Xref to:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9d1n89%242bv1%241%40news.tht.net
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: British Columbia's Ken McVay's NIZKOR Tax Fraud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, can.politics, pq.general, mtl.general, bc.general
(Everyone read the link above to really see McVay do the two step and spin his
tax scam.)
---------
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>
>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
<end>
I asked why should a "website" be awarding tax receipts and I get
personally attacked!
Here is evidence NIZKOR just might be skirting tax laws and I have
contacted CCRA too!
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
CCRA said: "we have no record of a registered charity by the name of
Nizkor.org." (Letter included below) Only registered charities are allowed
to issue "Canadian receipts"!!
"A registered charity is a charity that has specifically applied to the
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for registration and has been accepted as
such. A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes."
CCRA rule included below with web link for verification!
LOOK!
From: Charity webmail <Charities-B...@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
Sender: "Langdon, Blaine" <Blaine....@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
To: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
Subject: Registered charity question.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Thank you for your e-mail.
The Charities Directorate of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency is
responsible for the registration and compliance of charities in Canada.
These organizations are similar to "exempt organizations" as are registered in
the United States. However, we have no record of a registered charity by the
name of Nizkor.org.
Additionally, due to the confidentiality provisions of the Canadian Income
Tax Act, I am unable to disclose information concerning a particular
organization's tax affairs, including measures taken or to be taken by the
Department resulting from complaints. However, I wish to assure you that
all complaints received by the Department are treated seriously and are
fully investigated, where appropriate.
Finally, the annual information returns of Canadian registered charities
are available to the public. However, as you will note from the above,
Nizkor.org is not a registered charity. The non-profit information return
which you describe is not available to the public.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention.
Sincerely,
Blaine Langdon
Charities Directorate
~~~~END~~~~
kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,bc.general,can.general,tor.general,on.general
Re: ATTENTION NIZKOR: Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit
Organization (NPO) Information Return Form T1044
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <99oro0$259r$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <eghvbtgm6r3tsa0ef...@4ax.com>
<3abfe742$0$1...@news.impulse.net>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>
>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
Glad to see you making that a public record. Care to explain how a website
not being either an "NPO nor a Charity" can operate as you do and issue tax
receipts?
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117eq/t4117eq.html#P131_12645
Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO) Information Return
Includes Form T1044
[...]
An NPO described in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income Tax Act is a club,
society, or association that is organized and operated solely for:
social welfare;
civic improvement;
pleasure or recreation;
or any other purpose except profit.
Also, no part of the income of these organizations can be payable to or
otherwise available for the personal benefit of any proprietor, member, or
shareholder, unless the proprietor, member, or shareholder was a club,
society,or association whose primary purpose was to promote amateur
athletics in Canada.
<<I don't think Nizkor promotes amateur athletics in Canada! Please note
that the law states above: "no part of the income of these organizations
can be payable to or otherwise available for the personal benefit of any
proprietor.." yet Ken McVay is the proprietor or director of Nizkor (a
website) and he is on public record (also shown below) as responding to
this question: "Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for
Nizkor?" with "Yup." Plainly this violates the above and seeing how Nizkor
operates as a back room operation from the "proprietor's" own house (proven
below) this operation should be very questionable! Finally note that Ken McVay
announced in a public posting above: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity.
Nizkor is a website." How does a "website" warrant receiving "exempt donations"?
Doc Tavish Comments>>
Distinguishing non-profit organizations from registered charities
An NPO is not a registered charity. A registered charity is a charity that
has specifically applied to the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for
registration and has been accepted as such.
A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes. An NPO does
not have to register either federally or provincially to maintain its privileged
tax status.
Generally, registered charities also have to disburse 80% of the funds for
which they issued charitable receipts on their own charitable activities or as
gifts to qualified donees. NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations or
membership fees contributed, and they are not required to disburse a specified
percentage of their earnings.
<End of CCRA web page>
Notice what CCRA said about "issu[ing] charitable receipts for tax
purposes"? Look at McVay's operation and see if it complies with the law
stated above: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations.." yet Ken
McVay's very own NIZKOR page says: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a
Canadian tax receipt." Ken McVay also claims that NIZKOR is NOT a charity
as shown down further in this post.
<FAIR USE INTENDED -- NON-PROFIT>
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation
with the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a
national volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism,
racism and bigotry, and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may
call B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist
that they wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer,
you can print this form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human Rights of
B'nai Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust Fund" to the cheque's
memo section. A portion of amounts donated to the Trust Fund is used to
build the Nizkor Endowment Fund. If you prefer that all of your donation
be invested for Nizkor's future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft
with the notation 'For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests
should be to the 'Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The League for Human
Rights of B'nai Brith Canada'.)
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt.
[#0235903-43-13]
-----------------------
Notice what is said above? Look what Ken McVay has said not too long ago:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&selm=90jnnp%24npp%241%40news.tht.net
Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Re: JEWS DUMPED FAG MCVAY!!!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2000-12-05 13:46:34 PST
"McVay/Nizkor" has never issued tax receipts of any sort, Mr.
Grosvenor, so it's rather silly to suggest we got "caught at it."
<end>
It is also plain that McVay does not claim Nizkor to be a charitable
organization as shown here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=936j5k%2427s9%241%40news.tht.net
Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Re: Is Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham Which Gets its Director
Spending Money? R 2
Date: 2001-01-06 00:00:08 PST
In article <8kjd5t0el7tbd9lv4...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
>survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
>charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
>McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" these things?
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" that Nizkor is a "charitable
organization?" (Can he show that anyone from Nizkor has ever claimed to
be such an organization?)
<end>
Well now we know Nizkor is not a "charitable organization" so it has to be
an NPO?! So why does Ken McVay's NPO declare at its web page: "Donations
over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt" which would be in
violation of: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations" but Ken McVay
lies to a person who's an object of his smear campaign: "McVay/Nizkor" has
never issued tax receipts of any sort.." Then again McVay admitted higher
up in this post: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a
website." See how NIZKOR skirts all criteria of the tax laws?
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
You're a fraud McVay and you need to be exposed!
We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
Questions:
1) What is the tax number of Nizkor?
2) What is the physical address of Nizkor?
3) What is the phone number of Nizkor?
4) Where can one find the organizational papers for Nizkor?
a) How many people compose the Nizkor staff?
b) What are the financial responsibilities of Nizkor?
5) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is authorized to
solicit tax free contributions?
6) How much money does Nizkor Org receive yearly as charitable donations?
7) You show below that you pay yourself-- what is your yearly pay?
http://x71.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=620760630
Subject: Re: How much of a cut does the B'nai Brith get from Nizkor? Date:
05/08/2000
Author: Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@vex.net>
>f) Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?
Yup - I also appreciate revenue from public speaking and site advertising.
~~~~~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~~~~
8) Is Nizkor proper (it's office and main facilities) located in a back
room of your own residence as this says?
http://www.Xgeocities.com/dcjarviks/Idler/vIn15.htmlX
(Remove the X's to view the site, this is to help prevent McVay from
spamming the search engines.)
"A Voyage to Nanaimo-- It takes two hours to cross the Georgia Strait by
ferry from Vancouver, British Columbia, another half-hour by jitney from
the Nanaimo terminal to reach the home of Kenneth N. McVay, webmaster for
The Nizkor Project . The address is an ordinary suburban split-level in a
middle-class neighborhood. There is nothing distinctive about its
location. .... I am taken to a back room, filled with computer equipment,
monitors, and books... Seated in front of the array is McVay, apparently a
50-something computer nerd. He is tall, thin, with short hair and glasses,
wired to the world through his ISP. The Nizkor project which McVay runs
from this room in the back of his house... " <END>
A question for all reading this:
How many organizations which receive charitable contributions operate from
the backroom of the director's home? He claims to be non-profit and it
appears that he would have a low overhead-- so how much money does Ken
McVay receive for his backroom operation?
9) Why should anyone wish to donate to an organization who has a
director who's been caught in numerous lies especially as documented here?
Using <http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search> the adjacent archive may
be retrieved by inserting the included MESSAGE ID into the field: "Message ID -
Find the message with message ID" and then activating the "Google Search"
button. USE this Message ID: 1jq3fts9fb6cn1lth...@4ax.com
From: Andrew John McVay (Andrew_J...@fractal.com)
Subject: Ken McVay Caught in a Lie? What About That Nizkor San Antonio Operation
He Has Denied Having?
Date: 2001-05-03 17:03:02 PST
Here is a real dilemma. Which entity is lying- Nizkor (Ken McVay) or B'nai Brith
the Funding Arm of Nizkor (Ken McVay)?
Ken McVay insists that he has no San Antonio, Texas connection YET his funding
arm shows that he does at their web page! Here is B'nai Brith:
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed
a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and educational purposes only. - FAIR USE INTENDED>>>
http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/jclinks/jincan-01.htm
(Link Active July 13, 2001)
B'NAI BRITH CANADA
LINKS If you would like to add your organization or community service to this
listing, or if you have suggestions for other links, please email the webmaster
at b...@bnaibrith.ca.
Jewish Indices | Selected Israel sites | Media Sites | Hate on the Internet |
Palestinian and Islamic Sites | Anti-Hate Groups | Canadian Government
Anti-Hate Groups:
Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith
Canadian Race Relations Foundation / Fondation canadienne des relations raciales
Fighting Hate - HTML
HateWatch Inc.
Simon Wiesenthal Center
Anti-Racist Action
Human Rights Internet (HRI)
International Centre of Human Rights and Democratic Development
Nizkor Home Page Toronto
http://www.nizkor.org/
Nizkor Home Page British Columbia
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/
Nizkor - Toronto (T1)
http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/
Nizkor - Toronto (128K)
http://www1.ca.nizkor.org/
Nizkor - San Antonio (128K)
http://www1.us.nizkor.org/
(Link active July 13, 2001)
Holocaust Cybrary- Now at Nizkor!
Nizkor Search Engine - San Antonio
http://www1.us.nizkor.org/search.html
<end>
Those US Nizkor Links work! Why does Ken McVay insist he has no U.S. operation?
Why does he deny having a San Antonio, Texas operation when his money changer,
B'nai Brith, shows so!? Is Ken McVay afraid that the American IRS will audit his
Tax Scheme?
Here is Ken McVay denying his San Antonio, Texas operation:
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
challenge stands:
If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
organization in the United States, produce it.
While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files.
1,999,936 to go.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp-whats-new.cgi
<<YAWN>>
<end>
Doc Tavish (doc_tavi...@my-deja.com)
Re: Doc, do me a favor
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-03 13:51:40 PST
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 20:22:03 GMT, Jeff F. Davis <jeff_f...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>Start pulling up as many of Ken McVay's denials of having Nizkor
>operations in Texas from the archives. I would do it but I have to go to
>work now. Rev is digging them up also as we speak.
Will do but he has not denied lately that I've seen. I seem to remember
that someone else did claim that Nizkor in Texas had folded. I haven't
seen any trace lately by Nizkor claiming operations in Texas.
Doc Tavish
>I am your friend,
>Jeff F. Davis
<END>
In the short interval between making the reply and researching I found out
my original answer was in error.
Here is what I found:
http://www.mazal.org/
(Looks Nizkorish)
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG
Whois: mazal.org
Server: -automatic-
Registrant:
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
600 Sandau Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216 US
Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
Mazal, Harry (HM1296) hma...@TXDIRECT.NET
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC
600 Sandau
Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216
210-377-2422
Record last updated on 25-Jul-2000.
Record expires on 28-Jun-2001.
Record created on 27-Jun-1997.
Database last updated on 3-Jan-2001 04:57:34 EST.
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.VERDAD.ORG 209.142.81.242
NS2.IDWORLD.NET 209.142.64.253
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is another link:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/HNet/Mott231000.html
(I actually used this to get the info above)
[...]
For those who are curious, here the details of
<http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG> the neutral
people behind Mr Mazal: His above website is registered by the "San
Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" c/o BASIC of 600 Sandau Suite 400,
San Antonio, TX 78216, in Texas, USA. The billing contact is Mr Harry
Mazal of the same address: San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o
BASIC, 600 Sandau, Suite 400, San Antonio, TX 78216, and their phone
number is 210-377-2422. Somebody might like to check them out in more
details. We will be happy in the spirit of openness to post all that we
are told of these people. It is the old Nizkor gang at work again.
<<Doc Tavish comment May 3, 2001: No wonder McVay hates David Irving so much.
David exposes his con game!>>
~~~~END~~~~
McVay claims to have no ties whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
Nizkor Fund" yet his very own administer of his exempt funds shows otherwise as
I documented higher up in this post. B'nai Brith's own web page gives a San
Antonio link as shown above!
Why does Ken McVay lie? Why won't Ken McVay make public information other
organizations which receive exempt donations are required by law to make?
How many reputable organizations which receive exempt donations act in such a
manner when they are put under scrutiny? If Ken McVay's Nizkor Org were above
board then why all the nastiness? Why all the personal attacks and evasion?
Neither does the CCRA has any file on Nizkor and it having "permission" to
receive exempt donations as documented above.
The local BBB doesn't even have Nizkor registered!
LOOK!
http://204.228.135.156/van/search.html
BBB Serving Mainland B.C. Database Search
TIP: Normally you would only enter a part of the company's name and search
on that. If you put information in other fields, then the search will only
bring up companies that match ALL of the search criteria. You should
usually leave most of the fields blank.
Company Name:
I entered Nizkor and this is what I got:
http://204.228.135.156/van/results.html
BBB of Mainland B.C. Database Search Results
No entries fit these criteria.
To recommend that the BBB of Vancouver, British Columbia
consider creating a report on the company in question,
click HERE. <http://204.228.135.156/van/createreport.html>
For more information contact us:
Better Business Bureau
788 Beatty St., Suite 404
Vancouver, British Columbia V6B 2M1
Phone: (604) 682-2711
Perhaps BBB will get some answers about Ken McVay's sham!
As revenue payers you all owe it to yourselves to demand that the Nizkor
Tax Scheme be investigated.
BTW for the record- once again Ken McVay in denial said (as documented above):
"While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files."
Ken I just ran GEEKTOOLS on MAZAL.ORG and got this:
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG
Registrant:
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
600 Sandau Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216 US
Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
Mazal, Harry (HM1296) hma...@TXDIRECT.NET
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC
600 Sandau
Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216
210-377-2422
Record last updated on 15-Mar-2001.
Record expires on 28-Jun-2006.
Record created on 27-Jun-1997.
Database last updated on 13-Jul-2001 01:55:00 EDT.
<end>
Notice that the Database was last updated "13-Jul-2001 01:55:00 EDT" and that
GEEKTOOLS still shows (which agrees with B'nai Brith showing "Nizkor - San
Antonio"): "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC" which deep
sixes your arrogant and deceptive claim: "While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone
else in the Wading Pool) to produce evidence that there exists some sort of
"Nizkor Organization" in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files."
Your challenge was: "While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading
Pool) to produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
in San Antonio, Texas.."- I did again prove that such exists again!
People why do you all let this guy receive exempt donations at your expense?
Key facts you all should not forget:
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
Remember "exempt donation"
Ken McVay admitted:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>
>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
You all may verify the above by:
Using <http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search> the adjacent archive may
be retrieved by inserting the included MESSAGE ID into the field: "Message ID -
Find the message with message ID" and then activating the "Google Search"
button. USE this Message ID: 99oro0$259r$1...@news.tht.net
Remember what CCRA told me via e-mail:
From: Charity webmail <Charities-B...@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
Sender: "Langdon, Blaine" <Blaine....@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
To: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
Subject: Registered charity question.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Thank you for your e-mail.
The Charities Directorate of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency is
responsible for the registration and compliance of charities in Canada.
These organizations are similar to "exempt organizations" as are registered in
the United States. However, we have no record of a registered charity by the
name of Nizkor.org.
<end>
Remember what CCRA revenue code says concerning exempt donations:
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117eq/t4117eq.html#P131_12645
Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO) Information Return
Includes Form T1044
[...]
An NPO described in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income Tax Act is a club,
society, or association that is organized and operated solely for:
social welfare;
civic improvement;
pleasure or recreation;
or any other purpose except profit.
Also, no part of the income of these organizations can be payable to or
otherwise available for the personal benefit of any proprietor, member, or
shareholder, unless the proprietor, member, or shareholder was a club,
society,or association whose primary purpose was to promote amateur
athletics in Canada.
<<I don't think Nizkor promotes amateur athletics in Canada! Please note
that the law states above: "no part of the income of these organizations
can be payable to or otherwise available for the personal benefit of any
proprietor.." yet Ken McVay is the proprietor or director of Nizkor (a
website) and he is on public record (also shown above) as responding to
this question: "Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for
Nizkor?" with "Yup." Plainly this violates the above and seeing how Nizkor
operates as a back room operation from the "proprietor's" own house (proven
above) this operation should be very questionable! Finally note that Ken McVay
announced in a public posting above: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity.
Nizkor is a website." How does a "website" warrant receiving "exempt donations"?
Doc Tavish Comments>>
Distinguishing non-profit organizations from registered charities
An NPO is not a registered charity. A registered charity is a charity that
has specifically applied to the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for
registration and has been accepted as such.
A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes. An NPO does
not have to register either federally or provincially to maintain its privileged
tax status.
<end>
Need I say more other than TAX SCAM?
Doc Tavish
>What follows is proof positive that a web site has an elaborate tax scam which
>allows it to receive "tax exempt donations" which it is not entitled to under
>CCRA regulations. NIZKOR is neither a NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION nor is it a
>REGISTERED CHARITY but due to the ongoing tax scam it enjoys the full privileges
>at the expense of the Canadian revenue payers.
Since I know Ken has dumped you into his killfile I will attempt to explain this
to you one more time, Blubberbury. Hang on and we'll go for a little ride.
Hope you don't mind if I [snip] here and there. Your post is over 600 lines and
over 600 lines of Bradshit is way to much for anyone to be forced to endure.
[snip]
>On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
>(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
I don't see why this is so difficult to understand. It is difficult to spell it
out any differently. Nizkor is a website. It is not a charity. It is not a NPO.
Just keep that in mind. You'll need it later on.
>I asked why should a "website" be awarding tax receipts and I get
>personally attacked!
Obviously, as you well know by now, a website is NOT issuing tax receipts.
>Here is evidence NIZKOR just might be skirting tax laws and I have
>contacted CCRA too!
>http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
>Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
That is not evidence that Nizkor is skirting any tax laws. It is evidence that
after all this time you are still unable to see the forest for the trees.
>CCRA said: "we have no record of a registered charity by the name of
>Nizkor.org." (Letter included below) Only registered charities are allowed
>to issue "Canadian receipts"!!
Of course Nizkor is not a Canadian charity and does not issue Canadian receipts.
CCRA, I suspect, has gone from laughing about you to having putting their own
kill filter in place to get rid of your email.
[snip more Bradshit]
><<I don't think Nizkor promotes amateur athletics in Canada! Please note
>that the law states above: "no part of the income of these organizations
>can be payable to or otherwise available for the personal benefit of any
>proprietor.." yet Ken McVay is the proprietor or director of Nizkor (a
>website) and he is on public record (also shown below) as responding to
>this question: "Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for
Sigh. You are as dumb as a sack of hammers.
Nizkor is a website. It does not issue tax receipts. Is that sinking in yet? No
tax receipts issued, no vio;ation of Canadian tax law. Do you follow that?
>announced in a public posting above: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity.
>Nizkor is a website." How does a "website" warrant receiving "exempt donations"?
>Doc Tavish Comments>>
Because Nizkor does not receive exempt donations.
[snip]
>Notice what CCRA said about "issu[ing] charitable receipts for tax
>purposes"? Look at McVay's operation and see if it complies with the law
>stated above: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations.." yet Ken
>McVay's very own NIZKOR page says: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a
>Canadian tax receipt." Ken McVay also claims that NIZKOR is NOT a charity
>as shown down further in this post.
All you have done is wander in big circles here. Nizkor is not an NPO or a
Charity and it does not issues tax receipts as you have been told a hundred
times.
> The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation
>with the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a
>national volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism,
>racism and bigotry, and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
> Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may
>call B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist
>that they wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer,
>you can print this form and send to:
>It is also plain that McVay does not claim Nizkor to be a charitable
>organization as shown here:
At last! We're getting somewhere! I've been telling you this for years now.
[snip]
>Well now we know Nizkor is not a "charitable organization" so it has to be
>an NPO?! So why does Ken McVay's NPO declare at its web page: "Donations
Shit. And you were doing so good. No you flew off into La La land again.
Sorry, Blubberbury. Nizkor isn't an NPO.
>over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt" which would be in
>violation of: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations" but Ken McVay
>lies to a person who's an object of his smear campaign: "McVay/Nizkor" has
>never issued tax receipts of any sort.." Then again McVay admitted higher
>up in this post: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a
>website." See how NIZKOR skirts all criteria of the tax laws?
You ARE as dumb as that sack of hammers. Nizkor does not issues tax receipts. It
is not an NPO. It is not a charity.
You have been challenged before. Donate $10. If you get a tax receipt from
Nizkor I publicly announce I will give you $1000 in return.
>You're a fraud McVay and you need to be exposed!
The only fraud here, Scott, is you and you have been exposed.
>We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
>survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
>charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
>McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
Nizkor is not an organization. It has no employees. It has no organizational
structure. It is a website run by Ken McVay who is solely responsible for its
content and maintenance.
>Questions:
>1) What is the tax number of Nizkor?
It doesn't have one because it doesn't need one - it doesn't issues receipts.
>2) What is the physical address of Nizkor?
