BBB CPU temperature reading using built-in sensor

858 views
Skip to first unread message

Luther Goh Lu Feng

unread,
Mar 29, 2017, 2:38:57 AM3/29/17
to BeagleBoard
Based on my research, I believe that it is possible to get a temperature reading from the built-in sensor[1]. But I also read that the temperature reading obtained will be extremely unreliable. I would like to confirm that effort to get readings from the builtin sensor wont be worth it as the reading is unreliable even in BBB Industrial. Thanks.


-- Luther

[1] https://archlinuxarm.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=8670
[2] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/beagleboard/Y0LBU_cp7pY/B-gOCbH5QzEJ
[3] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/beagleboard/temperature|sort:date/beagleboard/e4XDrG-9s68/tfQ-9_qtBAAJ

Robert Nelson

unread,
Mar 29, 2017, 3:58:26 PM3/29/17
to Beagle Board
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:38 AM, 'Luther Goh Lu Feng' via BeagleBoard
<beagl...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Based on my research, I believe that it is possible to get a temperature
> reading from the built-in sensor[1]. But I also read that the temperature
> reading obtained will be extremely unreliable. I would like to confirm that
> effort to get readings from the builtin sensor wont be worth it as the
> reading is unreliable even in BBB Industrial. Thanks.

It's a silicon/ip issue, the "BBB Industrial" doesn't change anything
regarding the temp sensor.

Regards,

--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

best...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 13, 2017, 9:54:04 AM9/13/17
to BeagleBoard
Hi Robert,

Just in case someone is fully aware that the sensor isn't reliable would it be still possible to enable it ? Is there a patch somewhere to do that ?

Regards,

        Xav

PS: thanks for your work on the BBB

Robert Nelson

unread,
Sep 13, 2017, 10:01:15 AM9/13/17
to Beagle Board
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:42 AM, <best...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> Just in case someone is fully aware that the sensor isn't reliable would it
> be still possible to enable it ? Is there a patch somewhere to do that ?

Sure, nope..
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages