Re: Upgrade gRPC to newer version?

[Damien Martin-Guillerez]

bcc: bazel-discuss

+bazel-dev 

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:27 PM Damien Martin-Guillerez <dmar...@google.com> wrote:

+Jakob Buchgraber is waiting for 0.5.0 for proto to proto dependency before updating it. See https://bazel-review.googlesource.com/c/11012/

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:39 PM <alpha....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Bazel devs!

I wonder why Bazel is still using gRPC 0.15? This is almost 1 year behind. Can we upgrade this to a more recent version?

Is this more appropriate to ask in bazel-dev forum? However I see much less activity there..

Alpha

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bazel-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bazel-discus...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bazel-discuss/3df73381-551f-493e-b54a-9a32aaa82b7e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Jakob Buchgraber]

Hi Alpha,

great that you care about gRPC too! This is actually not blocked by proto to proto deps. It's just me not having had the time to push it (sorry!). I expect to merge it tomorrow and so this will definitely be part of the 0.5.1 release :-)!

Best,

Jakob

[Alpha Lam]

Cool! We're use it quite extensively. I'm looking forward to the upgrade. Thanks.

Alpha

2017-05-24 19:57 GMT-04:00 Jakob Buchgraber <buc...@google.com>:

Hi Alpha,

great that you care about gRPC too! This is actually not blocked by proto to proto deps. It's just me not having had the time to push it (sorry!). I expect to merge it tomorrow and so this will definitely be part of the 0.5.1 release :-)!

Best,

Jakob

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:28 PM Damien Martin-Guillerez <dmar...@google.com> wrote:

bcc: bazel-discuss

+bazel-dev 

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:27 PM Damien Martin-Guillerez <dmar...@google.com> wrote:

+Jakob Buchgraber is waiting for 0.5.0 for proto to proto dependency before updating it. See https://bazel-review.googlesource.com/c/11012/

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 12:39 PM <alpha....@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Bazel devs!

I wonder why Bazel is still using gRPC 0.15? This is almost 1 year behind. Can we upgrade this to a more recent version?

Is this more appropriate to ask in bazel-dev forum? However I see much less activity there..

Alpha

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "bazel-discuss" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bazel-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

[alpha....@gmail.com]

We might need to upgrade gRPC again because of 1.3.0 containing a buggy netty:

https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/3056#issuecomment-306250212

gRPC 1.4 seems to be landing soon.

Alpha

[Jakob Buchgraber]

Hi,

correct me if I am wrong, but the problem seems to be that gRPC was used with an unsupported Netty version. We don't have that issue in bazel, also we don't use the native KQueue transport.

As a side note, the bigger problem with Netty is that it's HTTP/2 implementation is marked experimental, changes frequently and breaks API's. Thus even minor releases might be incompatible with each other.

Best,

Jakob

bcc: bazel-discuss

+bazel-dev 

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bazel-discus...@googlegroups.com.