A website can exist anywhere and several places at the same time. Why would a
would a websites physical address be any business of yours?
>3) What is the phone number of Nizkor?
Why should Ken advertise his phone number? So every damn fool (like you) could
call him?
>4) Where can one find the organizational papers for Nizkor?
Nizkor is not an organization.
> a) How many people compose the Nizkor staff?
Nizkor is not an organization. There is no staff.
> b) What are the financial responsibilities of Nizkor?
Nizkor is a website. It has no financial obligations other than Ken's ensuring
the hosting fee's get paid.
>5) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is authorized to
> solicit tax free contributions?
Anyone in Canada can solicit tax free contributions. I have done it myself.
>6) How much money does Nizkor Org receive yearly as charitable donations?
Nizkor gets no money at all as a yearly charitable donation.
>7) You show below that you pay yourself-- what is your yearly pay?
Why should how much Ken pays himself be any of your business at all?
[snip]
>How many organizations which receive charitable contributions operate from
>the backroom of the director's home? He claims to be non-profit and it
>appears that he would have a low overhead-- so how much money does Ken
>McVay receive for his backroom operation?
You keep missing the point, Scott, just as you have missed it for the last
several years. Ken cannot be responsible what some reporter writes. Nizkor is
not an organization. How much money he receives is none of yours or anyone elses
business.
>9) Why should anyone wish to donate to an organization who has a
>director who's been caught in numerous lies especially as documented here?
I have known Ken personally for a long time now. I have never known him to lie.
I have known you for a short time. I have seldom heard you tell the truth.
>Here is a real dilemma. Which entity is lying- Nizkor (Ken McVay) or B'nai Brith
>the Funding Arm of Nizkor (Ken McVay)?
B'nai Brith does not fund Nizkor. You are going to have to try again.
>Ken McVay insists that he has no San Antonio, Texas connection YET his funding
>arm shows that he does at their web page! Here is B'nai Brith:
[snip]
>Those US Nizkor Links work! Why does Ken McVay insist he has no U.S. operation?
>Why does he deny having a San Antonio, Texas operation when his money changer,
>B'nai Brith, shows so!? Is Ken McVay afraid that the American IRS will audit his
>Tax Scheme?
>Here is Ken McVay denying his San Antonio, Texas operation:
>From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
>Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
>he Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
>States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
>I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
>challenge stands:
>
>If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
>organization in the United States, produce it.
And the answer is that Nizkor has no organization in the United States. As to
the San Antonio Area Foundation (which you will note has no links from Nizkor)
you might wish to direct your questions to Harry Mazal. But be nice. Harry
doesn't like to be screwed with and you DO NOT want to piss him off.
[snip]
>Here is what I found:
>http://www.mazal.org/
>(Looks Nizkorish)
[looks Mazal'ish to me]
>McVay claims to have no ties whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
>Nizkor Fund" yet his very own administer of his exempt funds shows otherwise as
So B'nai Brith's web site is in error. So what?
>I documented higher up in this post. B'nai Brith's own web page gives a San
>Antonio link as shown above!
So B'nai Brith's web site is in error. So what?
>Why does Ken McVay lie? Why won't Ken McVay make public information other
>organizations which receive exempt donations are required by law to make?
Because Ken isn't lying? Because Nizkor isn't an organization? Because their is
no onus by law for Ken to reveal anything?
>How many reputable organizations which receive exempt donations act in such a
>manner when they are put under scrutiny? If Ken McVay's Nizkor Org were above
>board then why all the nastiness? Why all the personal attacks and evasion?
Who has them under scrutiny? You? It is to laugh! I can assure that Revenue
Canada does not have Nizkor under scrutiny.
Nor has their been any evasion. Your questions have been answered time and time
again. You just don't like the answers.
>Neither does the CCRA has any file on Nizkor and it having "permission" to
It doesn't have any file of Nizkor period.
>The local BBB doesn't even have Nizkor registered!
Do you suppose that might be because Nizkor isn't a business? Duh!
>http://204.228.135.156/van/search.html
>BBB Serving Mainland B.C. Database Search
That might be one of your problems you dumb fuck but the biggest one is still
that Nizkor is not a business.
[snip]
>Notice that the Database was last updated "13-Jul-2001 01:55:00 EDT" and that
>GEEKTOOLS still shows (which agrees with B'nai Brith showing "Nizkor - San
>Antonio"): "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC" which deep
>sixes your arrogant and deceptive claim: "While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone
>else in the Wading Pool) to produce evidence that there exists some sort of
>"Nizkor Organization" in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files."
It does no such thing, Scotty. It just shows Harry updated it. Now you have to
prove that a relationship exists between Harry Mazal and Ken McVay and since
there no longer exists any relationship you are tough out of luck.
[snip]
>Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
>Remember "exempt donation"
>Ken McVay admitted:
Yes. That's correct. Invest $10 and you too can get a $10 tax deductible
receipt. But not from Nizkor. And, citizens from the US are doubtless shit out
of luck, I doubt Internal Revenue will accept Canadian receipts.
>On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
>(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
On this I disagree with Ken. I think if Mr. Bradbury had a brain cell it would
die of lonliness.
I know this is difficult for you, Blubberbury, but lets see if we can recap and
put this to rest.
1) The San Antonio Foundation is not connected to Ken in anyway.
2) There is no facility whereby citizens of the US can make a tax deductible
donation to Nizkor.
3) Nizkor is a website.
4) Nizkor is not an organization.
5) Nizkor is not a non profit organization nor a charity.
6) Nizkor does not issue Canadian tax deductible receipts.
7) Anyone wishing to make a donation to Nizkor may do so using the format
suggested in funding.shtml on the Nizkor site.
(Now pay attention here Scott. This is where it gets interesting.)
8) B'nai Brith is a non profit organization or a charity (I don't recall which).
9) B'nai Brith is allowed to issue tax deductable receipts.
10) Money donated to B'nai Brith and marked for Nizkor go into an account for
Nizkor (Ken McVay).
11) B'nai Brith is allowed by Canadian Law to issue a tax deductable receipt for
the money THEY received with the request it be given to Nizkor.
12) NPO's and Charities may dispose of their money in any fashion they see fit.
13) B'nai Brith chooses to give the money they get with the request it be given
to Nizkor to Nizkor.
14) In all cases above where Nizkor is used we are speaking of a person - Ken
McVay.
15) Since Nizkor is not an organization, any money donated to 'Nizkor' and
received by Ken from B'nai Brith must be claimed as revenue on Ken's personal
income tax.
And there you have it, Blubberbury. The whole kit-n-kaboodle. Nothing illegal.
Nothing suspect. Just you making a complete ass out of yourself as usual.
Not that this will stop you. You'll keep repeating the same lies, the same
baseless assertions over and over again. You have been given these answers time
and time again.
<deleted most of post>
>
> And there you have it, Blubberbury. The whole kit-n-kaboodle. Nothing illegal.
> Nothing suspect. Just you making a complete ass out of yourself as usual.
>
> Not that this will stop you. You'll keep repeating the same lies, the same
> baseless assertions over and over again. You have been given these answers time
> and time again.
So why try again? Are you trying to "get attention"?
Joe Bruno
Let's cut through your bullshit and get to the point:
Nizkor (McVay) *cannot* legally issue tax receipts for donations made to
Nizkor, so McVay funnels donations made to Nizkor through B'nai Brith
Canada, which CAN and DOES issue Canadian tax receipts for donations
earmarked for Nizkor (McVay).
Conclusion: B'nai Brith Canada launders money for Ken McVay.
Is this legal? If it is, it is a loophole that needs to be closed.
Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
Who is victimized by this scam? The Canadian taxpayer.
Waldo
Observer at Large
Ken Lewis <kle...@netbbistro.com> wrote in message
news:3b73dbf4....@news.abccom.bc.ca...
> Thanks, Mr. Lewis.
>
> Let's cut through your bullshit and get to the point:
>
> Nizkor (McVay) *cannot* legally issue tax receipts for donations made to
> Nizkor, so McVay funnels donations made to Nizkor through B'nai Brith
> Canada, which CAN and DOES issue Canadian tax receipts for donations
> earmarked for Nizkor (McVay).
>
> Conclusion: B'nai Brith Canada launders money for Ken McVay.
'Money laundering' has a specific legal definition. Demonstrate that the
issuance of Canadian tax receipts for donations to Nizkor meets this definition.
> [...deletia...]
> Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
You're a known liar. You are incompetent to make ethical judgements.
JGB
P.S. Where's that evidence of 'coercion' on the part of Kosher certification
agencies, Waldo? You're still so embarrassed by your lie that you now routinely
snip all reference to your accusation.
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Demonstrate that it doesn't, turd.
> > [...deletia...]
Couldn't make it through a post without snipping, could you Snipples? What
was it about the following fifteen words that made them incompatible with
the point you were trying to make?
Snipples' snip restored:
_______________________
Is this legal? If it is, it is a loophole that needs to be closed.
_______________________
</ restored snip>
You snipped it because you were *trying* to make it *appear* that I was
directly accusing Nizkor and B'nai Brith of illegal activity, and those
fifteen words didn't fit with that theme, Right?
In other words, the sole reason for your snip was your attempt to change the
character of my post, right Snipples?
Manipulation through deletion for the purpose of trying to alter the thrust
of someone's message is DECEPTIVE Snipples, and that's your M.O. You do it
in practically EVERY post you make.
You have a lot of nerve calling OTHER people liars, Snipples.
> > Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
>
> You're a known liar. You are incompetent to make ethical judgements.
>
> JGB
BWWWWWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
>
> P.S. Where's that evidence of 'coercion' on the part of Kosher
certification
> agencies, Waldo? You're still so embarrassed by your lie that you now
routinely
> snip all reference to your accusation.
The issue has been addressed. If you're unsatisfied with the answer, that's
your problem, turd.
If it's Brown
flush
it
DOWN!
Waldo
Observer at Large
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:jg_brown-6EC291...@news.alt.net...
> [...deletia...]
> > 'Money laundering' has a specific legal definition. Demonstrate that the
> > issuance of Canadian tax receipts for donations to Nizkor meets this
> > definition.
>
> Demonstrate that it doesn't, turd.
You made the claim, coward. You back it up -- or go right on running.
> [...deletia...]
> You have a lot of nerve calling OTHER people liars, Snipples.
It's merely a statement of fact. You're a liar, Waldo. That's been proven.
> [...deletia...]
> > You're a known liar. You are incompetent to make ethical judgements.
> >
> > JGB
>
> BWWWWWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!
Facts are facts. You are a moral incompetent, Waldo. You've proven that again
today.
> > P.S. Where's that evidence of 'coercion' on the part of Kosher certification
> > agencies, Waldo? You're still so embarrassed by your lie that you now routinely
> > snip all reference to your accusation.
>
> The issue has been addressed.
