I get a kick out of those "Guidelines". They are just that, guidelines. One of the key functions of a PCB is to control the impedance of a signal, something that is done by a combination of the trace width, length, and the distance to ground, the "air gap". That is the key aspect of the stack-up and it varies from PCB shop to PCB shop depending on their processes and the equipment they use.
These models they mention again, make for a nice document. Yes the BeagleBone layout has good EMC, it did pass FCC part 15 and CE. There was no model used in the design of the BeagleBone. In fact, I have never heard of any PCB guy relying on models to lay out a board. Models do not comprehend things like power planes, cross talk, signal integrity, trace length, impedance, and length matching that are dictated by things like, schematic and mechanical restrictions.
The six layer design was dictated by needing enough layers to make all the connections. Needing the DDR signals to run over a ground plane and all signals to me matched lengths. USB impedance to meet the USB specification and making sure the signals did not cross over breaks in the power planes so as to pick up noise. LCD signal to be matched lengths so as not to create any skewing of the data. Having enough ground planes to pull the heat off the various devices. Ensuring that the power connections were large enough to connect to all pints and provide proper isolation between the various rails as needed. And making sure it all fit in the constraints of the board size.
I hope I was able to answer your question. One other side note. The board was not autorouted and it was done out by a guy with over 30 years of experience.
Gerald
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:38 PM,
<alexandr...@i9lab.com> wrote:
Hello,
I need to design a PCB like a Beaglebone, i.e., with sitara soc, including the WL1270 wifi module. The PCB files are a good start point. But, would you have any additional references beyond PCB files?
I am studying the "High-Speed Layout Guidelines" from Texas Instruments. In section "Board Stackup" of this document there are a table with 6 suggestions (models) of possible board stackup on a six-layer PCB comparing each of them in terms of decoupling, EMC and signal integrity. Unfortunately, the stackup solution employed for Beaglebone (signal-gnd-signal-signal-vcc-signal) doesn't use any of those 6 models. This model has a good EMC?
Would anybody know what this model (used in the Beaglebone) was employed? Is it have a good EMC?
My regards,
Alexandre