Hi BCDA Team,
We would like to request clarification regarding the mapping of CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD (Claim Product Type Code) between the CCLF file and BCDA V3.
As per the CCLF Version 39 documentation, CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD is a one-character field used to classify the diagnosis category. The documented values include:
However, in BCDA V3, we are receiving diagnosis type values such as:
We are currently following the following FHIR mapping for this field:
FHIR Path: ExplanationOfBenefit.diagnosis.type.coding
Could you please clarify the following:
We want to ensure that our BCDA V3 → CCLF transformation follows the expected CMS/BCDA mapping and does not introduce differences from the existing CCLF output.
Please provide the recommended mapping or any relevant documentation for this field.
Thanks,
Ashvani Goyal
Hi Ashvani ,
Thank you for your question about the mappings of CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD!
We were able to confirm that ExplanationOfBenefit.diagnosis.type.coding is the correct FHIR path to use for mapping CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD. After checking with our upstream data source, the Beneficiary FHIR Data (BFD) Server, the values of CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD are translated into FHIR diagnosis type codes based on https://terminology.hl7.org/7.3.0/en/CodeSystem-ex-diagnosistype.html and https://hl7.org/fhir/us/carin-bb/STU2.2/en/CodeSystem-C4BBClaimDiagnosisType.html.
The mapping from CLM_PROD_TYPE_CD to FHIR Diagnosis Type is as follows:
1: externalCauseOfInjury