False. You have never provided evidence for your claim. That's because you were
lying, and you knew you were lying when you made the claim. Keep running,
coward. I'll keep rubbing your nose in your lies.
JGB
>On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:41:00 -0700, "Waldo" <Wald...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Thanks, Mr. Lewis.
>
>>Let's cut through your bullshit and get to the point:
>>
>>Nizkor (McVay) *cannot* legally issue tax receipts for donations made to
>>Nizkor, so McVay funnels donations made to Nizkor through B'nai Brith
>>Canada, which CAN and DOES issue Canadian tax receipts for donations
>>earmarked for Nizkor (McVay).
:
>And issues receipts for any other money it receives.
:
>>Conclusion: B'nai Brith Canada launders money for Ken McVay.
:
>No more so than a church launders money for a missionary it supports.
:
So are you comparing a web site which keeps files on private citizens and smears
private citizens as a regular operation as being a missionary? I guess in a way
you have a point. Ken McVay is a missionary for the Synagogue of Satan and we
all know what a liar and a smearer of men Satan is!
:
>>Is this legal? If it is, it is a loophole that needs to be closed.
:
>It is certainly legal. Remember, ultimately someone must pay the taxes on the
>money. Ken does.
How do you know Ken pays taxes?
>>Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
:
>Absolutely so. He pays the taxes. It is no different than a church ear-marking
>money for a missionary who later must pay taxes on it.
Ken McVay is no missionary. Missionaries are part of the church they are doing
work for. Are you saying that Ken McVay is an observing Jew? See how easy it is
to expose your deceptions?
:
>>Who is victimized by this scam? The Canadian taxpayer.
:
>Absolutely no one is victimize by it.
People are victimized by it because it makes their money available to a web site
which is not entitled to receiving tax exempt donations. PERIOD!
BTW B'nai Brith is NOT a church either (NOR a synagogue for that matter- it is a
political activist group!).
>I am sure that disappoints many of you but that's life. Nothing illegal. Nothing
>unethical.
:
Then why the deception? Why the money laundering?
>>Waldo
>>
>>Observer at Large
BTW Ken you do know that all you can do is name call and make personal attack
don't you? Everyone sees your subject titles too! What does this say of an
organization you compare to being a missionary for a church!?
You're just like all your other Neo-Pharisees and it is so easy to point it out
too!
Doc Tavish
For those who see this post in the archives the above discussion relates to
this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9d1n89%242bv1%241%40news.tht.net
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: British Columbia's Ken McVay's NIZKOR Tax Fraud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, can.politics, pq.general, mtl.general, bc.general
(Everyone read the link above to really see McVay do the two step and spin his
tax scam.)
---------
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>
>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
<end>
I asked why should a "website" be awarding tax receipts and I get
personally attacked!
Here is evidence NIZKOR just might be skirting tax laws and I have
contacted CCRA too!
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
CCRA said: "we have no record of a registered charity by the name of
Nizkor.org." (Letter included below) Only registered charities are allowed
to issue "Canadian receipts"!!
"A registered charity is a charity that has specifically applied to the
Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for registration and has been accepted as
such. A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes."
CCRA rule included below with web link for verification!
LOOK!
From: Charity webmail <Charities-B...@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
Sender: "Langdon, Blaine" <Blaine....@ccra-adrc.gc.ca>
To: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
Subject: Registered charity question.
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:26 -0500
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Thank you for your e-mail.
The Charities Directorate of the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency is
responsible for the registration and compliance of charities in Canada.
These organizations are similar to "exempt organizations" as are registered in
the United States. However, we have no record of a registered charity by the
name of Nizkor.org.
Additionally, due to the confidentiality provisions of the Canadian Income
Tax Act, I am unable to disclose information concerning a particular
organization's tax affairs, including measures taken or to be taken by the
Department resulting from complaints. However, I wish to assure you that
all complaints received by the Department are treated seriously and are
fully investigated, where appropriate.
Finally, the annual information returns of Canadian registered charities
are available to the public. However, as you will note from the above,
Nizkor.org is not a registered charity. The non-profit information return
which you describe is not available to the public.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to our attention.
Sincerely,
Blaine Langdon
Charities Directorate
~~~~END~~~~
kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,bc.general,can.general,tor.general,on.general
Re: ATTENTION NIZKOR: Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit
Organization (NPO) Information Return Form T1044
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <99oro0$259r$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <eghvbtgm6r3tsa0ef...@4ax.com>
<3abfe742$0$1...@news.impulse.net>
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC), kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>Poor Mr. Bradbury... if he had a brain, he would be dangerous.
>
>Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a website.
Glad to see you making that a public record. Care to explain how a website
not being either an "NPO nor a Charity" can operate as you do and issue tax
receipts?
http://www.ccra-adrc.gc.ca/E/pub/tg/t4117eq/t4117eq.html#P131_12645
Income Tax Guide to the Non-Profit Organization (NPO) Information Return
Includes Form T1044
[...]
An NPO described in paragraph 149(1)(l) of the Income Tax Act is a club,
society, or association that is organized and operated solely for:
social welfare;
civic improvement;
pleasure or recreation;
or any other purpose except profit.
Also, no part of the income of these organizations can be payable to or
otherwise available for the personal benefit of any proprietor, member, or
shareholder, unless the proprietor, member, or shareholder was a club,
society,or association whose primary purpose was to promote amateur
athletics in Canada.
<<I don't think Nizkor promotes amateur athletics in Canada! Please note
that the law states above: "no part of the income of these organizations
can be payable to or otherwise available for the personal benefit of any
proprietor.." yet Ken McVay is the proprietor or director of Nizkor (a
website) and he is on public record (also shown below) as responding to
this question: "Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for
Nizkor?" with "Yup." Plainly this violates the above and seeing how Nizkor
operates as a back room operation from the "proprietor's" own house (proven
below) this operation should be very questionable! Finally note that Ken McVay
announced in a public posting above: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity.
Nizkor is a website." How does a "website" warrant receiving "exempt donations"?
Doc Tavish Comments>>
Distinguishing non-profit organizations from registered charities
An NPO is not a registered charity. A registered charity is a charity that
has specifically applied to the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency for
registration and has been accepted as such.
A registered charity can issue charitable receipts for tax purposes. An NPO does
not have to register either federally or provincially to maintain its privileged
tax status.
Generally, registered charities also have to disburse 80% of the funds for
which they issued charitable receipts on their own charitable activities or as
gifts to qualified donees. NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations or
membership fees contributed, and they are not required to disburse a specified
percentage of their earnings.
<End of CCRA web page>
Notice what CCRA said about "issu[ing] charitable receipts for tax
purposes"? Look at McVay's operation and see if it complies with the law
stated above: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations.." yet Ken
McVay's very own NIZKOR page says: "Donations over $10.00 will receive a
Canadian tax receipt." Ken McVay also claims that NIZKOR is NOT a charity
as shown down further in this post.
<FAIR USE INTENDED -- NON-PROFIT>
http://www.nizkor.org/funding.shtml
Click here to learn how to make an exempt donation (Canadian receipt)
http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
The Nizkor Project is pleased to announce its cooperative affiliation
with the League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada. The League is a
national volunteer organization dedicated to combatting antisemitism,
racism and bigotry, and to promoting human rights for all Canadians.
Donors wishing to use their VISA or MASTER CARD for their donation may
call B'nai Brith directly, at 1-416-633-6224, and advise the receptionist
that they wish to make a donation to the Nizkor Project; If you prefer,
you can print this form and send to:
The Nizkor Project
c/o The League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada
15 Hove Street
Toronto, Ontario M3H 4Y8
Name:________________________________________
Street Address:________________________________________________
City_________________State/Province__________Postal Code_______
E-Mail Address:_________________________________
Amount Enclosed: $___________
Please make your donations payable to "The League for Human Rights of
B'nai Brith Canada," and add the words "Nizkor Trust Fund" to the cheque's
memo section. A portion of amounts donated to the Trust Fund is used to
build the Nizkor Endowment Fund. If you prefer that all of your donation
be invested for Nizkor's future needs, please earmark your cheque or draft
with the notation 'For The Nizkor Endowment Fund Only. (All bequests
should be to the 'Nizkor Endowment Fund, Care of The League for Human
Rights of B'nai Brith Canada'.)
Donations over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt.
[#0235903-43-13]
-----------------------
Notice what is said above? Look what Ken McVay has said not too long ago:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=6&selm=90jnnp%24npp%241%40news.tht.net
Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Re: JEWS DUMPED FAG MCVAY!!!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2000-12-05 13:46:34 PST
"McVay/Nizkor" has never issued tax receipts of any sort, Mr.
Grosvenor, so it's rather silly to suggest we got "caught at it."
<end>
It is also plain that McVay does not claim Nizkor to be a charitable
organization as shown here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=936j5k%2427s9%241%40news.tht.net
Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Re: Is Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham Which Gets its Director
Spending Money? R 2
Date: 2001-01-06 00:00:08 PST
In article <8kjd5t0el7tbd9lv4...@4ax.com>,
Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
>survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
>charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
>McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" these things?
How does Mr. Bradbury "know" that Nizkor is a "charitable
organization?" (Can he show that anyone from Nizkor has ever claimed to
be such an organization?)
<end>
Well now we know Nizkor is not a "charitable organization" so it has to be
an NPO?! So why does Ken McVay's NPO declare at its web page: "Donations
over $10.00 will receive a Canadian tax receipt" which would be in
violation of: "NPOs cannot issue tax receipts for donations" but Ken McVay
lies to a person who's an object of his smear campaign: "McVay/Nizkor" has
never issued tax receipts of any sort.." Then again McVay admitted higher
up in this post: "Nizkor is neither an NPO nor a Charity. Nizkor is a
website." See how NIZKOR skirts all criteria of the tax laws?
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
You're a fraud McVay and you need to be exposed!
We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
Questions:
1) What is the tax number of Nizkor?
2) What is the physical address of Nizkor?
3) What is the phone number of Nizkor?
4) Where can one find the organizational papers for Nizkor?
a) How many people compose the Nizkor staff?
b) What are the financial responsibilities of Nizkor?
5) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is authorized to
solicit tax free contributions?
6) How much money does Nizkor Org receive yearly as charitable donations?
7) You show below that you pay yourself-- what is your yearly pay?
http://x71.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=620760630
Subject: Re: How much of a cut does the B'nai Brith get from Nizkor? Date:
05/08/2000
Author: Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@vex.net>
>f) Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?
Yup - I also appreciate revenue from public speaking and site advertising.
~~~~~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~~~~
8) Is Nizkor proper (it's office and main facilities) located in a back
room of your own residence as this says?
http://www.Xgeocities.com/dcjarviks/Idler/vIn15.htmlX
(Remove the X's to view the site, this is to help prevent McVay from
spamming the search engines.)
"A Voyage to Nanaimo-- It takes two hours to cross the Georgia Strait by
ferry from Vancouver, British Columbia, another half-hour by jitney from
the Nanaimo terminal to reach the home of Kenneth N. McVay, webmaster for
The Nizkor Project . The address is an ordinary suburban split-level in a
middle-class neighborhood. There is nothing distinctive about its
location. .... I am taken to a back room, filled with computer equipment,
monitors, and books... Seated in front of the array is McVay, apparently a
50-something computer nerd. He is tall, thin, with short hair and glasses,
wired to the world through his ISP. The Nizkor project which McVay runs
from this room in the back of his house... " <END>
A question for all reading this:
How many organizations which receive charitable contributions operate from
the backroom of the director's home? He claims to be non-profit and it
appears that he would have a low overhead-- so how much money does Ken
McVay receive for his backroom operation?
9) Why should anyone wish to donate to an organization who has a
director who's been caught in numerous lies especially as documented here?
Using <http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search> the adjacent archive may
be retrieved by inserting the included MESSAGE ID into the field: "Message ID -
Find the message with message ID" and then activating the "Google Search"
button. USE this Message ID: 1jq3fts9fb6cn1lth...@4ax.com
From: Andrew John McVay (Andrew_J...@fractal.com)
Subject: Ken McVay Caught in a Lie? What About That Nizkor San Antonio Operation
He Has Denied Having?
Date: 2001-05-03 17:03:02 PST
Here is a real dilemma. Which entity is lying- Nizkor (Ken McVay) or B'nai Brith
the Funding Arm of Nizkor (Ken McVay)?
Ken McVay insists that he has no San Antonio, Texas connection YET his funding
arm shows that he does at their web page! Here is B'nai Brith:
<<<In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
B'NAI BRITH CANADA
<end>
Those US Nizkor Links work! Why does Ken McVay insist he has no U.S. operation?
Why does he deny having a San Antonio, Texas operation when his money changer,
B'nai Brith, shows so!? Is Ken McVay afraid that the American IRS will audit his
Tax Scheme?
Here is Ken McVay denying his San Antonio, Texas operation:
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
challenge stands:
If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
organization in the United States, produce it.
While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files.
1,999,936 to go.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp-whats-new.cgi
<<YAWN>>
<end>
Doc Tavish (doc_tavi...@my-deja.com)
Re: Doc, do me a favor
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-01-03 13:51:40 PST
On Wed, 03 Jan 2001 20:22:03 GMT, Jeff F. Davis <jeff_f...@my-deja.com>
wrote:
>Start pulling up as many of Ken McVay's denials of having Nizkor
>operations in Texas from the archives. I would do it but I have to go to
>work now. Rev is digging them up also as we speak.
Will do but he has not denied lately that I've seen. I seem to remember
that someone else did claim that Nizkor in Texas had folded. I haven't
seen any trace lately by Nizkor claiming operations in Texas.
Doc Tavish
>I am your friend,
>Jeff F. Davis
<END>
In the short interval between making the reply and researching I found out
my original answer was in error.
Here is what I found:
http://www.mazal.org/
(Looks Nizkorish)
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG
Whois: mazal.org
Server: -automatic-
Registrant:
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
600 Sandau Suite 400
San Antonio, TX 78216 US
Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
Mazal, Harry (HM1296) hma...@TXDIRECT.NET
San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is another link:
[...]
~~~~END~~~~
McVay claims to have no ties whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
Nizkor Fund" yet his very own administer of his exempt funds shows otherwise as
I documented higher up in this post. B'nai Brith's own web page gives a San
Antonio link as shown above!
Why does Ken McVay lie? Why won't Ken McVay make public information other
organizations which receive exempt donations are required by law to make?
How many reputable organizations which receive exempt donations act in such a
manner when they are put under scrutiny? If Ken McVay's Nizkor Org were above
board then why all the nastiness? Why all the personal attacks and evasion?
Neither does the CCRA has any file on Nizkor and it having "permission" to
receive exempt donations as documented above.
The local BBB doesn't even have Nizkor registered!
LOOK!
http://204.228.135.156/van/search.html
BBB Serving Mainland B.C. Database Search
TIP: Normally you would only enter a part of the company's name and search
>On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 19:19:27 GMT, <3b738fa5....@news.abccom.bc.ca>
>kle...@netbbistro.com (Ken Lewis) wrote:
>>On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:41:00 -0700, "Waldo" <Wald...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>>>Thanks, Mr. Lewis.
>>>Let's cut through your bullshit and get to the point:
>>>>>>Nizkor (McVay) *cannot* legally issue tax receipts for donations made to
>>>Nizkor, so McVay funnels donations made to Nizkor through B'nai Brith
>>>Canada, which CAN and DOES issue Canadian tax receipts for donations
>>>earmarked for Nizkor (McVay).
>>And issues receipts for any other money it receives.
>>>Conclusion: B'nai Brith Canada launders money for Ken McVay.
>:
>>No more so than a church launders money for a missionary it supports.
>So are you comparing a web site which keeps files on private citizens and smears
>private citizens as a regular operation as being a missionary? I guess in a way
>you have a point. Ken McVay is a missionary for the Synagogue of Satan and we
>all know what a liar and a smearer of men Satan is!
>>>Is this legal? If it is, it is a loophole that needs to be closed.
>>It is certainly legal. Remember, ultimately someone must pay the taxes on the
>>money. Ken does.
>How do you know Ken pays taxes?
I live in Canada too, Blubberbury, and I can assure you that Revenue Canada gets
every damn nickle it can from every one of us. Failure to pay income tax is as
much a crime in this country as it is in yours. And, being a much smaller
country, Revenue Canada catches up to people who do not pay much quicker.
For all your bullshit and bluster, fatman, isn't interesting that neither
'Nizkor' or Ken McVay haveever been investigated for any income tax
irregularities.
>>>Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
>>Absolutely so. He pays the taxes. It is no different than a church ear-marking
>>money for a missionary who later must pay taxes on it.
>Ken McVay is no missionary. Missionaries are part of the church they are doing
>work for. Are you saying that Ken McVay is an observing Jew? See how easy it is
>to expose your deceptions?
Did I say he was a missionary? Did I say Ken McVay was an observing Jew? See how
easy it is to make a fool of you?
You see, Scotty, the only deceptions are posted by you.
Can you spell analogy? More to the point, do you understand it?
Thee same principal is at work here. In Canada NPO's and Charities are free to
spend their money as they see fit. It is up to the person or organization who
receives the money to pay the taxes on it. If the receiving person or
organization is an NPO or Charity there is no obligation to pay taxes. If they
are not an NPO or Charity they must pay the taxes on it.
>>>Who is victimized by this scam? The Canadian taxpayer.
>>Absolutely no one is victimize by it.
>People are victimized by it because it makes their money available to a web site
>which is not entitled to receiving tax exempt donations. PERIOD!
At least you FINALLY admit Nizkor is merely a website. Thank you!
You really should have read my entire post before responding, however. Nizkor,
in the person of Ken McVay, does not receive tax exempt donations. Ken must pay
taxes on the donations he receives.
Being one of the most highly taxed countries on the face of the earth, Revenue
Canada has removed any loopholes.
B'nai Brith is a NPO an as such IS able to issue tax deductable receipts. They
are also permitted to dispence that money however they see fit. Thus they are
free to funnel donations to 'Nizkor,' in the person of Ken McVay as they see
fit.
Revenue Canada's only concern is that SOMEONE pay taxes on it which Ken does
each year when he files his personal income tax return.
>BTW B'nai Brith is NOT a church either (NOR a synagogue for that matter- it is a
>political activist group!).
>>I am sure that disappoints many of you but that's life. Nothing illegal. Nothing
>>unethical.
>Then why the deception? Why the money laundering?
Where is there any deception? The truth is out there for all to see in
funding.shtml and has been there all along. This has been pointed out to you
time and time again but you refuse to see it.
There is none so blind as he who will not see.
Nor, obviously, is there any 'money laundering.' Any Canadian resident who
wishes to make a contribution to Nizkor can get a tax deductable receipt which
is issued by B'nai Brith who is an NPO.
As long as Ken pays the income tax on the money he receives absolutely nothing
illegal or unethical has taken place.
If I so desired and could find a NPO or Charity who would look after it I could
solicit money for my website and offer a tax deductable receipt through the
offering party. As long as I claimed the money as income on my tax return.
>>>Waldo
>>>Observer at Large
>BTW Ken you do know that all you can do is name call and make personal attack
>don't you? Everyone sees your subject titles too! What does this say of an
>organization you compare to being a missionary for a church!?
This is hilarious coming from a man who has used Yale and Sara in his subject
line for months on end. Can you spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e?
Firstly, I have not had anything to say about any organization. We settled that
above. Remember?
Secondly, I did not compare Nizkor to being a missionary for a church. For
purposes of explaining the tax situation I used an analogy. Can we spell
a-n-a-l-o-g-y, Scott?
>You're just like all your other Neo-Pharisees and it is so easy to point it out
>too!
No, Blubberbury, you are like all the rest of the brain dead fucks who claim to
be revisionist scholars.
[snip a long portion of the same, tired, worn out Bradbury drivel]
Please make your donations now to this worthy cause.
And, thank's, Scotty, for reminding me to make another contribution.
[snip another long section of Bradshit I answered last night]
>Nizkor Home Page Toronto
>http://www.nizkor.org/
In Toronto.
>Nizkor Home Page British Columbia
>http://www.almanac.bc.ca/
Non-existant. I believe Ken maintains the rights to the domain name.
>Nizkor - Toronto (T1)
>http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/
Veritas. In Toronto.
>Nizkor - Toronto (128K)
>http://www1.ca.nizkor.org/
In Toronto.
>Nizkor - San Antonio (128K)
>http://www1.us.nizkor.org/
>(Link active July 13, 2001)
Sorry, Scott, www1.us.nizkor.org is in Toronto. (Didn't ya remember me telling
you a website could live anywhere and everywhere all at the same time.)
Check the DNS on this and you'll figure it out. Ecentually.
>Holocaust Cybrary- Now at Nizkor!
Well, that is a mistake, of course. Mr. Dunn's work is not connected with
Nizkor.
>Nizkor Search Engine - San Antonio
>http://www1.us.nizkor.org/search.html
Once again a simple DNS search could save you a lot of trouble.
www1.us.nizkor.org is merely a domain name and does not indicate where the pages
resides. But, as I indicated above, this one is in Toronto.
>Those US Nizkor Links work! Why does Ken McVay insist he has no U.S. operation?
There are no US links. The links are in Canada. Beautiful downtown Toronto.
Probably a wonderfuk 40 degrees there today.
>Why does he deny having a San Antonio, Texas operation when his money changer,
>B'nai Brith, shows so!? Is Ken McVay afraid that the American IRS will audit his
>Tax Scheme?
Because he doesn't have a San Antonio operation? Because there is no tax scheme?
>Here is Ken McVay denying his San Antonio, Texas operation:
>From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
>Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
> The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
>States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
>I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
>challenge stands:
>If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
>organization in the United States, produce it.
