現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響

2 views
Skip to first unread message

david chou

unread,
May 13, 2026, 6:48:24 AMMay 13
to BATA Group, Seashon Chen, Dr. JC Fann, John 2 Hsieh, Douglas Chiang, Dr. Michael Yeun, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Chilly Chen, Tek-Khiam Chia, Ted Lau, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Hwan Lin, Michael Richardson, Sim Kiantek, 邱律師

 台灣人的建軍備戰與民進黨政府的特別軍購預算遭到在台支那人與境內敵對勢力的掣肘與打擊, 現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響(I)

1

明天, 5月14日, 老川就要率領他的國務卿.戰爭部長.財政部長與習某在北京進行一場高峰會與談判, "台灣" 與 "美國對台軍售" 都是談判桌上的議題.

"台灣" 長久以來都是美支高峰會的議題, 每次都讓我台灣族人.台派.民進黨政權憂懼. 這種困擾與憂懼只有等到 "台灣加入美國",  才可望解決.

2

關於 "美國軍售台灣" 在這一次的美支高峰會也成為議題一事, 這事情本身就是對我台灣與台灣族人 [包括台灣建州運動與台灣獨立建國運動] 的傷害, 我請台灣與台美鄉親先來閱讀POLITICO所發出的一則訊息 [Appendix]. 

[我的Posts, 前綠人士.現已轉而擁抱藍白紅的人士.現已宣稱自己是支那人的人士.現已淪為藍白紅的幫閒或useful idiots的人士, 都不要或無需閱讀.]

[to be continued]

david chou
founder
formosa statehood statement

=======================

Appendix

POLITICO National Security Daily

By Daniella Cheslow , Phelim Kine and Giselle Ruhiyyih Ewing

With help from Daniel Lippman, Eric Bazail-Eimil and Grace Yarrow 

May 11, 2026

 


Trump puts Taiwan arms sales on table

There’s little chance that President Donald Trump would completely abandon arms sales to Taiwan, but simply discussing the topic with Chinese leader Xi Jinping would be a deviation from longstanding U.S. policy. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images

 

U.S. arms sales to Taiwan will be on the agenda in Beijing this week, President DONALD TRUMP told reporters today. That’s raising dread among Taiwan's supporters that Trump will agree to rethink a foundation of U.S.-Taiwan defense ties in exchange for a successful summit with China’s leader XI JINPING .

Asked whether the U.S. should keep selling weapons to Taiwan, Trump told reporters , “I’m going to have that discussion with President Xi,” and added, “President Xi would like us not to.”

While there’s little chance that Trump would completely abandon arms sales to Taiwan, simply discussing the topic with Xi would be a deviation from longstanding U.S. policy. The U.S. government pledged to Taiwan in 1982 in a document known as the Six Assurances that the U.S. wouldn’t consult with Beijing on weapons sales to the island.

“Under previous administrations, they certainly would have taken pains to avoid any perception that China was dictating what the United States would or would not provide to Taiwan,” CHRISTINE WORMUTH , who served as Army secretary under President JOE BIDEN , told NatSec Daily.

Asked about Trump’s comments today, the White House told NatSec Daily “There has been no change in U.S. policy regarding Taiwan.”

The issue of how much weaponry the U.S. should be sending to Taiwan defense is a live one. Congress approved the latest arms sale to Taiwan, for $14 billion, in January but the sale can’t advance until Trump formally transmits it to Congress.

A bipartisan group of eight lawmakers pressed the White House to move forward in a letter made public today.

“The conventional and asymmetric capabilities we provide — drones, anti-ship missiles, radar systems and mines — make a Chinese invasion prohibitively costly and thereby help preserve the peaceful status quo,” the senators, led by Senate Foreign Relations ranking member JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.), wrote in the letter sent Friday . Sens. THOM TILLIS (R-N.C.) and JOHN CURTIS (R-Utah) joined Democrats.

Taiwan’s diplomatic outpost in Washington didn’t immediately respond to questions from NatSec Daily.

“It's very justified for Taiwan to be concerned" about Trump’s comments, said LYLE MORRIS , a former China director at the Pentagon under both Biden and Trump. "It gives room for interpretation that Trump is willing to accommodate China on arms sales.”

Others close to Trump stressed that an actual change in policy isn’t going to happen. ALEX GRAY , who served on the National Security Council in Trump’s first term, said abandoning Taiwan “would be the end of American power in Asia” and had a “zero percent chance.”

A senior White House official told reporters Sunday that Trump has approved more arms sales to Taiwan than Biden. That’s true — Trump approved a previous $11 billion package in December, which was the largest arms sale to Taiwan in history. But the AP’s Aamer Madhani and Siminia Minstreanu note today that bottlenecks in U.S. defense industry production mean that delivery of those systems could be years away.

Taiwan’s own defense spending has also become part of the debate in Washington. Taiwanese President LAI CHING-TE pushed for a $40 billion special defense budget. Instead, opposition lawmakers who control the country’s legislature reduced that spending to $25 billion last week.

The Trump official told reporters Taiwan’s defense budget “was disappointing in that there was some stuff left on the cutting room floor that we believe still needs to be funded.”

Those words should be a blinking red light, said JASON HSU , a former Taiwanese lawmaker for the main opposition Nationalist Party, or KMT, now at the Hudson Institute.

“It gives Xi Jinping an area that he can exploit,” Hsu said.



david chou

unread,
May 13, 2026, 9:49:27 PM (14 days ago) May 13
to BATA Group, Seashon Chen, Dr. JC Fann, John 2 Hsieh, Douglas Chiang, Dr. Michael Yeun, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Chilly Chen, Tek-Khiam Chia, Ted Lau, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Hwan Lin, Michael Richardson, Sim Kiantek, 邱律師
台灣人的建軍備戰與民進黨政府的特別軍購預算遭到在台支那人與境內敵對勢力的掣肘與打擊, 現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響(III)

老川今天與習某舉行高峰會與談判, 若無意外, 會談到美國對台軍售這個議題.

