日本前防衛大臣森本敏在接受自由時報專訪時的談話, 很值得我們台灣人的注意與參考
david chou
日本前防衛大臣森本敏在接受自由時報專訪時的談話, 很值得我們台灣人的注意與參考(I)
1
請我的台美與台灣鄉親仔細讀, 森本防相這樣說:"Documents disclosed online showed that Xi had considered invading Taiwan after the CCP’s third plenary session in 2024.""The revelation was startling because it showed that Xi considered taking military action earlier than the timeline given by US intelligence, which said that Xi instructed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready for action by 2027."2
我與我的台獨大老盟友(從2018年的一人到現在的三人)為了解決一項重大問題,從2010年代末期到現在,持續給美國有關方提出備忘錄與建議案,我們遞交的主文件標題是: "Battle Force 2024-2025 [略去副題]".這是為了因應我們的 "老共可能在2024-2025對台發動侵略戰爭的想定" 而提出的建議案.我們的提案至少得到一位美國眾議員的正面回應,他發表了一份 "Battle Force 2025: A Plan to Defend Taiwan Within the Decade by Rep. Mike Gallagher, February 17, 2022, https://www.fdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/fdd-memo-battle-force-2025.pdf" 文件或論文做為回應, 我們不曉得一個有關方是否內部開過會議討論我們的建議案, 我們只知它目前仍在執行我們所列的第一階段行動, 但遲遲沒有邁入第二階段, 我現在也看不出它有執行第二階段行動的跡象. 我必須看到美方進入第二階段, 我才能安心睡覺.[to be continued]David ChouFounderFormosa Statehood Movement=============================
日本前防衛大臣森本敏在接受自由時報專訪時的談話, 很值得我們台灣人的注意與參考(I)
Appendix
《TAIPEI TIMES》 INTERVIEW: Japan’s involvement depends: ex-minister
By Chen Yu-fu and Fion Khan Staff reporter, in Tokyo / with staff writer
2026/03/09 03:00
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/breakingnews/5363458
[Former Japanese minister of defense Satoshi Morimoto gestures during an interview with the Liberty Times in Tokyo in an undated photograph. Photo: Chen Yu-fu, Taipei Times]
Whether Japan would help defend Taiwan in case of a cross-strait conflict would depend on the US and the extent to which Japan would be allowed to act under the US-Japan Security Treaty, former Japanese minister of defense Satoshi Morimoto said.
As China has not given up on the idea of invading Taiwan by force, to what extent Japan could support US military action would hinge on Washington’s intention and its negotiation with Tokyo, Morimoto said in an interview with the Liberty Times （sister paper of the Taipei Times） yesterday.
There has to be sufficient mutual recognition of how Japan could provide assistance under the US-Japan Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security in case of a Chinese invasion, he said.
Any response would first require an assessment of the specific scenario to determine what actions Japan could legally take under international and domestic law, he said.
For example, deploying the Japan Self-Defense Forces （JSDF） onto Taiwanese soil or directly taking up responsibility of defending Taiwan is not envisioned under the law, nor is it an anticipated goal, he said.
The possibility of the JSDF landing in Taiwan to conduct joint defense operations with the US and Taiwanese forces is not allowed for in Japanese law, he added.
If the US conducts operations around Taiwan, Japan could provide support and cooperation, such as maritime transport, patrol and surveillance missions, protection of undersea cables and logistical supply operations, he said.
This would require determining in advance what kind of strategy the US might adopt and how far it would be willing to go, while considering how a US-Japan cooperation framework should be established, he said.
The next important question would be which countries besides the US would provide support and cooperation, he said.
Tokyo believes Australia and the Philippines are likely to offer support, while European countries are geographically distant and would face difficulties deploying naval or air forces immediately, he said.
South Korea would be in a complicated situation, as tensions could rise on the Korean Peninsula if there were a contingency in the Taiwan Strait, he said.
If Russia and North Korea were to take action on the Korean Peninsula under China’s request, South Korea would likely be unable to take part in supporting Taiwan, he added.
South Korean polls showed that more than 60 percent of respondents supported providing all sorts of assistance to Taiwan in such a situation, but they did not expect deploying South Korean troops Korea-based US forces to Taiwan, he said.
Seoul would likely not be a highly reliable source of help in case of a Taiwan contingency, he added.
The key would be to what extent the US would be willing to help Taiwan, he said, adding the White House has not clearly elaborated its stance in public.
US skeptics’ belief that Washington would not come to Taiwan’s aid in a crisis is likely fueled in part by Chinese information manipulation, he said.
Regarding the purge and reshuffle of senior officials in the Chinese Communist Party （CCP）, he said two scenarios could emerge.
One possibility is that the purge could consolidate Chinese President Xi Jinping’s （習近平） power and make it easier for him to resort to military action against Taiwan, he said.
Documents disclosed online showed that Xi had considered invading Taiwan after the CCP’s third plenary session in 2024, he said.
Xi’s plan was thwarted by Central Military Commission vice chairman Zhang Youxia （張又俠）, who was under investigation for suspected serious contraventions of discipline and law, and other senior officials, he said.
The revelation was startling because it showed that Xi considered taking military action earlier than the timeline given by US intelligence, which said that Xi instructed the People’s Liberation Army to be ready for action by 2027, he said.
In the past, many Japanese experts believed that if China were to use force against Taiwan, it would be enormously costly and risk heavy losses and the possibility of failure, he said.
Pursuing unification through non-military means, such as political, economic and information-based measures without resorting to war would be Beijing’s other option, he said.
Despite taking more time, such an approach would involve fewer risks and a possible higher chance of success for China, while making it more difficult for the US and other countries to intervene, he said.
If that proves to be the case, Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2028 could become an important turning point in cross-strait relations, he added.
Another scenario could involve a sudden development, such as Taiwan unexpectedly declaring independence or the US making a clear commitment to militarily intervene in support of Taiwan, he said.
Under such circumstances, China might decide to use force without hesitation, he said.
“Xi has clearly considered military unification and that intention may not have changed,” he said, warning that China could simultaneously intensify military pressure while attempting to achieve political objectives without launching a full-scale war.
If the Taiwan Strait were to fall under China’s effective control, freedom of navigation for Japan and the US would be severely restricted, potentially disrupting maritime supply routes and affecting the flow of energy, goods and trade, he said.
While it is difficult to determine which scenario is more likely to emerge, he believes that Xi is likely to consolidate his authority and reorganize the CCP’s power structure, he said.
As Xi is unlikely to immediately resort to military unification, Taiwan’s upcoming presidential election could become the next major turning point, making it essential to closely observe Taiwan’s domestic politics, he said.
david chou
日本前防衛大臣森本敏在接受自由時報專訪時的談話, 很值得我們台灣人的注意與參考(II)
"Despite taking more time, such an approach would involve fewer risks and a possible higher chance of success for China, while making it more difficult for the US and other countries to intervene."
"If that proves to be the case, Taiwan’s presidential election in January 2028 could become an important turning point in cross-strait relations."
"“Xi has clearly considered military unification and that intention may not have changed,”-----------warning that China could simultaneously intensify military pressure while attempting to achieve political objectives without launching a full-scale war."
"As Xi is unlikely to immediately resort to military unification, Taiwan’s upcoming presidential election could become the next major turning point, making it essential to closely observe Taiwan’s domestic politics."