David Chou對H.Con.Res.8 (2025)的理解與解釋:在現階段, 凡是會根本改變或顛覆台灣關係法(體制)/六項保證/美支三公報的眾院決議案/參院決議案/法律提案, 被國會通過的機會都很渺茫或全無, 但美國國會議員/台派政權/獨派與建州派的台灣人與台美人都要繼續努力, 以促進美台關係和美台的共同利益

7 views
Skip to first unread message

david chou

unread,
Feb 10, 2025, 8:45:51 PM2/10/25
to BATA Group, John 2 Hsieh, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Tek-Khiam Chia, Douglas Chiang, Jerome F. Keating, Dr. JC Fann, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Chilly Chen, Ted Lau, Sim Kiantek, Jim Lee, RWH (Taipei)

David Chou對H.Con.Res.8 (2025)的理解與解釋:在現階段, 凡是會根本改變或顛覆台灣關係法(體制)/六項保證/美支三公報的眾院決議案/參院決議案/法律提案, 被國會通過的機會都很渺茫或全無, 但美國國會議員/台派政權/獨派與建州派的台灣人與台美人都要繼續努力, 以促進美台關係和美台的共同利益

1

202011, Wisconsin州第7國會選區選出該州參議院議員Tom Tiffany做為聯邦眾議院議員. 從第117屆國會 (20211月   - 20231) 開始, Tom就開始與賓夕法尼亞州10國會選區 [David Chou的母校所在的選區] 選出的聯邦眾議員Scott Perry領銜提出一項共同決議案  (House Concurrent Resolution, 縮寫為H. Con. Res.), 呼籲拜登政府終結「一個支那政策」並與台灣建立外交關係, 眾院同僚沒有接受該決議案,   Tom & Scott於第118屆國會再度提出, 但又失敗.
 
2

Tom & Scott於2024年11月再度當選連任, 他們又在這一屆 (119, 20251- 20271) 的國會眾議院提出這項共同決議案.

請鄉親們先讀:

Appendix I---共同決議文

Appendix II---Rep. Tom Tiffany辦公室發的新聞稿

Appendix III---The Fox News的報導


[to be continued]

David Chou
Founder
Formosa Statehood Movement


 

 

Appendix I

 

H.Con.Res.8 - Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should resume normal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement with Taiwan, and support Taiwans membership in international organizations.119th Congress (2025-2026) | 

Text - H.Con.Res.8 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should resume normal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement with Taiwan, and support Taiwans membership in





Text: H.Con.Res.8 — 119th Congress (2025-2026)

Introduced in House (02/06/2025)

[Congressional Bills 119th Congress]

[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[H. Con. Res. 8 Introduced in House (IH)]

 

 

119th CONGRESS

  1st Session

H. CON. RES. 8

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should resume normal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement with Taiwan, and support Taiwans membership in international organizations.

 

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

                            February 6, 2025

 

Mr. Tiffany (for himself, Mr. Perry, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Ms. Malliotakis, Mr. Ogles, Mr. Gooden, Mrs. Cammack, Mr. Baird, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Stauber, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Wied, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mrs. Harshbarger, Mr. Ellzey, Mr. McCormick, Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. Meuser, Mr. Gimenez, Ms. Boebert, Mr. Williams of Texas, Mr. Feenstra, Mr. Garbarino, and Mr. Nunn of Iowa) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee

                                                               concerned

 

_______________________________________________________________________

 

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should resume normal diplomatic relations with Taiwan, negotiate a bilateral free trade agreement with Taiwan, and support Taiwans membership in international organizations.

Whereas the people of Taiwan have established a free, open, pluralistic, and democratic society;

Whereas the people of Taiwan have conducted successive democratic Presidential elections yielding several peaceful transfers of power, successive parliamentary elections, multiple nationwide referenda, and numerous local elections;

Whereas Taiwan and its outlying islands have never been under the jurisdiction or control of the Communist regime in Beijing, which continues to illegitimately claim sovereignty over Taiwan and its people; 

Whereas Communist China has weaponized the so-called ``One China Policy'' to block Taiwan's membership and full participation in international organizations and events ranging from the United Nations and the World Health Organization to the Olympic Games;

Whereas the so-called ``One China Policy'' is obsolete, does not serve the people of Taiwan or the United States, and fails to reflect the obvious reality that Taiwan has been a sovereign and independent country for over 70 years; 

Whereas Taiwan maintains diplomatic, cultural, and economic links with several countries around the world, demonstrating its clear and indisputable independence from the People's Republic of China; 