我再請鄉親們閱讀Politico刊登的一篇報導. [Appendix]

[to be continued]

david chou
founder
formosa statehood movement

=============================

appendix

Here’s how Trump’s meeting with Xi could spark a crisis over Taiwan

Trump’s domestic woes and the Iran war raise the risk that Chinese leader Xi Jinping may try to swap economic sweeteners for a backtrack on U.S.-Taiwan ties.

By Phelim Kine and Megan Messerly

05/11/2026 05:00 AM EDT

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/11/trump-xi-taiwan-crisis-00911593?nid=0000014f-1646-d88f-a1cf-5f46b7bd0000&nname=playbook&nrid=00000160-d5d3-df97-a1f4-ddd348370000

 

President Donald Trump has teased his upcoming summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping as “potentially historic.” If the U.S. president doesn’t choose his words carefully, he could make history by overturning decades of delicate diplomacy over Taiwan.


U.S. allies are particularly worried that Trump — known for sweeping, off-the-cuff statements — could end up disavowing U.S. support for Taiwan, perhaps even inadvertently, according to conversations with five diplomats from Asian and European countries.

“It will be a great success for Xi to make Trump say something good for China in public like ‘I support peaceful unification’ or ‘I oppose the independence of Taiwan,’ or ‘Taiwan is a part of China,” one Asian diplomat said. “Trump is Trump — off script all the time. Let’s pray nothing disastrous happens.”

The diplomat, like others, was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive diplomatic issue.

U.S. policy on Taiwan has long been to acknowledge it as distinct from the People’s Republic of China, which claims the island as its territory, while avoiding voicing any support for Taiwan independence. Beijing has warned such a move could trigger war. Even slight variances in wording could signal a change in policy. Diplomats and China experts warn Xi might push Trump to adjust U.S. policy language from “we do not support Taiwan independence,” to a more definitive “we oppose Taiwan independence.”


“This is pretty subtle stuff — it sounds like tomato-tomahto, even though it has big strategic ramifications,” said Jonathan Czin, a former China analyst at the CIA, now at the Brookings Institution. The risk is that “Trump doesn’t operate with that level of precision,” Czin added.

A person close to the White House said those around Trump are encouraging the president to consider the importance of how he speaks about Taiwan in his conversations with Xi, with the goal of keeping the U.S. policy toward Taiwan unchanged.

“Trump, you never know with him, he’s very unpredictable. So all of his advisers, and all of the materials, and all of the briefings and discussions are to leave the status quo in place in Taiwan and minimize discussion of it,” the individual said.

Those who are working to make sure Trump treads carefully on Taiwan are worried that he may not have enough personally invested to stick to the script, the person said.

“The thing about selling out Taiwan in terms of Trump is there’s really no consequence for him. He’s not going to run again. He doesn’t have this ideological concern about the future of democracy,” the person explained. “He looks at things only in practical economic terms.”

One of diplomats’ major worries: that Trump will trade away years of careful Taiwan policy in exchange for trade deals or help on Iran.

“We’re concerned that Beijing may offer to broker a deal with Iran that would re-open the Hormuz Strait in exchange for U.S. concessions on Taiwan,” a second Washington-based Asian diplomat said in an interview.

The administration hasn’t divulged any specific details about the summit agenda. The two leaders “will discuss a variety of topics including trade, fentanyl, Iran, and other matters of importance to the American people,” the White House said in a statement last week.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested last week that any mention of Taiwan during the meeting would likely be limited to a restatement of existing U.S. and Chinese postures toward the island.

“I’m sure Taiwan will be a topic of conversation, as it always is,” Rubio told reporters. “The Chinese understand our position on that topic, we understand theirs.”

The White House said in a statement that “there has been no change in U.S. policy regarding Taiwan,” but declined to comment on how Trump plans to approach discussions over the island.

Alex Gray, who served in a senior role at the National Security Council in Trump’s first term, rejected the idea that Trump might be swayed by Xi to shift on Taiwan.

“Look, I don’t think this is going to be a strategic conversation. I think this is going to be a primarily economic conversation. The think tank class in Washington has been predicting the president will abandon Taiwan for over a decade now,” Gray said. “Not only does he not do that, but he’s strengthened Taiwan more than any president since 1979 … I see nothing but positive indicators of a strengthened relationship with Taiwan.”

Even if Taiwan doesn’t become a live issue in the talks, the fears of other countries in the region highlight the damage Trump has inflicted on perceptions of American reliability by upending established norms. Trump’s willingness to shred traditional alliances through threats to annex Greenland, make Canada the 51st state and reduce U.S. troop numbers in Germany has eroded international confidence in his willingness to honor longstanding U.S. commitments. That includes commitments aimed at deterring possible Chinese aggression against Taiwan.


Taipei is so anxious about how Trump could address its future in the meeting with Xi that it has said it hopes it doesn’t come up as a topic at all.

Taiwan doesn’t want to land “on the menu of the talk between Xi Jinping and President Trump,” Deputy Foreign Minister Francois Wu said in an interview with Bloomberg News last month. “We worry, and we need to avoid that.”

Taiwan’s diplomatic outpost in Washington declined to comment on Wu’s statement or any concerns Taipei has about the Trump-Xi summit.

Some U.S. lawmakers are trying to insulate Taiwan from potential summit horsetrading. Sens. Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) introduced a resolution last month urging the administration to “maintain the longstanding United States policy on Taiwan.” Coons declined to comment on any specific Taiwan-related outreach to the White House, and Ricketts didn’t respond to a request for further comment.


Beijing is hinting it wants Taiwan on the meeting agenda.

In a pre-summit preparatory call last month, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told Rubio that Taiwan is “the greatest risk factor in China-U.S. relations,” per a Chinese Foreign Ministry readout.