>While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
>produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
>in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files.
>1,999,936 to go.
>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp-whats-new.cgi
><<YAWN>>
><end>
Here is another one for you.
(Queue spooky music) The truth is out there, Bradshit.
Since I know you won't go and look at it, it is posted for you below. It is a
reply from Ken to Pat Blakely, another of your kind who lives on conspiracy
theories and likes to tilt at windmills.
<quote>
From kmc...@nizkor.org Thu Jun 1 21:09:22 EDT 2000
Article: 747674 of alt.revisionism
Path: hub.org!hub.org!not-for-mail
From: kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: The embezzlement question McVay refuses to answer
Date: 2 Jun 2000 01:04:24 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <8h716n$2t9h$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <282e6175...@usw-ex0103-086.remarq.com>
Reply-To: kmc...@nizkor.org
X-Trace: news.tht.net 959907864 95537 216.126.72.2 (2 Jun 2000 01:04:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test72 (19 April 1999)
Xref: hub.org alt.revisionism:747674
"Blakely" wrote in message
news:282e6175...@usw-ex0103-086.remarq.com...
> What did you do with the $50,000 given to you to start a Nizkor
> operation in San Antonio? Since you claim you don't have a San
> Antonio operation, is it safe to say that you simply embezzled
> the money?
No one ever gave me $50,000. That sum was donated to the San Antonio
Area Foundation. $40,000 was invested, at the direction of the donor,
in the purchase of two Sun computer systems. $10,000 was invested in
an endowment fund in accordance with the regulations set by the San
Antonio Area Foundation. The San Antonio Area Foundation has never
paid me - or anyone else, to my knowledge. They have, however,
invested the donation as they were directed and legally bound to do.
The computers are in use to this day, confronting and refuting
Holocaust denial, but I have nothing to do with their operation,
maintanence or development.
You can verify their existence by visiting
http://www.holocaust-history.org and http://thhp.org.
I have no association with either organization, and never have. Should
you have further questions, I suggest that you contact Robert
Washington, Patrick Groff, Mark S. Freedman or Harry W. Mazal, OBE,
who are collectively responsible for the fund and the machines.
You can write to them in care of the San Antonio Area Foundation,
http://www.saafdn.org/
> Or did you lie (you seem to be good at that lately) about not
> having a Nizkor connection in San Antonio?
I have no connection in San Antonio, and neither does Nizkor. Get used
to it.
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
David Irving vrs. Deborah Lipstadt & Penguin Books Ltd: Judgment
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/judgment-00-00.html
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/i/irving.david/libel.suit
</quote>
[snip more Bradshit]
>In the short interval between making the reply and researching I found out
>my original answer was in error.
>Here is what I found:
>http://www.mazal.org/
>(Looks Nizkorish)
But as stated last night, is actually Mazal'ish.
>http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG
>Whois: mazal.org
>Server: -automatic-
>
>Registrant:
>San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC (MAZAL2-DOM)
> 600 Sandau Suite 400
> San Antonio, TX 78216 US
> Domain Name: MAZAL.ORG
> Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact:
> Mazal, Harry (HM1296) hma...@TXDIRECT.NET
> San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o BASIC
> 600 Sandau
> Suite 400
> San Antonio, TX 78216
> 210-377-2422
> Record last updated on 25-Jul-2000.
> Record expires on 28-Jun-2001.
> Record created on 27-Jun-1997.
> Database last updated on 3-Jan-2001 04:57:34 EST.
> Domain servers in listed order:
> NS1.VERDAD.ORG 209.142.81.242
> NS2.IDWORLD.NET 209.142.64.253
You know? If I search my ISP I come up with information that is years old. I
don't know if that is because they don't care about correcting it or is it is
difficult to do so. No matter. It doesn't change the facts. All this is say is
that Harry Mazal registered a doman name called mazal.org and fed that
information into it.
If you go to www.mazal.org you will find that website has absolutely nothing to
do with Nizkor and no links to Nizkor. Sure looks like Harry's site to me.
(BTW, verdad.org belongs to Harry also. I don't know about idworld.)
>For those who are curious, here the details of
><http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi?query=MAZAL.ORG> the neutral
>people behind Mr Mazal: His above website is registered by the "San
>Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund" c/o BASIC of 600 Sandau Suite 400,
>San Antonio, TX 78216, in Texas, USA. The billing contact is Mr Harry
>Mazal of the same address: San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund c/o
>BASIC, 600 Sandau, Suite 400, San Antonio, TX 78216, and their phone
>number is 210-377-2422. Somebody might like to check them out in more
>details. We will be happy in the spirit of openness to post all that we
>are told of these people. It is the old Nizkor gang at work again.
By all means. Do check Harry out. But as I warned you last night. You'll be
dealing with a different kettle of fish. Be careful you don't piss him off.
Harry can assure you that the San Antonio foundation has no connection with
Nizkor in any way, shape, or form.
The Mazal group are the people responsible for The Holocaust History Project
which can be found at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
><<Doc Tavish comment May 3, 2001: No wonder McVay hates David Irving so much.
>David exposes his con game!>>
I can assure you from first hand knowledge that Ken has no feelings about David
Irving one way or another.
The only thing that David Irving has been able to reveal is that he is a liar, a
racist, and an anti-Semite.
>McVay claims to have no ties whatsoever with the "San Antonio Area Foundation -
>Nizkor Fund" yet his very own administer of his exempt funds shows otherwise as
>I documented higher up in this post. B'nai Brith's own web page gives a San
>Antonio link as shown above!
Since it concerns you so much you should contact B'nai Brith and ask them to
correct this as it is not true.
>Why does Ken McVay lie? Why won't Ken McVay make public information other
>organizations which receive exempt donations are required by law to make?
Asked and answered last night.
[snip]
>Neither does the CCRA has any file on Nizkor and it having "permission" to
>receive exempt donations as documented above.
CCRA has no file on 'Nizkor' or Ken McVay period. Isn't that odd. You have been
braying like an as to them and they don't even open a file. Why is that?
Wait. I know. It's the consiracy, of course. Ken is in cahoots with the Joos at
Agence des douanes et du revenu du Canada!
>The local BBB doesn't even have Nizkor registered!
Funny that. They don't have me registered either. I guess that's because I am
not a business either.
See you later Scott. Please, don't forget. You promised you were going to take
more and more time away from USENET. Could you begin today?
I'm sure it does. Does it receive any monies earmarked for Ken Lewis or
other individuals???
> >Conclusion: B'nai Brith Canada launders money for Ken McVay.
>
> No more so than a church launders money for a missionary it supports.
So the Goy McVay is a 'missionary' prostelitizing for the "Church of the
Sanctified and Utterly Irrefutable Holy Jewish Holocaust"???
> >Is this legal? If it is, it is a loophole that needs to be closed.
>
> It is certainly legal. Remember, ultimately someone must pay the taxes on
the
> money. Ken does.
It's not quite that simple, and you know it Mr. Lewis. See below.
> >Is it ethical? Absolutely not.
>
> Absolutely so. He pays the taxes. It is no different than a church
ear-marking
> money for a missionary who later must pay taxes on it.
That's twice you've equated McVay to a 'missionary'. And the Jews scoffed
when *I* called Holocaustism a religion, and equated "Denial" to BLASPHEMY.
> >Who is victimized by this scam? The Canadian taxpayer.
>
> Absolutely no one is victimize by it.
Bullshit, and you know it.
Chew on this:
A Canadian citizen makes $250,000.00 in interest income a given year. If he
is in a 40% tax bracket, he would owe $100,000.00 in taxes to the Canadian
government, making his *after tax* income $150,000.00.
($250,000 - 40% (taxes) = $150,000)
Let's look a the difference between donating directly to McVay and
laundering through B'nai Brith:
==============================
EXAMPLE (A): Donating *directly* to McVay / Nizkor - *no* tax writeoff:
($250,000 - 40% (taxes) = $150,000 - $10,000 (gift) = $140,000 (balance).
This $10,000.00 was *actually* $16,666.66 in *pre-tax* dollars:
$16,666.66 - 40% (taxes) = $10,000.00 available for the "gift".
So in order to give $10,000 *directly* to McVay, the donor would have had to
EARN $16,666.66 in *pre-tax* dollars.
Assuming that McVay is ALSO in a 40% tax bracket, he would be liable for
$4,000.00 in *additional* taxes on the money received.
By this method, Canadian Revenue would receive a total of $10,666.66 in tax
revenue from these transactions.
($6,666.66 (donor) + $4,000.00 (McVay) = $10,666.66)
===============================
EXAMPLE (B): Laundering a donation to McVay / Nizkor via B'nai Brith -
*with* a tax write-off.
In this case, the monies are donated from *pre-tax* dollars:
$250,000 - $10,000 (gift) = $240,000 - 40% (taxes) = $144,000.00 (balance).
We immediately see that the donor, by utilizing "B'nai Brith laundry" and
donating from *pre-tax* dollars, saved $4,000.00. So in effect, he is only
actually "giving" $6,000.00 to McVay / Nizkor, as the other $4,000.00 would
have gone to taxes anyway.
Once again, assuming that McVay is ALSO in a 40% tax bracket, he would be
liable for $4,000.00 in taxes on the money received.
In the "B'nai Brith Laundry Method", the ONLY monies Canadian Revenue will
receive are the taxes they collect from McVay.
($0.00 (donor) + $4,000.00 (McVay) = $4,000.00)
========================================
Total tax revenue from method (A) $10,666.66
Total tax revenue from method (B) $4,000.00
Amount *lost to* Canadian taxpayers via the money laundering scheme:
$6,666.66.
Of course, McVay may well be laundering his house, car, boat, and vacation
condo payments through B'nai Brith as well, in which case he would pay much
*less* than the $4,000.00 mentioned above:
A check might look something like this:
_________________________________________
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC
Pay to the order of: B'nai Brith Canada
Amount: $750.00
Memo: Abraham's Boat Sales - Trust Fund
(tax receipt requested. Thanks! Ken)
_________________________________________
> I am sure that disappoints many of you but that's life. Nothing illegal.
Nothing
> unethical.
Under the above scenario, if McVay / Nizkor receives $200,000.00 per year in
"donations", via B'nai Brith, Canadians stand to loose $133,000.00 in tax
revenue.
And while the above scenario is certaily not precise, it draws an accurate
picture of what IS happening as a result of the Nizkor - B'nai Brith
relationship.
If it isn't illegal, it ought to be. It is a MAJOR loophole in the Canadian
Tax system, and all other Canadian taxpayers are the victims - as their
taxes will be increased to make up the difference.
If it isn't unethical, NOTHING is!
Furthermore, if B'nai B'rith is playing this kind of tax-dodge game with
McVay / Nizkor, they're probably doing the same thing with countless OTHER
outfits as well.
After all, If McVay is qualified to receive tax-free money via B'nai Brith,
shouldn't Abraham's Boat Sales be qualified as well?
