Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Windows 10 heeft succesvol Linux geassimileerd

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Unknown

unread,
May 2, 2021, 10:16:14 AM5/2/21
to
Ter nagedachtenis aan Remy Belvaux die suïcide pleegde na stelselmatige
marteling tijdens verhoren waarom hij Bill Gates een taart in gezicht
gooide.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFkEVQeKDfsfWZIQF7rY8sheDSwVeB3Fu

The secret of Microsoft's success. Microsoft has special people who search
everywhere on the internet for anything that might be a technological
advance in mostly software technology because software is easy to steal,
buy or copy. In the 1980's Bill Gates had seen cp/m from Gary Kildall and
told IBM that Microsoft could provide an operating system. Bill Gates and
Steve Ballmer simply bought a cheap cp/m rip-off named Q-dos for $50,000
illegally stolen by Tim Paterson who simply copied it from disassembled
cp/m machine code. Gary Kildall found out and tried to sue IBM and
Microsoft. Unfortunately for Gary, Bill Gates father was a powerfull lawyer
employed by the Rockefeller family, so the judge made a statement. For
every PC wheter an original IBM or a IBM clone, customers had to pay
Microsoft even when the customer only wanted Gary's cp/m based dr-dos.
These practises are still used by Microsoft today. If you want a laptop or
PC you are forced to buy it with a Microsoft product named Windows. They
pretend you have a choice to not pay for Windows. Usually if you do not
want Windows, they have to take out the harddrive with its Windows recovery
partition and to replace it with a clean harddrive. So buying a PC or
laptop without Windows will simply cost you more. Most stores however
simply refuse you to sell the PC or laptop if you don't want Windows. Did
Microsoft invented Windows themselves? Is Windows stolen technology? And
Bill Gates had seen Xerox Star so he bought such a Xerox Star machine (made
in 1978), it would take Microsoft 13 years to duplicate its operating
system capabilities, and they named it Windows 3.1. Meanwhile Gary Kildall
got a tragic accident, unexplainable head injury wich caused his death
shortly after writing a book that Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer steal
technology from whomever they can. Gary's son is still scared of Microsoft
so the book remains sealed. And Microsoft kept on stealing technology.
Visicalc became Microsofy Excell. Borland became Microsoft Developer
Studio, Wordstar became Microsoft word. Netscape became Internet Explorer.
3dFx became Microsoft directX, Lernaut&Hauspie became Microsoft speech
synthesis and recognition. Even the Windows 95 taskbar and startmenu where
stolen from a graphical user interface made by another company in 1987 than
named Icon Bar. Almost nobody knows the original inventors of the by
Microsoft stolen technology and about the highly unexplainable death rates
under original software inventors. Who knows Stacker? The company from who
Microsoft stole their compression technology for filesystems? Even fat32
the filesystem for wich other companies have to pay Microsoft for, was
stolen. Microsoft hires special companies to scare programmers and
inventors with braindead, cardiac arrest, lifelong unemployement, lifelong
prosecution, tragic car accidents (Avalon programmer found dead, Netscape
programmers found blood on their PC's, programmers wrapped and choked to
death naked in their own bedsheets, Gary Kildall's dead, Remy Belvaux's
dead, and many more....) These programmers had all one thing in common,
they made something Microsoft wanted, and for some reason Bill Gates and
Steve Ballmer simply for no reason wanted them dead. All Microsoft does is
hire professional companies to search and kill programmers for their code,
work or something else Microsoft wants or sees as a threat. This is
Microsoft's business model. In 2001 e.g. a second grade university student
made the graphical command line interface. You just had to see it to know
it was innovative. You typed in commands just like dos but it had the same
capabilities like a webbrowser and came with its own compiler for it.
Imagine a dos prompt with images, buttons, windows, 3d reality, video
support, the internet as if it where a directory on your local harddrive.
And steve....@ceo.microsoft.com and bill....@chairman.microsoft.com
send the young programmer a contract that he would never talk about it,
that it now was Microsoft property, Microsoft would not have to pay any
costs. But the programmer refused and mailed them he would make it open
source. And Steve Ballmer mailed the student it would be tragic to suffer a
tragic and horrifying death. You can search google for 'Steve Ballmer
kill....' and you will find that Steve Ballmer even threatens highly placed
people with death and evenso boasted that he killed people before. You
don't have to guess, the programmer who made the graphical commandline
interface got infected with a tragic bacteria from his PC's keyboard, got
blind and later went into coma and drained in his own blood when his lungs
collapsed vomiting blood in the process. Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have
special ruthless people specialised in these kind of crimes. The
programmers girlfriend experienced a tragic unexplainable head trauma
causing prolonged coma, she will never talk again. These things happen
because people believe Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer are kind and loving
persons. Students who invent innovative products really believe Microsoft
is an honest business. Meanwhile Bill Gates paid over $40 million dollar to
elect George Bush. The first thing Bush did was dropping all antitrust
charges from many companies all over America against Microsoft providing
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer with diplomatic immunity. Bill also finances
Bush his reelection. As a member of the Gates family Bill and Microsoft
have all the support from the highest than CIA official Robert Gates, the
Rockerfellers and Rothschilds. Microsofts bribes law officials, police
officers, hires companies like Blackwater all to kill off anyone who they
can steal from. But why does Microsoft not provide the customer with a
graphical command line interface? The answer is simple, no matter how good
something might be, it does not force people to buy more copies of
Microsoft Windows. The graphical commandline interface will one day show up
as an invention by Microsoft Research just like oil companies kill off
inventors who make engines a tiny bit more efficient. Compare Microsoft's
power with an oil company. One big oil company named Microsoft stealing and
killing people who have little bits of oil and then forcing customers to
buy Microsoft oil, and a small tiny oil company named Apple, and a company
giving their oil away for free named Linux. Microsoft will ever have to
keep on killing young smart but naive programmers all over the world
especially before they might contribute to Linux. Microsoft deliberately
keeps stolen technology off the market, reducing advancement in operating
systems.

Innovative young smart and naive programmers are simply murdered before they
can contribute to Linux. These pour souls believe in the lie that Microsoft
pays for an invention. Like steve....@ceo.microsoft.com once said to
such a tragic soul 'Nothing provides me more pleasure than to know you will
die an extremely painful death!' Read more search on google for 'Why I hate
Microsoft' 'Xerox Star' 'Programmer found dead' 'Gary Kildall the man who
could have been Bill Gates' 'Steve Ballmer kill...' 'Microsoft's touch of
death' When Bush was reelected people thought the voting computers where
messed with. You can search for how many Diebold computerprogrammers where
found dead suddenly. This is the business model of Microsoft, even bribing
the president. See Bush and Gates together celebrating their crimes, google
for 'bill gates and bush' on google image search. The only solution for
young programmers is to not innovate. To not make software wich never has
been made before. And if they still want to do it, they have to work for
free by making it open source and work with many other open source people.
Sure Steve Ballmer calls Linux programmers cancers who attach themselves to
Microsofts intellectual property, but these programmers have no other
choice. Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several
manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market determines a
fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly high profit margins
over 80%, they simply force their customers to buy it, they kill off any
competition. Communism means everything belongs to the state, in this case
everything belongs to Microsoft (they even own the president), so Microsoft
is far more likely like communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any
unknowing naive programmer facing an evil never seen in the software
industry before.

edit: Corporatism is not even the cruelest word.


See the graphical command line interface here
https://youtu.be/0X6ZQspcWI8




0 new messages