That’s consistent with messaging Chinese officials have shared with American China experts over the past year.

“More and more there’s a view in Beijing like, ‘We might as well try a Hail Mary on Taiwan. It probably won’t work, but there’s no real downside,’” said Zack Cooper, the former assistant to the deputy national security adviser for counterterrorism from 2007 to 2008 who regularly meets with Chinese officials.

It wouldn’t be the first time Beijing uses a leader summit to press the Taiwan issue. Xi also asked President Joe Biden to change the language the U.S. uses on Taiwan independencewhen they met in 2024. Biden refused.


The Chinese Embassy declined to comment on whether Xi will press Trump to backpedal on U.S. support for Taiwan.

If the U.S. were to explicitly oppose Taiwan independence, it could open the door for China to declare currently routine U.S.-Taiwan engagement — including lawmaker contacts with Taiwanese officials and U.S. arms sales to the island — as support for Taiwan independence.

Trump already raised questions about his adherence to U.S. commitments to Taiwan in February when he told reporters that he and Xi had discussed potential additional weapons sales to Taiwan in a call. That suggested Trump had violated one of the commitments that the administration of President Ronald Reagan made to Taiwan in 1982 — known asthe Six Assurances — that the U.S. wouldn’t consult with Beijing on weapon sales to the island.


Backtracking on Taiwan ties could come with costs for the U.S. The Trump administration made arecord $11 billion arms sale to Taiwan in December. The administration has also approved an additional $14 billion in weapon sales, the Taipei Times reported in March, citing Defense Minister Wellington Koo.


The White House declined to comment on Koo’s assertion.

Taiwan is also a key component of administration efforts to create a secure supply chain for the U.S. high technology sector. The administration finalized a trade deal with Taiwan in January that will funnel up to $500 billion in Taiwanese direct investment and credit guarantees into the U.S. semiconductor and artificial intelligence sectors.

Still, if Trump makes a broad statement that appears to change U.S.-Taiwan ties, it may not result in actual policy change. Aides to then-President Biden scrambled to walk back his assertions on four separate occasions that the U.S. would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of Chinese aggression against Taiwan (a violation of the “strategic ambiguity” policy aimed to keep Beijing guessing as to how the U.S. would react in such a scenario).





Trump’s aides — or even Trump himself on the way home on Air Force One — could do a similar message reversal if Trump makes unscripted remarks in Beijing that suggest he’s changing the U.S. relationship with Taiwan.

“The Chinese would love him to say something that differs from existing policy, but depending on how dramatic that something is, they know that it would probably be ephemeral,” said Mark Lambert, former deputy assistant secretary of State for China and Taiwan in the Biden administration.





--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
這是 Google 網路論壇針對「Bay Area Taiwanese American」群組發送的訂閱通知郵件。
如要取消訂閱這個群組並停止接收來自這個群組的郵件,請傳送電子郵件到 bay-area-taiwanese-...@googlegroups.com
如要查看這個討論,請前往 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/1754081743.1411011.1778669299546%40mail.yahoo.com

david chou

unread,
May 16, 2026, 5:31:08 AM (11 days ago) May 16
to Seashon Chen, BATA Group, Dr. JC Fann, John 2 Hsieh, Douglas Chiang, Dr. Michael Yeun, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Chilly Chen, Tek-Khiam Chia, Ted Lau, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Hwan Lin, Michael Richardson, Sim Kiantek, 邱律師
台灣人的建軍備戰與民進黨政府的特別軍購預算遭到在台支那人與境內敵對勢力的掣肘與打擊, 現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響(IV)

回應Dr. seashon chen

1

我開這一欄, 正如欄目或標題所揭示的, 是要談美國軍售台灣或協助武裝台灣或協助台灣人建軍備戰的議題, 美國軍售台灣或協助武裝台灣或協助台灣人建軍備戰, 是台灣人打或打贏一場 "抗支保台戰爭" 或 "反支那侵略與併吞台灣的戰爭" 的必要條件之一, 也是美國打或打贏一場挫折或擊敗 "支那的取代美國做為新的世界霸主的圖謀" 的必要條件之一, 換言之, 若白宮的主人不努力執行TRA的軍售條款對他所課的責任與義務, 或不再遵循 "對台六項保證", 那台灣必會遭支那併吞, 而美國也必失去世界霸權, 至少是終將失去印太霸權的開始.

所以, 我今天要回應我們可敬的.愛台護台不落人後的.筆耕不輟的DR. sEASHON CHEN日前在本欄所留下的COMMENTS.

Dr. Chen給我的指教如下:

Seashon Chen

20265月14日週四 

 

不必陷入撰文者無端的假想,讓台灣人陷入恐慌。

雷根六項保證仍然有效。

美國:

1. 未同意設定終止對台軍售的日期

2. 未同意就對台軍售議題向中華人民共和國徵詢意見

3. 不會在台北與北京之間擔任斡旋角色

4. 未同意修訂《台灣關係法》

5. 未改變關於台灣主權的立場。

6. 不會對台施壓,要求台灣與中華人民共和國進行談判

「六項保證」始終是美國對台及對中政策的根本要素。

 

Taiwan must sever ties with the ROC and act independently in order to resolve historical issues. 台灣必須與ROC切割並各自為政,才能解決歷史問題。

2

2-A

我在本欄是在議事論政, 因此, 我必須引用或提及各方的論點或觀點, 讓我的敘事或論述更周延, 或讓我在做結論或判斷或提出對策時能站在比較堅實的基礎上, 或能幫助我來說服鄉親, 或能讓我的支持者更有自信, 也能幫助我的鄉親以及我的支持者在做決定或選擇時, 能有較好的依據或基礎. 