There's no profit like non-profit!
We don't have a 40% tax bracket in Canada.
[remainder of ignorant bs nipped]
[snip reams of bafflegab from someone who has no understanding of Canadian tax
law]
>Assuming that McVay is ALSO in a 40% tax bracket, he would be liable for
>$4,000.00 in *additional* taxes on the money received.
I suggest that if McVay was in a 40% tax bracket he'd be sitting on a beach in
the Bahamas and completely retired from his involvement in Nizkor.
You illustrations just do not work. By your account donations to a church, a
charity, or any NPO are a money laundering scheme and hurt the taxpayer.
Back to the drawing board, Waldo.
>Ken Lewis <kle...@netbbistro.com> wrote in message
>news:3b738fa5....@news.abccom.bc.ca...
>> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 10:41:00 -0700, "Waldo" <Wald...@hushmail.com> wrote:
>I'm sure it does. Does it receive any monies earmarked for Ken Lewis or
>other individuals???
I don't know about other individuals. I know it doesn't for me. But, then, I
have never asked, being just a small fish in a big pond.
However, if you should like to make a contribution to my effort I would be
pleased to accept it. I cannot give you a tax deduction for it, however.
[rest of Walso crap deleted - it was posted twice]
> [...deletia...]
> Of course, McVay may well be laundering his house, car, boat, and vacation
> condo payments through B'nai Brith as well
The ignorant speculations of a known liar are worthless. Provide evidence that
Mr. McVay is doing anything of the sort, anonymous coward.
> [...deletia...]
> And while the above scenario is certaily not precise
Your scenario is pure fantasy. You are unable to demonstrate that any 'money
laundering' has taken place, since you are ignorant of the legal definition of
the term.
> it draws an accurate
> picture of what IS happening as a result of the Nizkor - B'nai Brith
> relationship.
False. You know nothing of the financial arrangements between Nizkor and B'nai
Brith.
> [...deletia...]
> If it isn't unethical, NOTHING is!
You're a proven liar and a coward. You are unfit to judge anyone's ethics.
> Furthermore, if B'nai B'rith is playing this kind of tax-dodge game with
> McVay / Nizkor
Prove that this is happening, anonymous coward.
You won't. You'll run away from this just as you ran from your kosher
accusations when you couldn't supply evidence for any of them.
> [...deletia...]
> There's no profit like non-profit!
There's no liar like an anonymous liar.
>> [...deletia...]
>> Of course, McVay may well be laundering his house, car, boat, and vacation
>> condo payments through B'nai Brith as well
>The ignorant speculations of a known liar are worthless. Provide evidence that
>Mr. McVay is doing anything of the sort, anonymous coward.
You are too kind... perhaps you should have asked him to provide
evidence that Mr. McVay OWNS a house, car, boat, or vacation condo.
THAT would be far more entertaining :-)
--
The Nizkor Project - An electronic Holocaust educational resource
David Irving, Holocaust denial, and his connections to Right-Wing
Extremists and Neo-Nazism in Germany:
http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/f/funke-hajo/
Goddamn it! That is only because Revenue Canada hasn't thought of it yet. Be
quiet before they get the idea! :-)
If Ken McVay was in a 40% tax bracket, I would have charged a whole lot
more (than nothing) for the work I did for Nizkor....
Which reminds me, has everyone received their ZOG checks this month?
Mine seems to be late....
Sara
I'm sure they've thought of it, and abandoned it because the rich
folks would complain far too loudly. Especially the MPs who would
have to vote for it.
[...]
>If Ken McVay was in a 40% tax bracket, I would have charged a whole lot
>more (than nothing) for the work I did for Nizkor....
I would have paid you, too :-)
>Which reminds me, has everyone received their ZOG checks this month?
>Mine seems to be late....
Ayup... the Elders moved the account to the Rothschild Bank and Storm
Door Company to help finance the next election in Texas. A mil six, as
always.... your is, ah, in the mail...
--
"...I note that on the few occasions of which I am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been singularly unsuccessful..."
(http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/reason.html)
[...]
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9d1n89%242bv1%241%40news.tht.net
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: British Columbia's Ken McVay's NIZKOR Tax Fraud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, can.politics, pq.general, mtl.general, bc.general
(Everyone read the link above to really see McVay do the two step and spin his
tax scam.)
[...]
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9334lf%241nlt%241%40news.tht.net
>From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
>Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
>
> The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
>States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
Everyone remember the key statement made above and place special emphasis on the
part in which Nizkor's Ken McVay stated: "The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has
ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund""
Is that so? Well are these you own words or not?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=9&selm=5n6ib9%24f3h%241%40eclipse.txdirect.net
From: Ken McVay (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: McVay Confirms Nizkor's ADL Connection: Mossad and ARA Also Allies.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1997/06/05
In article <5n400d$s...@crack.usaor.net>, i...@usaor.net (William "Ian
McKinney Roger Hughes" Scott) wrote:
>McVay admits the ADL collects and disburses the money to Nizkor. Just
The ADL is an American organization. American funds donated to The
Nizkor Project are handled by the San Antonio Area Foundation, which
has no ties to the ADL. (Sorry, no banana)
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: Didn't Ken McVay claim: "The Nizkor Project
has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United States. Neither The
Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money from the "San Antonio
Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund">>
Ergo, I have made no such "admission."
[...]
> the ADL directs funding to Nizkor.
The ADL has absolutely nothing to do with my funding. Canadian
funding is collected and dispersed by the League for Human Rights of
B'nai Brith Canada, which is not part of the ADL, although it is
associated with that organization (and a good many others) as a
partner. The League is strictly Canadian, and its Director does not
work for, or report to, the ADL, which is an American group.
(Sorry...)
The B'nai Brith Foundation, which receives funds donated to The
Nizkor Project by Canadians, and which issues tax receipts, neither
funds my work...
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: If B'nai Brith does not fund your work then
exactly why do you receive exempt donations from them? What are they financing?
A web site?>>
~~End of GOOGEl Archival Excerpt~~
>I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
>challenge stands:
>
>If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
>organization in the United States, produce it.
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: I have already shown you to be a liar with
your words above you con man and tax defrauder.>>
>While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
>produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
>in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files.
>
>1,999,936 to go.
>
>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp-whats-new.cgi
>
><<YAWN>>
>
><end>
More insight on a web site receiving exempt donations via a tax scam:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=17&selm=5m1sqg%24rse%241%40eclipse.txdirect.net
From: Ken McVay (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: Nizkor under B'nai B'rith auspices?!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1997/05/22
In article <5m11au$4...@access1.digex.net>, mst...@access.digex.net wrote:
> As you could tell from the Nizkor web page, Nizkor's funding in Canada
>is now coordinated through the Zikaron Tolerance and Remembrance Society,
>an independent organization. In the United States, it is channeled
>through the Nizkor Fund of the San Antonio Area Foundation, which is a San
>Antonio umbrella organization something like the United Way.
Zikaron remains a supporter of the Nizkor Project, but Canaidan
_national_ funding is now managed by the B'nai Brith Foundation, in
Toronto. B'nai Brith Foundation does not, however, support Nizkor
financially - it simply receives donations from the public, issues
receipts if the donations exceed $10, and disperses donated funds as
required.
In short, the B'nai Brith Foundation operates exactly as does the San
Antonio Area Foundation - as an umbrella organization....
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Didn't Ken McVay claim: "The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort
whatsoever within the United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay
has ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
Once again McVay is proven to be a liar!
Doc Tavish
> In article <jg_brown-10789A...@news.alt.net>,
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >In article <3b71cb60$0$1...@news.impulse.net>, "Waldo"
> ><Wald...@hushmail.com>
> >wrote:
>
> >> [...deletia...]
>
> >> Of course, McVay may well be laundering his house, car, boat, and
> >> vacation
> >> condo payments through B'nai Brith as well
>
> >The ignorant speculations of a known liar are worthless. Provide
> >evidence that
> >Mr. McVay is doing anything of the sort, anonymous coward.
>
> You are too kind... perhaps you should have asked him to provide
> evidence that Mr. McVay OWNS a house, car, boat, or vacation condo.
>
> THAT would be far more entertaining :-)
Perhaps he just needs to get a tin-foil adjustment on his collander.
Sara
Nice dodge, Spence.
If it were 25%, would THAT make it any better?
http://www.pigs-get-fat.com/taxinfo.html
" Reduction in middle tax bracket - effective July 1, 2000, the tax rate for
the middle bracket (and that's most everyone) will be reduced from 26% to
25%. The last time an entire bracket was lowered was 1988."
Does THAT change the principle? Does that make the evasion less tangible?
The point is that B'nai Brith launders money for Nizkor, and this siphons
money from Revenue Canada to the detriment of all Canadian taxpayers.
Isn't that right, McVay?
Canadian Jews seem to have a problem with trying to scam the tax system:
____________________________
http://www.usajewish.com/scripts/usaj/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=932
HASIDIC GROUP CHARGED WITH $60 MILLION FRAUD
The Tash folks, who may or may not have invited neo-Nazi Haider to their
wedding, now have worse headaches to worry about.
Huge tax scam exposed
Religious group issued phony receipts for tens of millions
Hundreds of people and businesses in Montreal's Jewish community are to face
criminal charges or be required to pay tens of millions of dollars in evaded
taxes as a result of a guilty plea yesterday in a Saint-Jerome court. The
guilty plea by a religious group connected to the Hasidic community in
suburban Boisbriand capped a two-year investigation of what federal tax
auditors say is the largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious
organization in Quebec.
The religious group, which is known as Construit Toujours Avec Bonte and has
links to the Montreal Rabbinical College, pleaded guilty to issuing tax
receipts for charitable donations that overstated the amount of the
donation.
A senior Montreal construction executive blew the whistle on the scam when
he approached Revenue Canada, now part of the Canadian Customs and Revenue
Agency, with taped information in 1997. The resulting investigation saw
federal tax sleuths seize about $60 million in phony receipts from
individuals and businesses in the Jewish community, court documents say.
Joseph Gutstadt, president of Magil Construction International, the
whistle-blower who exposed the fraud, said in a telephone interview last
night from Israel: "I'm happy that, at the end of the day, justice has
prevailed."
But Gutstadt said he was disappointed that Construit Toujours was fined only
$400,000, and that none of the administrators of the organization or the
rabbinical college were charged.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
In pursuit of donors linked to tax evasion
Hundreds in Jewish community under scrutiny by federal officials
Federal tax investigators insisted yesterday that they will continue an
investigation involving hundreds of people and businesses in the Jewish
community suspected of participating in a charitable-donation tax fraud. The
case involves about $60 million in claimed donations, federal tax officials
said, making it Quebec's largest-ever tax fraud involving a religious
organization.
On Wednesday, a religious group connected to the Hasidic community of Tash,
in suburban Boisbriand, pleaded guilty to issuing charitable-donation tax
receipts which overstated the amounts actually given.
Yesterday, the community, through a public-relations firm, asserted that
government officials had agreed not to go after donors who participated in
the scam. The same statement said the community's Montreal Rabbinical
College would retain the right to issue charitable-donation receipts that
can be used to reduce donors' tax liabilities.
(Montreal Gazette, sent in by R. Shultz)
__________________________
Look at the bright side McVay, they didn't even toss these Jews in Jail!
Oh, but you're not Jewish. You don't suppose B'nai Brith would try to put
all the blame on you, would they?
Waldo
Observer at Large
> <kmsp...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:Zc5xOyRF9+B1Kz...@4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 8 Aug 2001 16:29:21 -0700, "Waldo" <Wald...@hushmail.com>
> > wrote:
> [...deletia...]
> > >A Canadian citizen makes $250,000.00 in interest income a given year. If he
> > >is in a 40% tax bracket,
> >
> > We don't have a 40% tax bracket in Canada.
> >
> > [remainder of ignorant bs nipped]
>
> Nice dodge, Spence.
Wrong. But it _is_ a nice proof of your ignorance, liar.
> [...deletia...]
> The point is that B'nai Brith launders money for Nizkor
The point is that your fact-free fantasies don't constitute proof of that,
anonymous coward.
JGB
P.S. Where's that evidence of 'coercion' on the part of Kosher certification
agencies, Waldo?
================================================================== =====
>> > We don't have a 40% tax bracket in Canada.
>> >
>> > [remainder of ignorant bs nipped]
>>
>> Nice dodge, Spence.
>
>Wrong. But it _is_ a nice proof of your ignorance, liar.
Actually liar, it is your ignorance this proves.
"If each year, for 30 years, you place that $600 in an unsheltered
investment
which (hypothetically) earns 10% per annum, your after tax yield would be
6%.
The result is that your retirement nest egg would only have an after tax
value
of $47,435. Using the same scenario, a Canadian in the 40% tax bracket could
shelter the entire $1,000 in gross income from tax, and invest it inside an
RRSP earning an assumed rate of 10%. By doing so every year for 30 years,
the
RRSP grows to a pre-tax level of $164,494. Incredibly, you could have saved
more than three times as much simply by using an RRSP to protect income from
tax. The difference between sheltered and unsheltered investing is that
important."
http://www.fundfilter.com/readroom/articles/others/rrspmust.htm
"Understanding the taxes
So how much tax will you pay on your investment income? It depends on three
things: your province of residence; your taxable income; and the type of
investment income you receive.
INTEREST INCOME IS FULLY TAXABLE This means that if you're in the 40% tax
bracket, 40 cents of every dollar of interest income you earn will go to
Revenue Canada. There is no special tax break."
http://plaza.v-wave.com/financial_planning/inctax.html
<<space reserved for Geekman's ranting and jumping>>
PB
------------------------------------------------------------
The 5,000,000 forgotten victims of the holocaust
http://www.holocaustforgotten.com
Mr. Blakley crushed *that* statement in another thread, Snipples.
> > [...deletia...]
>
> > The point is that B'nai Brith launders money for Nizkor
>
> The point is that your fact-free fantasies don't constitute proof of that,
> anonymous coward.
Webster's defines "launder" as:
"3 b. to disguise the true nature of (a transaction, operation or the like)
by routing money or goods through one or more intermediaries"
Does the Nizkor-B'nai Brith relationship qualify?
McVay / Nizkor WANTS people to donate MONEY. He knows that people are FAR
more likely to donate MONEY if the donor BELIEVES that they are contributing
to a non-profit / charitable organization. Why?
1) People tend to believe that non-profit / charitable organizations do
"good works" out of the "goodness of their hearts", (snigger) and
2) People KNOW that when they donate money to a non-profit / charitable
organization, they can obtain a tangible benefit in the form of a TAX
DEDUCTION.
McVay KNOWS that he cannot *legally* offer tax certificates to donors, but
he WANTS to offer such certificates anyway, because he KNOWS that it lends
his "website" an air of le-git-i-ma-cy, and that few if any will otherwise
willingly line his pockets.
B'nai Brith ALSO knows that McVay cannot *legally* offer tax certificates,
but they want to see his "website" succeed because his "website" creates a
sym-pa-the-tic shield for Jews.
But (Praise Moses) B'nai Brith, being a "Non-Profit" or-gan-i-za-tion CAN
offer tax certificates to any and all donors!
Solution: McVay / Nizkor coll-a-bo-rates with B'nai Brith, and directs
donors to make ALL donations payable to B'nai Brith, (earmarked for Nizkor,
of course) who CAN and DOES issue tax certificates to all those who donate
$10.00 or more earmarked for NIZKOR. Said funds are then LAUNDERED and
forwarded to McVay (less a 5% "handling fee", of course)
Benefits: The Duped Donor receives a valuable tax certificate from B'nai
Brith in exchange for his donation to Nizkor, which he believes is a
charitable, non-profit organization. (SUCKER!)
McVay / Nizkor APPEARS to be a charitable / non-profit organization (even
though he / it is not) which enables him to receive MORE MONEY!
B'nai Brith gains an advocate for the Universal Image of Jewish Suffering,
said image giving them an incalculable social / political advantage via the
sympathy of the Gentile public and the reinforced cohesion of frightened
Jews. . . (oh, and they also get 5% of the proceeds)
So, does the relationship between McVay / Nizkor fit the description of a
money-laundering operation?
"3 b. to disguise the true nature of (a transaction, operation or the like)
by routing money or goods through one or more intermediaries"
You tell me.
Waldo
Observer at Large
> Jeffrey G. Brown <jg_b...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:jg_brown-6E95F5...@news.alt.net...
> > In article <3b720f16$0$1...@news.impulse.net>, "Waldo" <Wald...@hushmail.com>
> > wrote:
> [...deletia...]
> > > The point is that B'nai Brith launders money for Nizkor
> >
> > The point is that your fact-free fantasies don't constitute proof of that,
> > anonymous coward.
>
> Webster's defines "launder" as:
Irrelevant. Demonstrate that the transaction meets the Canadian legal definition
of "money laundering".
You cannot, because you do not know the Canadian legal definition of "money
laundering". You are also too stupid to find that definition.
JGB
P. S. Where's that evidence of 'coercion' on the part of Kosher certification
agencies, Waldo? Run away, little coward...
I see you're still waiting for this "Waldo" guy to come up with some
concrete evidence. I hope you weren't holding your breath, because these
guys can't seem to come up with anything beyond childish innuendo.
I wonder if any of them finished grade school?
--
Burn your own DVDs with your CD-R & Software!
http://coldfusion.affiliateshop.com/AIDLink.cfm?AID=009108
[...]
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9d1n89%242bv1%241%40news.tht.net
From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: British Columbia's Ken McVay's NIZKOR Tax Fraud
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, can.politics, pq.general, mtl.general, bc.general
(Everyone read the link above to really see McVay do the two step and spin his
tax scam.)
[...]
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=9334lf%241nlt%241%40news.tht.net
>From: Kenneth McVay, OBC (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
>Subject: STILL Waiting for Donnie..... (Or "Bradbury: Wrong Again")
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Date: 2001-01-04 16:32:12 PST
>
> The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United
>States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money
>from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
Everyone remember the key statement made above and place special emphasis on the
part in which Nizkor's Ken McVay stated: "The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has
ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund""
Is that so? Well are these you own words or not?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=9&selm=5n6ib9%24f3h%241%40eclipse.txdirect.net
From: Ken McVay (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: McVay Confirms Nizkor's ADL Connection: Mossad and ARA Also Allies.
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1997/06/05
In article <5n400d$s...@crack.usaor.net>, i...@usaor.net (William "Ian
McKinney Roger Hughes" Scott) wrote:
>McVay admits the ADL collects and disburses the money to Nizkor. Just
The ADL is an American organization. American funds donated to The
Nizkor Project are handled by the San Antonio Area Foundation, which
has no ties to the ADL. (Sorry, no banana)
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: Didn't Ken McVay claim: "The Nizkor Project
has no operations of any sort whatsoever within the United States. Neither The
Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay has ever received any money from the "San Antonio
Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund">>
Ergo, I have made no such "admission."
[...]
> the ADL directs funding to Nizkor.
The ADL has absolutely nothing to do with my funding. Canadian
funding is collected and dispersed by the League for Human Rights of
B'nai Brith Canada, which is not part of the ADL, although it is
associated with that organization (and a good many others) as a
partner. The League is strictly Canadian, and its Director does not
work for, or report to, the ADL, which is an American group.
(Sorry...)
The B'nai Brith Foundation, which receives funds donated to The
Nizkor Project by Canadians, and which issues tax receipts, neither
funds my work...
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: If B'nai Brith does not fund your work then
exactly why do you receive exempt donations from them? What are they financing?
A web site?>>
~~End of GOOGEl Archival Excerpt~~
>I am compelled once again remind Mr. Ellis, and thus Mr. Bradbury, that my
>challenge stands:
>
>If you have any _evidence_ that The Nizkor Project has _any_ sort of
>organization in the United States, produce it.
<<Doc Tavish comment August 8, 2001: I have already shown you to be a liar with
your words above you con man and tax defrauder.>>
>While waiting for Don Ellis (or anyone else in the Wading Pool) to
>produce evidence that there exists some sort of "Nizkor Organization"
>in San Antonio, Texas, I have archived 64 new files.
>
>1,999,936 to go.
>
>http://www.nizkor.org/ftp-whats-new.cgi
>
><<YAWN>>
>
><end>
More insight on a web site receiving exempt donations via a tax scam:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=17&selm=5m1sqg%24rse%241%40eclipse.txdirect.net
From: Ken McVay (kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org)
Subject: Re: Nizkor under B'nai B'rith auspices?!
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 1997/05/22
In article <5m11au$4...@access1.digex.net>, mst...@access.digex.net wrote:
> As you could tell from the Nizkor web page, Nizkor's funding in Canada
>is now coordinated through the Zikaron Tolerance and Remembrance Society,
>an independent organization. In the United States, it is channeled
>through the Nizkor Fund of the San Antonio Area Foundation, which is a San
>Antonio umbrella organization something like the United Way.
Zikaron remains a supporter of the Nizkor Project, but Canaidan
_national_ funding is now managed by the B'nai Brith Foundation, in
Toronto. B'nai Brith Foundation does not, however, support Nizkor
financially - it simply receives donations from the public, issues
receipts if the donations exceed $10, and disperses donated funds as
required.
In short, the B'nai Brith Foundation operates exactly as does the San
Antonio Area Foundation - as an umbrella organization....
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Didn't Ken McVay claim: "The Nizkor Project has no operations of any sort
whatsoever within the United States. Neither The Nizkor Project nor Ken McVay
has ever received any money from the "San Antonio Area Foundation - Nizkor Fund"
Once again McVay is proven to be a liar!
Doc Tavish