--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/3cc933a3-b647-4fe4-b24b-9ba03c478f1fn%40googlegroups.com.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
This looks like another effort to use a RISC-V processor on a board so it will be different than an ARM core.
Jon
I got a mail message from seeed that introduced the BeagleV.Although I am very hopeful for a complete opensource hardware and software platform, I noticed that the pin-layout and the compatibility of the ARM-Beagleboards has been abandoned.I also noticed on the specs that the GPIO pins could be used for any kind of communication protocol, be it UART, SPI, SDIO etc.I am currently using 3 UART ports on a BeagleBone to communicate with some peripherals.Would that still be possible in the new design?I also noted the RS485, or Canbus was not described in the IO.Can anyone involved in the design comment on these observations?(Why abandon the old pin layout, how to implement three UARTS or 2 I2C's, and why no CANBus availability)Kind RegardsJohan Henselmans--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/3cc933a3-b647-4fe4-b24b-9ba03c478f1fn%40googlegroups.com.
Em 13 de jan. de 2021, à(s) 15:42, Jason Kridner <jkri...@beagleboard.org> escreveu:
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CA%2BT6QP%3D5vSi9%3DTn%2B2n6wT%3Dkp09sLCGmMT3dv-Q6kdzmWOD8FBQ%40mail.gmail.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/CA%2BT6QP%3D5vSi9%3DTn%2B2n6wT%3Dkp09sLCGmMT3dv-Q6kdzmWOD8FBQ%40mail.gmail.com.
Hi JasonThe idea on the BBAI is change from am5729 to TDA4VM ?
15.4 support that's huge. Is the TI SUB GHz radio on a cape?Our neighborhood gas meters were recently updated with a product I worked on that product had an older TI radio and was based on a Renesas controller.This alternative positions TI to possibly offer a turn key replacement for that product beyond porting the app to Linux.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/739969806.865749.1610573028666%40mail.yahoo.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/63df07cc-33ac-4be3-8860-93111ccdf3c3n%40googlegroups.com.
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/QRpeww8-HsU/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/d39efbf2-b43c-40ea-9346-70753cec773fn%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/61128CAB-563B-4FFB-A3A4-5492A5E3068A%40kulp.com.
I totally get it on the Beaglebone form-factor and continuing support for it. I have Beaglebone AI format-type solutions I have to support on the software side and the Mech. and Elec. engineers in my group would probably devise some kind of torture system and install it in my cubicle if I pushed a radically different form factor "just because". I was really only parroting what I've observed with the other groups like RPi and the Jetson stuff - they seem to be partly going for an industrial direction in a "mass quantities" kind of way, doesn't mean that's what the Beagleboard group should do at all.The possibility of expanded I/O would be great to see and PCIe would be fantastic even over a "non-standard" connection.
I'd also add a vote for a populated JTAG connection, or at least one that one that isn't too involved to install.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/2d62e992-fb12-4d35-9371-86e238399014n%40googlegroups.com.
BeagleV 's pin layout is very similar to Rasaberry Pi