倘若我所援用或提及的資料或評論或報導, 只是那些作者的 "無端的假想", 且會讓我台灣族人 "陷入恐慌"那當然非我本意, 我議事論政旨在幫助我台灣族人, 若得到反效果, 那就不好了. 不過, 在議事論政時, 我傾向於面對現實, 說實話, 不造假, 不做政令宣傳, 不為台灣建州運動的利益而便宜行事.

2-B

"台灣必須與ROC切割並各自為政,才能解決歷史問題", 這話說得沒錯但我們台灣人現在實際上還做不到. 現階段, 在我們成功地REMOVE roc體制之前, 我們只能LIVE WITH IT, 無法不受或擺脫它的影響或gOVERNANCE.

2-C

"雷根六項保證仍然有效", 我也希望如此不過很顯然這六項保證之中的一項即 "The U.S. "has not agreed to consult with the PRC on arms sales to Taiwan."  " 這一項保證已被老川DELIBERATELY IGNORED.

老川在今年二月初, 就已表示, 他將在不久之後的支那行, 與支那領導人談軍售台灣的議題, 他隨即遭人批評 [aPPENDIX i], 但他日前在北京仍執意為之 [aPPENDIX II]. 我們要觀察的是, 他將如何處理被他擱置的軍售案, 在他任內其他可能的軍售案, 國會通過的無償軍援台灣案, 也要觀察以後的白宮新主人是否會FOLLOW老川的壞鬼帶頭行為.

老川這個壞鬼帶頭的行為, 與他自己的政府的nss & nds對第一島鏈的ALLIES & pARTNER提高國防預算.致力建軍與COLLECTIVE DEFENSE的鞭策與期許產生嚴重的矛盾.

[TO BE CONTINUED]

DAVID CHOU
FOUNDER
FORMOSA STATEHOOD MOVEMENT

=========================


appendix i

Why Trumps comment on discussing taiwan arms sales with china has raised concerns

By  SIMINA MISTREANU

Updated 3:18 AM GMT+8, February 19, 2026

 

U.S. President Donald Trump’s comment that he is discussing potential arms sales to Taiwan with Chinese President Xi Jinping is raising concerns in Taipei as the island democracy relies on U.S. backing in the face of China ’s territorial claims.

On Monday [February 16], Trump told journalists he is discussing the potential sales with the Chinese leader, an unexpected statement that experts say might violate decades-old foreign policy principles defining the United States’ relationship with self-ruled Taiwan.

“I’m talking to him about it. We had a good conversation, and we’ll make a determination pretty soon,” Trump said when asked about Xi’s opposition to the arms sales. He added he has “a very good relationship with President Xi.”

His comments have stirred a debate among some experts and politicians about whether this signals a potential change in U.S. policy toward Taiwan ahead of Trump’s planned visit to China in April. Here is some context:

A ‘dangerous precedent’?

Trump consulting Xi about arms sales to Taiwan may violate the so-called Six Assurances, a set of non-binding U.S. policy principles formulated in 1982 under President Ronald Reagan that have helped to guide the U.S. relationship with Taipei, said William Yang, a senior Northeast Asia analyst for the International Crisis Group.

The second of the Six Assurances states that the U.S. “did not agree to consult with the People’s Republic of China on arms sales to Taiwan.”

“That basically has been executed by several U.S. presidents after Ronald Reagan to justify and continue the arms sales to Taiwan without actually discussing the topic with China over the past few decades,” Yang said.

He added that Trump may be creating a “dangerous precedent” allowing for Beijing to make demands regarding U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.

Taiwan’s government, which is observing a weeklong Lunar New Year holiday, has not reacted to Trump’s statements.

China has condemned record U.S. arms sales to Taiwan

The tensions are rooted in China’s claims over Taiwan, which China says needs to be annexed, by force if necessary. Beijing prohibits any country it has diplomatic relations with from having formal ties with Taipei and regularly sends warships and military aircraft near the island.

Despite not having official ties with Taiwan, the U.S. is the island’s biggest informal backer and arms supplier. It is obligated by domestic law to provide Taiwan with sufficient hardware to deter any armed attack from the mainland.

In December, the Trump administration announced a record-breaking arms sales package to Taiwan worth more than $11 billion.

China bristled at the deal, and in a phone conversation with Trump earlier this month, Xi warned that “the U.S. must handle the issue of arms sales to Taiwan with prudence.”

Xi also stressed that “the Taiwan question is the most important issue in China-U.S. relations,” according to a readout of their call published by the Chinese foreign ministry.

Three pillars of U.S.-Taiwan relations

In the absence of formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, U.S. policies toward the self-ruled island are based on three pillars, said Lev Nachman, a political science professor at National Taiwan University.

The first pillar, and the only one that’s been formalized into law, is the Taiwan Relations Act. It was passed by Congress in 1979, the year the U.S. established formal diplomatic relations with China and severed ties with Taiwan. The act binds the U.S. to provide Taiwan with the means to defend itself while regarding all threats to the island as a security concern.

Secondly, the Three Communiques are three sets of statements by the U.S. and Chinese governments in the 1970s and 1980s that cover a variety of topics including Taiwan. Through the communiques, the U.S. acknowledges that there is only one China without recognizing Beijing’s sovereignty over Taiwan. The Three Communiques form the basis of U.S. strategic ambiguity on Taiwan, leaving the U.S. with room to support the island while not breaking its diplomatic agreements with China.

Finally, the Six Assurances were formulated as a means to reassure Taiwan of continued U.S. support, and they are believed to have been upheld by all U.S. presidents since Reagan.

Trump’s comments give the impression that China may have a say in the quantity of arms sales to Taiwan, said Hoo Tiang Boon, an associate professor of international relations at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore.

“Even if eventually the U.S. will approve whatever arms sales packages to Taiwan, it is a disturbing development, particularly from the perspective of Taiwan because it sounds like it would be an issue that would be bargained away,” Hoo said.

Taiwan to feature prominently in Trump’s China visit

Trump is set to make his first trip to China in his current term in April, and Taiwan likely will feature prominently during his meetings with Xi, along with issues such as trade and access to advanced technologies.

Uncertainty about whether Trump will address the issue of arms sales to Taiwan during his visit is set to amplify skepticism on the island about whether the U.S. would intervene in a potential Chinese attack, Yang said.

“This further surge of skepticism, anxiety about the United States within Taiwan is exactly what China would be aiming for,” he added.

The island’s independence-leaning government led by President Lai Ching-te is already having a hard time securing payment for the existing U.S. arms sales packages, with the budget stalled in parliament.

Taiwan’s opposition lawmakers said Monday they would review a $40 billion special defense budget once they reconvene after the holiday on Feb. 23.

___

This version corrects Trump’s quote to “I’m talking to him about it. We had a good conversation” from the previous versions that incorrectly quoted him as saying “I’ve talked to him about it, made a good conversation.”

AP journalist Huizhong Wu in Bangkok contributed to this report.

SIMINA MISTREANU

Mistreanu is a Greater China reporter for The Associated Press, based in Taipei, Taiwan. She has reported on China since 2015.


appendix ii


May 15, 2026, 10:30 a.m. ET     May 15, 2026

Chris Buckley

Reporting from Taipei, Taiwan

Trump discussed Taiwan arms sales with Xi ‘in great detail.’

President Donald Trump said on Friday that he had discussed U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan with China’s leader, Xi Jinping, in Beijing, a step that may have tested Washington’s decades-old assurance to Taiwan not to “consult” on the sensitive topic with China.

 

Speaking to journalists aboard Air Force One after his departure from Beijing, Mr. Trump was asked if the topic of U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan came up during the two-day summit with Mr. Xi. Mr. Trump offered somewhat contradictory answers, saying at first: “No, I didn’t say anything about it,” then, moments later, saying that the arms sales had been discussed with Mr. Xi “in great detail.”

Since 1979, Taiwan has received American weapons worth tens of billions of dollars. Beijing, which claims Taiwan as its territory, objects to those arms sales. In 1982, the United States broadened its support of Taiwan with a document known as the Six Assurances, one of which said Washington “has not agreed to consult with” China on arms sales to Taiwan.

Asked about the 1982 commitment, Mr. Trump appeared to downplay its relevance.

“Well, I think the 1980s is a long way,” Mr. Trump said, apparently referring to that commitment. “That’s a big, far distance.”

Mr. Trump told reporters the Chinese leader had brought up the issue of arms sales. “So what am I going to do?” he said. “Say ‘I don’t want to talk to you about it’? Because I have an agreement that was signed in 1982? No, we discussed arms sales.”

Mr. Trump added: “You know, the whole thing with the arms sales was in great detail, actually.”

Mr. Trump has delayed giving final approval for American companies to sell Taiwan weapons worth about $14 billion. His latest comments — which suggest he is weighing Mr. Xi’s objections — are likely to magnify uncertainty in Taiwan about whether or when the deal will be approved.

Mr. Trump said he would make a decision on that issue. But he also added: “I think the last thing we need right now is a war that’s 9,500 miles away. I think that’s the last thing we need.”

This week, Mr. Xi told Mr. Trump that their countries’ dispute over Taiwan, if handled poorly, could lead to conflict and “an extremely dangerous situation.” In a phone call in February, Mr. Xi warned Mr. Trump about those arms sales, telling him to handle the issue with “extreme caution.”

Mr. Trump had earlier signed off on an $11 billion sale late last year, a move that angered Beijing.

What precisely was discussed between Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi was not yet clear, said Bonnie S. Glaser, the managing director of the Indo-Pacific Program at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, who specializes in Taiwan policy. “We’re going to have to try and read between the lines, read the tea leaves,” she said.

“But my takeaway or preliminary assessment is that Xi Jinping was quite forceful in expressing his concern about U.S. arms sales to Taiwan,” she said. “I think Xi Jinping sees an opportunity to get the United States not only to delay arms, but potentially to reduce them and maybe not sell arms for a long period of time.”

President Trump has come under pressure from a group of U.S. lawmakers, who on Friday urged the president to formally notify Congress of the $14 billion arms package. They noted that Taiwan’s legislature had recently approved $25 billion in special funding to pay for the missiles and other weapons from the United States.

“Ahead of your summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping next week, we urge you and your team to make clear that America’s support for Taiwan is inviolable,” the senators wrote.

During the summit, Mr. Trump did not publicly discuss America’s support for Taiwan. And on Air Force One, when asked if he would defend Taiwan in a conflict, Mr. Trump held to the “strategic ambiguity” that American presidents have long maintained: neither denying nor confirming whether Washington would intervene in such a war.

“There’s only one person that knows that,” he said. “You know who it is? Me. I’m the only person.”





在 2026年5月14日星期四 下午03:04:22 [GMT+8], Seashon Chen<200...@gmail.com> 寫道:


 不必陷入撰文者無端的假想,讓台灣人陷入恐慌。

雷根六項保證仍然有效。

美國:

1. 未同意設定終止對台軍售的日期

2. 未同意就對台軍售議題向中華人民共和國徵詢意見

3. 不會在台北與北京之間擔任斡旋角色

4. 未同意修訂《台灣關係法》

5. 未改變關於台灣主權的立場。

6. 不會對台施壓,要求台灣與中華人民共和國進行談判

「六項保證」始終是美國對台及對中政策的根本要素。

 

Taiwan must sever ties with the ROC and act independently in order to resolve historical issues.