Whereas Taiwan and the United States maintained normal diplomatic relations and a Mutual Defense Treaty until President Carter abruptly abandoned both without the approval of Congress in 1979; 

Whereas Congress responded by adopting the landmark, bipartisan Taiwan Relations Act, codifying in law the basis for continued friendly relations between the people of the United States and Taiwan;

Whereas former President Reagan strengthened ties with Taiwan by issuing the ``Six Assurances'', noting that ``The United States has not altered its position regarding sovereignty over Taiwan'', underscoring that Communist Chinese claims of sovereignty over Taiwan have never been accepted by the United States;

Whereas former President Clinton declared ``that the issues between Beijing and Taiwan must be resolved peacefully and with the assent of the people of Taiwan'';

Whereas President Trump approved the sale of defense articles to Taiwan and signed bipartisan legislation allowing for expanded high-level exchanges and cooperation between Taiwanese and American officials; and

Whereas Taiwan remains a steadfast ally of the United States and a responsible and conscientious member of the international community: Now, therefore, 

be it
    

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

That--

            (1) the United States commends the people of Taiwan for their commitment to democracy, civil liberties, and human rights; and

            (2) it is the sense of Congress that--

                    (A) the President should abandon the antiquated ``One China Policy'' in favor of a policy that  recognizes the objective reality that Taiwan is an independent country not governed by or included within the territory of the People's Republic of China;

                    (B) the President should recognize the legitimacy of the democratically elected National Government in Taipei, normalize diplomatic relations between our two nations, appoint a United States ambassador to Taiwan, and receive a Taiwanese ambassador to the United States;

                    (C) the President should rescind arbitrary agency guidelines that restrict normal communication and interaction between United States and Taiwanese officials;

                    (D) the United States Trade Representative should initiate formal negotiations with Taiwan on the  establishment of a United States-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement; and

                    (E) the President, the Permanent Representative of the United States to the United Nations, and other relevant United States officials should take steps to advocate for Taiwan's full membership in the United Nations and other international organizations in which the United States is a member.


Appendix II

Tiffany Reintroduces Resolution to Scrap “One China” Policy, Normalize U.S.-Taiwan Ties

February 6, 2025

Press Release

https://tiffany.house.gov/media/press-releases/tiffany-reintroduces-resolution-scrap-one-china-policy-normalize-us-taiwan

 

WASHINGTON, DC – Reps. Tom Tiffany (WI-07) and Scott Perry (PA-10) led 22 members of Congress in reintroducing legislation to resume formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan and end the outdated, counter-productive, and dishonest “One China” policy. The resolution also encourages the Trump administration to support Taiwan's membership in international organizations, and to negotiate a bilateral U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement.

Taiwan has never been under the control of the People’s Republic of China – not even for a single day. It is a free, democratic, and independent nation, and it is past time for U.S. policy to reflect this undeniable objective truth,” said Congressman Tiffany.

Background: 

The U.S. maintained normal diplomatic relations with the government in Taiwan until 1979 when then-President Jimmy Carter abruptly cut off formal ties with Taipei and recognized the Communist regime in Beijing.

Lawmakers responded by approving the bipartisan Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), the cornerstone of continued U.S. ties with the island. President Reagan upgraded the relationship during his term with the “Six Assurances,” which made clear that the United States, which has never accepted Communist China’s claims of sovereignty over Taiwan, “has not altered its position.”
 
Despite the TRA and the "Six Assurances," the U.S. still lacks formal ties with Taiwan, inexplicably treating the island's democratically elected government the same way it treats brutal regimes in North Korea and Iran from a diplomatic perspective – and in a category worse than that of Cuba's dictatorship, which President Obama and Vice President Biden recognized during their second term.

23 members of Congress cosponsored Rep. Tiffany’s resolution, including: Reps. Scott Perry  (PA-10), Jim Baird (IN-04), Lauren Boebert (CO-04), Kat Cammack (FL-03), Randy Feenstra (IA-04), Chuck Fleischmann (TN-03), Scott Fitzgerald (WI-05), Andrew Garbarino (NY-02), Carlos Gimenez (FL-28), Lance Gooden (TX-05), Glenn Grothman (WI-06), Diana Harshbarger (TN-01), Jake Ellzey (TX-06), Nicole Malliotakis (NY-11), Rich McCormick (GA-07), Dan Meuser (PA-09), Zach Nunn (IA-03), Chris Smith (NJ-04), Pete Stauber (MN-08), Andy Ogles (TN-05), Randy Weber (TX-14), Tony Wied (WI-08), and Roger Williams (TX-25)

The full text of Congressman Tiffany’s resolution is available hereClick here to read the Fox News exclusive. 

###

 

Appendix III

Trump must dump 'One China' policy and recognize 'free' Taiwan, House Republicans say

By: Morgan Phillips

Fox News

February 6, 2025

https://tiffany.house.gov/media/editorials-letters-and-articles/trump-must-dump-one-china-policy-and-recognize-free-taiwan

 

Two dozen House Republicans from across the political spectrum are backing a resolution to formally recognize Taiwan – a break from current U.S. policy that would rankle leaders in Beijing.

The resolution, put forth by Reps. Tom Tiffany, R-Wis., and Scott Perry, R-Pa., would encourage President Donald Trump to abandon the U.S.’s longstanding ‘One China’ Policy and formally recognize Taiwan as autonomous. 

"Taiwan has never been under the control of the People’s Republic of China – not even for a single day. It is a free, democratic, and independent nation, and it is past time for U.S. policy to reflect this undeniable objective truth," Tiffany said in a statement

The resolution implores Trump to support Taiwan’s entry into international trade organizations and negotiate a bilateral U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement.

The U.S. had established diplomatic relations with Taiwan until 1979, when the late President Jimmy Carter cut off formal ties with Taipei and recognized the Communist regime in Beijing.

Congress then passed the Taiwan Relations Act, which created legal authority for unofficial relations with Taiwan and continued military aid. 

Currently, only 12 independent countries recognize the Taipei government. A change in U.S. policy would likely be viewed as a threat by Beijing. When the U.S. sent a military aid package to Taiwan in December, China's foreign ministry warned Washington was "playing with fire" and called for a stop to "dangerous moves that undermine peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait."

U.S. military analysts have projected 2027 as the year by which China would be fully equipped for a military invasion of Taiwan. And the U.S. has long followed a policy of refusing to say whether it would come to the island’s defense under such a scenario.

Trump slapped an additional 10% tariff on all Chinese goods last week, and China responded in kind with its own export levies. At the same time, Trump has demanded the U.S. take over the Panama Canal to counter Chinese influence.

But Trump’s comments on the campaign trail suggest that he would not be willing to put boots on the ground to face another global superpower in defense of a tiny island democracy. 

"I think Taiwan should pay us for defense," Trump told Bloomberg Businessweek in June. 

"You know, we're no different than an insurance company. Taiwan doesn't give us anything," he added.

Taiwan and China separated amid civil war in 1949 [David: 這段陳述, 從國際法的角度看是錯誤的, 但國際媒體記者的報導多半會出現這種錯誤] and China says it is determined to bring the island under its control by force if necessary. China is increasingly encroaching in the region in recent days with military activity in the Taiwan straits. 

The legislation has both interventionist and America First cosponsors, including Reps. Lauren Boebert, Colo., Carlos Gimenez, Fla., Andy Ogles, Tenn., and Kat Cammack, Fla. 

Read the article here








david chou

unread,
Feb 11, 2025, 4:17:16 AM2/11/25
to BATA Group, John 2 Hsieh, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Tek-Khiam Chia, Douglas Chiang, Jerome F. Keating, Dr. JC Fann, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Chilly Chen, Ted Lau, Sim Kiantek, Jim Lee, RWH (Taipei)
David Chou對H.Con.Res.8 (2025)的理解與解釋:在現階段, 凡是會根本改變或顛覆台灣關係法(體制)/六項保證/美支三公報的眾院決議案/參院決議案/法律提案, 被國會通過的機會都很渺茫或全無, 但美國國會議員/台派政權/獨派與建州派的台灣人與台美人都要繼續努力, 以促進美台關係和美台的共同利益(II)

1

什麼是House/Senate Concurrent Resolution?

The work of Congress is initiated by the introduction of a proposal in one of four principal forms: the bill, the joint resolution, the concurrent resolution, and the simple resolution.

A concurrent resolution is a resolution (a legislative measure) adopted by both houses of a bicameral legislature that lacks the force of law (is non-binding) and does not require the approval of the chief executive (president). Concurrent resolutions are typically adopted to regulate the internal affairs of the legislature that adopted them, or for other purposes, if authority of law is not necessary (such as in the cases of awards or recognitions). 
In the United States Congress, a concurrent resolution is a resolution passed by both the House of Representatives and the Senate but is not presented to the President for signature and does not have the force of law.

2

請鄉親們注意: a House/ Senate Concurrent Resolution沒有法律拘束力或法律效力, 它通常僅是國會所要表達的意見或國會要給總統施政或制訂政策時做參考的意見, 也因此, 我們會在許多Congressional Resolutions中讀到
"Expressing the sense of Congress that-----"這樣的expression. [在不少的Acts中, 有些條款也會出現這種文字, 那就表示, 那些條款也不具法律拘束力, 即便它們被包裹在國會兩院通過/ 總統簽署生效的法案中.]

3

既然如此, 那為何國會又經常要提出 [而且經常是在幾個會期中不斷被提出] 與通過Concurrent Resolutions? 那是因為國會或有不少國會議員認為, 他們所關切的是重大的/ 可是又是難以法案的形式被通過的議題.

Rep. Tom Tiffany (R, WI-7) & Rep. Scott Perry (R, PA-10) 二人領銜提出的H.Con.Res.8 (2025)為例來說明.

其他的條款不說, 我們只看 H.Con.Res.8 (2025)這兩個條款---(2)(A)the President should abandon the antiquated ``One China Policy'' in favor of a policy that  recognizes the objective reality that Taiwan is an independent country not governed by or included within the territory of the People's Republic of China 與(2)(B)the President should recognize the legitimacy of the democratically elected National Government in Taipei, normalize diplomatic relations between our two nations, appoint a United States ambassador to Taiwan, and receive a Taiwanese ambassador to the United States---就可知它們違反或顛覆了台灣關係法(體制), 因此, 若以法案的形式出現, 在現階段, 根本沒有被兩院三讀通過與被總統簽署生效的可能性, 若以共同決議案的形式出現或被提出, 雖然被通過的可能性也很小, 但若在幾個會期中連續被提出, 且若逢國際情勢或美國的國際戰略出現重大變化, 說不定就會被通過.

台灣關係法---
(a)建築在 "台灣的國際法律地位未定" 或 "台灣的主權歸屬尚未確立" 的基礎上.
(b)建築在美國沒有承認台灣或所謂的 "中華民國" 是 "主權獨立的國家" (或 "法理上獨立的主權國家") 的基礎上.
(c)規範的是 "commercial, cultural, and other relations between the people of the United States and the people on Taiwan", 也就是美台之間的 "非官方" 或 "非外交" 關係.

"台灣關係法體制"十分頑強, 在現階段, 任何人想顛覆它或根本改變它, 都極可能是螳臂擋車或徒勞無功, 現階段只能通過一些法案, 來增強或強化它, 例如制訂與通過一些協助台灣自衛或保衛台灣安全的法案或條款, 過去被通過的法案或條款都旨在強化TRA Sec. 2(2)(e)-(f)這兩個條款.

david chou

unread,
Feb 11, 2025, 5:05:51 AM2/11/25
to BATA Group, John 2 Hsieh, John Chou, Allen Kuo, Tek-Khiam Chia, Douglas Chiang, Jerome F. Keating, Dr. JC Fann, Ting-Kuei Tsay, Stephenlin0314, Chilly Chen, Ted Lau, Sim Kiantek, Jim Lee, RWH (Taipei)
David Chou對H.Con.Res.8 (2025)的理解與解釋:在現階段, 凡是會根本改變或顛覆台灣關係法(體制)/六項保證/美支三公報的眾院決議案/參院決議案/法律提案, 被國會通過的機會都很渺茫或全無, 但美國國會議員/台派政權/獨派與建州派的台灣人與台美人都要繼續努力, 以促進美台關係和美台的共同利益 (III)


1

說到這裡, David要告訴鄉親們:

(i)Rep. Tiffany & Rep. Perry領銜提出H. Con. Res. 8 (2025), 很值得我台灣族人與台美族人讚揚/ 肯定/ 感謝.

(ii)最近有些台灣與台美的菁英 [包括有國際政治與國際法律背景的菁英/ 專家/ 學者/ 媒體人/ 政論家] 把 H.Con.Res.8 (2025)誤讀為 "法案", 把它解讀為它反映了川普總統的觀點或意志, 這是犯錯.

(iii)台灣與台美台獨派與華獨派認為, 這項法案必會很快被通過, 大家普遍認為, "天就快光(亮)了", 我台灣族人 "已快看到隧道另一頭的亮光了", 這是過度的樂觀, 也是誤判, 但我的研判是:

(a)H.Con.Res.8 (2025)現在被通過的可能性仍然很小.
(b)即便被通過, 它也對白宮或行政部門沒有法律拘束力, 被Trump Administration採納為政策的可能性也很微小, 即便它在執行MAGA政策, 或把支那視為美國的 "戰略競爭者" [與國際秩序的 "修正主義者", 亦即要挑戰 "川普帝國" 的對手] 亦然.

2

本欄結束.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages