Thanks. I will look at that thread. My recent efforts have resulted in negative process.
Startup finished in 17.476s (kernel) + 41.899s (userspace) = 59.376s
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/2a75d9fa-0cfa-4c4c-b29a-98c7a424caeb%40googlegroups.com.
Thanks. I will look at that thread. My recent efforts have resulted in negative process.
Startup finished in 17.476s (kernel) + 41.899s (userspace) = 59.376s
From: beagl...@googlegroups.com <beagl...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of TJF
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 2:04 PM
To: BeagleBoard <beagl...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [beagleboard] Re: PocketBeagle Boot Time
On BBB:
$ systemd-analyze
Startup finished in 1.067s (kernel) + 15.828s (userspace) = 16.896s
Booting with USB WiFi stick including connection with static IP adress. Should be possible with PocketBeagle as well. Find details at
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagl...@googlegroups.com.
I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think that was from a different unit as I have several in various states of development. From what I have read, the usb gadget takes most of the userspace time. On the one hand, I find it amazing that the startup scripts work for so many boards, but on the other hand I find their size and complexity daunting to tramps through and figure out.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/9de2a436-e717-4cc0-8571-8803f46bfb4d%40googlegroups.com.
The newest image is certainly an improvement, but my results are not quite what yours are. Two quick questions:
cape_universal=disable
enable_uboot_cape_universal=0
enable_uboot_cape_universal=1
#enable_uboot_cape_universal=1
[ 19.595409] usb 1-1: Manufacturer: Realtek
[ 19.595416] usb 1-1: SerialNumber: 123456
[ 33.475816] cfg80211: Loading compiled-in X.509 certificates for regulatory database
[ 33.490036] cfg80211: Loaded X.509 cert 'sforshee: 00b28ddf47aef9cea7'
[ 34.111534] RTW: module init start
debian@beaglebone:~$ systemd-analyze blame
17.496s dev-mmcblk0p1.device
5.989s generic-board-startup.service
2.451s systemd-udev-trigger.service
1.849s networking.service
1.189s systemd-timesyncd.service
1.092s connman.service
1.027s ssh.service
1.023s systemd-journald.service
1.015s systemd-logind.service
906ms libpruio-lkm.service
890ms dnsmasq.service
735ms wpa_supplicant.service
719ms avahi-daemon.service
559ms systemd-update-utmp.service
551ms systemd-remount-fs.service
515ms us...@1000.service
508ms systemd-user-sessions.service
448ms systemd-modules-load.service
448ms kmod-static-nodes.service
407ms dev-mqueue.mount
393ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service
392ms rsyslog.service
359ms systemd-journal-flush.service
340ms systemd-udevd.service
331ms sys-kernel-config.mount
326ms systemd-sysusers.service
318ms systemd-sysctl.service
315ms systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev.service
308ms sys-kernel-debug.mount
298ms systemd-rfkill.service
294ms systemd-random-seed.service
285ms systemd-update-utmp-runlevel.service
257ms sys-fs-fuse-connections.mount
251ms fake-hwclock.service
114ms user-run...@1000.service
107ms ifupdown-pre.service
92ms cloud9.service