台灣必須與ROC切割並各自為政,才能解決歷史問題。


2026 0511 Item.jpg

2026 0102 T2.jpg

2026 0511 Item C.jpg
2026 0102 T1.jpg
2026 0207 7.jpg
2026 0409 K.png
Formosa 淡江大橋
AA22U1S4.jpg


david chou <davidch...@yahoo.com> 於 2026年5月14日週四 上午9:49寫道:


--
Seashon Chen, PH.D.

david chou

unread,
May 22, 2026, 10:24:13 AM (5 days ago) May 22
to BATA Group, Dr. JC Fann, John 2 Hsieh, Douglas Chiang, Dr. Michael Yeun, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Chilly Chen, Tek-Khiam Chia, Ted Lau, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Hwan Lin, Michael Richardson, Sim Kiantek, 邱律師, Seashon Chen
台灣人的建軍備戰與民進黨政府的特別軍購預算遭到在台支那人與境內敵對勢力的掣肘與打擊, 現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響(V)

我樂見與鼓勵台灣鄉親, 包括支持 "台灣建州" 的鄉親, 去參加台派民團在五月二十三日主辦的 "支持軍購群眾大會", 但不鼓勵大家去參加隔日由 "台美黨(建州的山寨黨)" 與 "復國黨" 聯合舉辦的同性質活動.

1

由於Old Donald與習某合意建立 "a New Relationship based on 'Constructive Strategic Stability'", 如此一來, 老川不再follow華府已行之有年的 "six assurances" [這是美國的Foreign policy guidelines, 不是或尚未成為Statutory Law] 其中的一條保證, 乃屬邏輯上的必然, 我們因此不必訝異, 為何老川要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為他與北京支共流氓政權及支那邪惡帝國談判的籌碼 [這是老川自己說的, 見Appendix], 若他過幾天, 真要與President Lai通電話, 倘若在電話之中, 跟William說, 他準備推遲或縮小或改為分批批准軍售, 那我們也不必訝異.

話雖如此, 我們台灣族人與台派弟兄與綠營民眾仍應上街發聲, 向President Lai表達我們支持他所提的特別軍購案, 也呼籲美國國會與美國人民向川普行政團隊施壓, 要求老川儘速全額批准140億美元的軍售案.

2

明天, 5月23日, 台派民團就要舉辦 "支持軍購群眾大會", 我呼籲台灣的Patriots [包括建州派鄉親] 前往參加與助勢. 我們必須建軍備戰, 以實力來維持台海和平, 以實力來保衛台灣, 以免台灣遭支那併吞, 不管是和平或非和平方式.

但我不樂見也不鼓勵台灣鄉親去參加隔日由 "台美黨" 與 "復國黨" 聯合舉辦的同性質活動, 理由是:
(1) "台美黨" 雖然在推動我所提出的主張, 可是它違反我的大戰略方針: (a)所有主張台灣建州或台灣獨立建國的黨派, 現階段都應在 "抗支保台" 的大旗下發展, 與民進黨分進合擊, 以打贏一場 "抗支保台, 救亡圖存的戰爭" 或 "反支那侵略與併吞台灣的戰爭" [不是我們要挑起或在挑起這場戰爭, 我們是被迫進行自衛與反擊]. 這場戰爭勝利後, 我們再來舉辦公投, 以解決台灣的主權歸屬. (B)在現階段, 所有主張台灣建州或台灣獨立建國的黨派, 都要與民進黨合作, 以確保民進黨繼續執政, 但在民進黨的勢力屈居弱勢的立委選區與縣市鄉鎮, 則應努力經營, 去擊敗藍白紅這三股與境外敵對勢力勾結的敗類.
"台美黨" 這個不被我認可與背書的山寨黨, 左打我的民進黨弟兄, 右打我的台獨派弟兄, 為了想在2028年取代民進黨執政. 這個目標不但無法達成, 反而有可能因為分裂綠營, 而造成團結的藍白紅的大勝. 藍白紅的大勝, 意謂著老共在台灣建立傀儡政權, 這會是我台灣族人與台派的大災禍.
因此, 我台灣鄉親, 包括支持 "台灣加入美國" 的鄉親, 都不要去參加該黨舉辦的活動, 不要去幫它助勢或造勢.
(2) "復國黨" 雖要反共, 但它要恢復 "中華民國", 要實現 "把台灣含蓋在內的聯邦制", 這違反了台灣建州運動的 "台灣在政治上, 不被納入支那的勢力範圍, 不與支那進行任何型式的政治聯合, 包括國協.邦聯.聯邦" 的主張.
因此, 我台灣鄉親, 包括支持 "台灣加入美國" 的鄉親, 都不要去參加該黨舉辦的活動, 不要去幫它助勢或造勢.


[TO BE CONTINUED]

DAVID CHOU
FOUNDER
FORMOSA STATEHOOD MOVEMENT

========================================

Appendix

Interview: Bret Baier Interviews Donald Trump in Beijing for Fox News - May 15, 2026

[[Fox News] Bret Baier conducted an interview with Donald Trump Friday morning Beijing time at the Four Seasons Hotel. The interview aired at 6:00 pm Eastern on Fox News' Special Report. ]
[Bret Baier專訪President Donald Trump內容摘錄, 與老川軍售台灣案有關的部分]



Bret Baier [sic] [此處應是Donald Trump]

00:03:35-00:03:59 (24 sec)

No Signal (0)


-------- They just don't want to see this place, Kokoda Place, because nobody knows how to define it, but they don't want to see it go independent. They don't want to do it. And I think they probably would do something pretty harsh, and then, they would be met harshly, and bad things will happen.


Bret Baier

00:05:51-00:05:57 (6 sec)

No Signal (0)

But you are waiting on approving billions of dollars of weapons for Taiwan. Is that moving forward?

No StressLens

[Crosstalk]

Donald Trump

00:05:57-00:06:00 (3 sec)

No StressLens

That's, well, I have not approved it yet. We are going to see what happens.



Bret Baier

00:06:00-00:06:02 (1 sec)

No StressLens

What do you looking for?

Donald Trump

00:06:02-00:06:03 (2 sec)

No StressLens

I may do it. I may not do it.

 

Bret Baier

00:06:03-00:06:04 (1 sec)

No StressLens

Yes, what's your hinge point?

Donald Trump

00:06:04-00:06:19 (15 sec)

Medium (1.556)

Well, I'm not going to say that. But I may do it, I may not do it. But we are not looking to have wars, and we are, if you kept it the way it is, I think China is going to be OK with that. But we are not looking to have somebody say let's go independent, because the United States is backing us. You know?



Bret Baier

00:06:19-00:06:25 (6 sec)

No StressLens

So, President Xi probably liked that you have not approved the weapons to Taiwan.

Donald Trump

00:06:25-00:06:45 (20 sec)

No Signal (0.775)

I would say like is maybe too strong a word, because he thinks I could do it with just the signing of my signature, -------- No, I'm holding that in abeyance, and it depends on China. Depends, it's a, it's a very good negotiating chip for us, frankly. It's a lot of weapons, it's $12 [sic] billion.

Donald Trump

00:06:45-00:07:22 (37 sec)

Weak (1.432)

It's a lot of weapons. But, you know, when you look at the odds, China is a very, very powerful big country, that's a very small island. It's, you think of it, it's 59 miles away. 59 miles. We are 9,500 miles away. That's a little bit of a difficult problem with all of that being said. --------





在 2026年5月17日星期日 下午03:45:04 [GMT+8], Seashon Chen<200...@gmail.com> 寫道:


 

Operations Conform to Facts and Laws

China is seizing Taiwan using the Crimean model of infiltration, occupation, takeover, and referendum; disregarding United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (March 27, 2014), which declared the Crimean referendum to belong to Russia invalid.

The current situation in Taiwan is similar to the "parliamentary coup" in Crimea in 2014, but Taiwan's affiliation can be determined by historical facts and existing laws: Taiwan belongs neither to the Republic of China (ROC) or Chinese Taipe in exile in Taipei, nor to the People’s Republic of China. This current situation is based on the following facts and laws: The Allied Headquarters General Order No. 1 (1945), the Allied Treaty of Peace with Japan (1952), UN Resolution 2758 (1971), the U.S. public law Taiwan Relations Act (1979), the Taiwan Travel Act (2018), the TAIPEI Act (2019), and the annual National Defense Authorization Act all confirm that neither the ROC nor the PRC has sovereignty over Taiwan, and Taiwan's sovereignty remains undetermined today.

President Trump, leading a delegation to China, stated that China is very firm on the issue of Taiwan independence, while the Secretary of State said: China has stated that the unification of Taiwan will be decided by a referendum of the Taiwanese people. Legally, Taiwan is not part of any country and is not suitable for independence. The Taiwanese people need the guidance and assistance of the occupying power (US) to establish a Taiwan Government or a US-Taiwan State Government to govern Taiwan. Taiwanese officers and soldiers should be reorganized into the Taiwan Defense Force, and the ROC government-in-exile and its core members, the Chinese Revolutionary Party (KMT), should be repatriated to Kinmen and Matsu. The Taiwan Strait median line should be used as the boundary, with China and Taiwan governing independently.

 

Seashon Chen, Ph.D.

Taiwan (Formosa) International Volunteers Regiment

2026/05/17

 

 

符合事實及法律的行動

中國正在進行滲透、佔領、接管、公投的克里米亞模式奪取Taiwan (Formosa and the Pescadores);不顧於聯合國大會(2014/03/27)68/262號決議(United Nations General Assembly Resolution 68/262) 克里米亞歸屬俄國的全民公投無效。

Taiwan當前的局勢有如2014年克里米亞的「國會政變」,但Taiwan的歸屬可由歷史事實及既有法律判定:Taiwan既不歸屬流亡台北的Republic of China (ROC) or Chinese Taipe也不歸屬People’s Republic of China. 這現況依據的事實及法律如次:二戰同盟國《總部第一號命令》(1945),同盟國《對日本和平條約》(1952),聯合國2758決議(1971),美國公法《台灣關係法》(1979),《台灣旅歷法》(2018),《TAIPEI Act(2019),及每年的《國防授權法》都證實ROCPRC都沒有台灣的主權,台灣的主權至今未定。

帶隊訪問中國的川普總統表示中國對於Taiwan獨立的問題非常強硬,而國務卿說:中國表示Taiwan的統一將由台灣人民公投決定。法理上,Taiwan不是那一個國家的一部分,不適用獨立方式建國。Taiwan people需要principal佔領國(US)的輔導及協助成立Taiwan GovernmentUS Taiwan State Government治理台灣。整編台籍(台灣出生)的官兵為台灣防衛軍,遣返ROC流亡政府及其骨幹中國革命黨(KMT)回去金門及馬祖。以台海中線為邊界,中國and台灣各自為政。

 


david chou <davidch...@yahoo.com> 於 2026年5月16日週六 下午5:31寫道:


--
Seashon Chen, PH.D.

david chou

unread,
May 25, 2026, 10:00:49 AM (2 days ago) May 25
to BATA Group, Dr. JC Fann, John 2 Hsieh, Douglas Chiang, Dr. Michael Yeun, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Chilly Chen, Tek-Khiam Chia, Ted Lau, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Michael Richardson, Sim Kiantek, 邱律師, Seashon Chen
台灣人的建軍備戰與民進黨政府的特別軍購預算遭到在台支那人與境內敵對勢力的掣肘與打擊, 現在Old Donald又要拿 "軍售台灣" 做為與支那鬼子談判的議題, 違背了華府多年來的傳統對台政策, 也會對台灣人的士氣以及第一島鏈的Collective defense帶來負面的影響(VI)

1

我評估在川習高峰會後, 美國媒體報導的老川談話會被台灣的境內外敵對勢力充分利用, 用來打擊綠營.台派.民進黨政府以及它們的支持民眾的信心與士氣. 為了避免情勢惡化, 包括台灣建州運動在內的綠營.台派還有民進黨政府, 都必須拿出辦法, 來給我們的支持者與民眾希望與信心, 讓我們可以hold the line, 讓抗支保台戰爭得以維繫下去, 不至於潰敗, 最重要的是, 我們台灣人在美國的同情者與支持者, 特別是親台灣與親台灣人的國會議員與國安事務界人士, 必須跟1970年代的美國國會議員一樣, 成為台灣的護法, 讓我們台灣人得以安然度過無釐頭老川給我們帶來的打擊.危機.災難.

老川給我們帶來的打擊.危機.災難, 應該或可能包括對第一島鏈的Collective defense的打擊或破壞. 老川對我台灣的態度, 會讓南韓的親北京政權更加不把台灣當一回事, 也會讓馬尼拉對台灣的態度產生變化.

2

我原以為菲律賓會在杜特締的女兒成為下一任的國家元首後, 第一島鏈防衛線的南翼才會出現破口, 但現在因為出現老川2.0這個變數, 菲律賓現在就已出現破口 [Appendix II]. 如果高市早苗.Pete Hegseth.Elbridge Colby不趕緊拿出有效辦法來挽救, 那就沒救了. 

在美國的歐亞盟國之間營造 "抗支保台聯合陣線" 的Old Joe政府讓菲律賓的小馬可士能在老川2.0的第一年也加入 "抗支保台聯合陣線". [Appendix I] 可惜只維持了幾個月.

當無釐頭的老川說 “But you know, I think the last thing we need right now is a war that’s 9,500 miles away.” 時, 我的台灣與台美鄉親不難猜想馬尼拉會怎麼想.

[to be continued]

david chou
founder
formosa statehood movement

=========================

Appendix I



‘No way to stay out’: Marcos on Philippines if China-Taiwan war erupts

Jean Mangaluz - Philstar.com


August 7, 2025 | 11:07am

https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/08/07/2463809/no-way-stay-out-marcos-philippines-if-china-taiwan-war-erupts#google_vignette

 

NEW DELHI, India — The Philippines cannot stay out of the way should a war break out between Taiwan and China, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said.

Speaking to local media in India, Marcos was asked if he was open to allowing US resources and bases to be used to defend Taiwan should China invade the island. 

Marcos sidestepped the question on US intervention, instead explaining the country's precarious position in the event of a war.

“To be very practical about it, if there is a confrontation over Taiwan between China and the United States, there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it, simply because of our physical geographic location,” Marcos told Firstpost. 

Marcos said that Kaohsiung, Taiwan, is a mere 40-minute flight from Laoag, Philippines.

“If you think about it, if there is an all-out war, then we will be joined into it. And I assure you with the greatest hesitation, but again, we will have to defend our territory and our sovereignty,” Marcos said. 

The president also cited the large volume of Filipinos working in Taiwan. An invasion from China would also spell a humanitarian crisis for the Philippines. 

Around 160,000 Filipinos reside in Taiwan. 

Should they find themselves in areas of conflict, Marcos said that he would immediately mobilize everything he could to bring their people out. 

China has previously warned the Philippines away from making comments about Taiwan, saying that those who make unfounded comments could be playing with fire. This was after Armed Forces of the Philippines chief Gen. Romeo Brawner Jr. told the military to make preparations should China invade Taiwan. 

While the administration has stated that it recognizes the One China policy, certain developments have been perceived by some as acknowledging Taiwan's position.

This includes Marcos’ congratulatory post to Taiwan President Lai Ching-te when he won in the elections. 

Marcos also issued an order easing travel restrictions for Taiwanese officials going into the Philippines.

Appendix II


PBBM: PH adheres to One China policy, won’t interfere in Taiwan

Philippine News Agency

Republic of the Philippines

By Ruth Abbey Gita-Carlos

May 19, 2026, 10:00 am

 

MANILAPresident Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. has reaffirmed the Philippines’ adherence to the One China Policy and stressed that the country would not interfere in issues concerning Taiwan.

In an interview with Japanese media on Monday [May 18], Marcos said the Philippines has consistently observed the One China Policy, which recognizes the People’s Republic of China as the only Chinese sovereign state.

“I have to make it very clear. The Philippines has, from the very start, always held a one-China policy. We have always held a one-China policy, and we will continue to do that,” Marcos said.

Marcos said the Philippines does not meddle in what it considers an internal matter but continues to call for the peaceful resolution of tensions involving Taiwan.

“What we counsel everyone involved is that any conflicts be resolved peacefully. And again, it all revolves in peace. And that is, I think, what everyone's ultimate goal is in Japan, the Philippines, and all the countries around the region,” he said.

Marcos made the statement, as he acknowledged that any confrontation involving Taiwan would affect the Philippines because of its geographic proximity and the presence of nearly 200,000 Filipinos living and residing there.

He said the Philippines wants to avoid any confrontation or hostilities around Taiwan, warning that conflict could affect “northern Luzon and probably the rest of Luzon.”

“We do not want to be involved in any conflict,” Marcos said.

“If there is actual confrontation, if there is conflict, just looking at the map, you can tell that the northern Philippines at the very least is going to be part of that or will feel the effects. I can just put it that way,” he added.

Marcos emphasized the importance of cooperation among countries in the Indo-Pacific region to maintain peace and stability.

Marcos said maintaining peace remains the common objective of countries in the region, including the Philippines and Japan.

“We continue to engage all stakeholders in this, and that is important. Because no country can fix this problem or put this problem to rest by itself. It really has to be the cooperation of all the stakeholders of all the countries that are in the region,” Marcos said.

He said the Philippines continues to engage China, through diplomatic channels and regular dialogue between foreign ministers.

“We have raised now the level of engagement with China, where we now have our foreign ministers have agreed to regularly meet. And I think, the first meeting between our foreign Secretary and the Foreign Minister of the People's Republic are scheduled to meet, I think in about less than a month's time,” Marcos said. (PNA) 






Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages