[台灣國]雙十不是台灣國慶 記者會
台灣國
記者會新聞稿 2025年10月10日
長久以來，中華民國與中華人民共和國一再援引《開羅宣言》，聲稱台灣主權理所當然屬於中國。然而，美國在台協會（AIT）與美國國務院已於日前公開重申：無論是《開羅宣言》、《波茲坦宣言》或《舊金山和約》，這些二戰關鍵國際文件都沒有決定台灣的最終歸屬。換言之，國際法明白揭示──台灣既不屬於中華民國，更不屬於中華人民共和國。台灣的未來，只能由台灣人民依照住民自決(self-determination)的普世原則來決定。而這正是「台灣國」之所以在十月十日大聲疾呼[雙十不是台灣國慶]的原因。
「台灣國」理事長陳峻涵表示，在這樣的現實下，仍然繼續在台灣土地上舉辦「雙十國慶」大典，將1911年辛亥革命的日子強加為台灣的「國慶」，完全是歷史錯置與政治僭越。辛亥革命發生於中國，與台灣歷史發展毫無關聯；當年台灣仍在日本統治之下，與中華民國的成立根本無涉。今日卻要台灣人民跟隨外來政權的腳步，慶祝一個與我們毫無歷史連結的日子，不但荒謬，更是對台灣人尊嚴與集體認同的侮辱。
「台灣國」理事長陳峻涵進一步嚴正指出：雙十節不是台灣的國慶日，而是中華民國政權的冥誕日。以它作為台灣的「國慶」，等於替外來殖民政權張目，掩蓋台灣地位未定的真相，更企圖阻斷台灣人民追求自決建國的道路。我們要再次重申：台灣至今沒有屬於自己的國慶，因為台灣仍未完成住民自決(self-determination)、尚未建立屬於台灣人的獨立國家。
「台灣國」執行長陳慶坤也說明，真正屬於台灣人民的國慶，必須透過民主程序與住民集體意志共同決定。那一天，將是台灣完成自決、宣告獨立建國的日子。屆時，全體台灣人民才可以名正言順、舉國歡騰，邀請國際友人與各國政府共同慶祝「台灣國慶」。這樣的國慶才有正當性，才有資格被歷史銘記。
因此，我們呼籲全體台灣人民：不要再被「雙十國慶」的假象所蒙蔽。台灣要的不是替中國歷史背書的慶典，而是屬於台灣人的自由日、建國日。我們必須勇敢踏出自辦住民投票、自決建國的步伐，才能真正結束百年來外來政權的統治枷鎖。只有當台灣完成法理建國，台灣國的國慶日才會真正誕生。
https://youtube.com/shorts/WdkjCjRM448?si=piMn1DIJa6PvjhvT
https://search.app/jjTvU
https://youtu.be/GHyoLT3hjeQ?si=Y2nHK_kOIbzG4Ruw
https://youtu.be/tlwiF5Wu2fU
https://youtu.be/OvuA0t_EGX8?si=LeexMwQWvCrEt3uE
https://youtu.be/1Lyq-O7ZcfU?si=_eivL4SUhkG4Ir_l
https://udn.com/news/amp/story/124628/9061919
https://youtu.be/GADetgYo-Tk?si=1emuyKHeUJWJfSrX
https://youtu.be/LsNRwn96YTw?si=I5SQ1HPV-17fTx6g
https://www.youtube.com/live/7YWsqVDgMLE?si=c3P4ZvTn9BfAjdm5
歡迎加入「台灣國」志工團隊,也歡迎慷慨解囊
捐款郵政劃撥帳號：50318279 戶名：社團法人台灣國
台北富邦銀行城中分行（ATM轉帳請加代碼012）
帳號：500120001895 戶名：社團法人台灣國
台新銀行西門分行（ATM轉帳請加代碼812）
帳號：20610100008029 戶名：社團法人台灣國
外幣帳戶:
Bank’s name：Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank
Bank’s address：NO. 9, Xiangyang Road, Taipei City, Taiwan,
SWIFT Code :TPBKTWTP
Bank’s TEL：（886-2）2389-5889
A/C NO of beneficiary：00731180000920
Beneficiary’s name：TAIWAN REPUBLIC
Bank’s name：Taishin International Bank-Simen Branch
Bank’s address：NO. 57, Sec.1,Chongqing S.Rd,Zhongzheng Dist,. Taipei City 100, Taiwan
SWIFT Code : TSIBTWTP
Bank’s TEL：（886-2）2371-7878
A/C NO of beneficiary：061-75-606125-1
Beneficiary’s name：TAIWAN REPUBLIC
聯絡人: 「台灣國」理事長陳峻涵 0983-739622
台灣小留學生家長協進會秘書長
--
This is the Bay Area Taiwanese American E-Mail Group. Our main objective is to provide open communication channel for the Taiwanese American community, let the Taiwan Spirit grow and pass down to the future.
---
這是 Google 網路論壇針對「Bay Area Taiwanese American」群組發送的訂閱通知郵件。
如要取消訂閱這個群組並停止接收來自這個群組的郵件，請傳送電子郵件到 bay-area-taiwanese-...@googlegroups.com。
如要查看這個討論，請前往 https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bay-area-taiwanese-american/666149342.113001.1760167171265%40sg2004-ap-c2。
alle...@timebyte.com
Good point Johnny.
2025 的國慶演說, 賴清德繼續捧著蔡萊爾的尿壺, 將台灣更進一步地鎖進了 “泛大中國詐騙集團的鐵籠子” 中.
看到被關在 “大中國詐騙集團鐵籠子” 裡的呆丸郎:
- 而你卻不敢踏出關鍵的第一步, 去找獄卒要求他解鎖, 放他這個呆丸郎出來 (台灣國, 一般台派).
- 甚至還在向這個呆丸郎大力鼓吹獄卒是同路人(51 Club, 英痴).
- 加上每天只是 Lip Service, 在跟這個鐵柵欄內的呆丸郎大談台灣人的自由日、建國日, 自辦住民投票、自決建國的步伐.
- 或是要這個呆丸郎捐款贊助活動.
My question is:
噴口水畫大餅 (住民投票、自決建國) 能把關在鐵籠內的呆丸郎解放出來?
還是去找獄卒 (執政者¸DPP**) 要求他解鎖?
Cheers,
Allen Kuo
From: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com <bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of 台灣小留學生家長協進會秘書長
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2025 5:56 PM
To: bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com
Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: [BATA] [台灣國]雙十不是台灣國慶 記者會
麥擱騙啊ㄌ啦 ! 還有誰不知道這跟台灣郎根本無關係啊 !
表面做社會改革, 卻不敢批判執政者 ? 證明拿人錢財, 卻不敢阬聲嗆執政者 ?
證明拿人錢財, 替執政者消災, 全都是假猩猩 !
包括騙我的錢會心安嗎 ?
台灣
黃育旗 Johnny Y.C Huang
台灣國 <i908....@msa.hinet.net> 於 2025年10月11日 週六 下午3:25寫道：
雙十不是台灣國慶
記者會新聞稿 2025年10月10日
david chou
收件者：bay-area-taiw...@googlegroups.com
副本：'台灣小留學生家長協進會秘書長'
2025年10月12日 週日 於 下午11:09
Good point Johnny. 2025 的國慶演說, 賴清德繼續捧著蔡萊爾的尿壺, 將台灣更進一步地鎖進了 “泛大中國詐騙集團的鐵籠子” 中. 看到被關在 “大中國詐騙集團鐵籠子” 裡的呆丸郎:
1. 而你卻不敢踏出關鍵的第一步, 去找獄卒要求他解鎖, 放他這個呆丸郎出來 (台灣國, 一般台派).
2. 甚至還在向這個呆丸郎大力鼓吹獄卒是同路人(51 Club, 英痴).
3. 加上每天只是 Lip Service, 在跟這個鐵柵欄內的呆丸郎大談台灣人的自由日、建國日, 自辦住民投票、自決建國的步伐.
4. 或是要這個呆丸郎捐款贊助活動.
david chou
david chou
"台灣國" [9/15/2025在總統府前的一個小Rally的一幅Banner]: "美國證實開羅謊言! 中華民國還要硬拗?"
"台灣國" 這個由一些主張或推動或支持台灣獨立建國的志士所組成的政治團體, 在每個重要時刻, 都會出來活動與發聲, 他們很盡責, 很勤奮, 很值得讚揚.
The Taipei Times 9/16/2025一則新聞報導附有一張圖, 這張圖的Caption是: "Taiwan Republic Office director Chilly Chen ["台灣國" 負責人陳峻涵], front, third left, speaks at a news conference outside the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday, urging the government to make clear to the world that “Taiwan is not the Republic of China, and that Taiwan and China are not subordinate to each other.”"
目前, "務實的台獨工作者" William並無能力正面回應Chilly的訴求, 他目前能做到的是告訴台灣住民: 你可以稱台灣為台灣, 可以稱台灣為 "中華民國台灣", 或稱台灣為 "中華民國".
Appendix
AIT comments on Taiwan accurate: State Department
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said
Taipei Times Staff writer, with CNA
Tue, Sep 16, 2025 page 1
https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2025/09/16/2003843862
The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said.
An AIT spokesperson on Saturday [9/13/2025] said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the [sic] China.
The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger.
[Image: The national flags of Taiwan, left, and the US fly outside a hotel in Houston, Texas, during a visit by then-president Tsai Ing-wen on Jan. 8, 2017. Photo: CNA]
The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday [9/15/2025] reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position.
Former AIT chairman Richard Bush and former AIT deputy director Robert Wang (王曉岷) said in separate e-mails that the US does not consider the political status of Taiwan to have been determined by any World War II-era documents, and that Washington expects the issue to be resolved peacefully.
[Image: Taiwan Republic Office director Chilly Chen, front, third left, speaks at a news conference outside the Presidential Office in Taipei yesterday, urging the government to make clear to the world that “Taiwan is not the Republic of China, and that Taiwan and China are not subordinate to each other.” Photo: Lo Pei-de, Taipei Times]
Wang cited the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), a 1979 US law governing its exchanges with Taiwan after Washington switched diplomatic recognition to Beijing.
The act made clear that “the United States decision to establish diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China [PRC] rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means,” he quoted the act as saying.
“In other words, the TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the political status of Taiwan to have been determined by any previous documents, including the World War II-era declarations or treaties,” he wrote.
Bush shared a similar view, saying that the US has long stated that “cross-strait differences should be resolved peacefully and with the assent of the people of Taiwan.”
On Aug. 15, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) said that the 1943 Cairo Declaration and 1945 Potsdam Proclamation “clearly defined Japan’s responsibility for the war and required that Japan return all the territories it had stolen from China, including Taiwan.”
He said that was “an indisputable outcome of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and constitutes an important part of the postwar international order.”
An unnamed AIT spokesperson said that Beijing “intentionally mischaracterizes” World War II-era documents, including the Cairo Declaration, the Potsdam Proclamation and the Treaty of San Francisco, “to try to support its coercive campaign to subjugate Taiwan.”
“Beijing’s narratives are simply false, and none of these documents determined Taiwan’s ultimate political status,” the spokesperson said. “False legal narratives are part of Beijing’s broader campaign to try to isolate Taiwan from the international community and constrain the sovereign choices of other countries regarding their interactions with Taiwan.”
The AIT’s comments on the issue echoed Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung’s (林佳龍) Aug. 16 statement rebuking Wang’s remarks.
Lin said that after World War II, the 1951 San Francisco Peace Treaty — binding under international law — superseded the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation.
The treaty did not cede Taiwan to the PRC, and the PRC has never governed Taiwan, he said.
Lin said that the Republic of China (ROC) is the “sole legitimate government” administering Taiwan and representing it internationally.