruss and "ti" the new remoteproc_pruss) but are there other differences?
Also, for the kernels being tagged "rt", they are compiled with RT_PREEMPT, right? It is not a xenomai patch being setup?
Kind regards,
Antoine.
Does anyone know the difference between the Robert C. Nelson kernels tagged "ti" and the ones tagged "bone"? At some point there was a difference in the PRU handling ("bone" was using the old uio_pruss and "ti" the new remoteproc_pruss) but are there other differences?
Also, for the kernels being tagged "rt", they are compiled with RT_PREEMPT, right? It is not a xenomai patch being setup?
Kind regards,
Antoine.
ZeekHuge
Jun 7, 2016, 12:23:19 PM6/7/16
to BeagleBoard
Hi Antoine
The "bone" images are basically patched version of torvalds' linux tree, while the 'ti' version are based on TI's linux kernel.
So basically the -ti- kernel is based on https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev
and -bone- are based on https://github.com/RobertCNelson/bb-kernel
and yes, those -rt- images are with RT_PREEMPT patch.
Further, this might be helpful : https://eewiki.net/display/linuxonarm/BeagleBone+Black
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages