Bugliosi: George W. Bush Should be Tried for Mass Murder
General Public:.are. Lobotomized Sheep....@..999.2012..WBCHNC.News.ukuscan.ca The General Public:.are.. Lobotomized Sheep
The Existentialist Cowboy | Is the Bush administration a failed presidency?
No! Bush will leave office having enriched his base by trashing the
Constitution.
...........................
Bugliosi: George W. Bush Should be Tried for Mass Murder
The Existentialist Cowboy
May 11, 2008
It has been my position for yeas that George W. Bush should be prosecuted
for various capital crimes, not the least of which are the deaths following
from his wars of naked aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq. [See: US Codes,
Title 18, Section 2441] I have urged that a Federal Grand jury bring
indictments against George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condo Rice, Don Rumsfeld
and numerous other co-conspirators, accomplices and accessories-after-the
fact. Now –a heavy hitter, a tough-minded, legendary prosecutor wants to see
George W. Bush stand trial for mass murder. Vince Bugliosi is famous for his
prosecution of Charles Manson and his ascerbic critique of a Supreme Court
decision that made no law –Bush v Gore. He now claims that George W. Bush
should stand trial for the crime of mass murder of US citizens.
When George W. Bush said of our "Constitution that it is "… just a Goddamn
piece of paper!", he declared himself an outlaw at war with the American
people. The Bush administration’s culture of fear, hate and contempt for law
inspires an epidemic of police lawlessness and thuggery that now terrorizes
law-abiding Americans all over America. You can be thrown in jail if
‘authorities’ merely ‘deem’ you a ‘terrorist’. Under Bush, the high
standards found in the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the US
Constitution no longer apply. You don’t get to make a phone call. You don’t
get to call your lawyer. You don’t get to call your wife or husband. You don
’t get visitors. It is a state of treasonous war, a capital crime for which
George W. Bush must answer. The following material consists of Bugliosi’s
article in blockquotes followed by my comments.
The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murderby Vincent BugliosiThere is
direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this
nation, but deliberately misled it into a war he wanted. Bush and his
administration knowingly lied to Congress and to the American public — lies
that have cost the lives of more than 4,000 young American soldiers and
close to $1 trillion.
A Monumental Lie
In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October
7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE),
a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact
opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and
the world.
On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was
that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the US This same information was
delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the
NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other US intelligence agencies. In
addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the
morning of October 7th.
According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, “Baghdad for now appears to be
drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or
CBW [chemical and biological warfare] against the United States, fearing
that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case
for making war.” The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use
any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of
mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is,
he would only use them in self-defense.
Preparing its declassified version of the NIE for Congress, which became
known as the White Paper, the Bush administration edited the classified NIE
document in ways that significantly changed its inference and meaning,
making the threat seem imminent and ominous.
In the original NIE report, members of the US intelligence community
vigorously disagreed with the CIA’s bloated and inaccurate conclusions. All
such opposing commentary was eliminated from the declassified White Paper
prepared for Congress and the American people.
The Manning Memo
On January 31, 2003, Bush met in the Oval Office with British Prime
Minister Tony Blair. In a memo summarizing the meeting discussion, Blair’s
chief foreign policy advisor David Manning wrote that Bush and Blair
expressed their doubts that any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons
would ever be found in Iraq, and that there was tension between Bush and
Blair over finding some justification for the war that would be acceptable
to other nations. Bush was so worried about the failure of the UN inspectors
to find hard evidence against Hussein that he talked about three possible
ways, Manning wrote, to “provoke a confrontation” with Hussein. One way,
Bush said, was to fly “U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over
Iraq, [falsely] painted in UN colors. If Saddam fired on them, he would be
in breach” of UN resolutions and that would justify war. Bush was
calculating to create a war, not prevent one.
Denying Blix’s Findings
Hans Blix, the United Nation’s chief weapons inspector in Iraq, in his
March 7, 2003, address to the UN Security Council, said that as of that
date, less than 3 weeks before Bush invaded Iraq, that Iraq had capitulated
to all demands for professional, no-notice weapons inspections all over Iraq
and agreed to increased aerial surveillance by the US over the “no-fly”
zones. Iraq had directed the UN inspectors to sites where illicit weapons
had been destroyed and had begun to demolish its Al Samoud 2 missiles, as
requested by the UN. Blix added that “no evidence of proscribed activities
have so far been found” by his inspectors and “no underground facilities for
chemical or biological production or storage were found so far.” He said
that for his inspectors to absolutely confirm that Iraq had no weapons of
mass destruction (WMD) “will not take years, nor weeks, but months.”
Mohamed El Baradei, the chief UN nuclear inspector in Iraq and director of
the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the UN Security Council that,
“we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of
a nuclear weapon program in Iraq.”
The UN inspectors were making substantial progress and Hussein was giving
them unlimited access. Why was Bush in such an incredible rush to go to war?
Hussein Disarms, so Bush … Goes to War
When it became clear that the whole purpose of Bush’s prewar campaign — to
get Hussein to disarm — was being (or already had been) met, Bush and his
people came up with a demand they had never once made before — that Hussein
resign and leave Iraq. On March 17, 2003, Bush said in a speech to the
nation that, “Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours.
Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict.” Military
conflict — the lives of thousands of young Americans on the line — because
Bush trumped up a new line in the sand?
The Niger Allegation
One of the most notorious instances of the Bush administration using
thoroughly discredited information to frighten the American public was the
16 words in Bush’s January 28, 2003 State of the Union speech: “The British
government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant
quantities of uranium from Africa.” The Niger allegation was false, and the
Bush administration knew it was false.
Joseph C. Wilson IV, the former ambassador to Iraq, was sent to Niger by
the CIA in February 2002 to investigate a supposed memo that documented the
sale of uranium yellowcake (a form of lightly processed ore) to Iraq by
Niger in the late 1990s. Wilson reported back to the CIA that it was “highly
doubtful” such a transaction had ever taken place.
On March 7, 2003, Mohamed El Baradei told the UN Security Council that
“based on thorough analysis” his agency concluded that the “documents which
formed the basis for the report of recent uranium transactions between Iraq
and Niger are in fact not authentic.” Indeed, author Craig Unger uncovered
at least 14 instances prior to the 2003 State of the Union address in which
analysts at the CIA, the State Department, or other government agencies that
had examined the Niger documents “raised serious doubts about their
legitimacy — only to be rebuffed by Bush administration officials who wanted
to use them.”
On October 5 and 6, 2002, the CIA sent memos to the National Security
Council, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and to the White House
Situation Room stating that the Niger information was no good.
On January 24, 2003, four days before the president’s State of the Union
address, the CIA’s National Intelligence Council, which oversees all federal
agencies that deal with intelligence, sent a memo to the White House stating
that “the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest.”
The 9/11 Lie
The Bush administration put undue pressure on US intelligence agencies to
provide it with conclusions that would help them in their quest for war.
Bush’s former counterterrorism chief, Richard Clarke, said that on September
12, 2001, one day after 9/11, “The President in a very intimidating way left
us — me and my staff — with the clear indication that he wanted us to come
back with the word that there was an Iraqi hand behind 9/11.”
Bush said on October 7, 2002, “We know that Iraq and the Al Qaeda
terrorist network share a common enemy — the United States of America. We
know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high level contacts that go back a
decade,” and that “Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb-making and
poisons and deadly gasses.” Of Hussein, he said on November 1, 2002, “We
know he’s got ties with Al Qaeda.”
Even after Bush admitted on September 17, 2003, that he had “no evidence”
that Saddam Hussein was involved with 9/11, he audaciously continued, in the
months and years that followed, to clearly suggest, without stating it
outright, that Hussein was involved in 9/11.
On March 20, 2006, Bush said, “I was very careful never to say that Saddam
Hussein ordered the attack on America.”
Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964. In his career at the
L.A. County District Attorney’s office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out
of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single
loss. His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of
his classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in
publishing history. The Prosecution of George W. Bush For Murder is
available May 27.For more information visit www.prosecutionofbush.com
When Bush said that the "Constitution is just a Goddamned piece of paper",
he aligned himself with Hitler, Mussolini, Mao –"state absolutists",
fascists, and/or radical communists. Bush declared war on the American
people, our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, Democracy and freedom. The
peace, therefore, is already broken and, by Bush’s declaration, a state of
war exists between Bush and the sovereign people of the United States.
Criminals and traitors have seized power illegitimately and operate outside
the law i.e, the Constitution so hated by Bush. So far, this gang of crooks
have had nothing to fear from the impeachment process though there is
probable cause to try Bush himself for capital crimes. As Bush jokes about
remaining in power past his term, Americans as well as Iraqis are brutalized
without charges, trial or representation. Under Bush, jackbooted thugs may
not bother accusing you of a crime. They need only ‘define’ you as a
terrorist. [See: Police Atrocities Define the Bush Police State]Bush’s "War
on Terror" is as fraudulent as is the official 911 conspiracy theory which
justifies it. It is as untruthful as the uncountable lies told to the United
Nations and the world about Iraq. Benazir Bhutto spoke the truth shortly
before her death: if US foreign policy does not support world wide terrorism
directly, it is, at least, the very cause of it! It is a charge supported by
official FBI statistics, published originally by the Brookings Institution.
The proposition that terrorism is the inevitable result of imperial
aggressions explains Bush’s incompetent economic policies as well as America
’s fascist tilt. That terrorism is always worse under GOP regimes is a
demonstrable, statistical fact and for daring to publish it, I was attacked
by the right wing Heritage Foundation. My rebuttal remains unanswered.
The CIA creates terrorism two ways by indulging it as a tactic and by
inspiring it with US imperial excesses. The legacy of Blackwater USA, an
international terrorist organization, will have inspired generations of
"terrorists" resorting to a tactic against which top down fascist regimes
are impotent. Bush has failed to make us safe. He has, rather, made the
world a much, much more dangerous place. And for this –we have given up the
cornerstone of American freedom.
Bush has abrogated or violated every provision of the US Bill of Rights,
arguably the most important document standing between you and tyranny! [See:
Bush’s War on the Bill of Rights] Next, an increasingly desperate Bush
administration will try to crack down on the internet, among the dwindling
sources of truth in a new age of Orwellian suppression! Bush has put himself
above the rule of law even as he denies you the benefit and the protections
that are yours under the law! There is a name for this –dictatorship! A
Roper Poll of October 1999 indicated that the American people supported the
International Criminal Court by a margin of 66% to only 29% opposed. While
public support for the court has not ‘translated’ into US national policy,
the Bush administration worked overtly to subvert the ICC and place
‘themselves’ above international, universal prohibitions against aggressive
war and torture! Bushco anticipated problems with international laws long
before 911 and, therefore, sought to place themselves beyond prosecution or
justice. A bill sponsored by then House Speaker Tom Delay authorized Bush to
order a military attack on the Hague should Americans find themselves on
trial for war crimes. Only a crooked regime would plan in advance to subvert
only those international laws that made their plans a capital crime.
That record of deceit itself is probable cause to indict George Bush, Dick
Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, Donald Rumself, Colin Powell and others in his
administration in connection with a ‘false flag’ attack –911! Bush’s order
that forensic evidence related to the crime of 911 be destroyed is ‘probable
cause’ to indict Bush for ‘obstruction of justice’ or worse —mass murder!
Only those guilty of crimes work overtly to cover them up.
Bush’s disregard of American or world opinion is matched by his utter
contempt for the the US Constitution, indeed, the very rule of law. The
Constitution –he screamed, impatiently –is "just a Goddamned piece of
paper!" Clearly –Bush had planned to trash the Constitution even before 911.
Iraq, of course, had nothing whatsoever to do with 911 and Saddam Hussein,
like Manuel Noreiga, had been a CIA puppet. While Saddam never had WMD, his
independent will was, in Bush’s opinion, a cause to invade, begin the
construction of permanent bases, and the permanent theft of Iraqi resources.
At Abu Ghraib, Bush would find a test of his ability to place the US above
international laws designed to prevent, or, at least, punish the those who
perpetrate atrocities. To this end, Bush employed the dubious talents of
Alberto Gonzales and John Yoo, toadies who would tell Bush what he wanted to
hear, that is, that he was above the international laws that were, in fact,
designed to prevent the very crimes Bush had in mind.
Is the Bush administration a failed presidency? No! Bush will leave office
having enriched his base by trashing the Constitution. That’s all he ever
cared about. He will leave office hated by the American people whose lives
he ruined and by the people of Iraq whose lives he snuffed with a smirk.